KHH1

Obama: Christians threaten nation

By Bryan Fischer, OneNewsNow.com October 19, 2015 6:52 am

Disagreement is not hatred, and the t***h is not h**e speech. Somebody needs to tell that to President Obama.

If you have ever wondered whether President Obama has an abiding hostility to people of Christian faith, wonder no more. He believes we are a threat to national security. If you are a sincerely dev**ed follower of Jesus Christ, your president believes you are a potential d******c t*******t.

I do not exaggerate. In a gathering at George Washington University this week, Obama's assistant attorney general for national security, John Carlin, revealed that the Department of Justice is creating a brand new position just to monitor us. The position, domestic terrorism counsel, will be created to combat the "real and present threat" of domestic terrorism.

And where, pray tell, does this threat come from? From the Muslim Brotherhood, which has a stated goal of exterminating Western civilization and sabotaging our miserable house from within? Nope. From ISIS, which is actively recruiting jihadists in all 50 states? Nope. Jihadists who are sneaking into the United States disguised as Syrian refugees? Nope.

No, the real threat to our national security, according to our president and his minions, is coming from the Family Research Council and the American Family Association.

Carlin lauded the work of the thoroughly discredited Southern Poverty Law Center, which is so blatantly and maliciously biased against Christians that other parts of Obama's administration – the FBI, the Pentagon, and the U.S. Army – are getting as far away from the SPLC as they can.

But the folks at SPLC are still useful to the DOJ, which is desperate to paint conservative Christians as a greater threat to our domestic tranquility than people who are determined to decapitate us in the name of Allah.

According to Carlin, the SPLC does the noble work of "examining what the threat is, observing it, and reporting on it," and claimed that its work is "very important."

The SPLC, mind you, is the group whose "h**e group" map was used by d******c t*******t Floyd Corkins to identify the Family Research Council as his target for a massacre. Only the bravery of an unarmed security guard prevented what could have been one of the worst mass shootings in U.S. history. In other words, if anybody's the h**e group here, it's the SPLC.

Heidi Beirich, the SPLC's intelligence project director, teamed with Carlin to demonize pro-family groups. She told a reporter that the SPLC classifies groups as h**e groups "on the basis of ideology." In other words, the SPLC will vilify groups because of what they believe, not because of what they do or because they have demonstrated any propensity toward violence.

And she flatly admits it. "We post groups on the basis of ideology, not whether they're violent or not."

And then she identified two groups by name: Family Research Council and American Family Association. "[W]hat they're putting out is anti-gay material so gay people are p*******es, or molesters, or wh**ever the case may be, and that's why they're on the list and that's the direct analogy."

We – FRC and AFA – "are simply pushing propaganda that [the SPLC] consider(s) h**eful." She acknowledges that theirs is a purely subjective standard: "It's our opinion that it's h**eful, and that's basically it."

The plain t***h is that we at FRC and AFA don't h**e a living soul. We love homosexuals enough to tell them the t***h about the physical and spiritual dangers of the homosexual lifestyle. We want something better for them than the darkness and disease associated with homosexual behavior. We want them to come out of that darkness into the light of the gospel of Christ. We are for the homosexual, and so we must be against the normalization and promotion of homosexuality.

Note the SPLC is no longer accusing FRC and AFA of h**e or of violence based on some objective standard. They have simply made a purely subjective assessment that our beliefs about human sexuality and our defense of natural marriage are so offensive to them that we must become the target of the unlimited resources of the federal government.

Do we disagree with the homosexual lobby about homosexuality? Of course. Do we h**e them? Absolutely not. Do we advocate violence against them? Never have, never will. We are simply determined to tell the moral, spiritual, and physical t***h about non-normative sexual behavior.

Bottom line: disagreement is not hatred, and the t***h is not h**e speech. Somebody needs to tell that to the president.

Bryan Fischer hosts "Focal Point with Bryan Fischer" every weekday on AFR Talk (American Family Radio) from 1:00 - 3:00 p.m. (Central).

This column is printed with permission. Opinions expressed in 'Perspectives' columns published by OneNewsNow.com are the sole responsibility of the article's author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of the staff or management of, or advertisers who support the American Family News Network, OneNewsNow.com, our parent organization or its other affiliates.

Bryan Fischer hosts "Focal Point with Bryan Fischer" every weekday on AFR Talk (American Family Radio) from 1:00 - 3:00 p.m. (Central).

Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas

Kuntus. Are you a Muslim ? Yes or no?

KHH1

Call people by their correct names if you want answers.......

JMHO Loc: Utah

Kibbles, are you a Muslim ? Yes or no?

KHH1

I know you were slow in school but I work with all students.........

JMHO Loc: Utah

Answer the question, kibbles.

KHH1

I guess he will eventually.........

JMHO Loc: Utah

At least I didn't need affirmative action to get my degree, pal...I did it the hard way.

KHH1

Degree(s) in my case...and what way is the affirmative action way?.....I graduated near or at the top all three times....my last school was a lilly school where AA was used to recruit students and faculty........I guess when you graduate at the top, then the naysayers...who have always had lesser grades...even going back to high school where there was no AA...have to say something to feel adequate about being a lesser student...because they did go in believing that black people are inherently inferior....well I guess I do not have to worry about bigots trying to shape my self-perception from a lowered premise....especially since I had better grades and more serious majors....but I'm curious to know what you consider needing AA since it is not much more than an opportunity unless yu're stupid enough to believe all black students are on the lower end of the scale...and that there are no white students right along with them on the whole scale....I was a student for 12 years and have been a professor for 20+...I'm sure I've had a better look at the bigger picture.......unless you can tell me what graduate courses you have taught and for how long........

JMHO Loc: Utah

Hmmmm...got your panties in a wad over that one. Probably inferior schools, and probably teach at one too.

KHH1

If you think so feel free...what did YOU teach once you met the basic requirement (Masters Degree) for facilitating courses? Were any of your undergraduate and graduate majors in the sciences? What did you write your thesis on? dissertation?

JMHO Loc: Utah

My MBA thesis was on a complete company analysis of Data General. From my analysis, I predicted they would go bankrupt, and they did. I got an "A" on that thesis.

Concerning the sciences, I taught advanced Radio and Radar electronics theory and applications in the U.S. Navy for four years, at the Advanced Electronics Class B School. Our main textbook was an Electronics Engineering principles book written by Fredrick Terman, dean of the School of Engineering at Stanford.

KHH1

Oh good....so you know about target acquisition and tracking.....my specialty at one time was with shipboard S band and X band radar. I worked with a three-story high phased array unit and a 50 ft monopulse dish. Performed calibration and PM routines, did some design work and actually operated the thing tracking and classifying various missile types. My title was Ship Sytems Engineer. Prior to that I worked at the Naval Air Warfare Center in China Lake. Electronic Countermeasures. My big project was to design a Missile System Controller that interfaced with the radar pedestal for receiver I&Q data acquisition with interrupt driven electronics that acquired data using A/D converters, t***sferred data to an array processor (on board co-processor chips did not exist then), perform a 128-point Fast Fourier T***sform to take the I&Q samples, change them from the frequency to time domain and provide pedestal positioning updates in real time. I used the Motorola 68030 processor as the CPU and had to write all of my own hardware initialization code and interrupt routines. Took me three years but it was one helluva learning experience.

KHH1

I wrote a thesis for my undergraduate EE degree. I was an intern at Houston Lighting and Power at the time so I wrote it on "Faults on Electrical Power Systems"...Did not write one for my Masters...took extra courses. My Doctoral Dissertation examined the Technology T***sfer process on the basis of formal and informal factors, examined which factors contributed to success the most and examined if the success of the factors differed significantly by technology type. I had approximately 20 categories of technologies that were being t***sferred. I used 100's of Federal Research Labs as my sample population.

JMHO Loc: Utah

Well, well we have something in common. Which navigational radars did you work on...AN/SPS 10, 46, or submarine AN/BPS-15/16? Which phased array...AN/SPS 48? I worked with the Motorola 68030 processor at Hughes Aircraft upon retiring from the Navy. It was the primary CPU used in a submarine cruise missile launch system Hughes was building at the time.