Today's Obama Joke.....
Oct 23, 2015 10:10:23 #
Q. How many Muslim extremists will it take to destroy America?
A. None, American Liberals can do it all by themselves, thank you.
A. None, American Liberals can do it all by themselves, thank you.
Oct 23, 2015 10:37:41 #
ghostgotcha wrote:
Q. How many Muslim extremists will it take to destroy America?
A. None, American Liberals can do it all by themselves, thank you.
A. None, American Liberals can do it all by themselves, thank you.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Oct 23, 2015 11:21:09 #
ghostgotcha wrote:
Q. How many Muslim extremists will it take to destroy America?
A. None, American Liberals can do it all by themselves, thank you.
A. None, American Liberals can do it all by themselves, thank you.
Q. How many knee-jerk reactionaries will it take to destroy America before a few rag-head unwashed and uneducated succeed in absolving us from our complicity in nurturing their circumstances?
A. None, if American Citizens put a stop to this travesty! The few, that is, who understand that we MUST cease foreign intrigues. Those who - being both liberal AND conservative, yet most importantly LIBERTARIAN - insist that we clean our own house of corporate and government r****t-sexist-nihilist liberal-conservative power-brokering elitists (God, WHY DON'T WE THINK AFTER ALL THESE CENTURIES?) before we presume to complain about the filthiness of others' corporate and government r****t... et cetera ad nauseum.
"There are several parts of this Constitution which I do not at present approve, not because I am not sure I shall never approve them but because I am not sure that I ever should." -- attributed to Benjamin Franklin, 1787
Oct 23, 2015 11:47:23 #
euhodos wrote:
"There are several parts of this Constitution which I do not at present approve, not because I am not sure I shall never approve them but because I am not sure that I ever should." -- attributed to Benjamin Franklin, 1787
"There are several parts of this Constitution which I do not at present approve, not because I am not sure I shall never approve them but because I am not sure that I ever should." -- attributed to Benjamin Franklin, 1787
s Allow me to finish his quote for you because it speaks volumns about todays state of U.S. Affairs.
Quote:
b In these sentiments, Sir, I agree to this Cons... (show quote)
Now. Does that not make you feel better knowing the whole t***h has been told? -- and -- you v**ed for whom?
Oct 23, 2015 12:49:05 #
ghostgotcha wrote:
Now. Does that not make you feel better knowing the whole t***h has been told? -- and -- you v**ed for whom?
None of the Above - No one more qualified was on the b****t.
Oh, did you mean in '68, '72, '76 (when we were already looking for our third President in only four years)? '80 (peanuts vs. 20-Mule Team) or '84 (Gipper vs. Wally and the Beaver), '88 (Read my Lips) or '92 (no more bushes needed in the Rose Garden), '96 or '00 (h*****g Chads vs. The Inventor of the InterNet), '04 or '08, '12, or?
Did you hear the one about Bill - asked by a friend after Hillary's fall (before B******i and eMails) how her head was? His reply: something like "Well, she's still no Monica."
So, YOUR POINT is - uh, what?
Oct 23, 2015 13:10:00 #
you have to be kidding...
euhodos wrote:
None of the Above.
No one more qualified was on the b****t.
No one more qualified was on the b****t.
Oct 23, 2015 13:12:51 #
Ve'hoe wrote:
you have to be kidding...
No, the parties were. I just refuse to attend.
George Carlin is dead, after all. Come to think of it, that brings up an interesting Write-In for 2016...
Oct 23, 2015 13:13:44 #
you are being trite and ridiculous
euhodos wrote:
No, the parties were. I just refuse to attend.
Oct 23, 2015 13:26:19 #
Ve'hoe wrote:
you are being trite and ridiculous
So does that make me, what, a Trumpeter or just another smirking "depends on what is is" elitist?
Oct 23, 2015 13:34:21 #
reread what I wrote until you get it,,,, unless you just want to start trouble and be an a-shole,,,,,
euhodos wrote:
So does that make me, what, a Trumpeter or just another smirking "depends on what is is" elitist?
Oct 23, 2015 13:43:52 #
Ve'hoe wrote:
reread what I wrote until you get it,,,, unless you just want to start trouble and be an a-shole,,,,,
I read it again, and I decided I'd rather be "an a_shole" than - once again - just another serf for the party barons (or baronesses).
The REAL question is - where do YOU stand on that issue?
Oct 23, 2015 13:47:04 #
You are an a-shole...... did that clear it up for you??
euhodos wrote:
I read it again, and I decided I'd rather be "an a_shole" than - once again - just another serf for the party barons (or baronesses).
The REAL question is - where do YOU stand on that issue?
The REAL question is - where do YOU stand on that issue?
Oct 23, 2015 13:56:00 #
Ve'hoe wrote:
You are an a-shole...... did that clear it up for you??
My clarity remains, well, clear. Sadly, I suspect that yours does not.
Oct 23, 2015 13:56:51 #
Was there some,,,, problem with what I said?????
euhodos wrote:
My clarity remains, well, clear. Sadly, I suspect that yours does not.
Oct 23, 2015 15:29:00 #
Ve'hoe wrote:
You are an a-shole...... did that clear it up for you??
Ve'hoe wrote:
Was there some,,,, problem with what I said?????
Not MY problem.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.