One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The B******i bust:
Page 1 of 19 next> last>>
Oct 23, 2015 07:49:36   #
moldyoldy
 
Friday, Oct 23, 2015 03:00 AM PDT
The B******i bust: Trey Gowdy and his GOP colleagues embarrassed themselves

If anyone doubted the B******i committee was a partisan joke, yesterday's Clinton hearing confirmed it.

There’s not really any good news for the GOP in the aftermath of yesterday’s House B******i Committee interrogation of Hillary Clinton. There had been some flickers of hope among conservative activists that the committee Republicans, led by chairman Trey Gowdy, would finally produce the long-rumored “smoking gun” that would prove once and for all that Hillary did… wh**ever evil thing she supposedly did with regard the B******i. Or maybe they’d goad her into making a terrible gaffe that would ruin her politically. But that’s not what happened.

After weeks of damaging stories about the B******i committee’s partisan agenda and vanishing credibility, it might have done Gowdy some good to put together a quiet and informative hearing that was befitting the “serious investigation” that he insisted he was leading. Instead, Gowdy took the lead role in proving correct each one of his Republican colleagues who said the committee was focused on damaging Hillary Clinton’s p**********l chances.

In his opening statement, Gowdy tried to shoot down allegations that the committee was focused on Clinton. “There are people frankly in both parties who have suggested that this investigation is about you,” Gowdy said to Hillary at the outset. “Let me assure you it is not.” But when it came time for Gowdy to ask questions, he focused singularly on Clinton’s emails with Sidney Blumenthal, a longtime Clinton friend and DC barnacle who was feeding Hillary intelligence “reports” from a source he knew in Libya. Gowdy used the volume of emails sent from Blumenthal to Clinton to portray him as a key advisor who had unfettered access to Clinton, and contrasted him with slain Libya ambassador Chris Stevens, who never emailed Clinton directly. “Help us understand how Sidney Blumenthal had that kind of access to you, Madame Secretary, but the ambassador did not,” Gowdy asked with much gravity.

Gowdy’s implication – that Stevens either lacked access to Clinton or that Clinton prioritized her communications with Blumenthal – was f**grantly false, and Gowdy knows it was false. Stevens had access to Clinton through a variety of means and could have been in touch with her at a moment’s notice if he’d wanted. But Gowdy used the frequency of email communication – and only email communication – to give the impression that Blumenthal was in the loop while the ambassador was not.

This theme was picked up on by his Republican colleagues, who weren’t nearly as subtle in their dishonesty as Gowdy was. Rep. Mike Pompeo grandiosely asked Clinton if Stevens had had Clinton’s cell phone number, fax number, or home address, and if he’d ever “stopped by your house.” After Clinton said no to all these things, Pompeo went in for what he thought was the k**l: “Mr. Blumenthal had each of those and did each of those things. This man who provided you so much information on Libya had access to you in ways that were very different from the access that a very senior diplomat had to you and your person.” If you’re the sort of thick-headed dolt who thinks the ambassador was at a disadvantage because he couldn’t send the Secretary of State a postcard or pop in on her every Sunday afternoon, then this point was probably quite compelling.

While the Republicans were wasting their time trying to portray Clinton as a tool of Sid Blumenthal, the Democrats used their time to make clear just how pointless they believe the entire investigation is and allowed Clinton her opportunities to offer sanitized and carefully worded defenses of the Libya intervention. At least one member of the committee used the hearing to pose useful and interesting questions about issues that arose from the B******i attack: Rep. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL). She asked Clinton about policies for outsourcing security to local m*****as and security contractors, which has caused problems for the State Department and other government agencies.

All in all it was a bust for Gowdy and the B******i committee, to the point that conservative pundits were griping about how poorly the Republicans fared against Clinton. Anyone who doubted that the committee was a partisan exercise in Clinton-bashing came away free of doubts. The only sliver of good news for the Republicans is that it likely won’t matter. The notion that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton engineered some sort of evil B******i cover-up is already assumed to be true in the minds of conservatives and Republican v**ers. The fact that Gowdy and crew spent the day stepping on rakes and scoring own-goals in a failed attempt to “prove” it won’t change their minds. And the House GOP won’t put the brakes on the investigation because the committee’s utility as a vehicle for strategic press leaks outweighs the bad press it’s enduring at the moment. The B******i committee will grind on, performing much the same role it always has.
http://www.salon.com/2015/10/23/the_b******i_bust_trey_gowdy_and_his_gop_colleagues_embarrassed_themselves/

Reply
Oct 23, 2015 07:55:47   #
reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Friday, Oct 23, 2015 03:00 AM PDT
The B******i bust: Trey Gowdy and his GOP colleagues embarrassed themselves

If anyone doubted the B******i committee was a partisan joke, yesterday's Clinton hearing confirmed it.

There’s not really any good news for the GOP in the aftermath of yesterday’s House B******i Committee interrogation of Hillary Clinton. There had been some flickers of hope among conservative activists that the committee Republicans, led by chairman Trey Gowdy, would finally produce the long-rumored “smoking gun” that would prove once and for all that Hillary did… wh**ever evil thing she supposedly did with regard the B******i. Or maybe they’d goad her into making a terrible gaffe that would ruin her politically. But that’s not what happened.

After weeks of damaging stories about the B******i committee’s partisan agenda and vanishing credibility, it might have done Gowdy some good to put together a quiet and informative hearing that was befitting the “serious investigation” that he insisted he was leading. Instead, Gowdy took the lead role in proving correct each one of his Republican colleagues who said the committee was focused on damaging Hillary Clinton’s p**********l chances.

In his opening statement, Gowdy tried to shoot down allegations that the committee was focused on Clinton. “There are people frankly in both parties who have suggested that this investigation is about you,” Gowdy said to Hillary at the outset. “Let me assure you it is not.” But when it came time for Gowdy to ask questions, he focused singularly on Clinton’s emails with Sidney Blumenthal, a longtime Clinton friend and DC barnacle who was feeding Hillary intelligence “reports” from a source he knew in Libya. Gowdy used the volume of emails sent from Blumenthal to Clinton to portray him as a key advisor who had unfettered access to Clinton, and contrasted him with slain Libya ambassador Chris Stevens, who never emailed Clinton directly. “Help us understand how Sidney Blumenthal had that kind of access to you, Madame Secretary, but the ambassador did not,” Gowdy asked with much gravity.

Gowdy’s implication – that Stevens either lacked access to Clinton or that Clinton prioritized her communications with Blumenthal – was f**grantly false, and Gowdy knows it was false. Stevens had access to Clinton through a variety of means and could have been in touch with her at a moment’s notice if he’d wanted. But Gowdy used the frequency of email communication – and only email communication – to give the impression that Blumenthal was in the loop while the ambassador was not.

This theme was picked up on by his Republican colleagues, who weren’t nearly as subtle in their dishonesty as Gowdy was. Rep. Mike Pompeo grandiosely asked Clinton if Stevens had had Clinton’s cell phone number, fax number, or home address, and if he’d ever “stopped by your house.” After Clinton said no to all these things, Pompeo went in for what he thought was the k**l: “Mr. Blumenthal had each of those and did each of those things. This man who provided you so much information on Libya had access to you in ways that were very different from the access that a very senior diplomat had to you and your person.” If you’re the sort of thick-headed dolt who thinks the ambassador was at a disadvantage because he couldn’t send the Secretary of State a postcard or pop in on her every Sunday afternoon, then this point was probably quite compelling.

While the Republicans were wasting their time trying to portray Clinton as a tool of Sid Blumenthal, the Democrats used their time to make clear just how pointless they believe the entire investigation is and allowed Clinton her opportunities to offer sanitized and carefully worded defenses of the Libya intervention. At least one member of the committee used the hearing to pose useful and interesting questions about issues that arose from the B******i attack: Rep. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL). She asked Clinton about policies for outsourcing security to local m*****as and security contractors, which has caused problems for the State Department and other government agencies.

All in all it was a bust for Gowdy and the B******i committee, to the point that conservative pundits were griping about how poorly the Republicans fared against Clinton. Anyone who doubted that the committee was a partisan exercise in Clinton-bashing came away free of doubts. The only sliver of good news for the Republicans is that it likely won’t matter. The notion that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton engineered some sort of evil B******i cover-up is already assumed to be true in the minds of conservatives and Republican v**ers. The fact that Gowdy and crew spent the day stepping on rakes and scoring own-goals in a failed attempt to “prove” it won’t change their minds. And the House GOP won’t put the brakes on the investigation because the committee’s utility as a vehicle for strategic press leaks outweighs the bad press it’s enduring at the moment. The B******i committee will grind on, performing much the same role it always has.
http://www.salon.com/2015/10/23/the_b******i_bust_trey_gowdy_and_his_gop_colleagues_embarrassed_themselves/
Friday, Oct 23, 2015 03:00 AM PDT br The B******i... (show quote)


I must have seen a different progam, in a alter universe !!

Reply
Oct 23, 2015 08:00:59   #
plainlogic
 
reconreb wrote:
I must have seen a different progam, in a alter universe !!


He lives in a phase shift, he's always 180 deg. out of phase

Reply
 
 
Oct 23, 2015 08:02:05   #
moldyoldy
 
reconreb wrote:
I must have seen a different progam, in a alter universe !!


You do seem to live in an alternate universe.

Reply
Oct 23, 2015 08:02:30   #
Kevyn
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Friday, Oct 23, 2015 03:00 AM PDT
The B******i bust: Trey Gowdy and his GOP colleagues embarrassed themselves

If anyone doubted the B******i committee was a partisan joke, yesterday's Clinton hearing confirmed it.

There’s not really any good news for the GOP in the aftermath of yesterday’s House B******i Committee interrogation of Hillary Clinton. There had been some flickers of hope among conservative activists that the committee Republicans, led by chairman Trey Gowdy, would finally produce the long-rumored “smoking gun” that would prove once and for all that Hillary did… wh**ever evil thing she supposedly did with regard the B******i. Or maybe they’d goad her into making a terrible gaffe that would ruin her politically. But that’s not what happened.

After weeks of damaging stories about the B******i committee’s partisan agenda and vanishing credibility, it might have done Gowdy some good to put together a quiet and informative hearing that was befitting the “serious investigation” that he insisted he was leading. Instead, Gowdy took the lead role in proving correct each one of his Republican colleagues who said the committee was focused on damaging Hillary Clinton’s p**********l chances.

In his opening statement, Gowdy tried to shoot down allegations that the committee was focused on Clinton. “There are people frankly in both parties who have suggested that this investigation is about you,” Gowdy said to Hillary at the outset. “Let me assure you it is not.” But when it came time for Gowdy to ask questions, he focused singularly on Clinton’s emails with Sidney Blumenthal, a longtime Clinton friend and DC barnacle who was feeding Hillary intelligence “reports” from a source he knew in Libya. Gowdy used the volume of emails sent from Blumenthal to Clinton to portray him as a key advisor who had unfettered access to Clinton, and contrasted him with slain Libya ambassador Chris Stevens, who never emailed Clinton directly. “Help us understand how Sidney Blumenthal had that kind of access to you, Madame Secretary, but the ambassador did not,” Gowdy asked with much gravity.

Gowdy’s implication – that Stevens either lacked access to Clinton or that Clinton prioritized her communications with Blumenthal – was f**grantly false, and Gowdy knows it was false. Stevens had access to Clinton through a variety of means and could have been in touch with her at a moment’s notice if he’d wanted. But Gowdy used the frequency of email communication – and only email communication – to give the impression that Blumenthal was in the loop while the ambassador was not.

This theme was picked up on by his Republican colleagues, who weren’t nearly as subtle in their dishonesty as Gowdy was. Rep. Mike Pompeo grandiosely asked Clinton if Stevens had had Clinton’s cell phone number, fax number, or home address, and if he’d ever “stopped by your house.” After Clinton said no to all these things, Pompeo went in for what he thought was the k**l: “Mr. Blumenthal had each of those and did each of those things. This man who provided you so much information on Libya had access to you in ways that were very different from the access that a very senior diplomat had to you and your person.” If you’re the sort of thick-headed dolt who thinks the ambassador was at a disadvantage because he couldn’t send the Secretary of State a postcard or pop in on her every Sunday afternoon, then this point was probably quite compelling.

While the Republicans were wasting their time trying to portray Clinton as a tool of Sid Blumenthal, the Democrats used their time to make clear just how pointless they believe the entire investigation is and allowed Clinton her opportunities to offer sanitized and carefully worded defenses of the Libya intervention. At least one member of the committee used the hearing to pose useful and interesting questions about issues that arose from the B******i attack: Rep. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL). She asked Clinton about policies for outsourcing security to local m*****as and security contractors, which has caused problems for the State Department and other government agencies.

All in all it was a bust for Gowdy and the B******i committee, to the point that conservative pundits were griping about how poorly the Republicans fared against Clinton. Anyone who doubted that the committee was a partisan exercise in Clinton-bashing came away free of doubts. The only sliver of good news for the Republicans is that it likely won’t matter. The notion that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton engineered some sort of evil B******i cover-up is already assumed to be true in the minds of conservatives and Republican v**ers. The fact that Gowdy and crew spent the day stepping on rakes and scoring own-goals in a failed attempt to “prove” it won’t change their minds. And the House GOP won’t put the brakes on the investigation because the committee’s utility as a vehicle for strategic press leaks outweighs the bad press it’s enduring at the moment. The B******i committee will grind on, performing much the same role it always has.
http://www.salon.com/2015/10/23/the_b******i_bust_trey_gowdy_and_his_gop_colleagues_embarrassed_themselves/
Friday, Oct 23, 2015 03:00 AM PDT br The B******i... (show quote)

Trey Gowdy, the little boy who cried wolf! What is this the eighth or ninth Bengazi boondoggle with nothing to show that we didn't know a week after it happened? Why not just install a wood stove in Gowdys office for him to burn taxpayer money? at least that would help heat the Capitol.

Reply
Oct 23, 2015 08:07:33   #
Liberty Tree
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Friday, Oct 23, 2015 03:00 AM PDT
The B******i bust: Trey Gowdy and his GOP colleagues embarrassed themselves

If anyone doubted the B******i committee was a partisan joke, yesterday's Clinton hearing confirmed it.

There’s not really any good news for the GOP in the aftermath of yesterday’s House B******i Committee interrogation of Hillary Clinton. There had been some flickers of hope among conservative activists that the committee Republicans, led by chairman Trey Gowdy, would finally produce the long-rumored “smoking gun” that would prove once and for all that Hillary did… wh**ever evil thing she supposedly did with regard the B******i. Or maybe they’d goad her into making a terrible gaffe that would ruin her politically. But that’s not what happened.

After weeks of damaging stories about the B******i committee’s partisan agenda and vanishing credibility, it might have done Gowdy some good to put together a quiet and informative hearing that was befitting the “serious investigation” that he insisted he was leading. Instead, Gowdy took the lead role in proving correct each one of his Republican colleagues who said the committee was focused on damaging Hillary Clinton’s p**********l chances.

In his opening statement, Gowdy tried to shoot down allegations that the committee was focused on Clinton. “There are people frankly in both parties who have suggested that this investigation is about you,” Gowdy said to Hillary at the outset. “Let me assure you it is not.” But when it came time for Gowdy to ask questions, he focused singularly on Clinton’s emails with Sidney Blumenthal, a longtime Clinton friend and DC barnacle who was feeding Hillary intelligence “reports” from a source he knew in Libya. Gowdy used the volume of emails sent from Blumenthal to Clinton to portray him as a key advisor who had unfettered access to Clinton, and contrasted him with slain Libya ambassador Chris Stevens, who never emailed Clinton directly. “Help us understand how Sidney Blumenthal had that kind of access to you, Madame Secretary, but the ambassador did not,” Gowdy asked with much gravity.

Gowdy’s implication – that Stevens either lacked access to Clinton or that Clinton prioritized her communications with Blumenthal – was f**grantly false, and Gowdy knows it was false. Stevens had access to Clinton through a variety of means and could have been in touch with her at a moment’s notice if he’d wanted. But Gowdy used the frequency of email communication – and only email communication – to give the impression that Blumenthal was in the loop while the ambassador was not.

This theme was picked up on by his Republican colleagues, who weren’t nearly as subtle in their dishonesty as Gowdy was. Rep. Mike Pompeo grandiosely asked Clinton if Stevens had had Clinton’s cell phone number, fax number, or home address, and if he’d ever “stopped by your house.” After Clinton said no to all these things, Pompeo went in for what he thought was the k**l: “Mr. Blumenthal had each of those and did each of those things. This man who provided you so much information on Libya had access to you in ways that were very different from the access that a very senior diplomat had to you and your person.” If you’re the sort of thick-headed dolt who thinks the ambassador was at a disadvantage because he couldn’t send the Secretary of State a postcard or pop in on her every Sunday afternoon, then this point was probably quite compelling.

While the Republicans were wasting their time trying to portray Clinton as a tool of Sid Blumenthal, the Democrats used their time to make clear just how pointless they believe the entire investigation is and allowed Clinton her opportunities to offer sanitized and carefully worded defenses of the Libya intervention. At least one member of the committee used the hearing to pose useful and interesting questions about issues that arose from the B******i attack: Rep. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL). She asked Clinton about policies for outsourcing security to local m*****as and security contractors, which has caused problems for the State Department and other government agencies.

All in all it was a bust for Gowdy and the B******i committee, to the point that conservative pundits were griping about how poorly the Republicans fared against Clinton. Anyone who doubted that the committee was a partisan exercise in Clinton-bashing came away free of doubts. The only sliver of good news for the Republicans is that it likely won’t matter. The notion that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton engineered some sort of evil B******i cover-up is already assumed to be true in the minds of conservatives and Republican v**ers. The fact that Gowdy and crew spent the day stepping on rakes and scoring own-goals in a failed attempt to “prove” it won’t change their minds. And the House GOP won’t put the brakes on the investigation because the committee’s utility as a vehicle for strategic press leaks outweighs the bad press it’s enduring at the moment. The B******i committee will grind on, performing much the same role it always has.
http://www.salon.com/2015/10/23/the_b******i_bust_trey_gowdy_and_his_gop_colleagues_embarrassed_themselves/
Friday, Oct 23, 2015 03:00 AM PDT br The B******i... (show quote)


Salon is just another ELWNJ blog with little credibility for being objective.

Reply
Oct 23, 2015 08:13:22   #
moldyoldy
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Salon is just another ELWNJ blog with little credibility for being objective.


There are very few right wing bloggers who have not given up on this farce.

Reply
 
 
Oct 23, 2015 08:16:32   #
VladimirPee
 
Salon is a far left loon site. I bet they wrote this BEFORE the hearing.

Hillary proved to be dishonest. Claiming not 1 of 600 emails requesting additional security went to her. Highly doubtful. Countless dishonest claims made by her. Honesty is her problem with v**ers and the hearings did not help



moldyoldy wrote:
Friday, Oct 23, 2015 03:00 AM PDT
The B******i bust: Trey Gowdy and his GOP colleagues embarrassed themselves

If anyone doubted the B******i committee was a partisan joke, yesterday's Clinton hearing confirmed it.

There’s not really any good news for the GOP in the aftermath of yesterday’s House B******i Committee interrogation of Hillary Clinton. There had been some flickers of hope among conservative activists that the committee Republicans, led by chairman Trey Gowdy, would finally produce the long-rumored “smoking gun” that would prove once and for all that Hillary did… wh**ever evil thing she supposedly did with regard the B******i. Or maybe they’d goad her into making a terrible gaffe that would ruin her politically. But that’s not what happened.

After weeks of damaging stories about the B******i committee’s partisan agenda and vanishing credibility, it might have done Gowdy some good to put together a quiet and informative hearing that was befitting the “serious investigation” that he insisted he was leading. Instead, Gowdy took the lead role in proving correct each one of his Republican colleagues who said the committee was focused on damaging Hillary Clinton’s p**********l chances.

In his opening statement, Gowdy tried to shoot down allegations that the committee was focused on Clinton. “There are people frankly in both parties who have suggested that this investigation is about you,” Gowdy said to Hillary at the outset. “Let me assure you it is not.” But when it came time for Gowdy to ask questions, he focused singularly on Clinton’s emails with Sidney Blumenthal, a longtime Clinton friend and DC barnacle who was feeding Hillary intelligence “reports” from a source he knew in Libya. Gowdy used the volume of emails sent from Blumenthal to Clinton to portray him as a key advisor who had unfettered access to Clinton, and contrasted him with slain Libya ambassador Chris Stevens, who never emailed Clinton directly. “Help us understand how Sidney Blumenthal had that kind of access to you, Madame Secretary, but the ambassador did not,” Gowdy asked with much gravity.

Gowdy’s implication – that Stevens either lacked access to Clinton or that Clinton prioritized her communications with Blumenthal – was f**grantly false, and Gowdy knows it was false. Stevens had access to Clinton through a variety of means and could have been in touch with her at a moment’s notice if he’d wanted. But Gowdy used the frequency of email communication – and only email communication – to give the impression that Blumenthal was in the loop while the ambassador was not.

This theme was picked up on by his Republican colleagues, who weren’t nearly as subtle in their dishonesty as Gowdy was. Rep. Mike Pompeo grandiosely asked Clinton if Stevens had had Clinton’s cell phone number, fax number, or home address, and if he’d ever “stopped by your house.” After Clinton said no to all these things, Pompeo went in for what he thought was the k**l: “Mr. Blumenthal had each of those and did each of those things. This man who provided you so much information on Libya had access to you in ways that were very different from the access that a very senior diplomat had to you and your person.” If you’re the sort of thick-headed dolt who thinks the ambassador was at a disadvantage because he couldn’t send the Secretary of State a postcard or pop in on her every Sunday afternoon, then this point was probably quite compelling.

While the Republicans were wasting their time trying to portray Clinton as a tool of Sid Blumenthal, the Democrats used their time to make clear just how pointless they believe the entire investigation is and allowed Clinton her opportunities to offer sanitized and carefully worded defenses of the Libya intervention. At least one member of the committee used the hearing to pose useful and interesting questions about issues that arose from the B******i attack: Rep. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL). She asked Clinton about policies for outsourcing security to local m*****as and security contractors, which has caused problems for the State Department and other government agencies.

All in all it was a bust for Gowdy and the B******i committee, to the point that conservative pundits were griping about how poorly the Republicans fared against Clinton. Anyone who doubted that the committee was a partisan exercise in Clinton-bashing came away free of doubts. The only sliver of good news for the Republicans is that it likely won’t matter. The notion that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton engineered some sort of evil B******i cover-up is already assumed to be true in the minds of conservatives and Republican v**ers. The fact that Gowdy and crew spent the day stepping on rakes and scoring own-goals in a failed attempt to “prove” it won’t change their minds. And the House GOP won’t put the brakes on the investigation because the committee’s utility as a vehicle for strategic press leaks outweighs the bad press it’s enduring at the moment. The B******i committee will grind on, performing much the same role it always has.
http://www.salon.com/2015/10/23/the_b******i_bust_trey_gowdy_and_his_gop_colleagues_embarrassed_themselves/
Friday, Oct 23, 2015 03:00 AM PDT br The B******i... (show quote)

Reply
Oct 23, 2015 08:17:24   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
moldyoldy wrote:
There are very few right wing bloggers who have not given up on this farce.


And, if you l*****ts have not given up on the cover up. You phonies are not interested in finding out the t***h, you're only interested in covering the ass of the worst president in U.S. history, the most incompetent SoS, and the most corrupt administration. You clowns watched a serial liar at work yesterday, and lapped up the lies. Pathetic.

Reply
Oct 23, 2015 08:26:26   #
moldyoldy
 
VladimirPee wrote:
Salon is a far left loon site. I bet they wrote this BEFORE the hearing.

Hillary proved to be dishonest. Claiming not 1 of 600 emails requesting additional security went to her. Highly doubtful. Countless dishonest claims made by her. Honesty is her problem with v**ers and the hearings did not help


I am sure security requests are handled by a manager whose job it is to handle them. Perhaps if congress had not cut funding for security, there would have been more available. Would it have made a difference, no.

Reply
Oct 23, 2015 08:27:46   #
moldyoldy
 
JMHO wrote:
And, if you l*****ts have not given up on the cover up. You phonies are not interested in finding out the t***h, you're only interested in covering the ass of the worst president in U.S. history, the most incompetent SoS, and the most corrupt administration. You clowns watched a serial liar at work yesterday, and lapped up the lies. Pathetic.


Maybe the tenth time will be the one to finally convince even you that enough money has been wasted.

Reply
 
 
Oct 23, 2015 08:29:25   #
plainlogic
 
Kevyn wrote:
Trey Gowdy, the little boy who cried wolf! What is this the eighth or ninth Bengazi boondoggle with nothing to show that we didn't know a week after it happened? Why not just install a wood stove in Gowdys office for him to burn taxpayer money? at least that would help heat the Capitol.


The Clinton spin machine works very well." What is the meaning of is"sic I did not have sex with that woman.

Reply
Oct 23, 2015 08:32:23   #
Artemis
 
Kevyn wrote:
Trey Gowdy, the little boy who cried wolf! What is this the eighth or ninth Bengazi boondoggle with nothing to show that we didn't know a week after it happened? Why not just install a wood stove in Gowdys office for him to burn taxpayer money? at least that would help heat the Capitol.



~The spending habits of the conservative right is interesting, let's spend 4.5 mil on bulls**t charges with the t***sparent intention of discrediting Hillary's character, but lets not pay bills on approved budget money that has already been spent.Great budget plan. :thumbup:

Reply
Oct 23, 2015 08:33:12   #
moldyoldy
 
plainlogic wrote:
The Clinton spin machine works very well." What is the meaning of is"sic I did not have sex with that woman.


Obviously that did not work, even though a blow job is a long way from what they were supposed to be investigating. It does fit a pattern though, just keep pushing until you find something. Maybe she jay walked, or littered.

Reply
Oct 23, 2015 08:33:17   #
plainlogic
 
moldyoldy wrote:
I am sure security requests are handled by a manager whose job it is to handle them. Perhaps if congress had not cut funding for security, there would have been more available. Would it have made a difference, no.


Depends on which side of the Progressive or Conservative line
your on.

Bottom line, for any illegal action the word is, Prove it.

Reply
Page 1 of 19 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.