I am a no party affiliation registered v**er. I don't believe in party affiliation. Both major party have big problems. Me I look for what politicians are not saying not so much as what they say. Example: Gun Control is a good example. It is what advocates such as our president aren't saying. To me it is an example of people talking all day and never say a word. They just blabber the same old rubbish. This gives people reading my replies an idea where I stand politically.
mparke123 wrote:
I am a no party affiliation registered v**er. I don't believe in party affiliation. Both major party have big problems. Me I look for what politicians are not saying not so much as what they say. Example: Gun Control is a good example. It is what advocates such as our president aren't saying. To me it is an example of people talking all day and never say a word. They just blabber the same old rubbish. This gives people reading my replies an idea where I stand politically.
Welcome aboard mparke123, I look forward to reading more from you.
Theo
Loc: Within 1000 miles of Tampa, Florida
mparke123 wrote:
I am a no party affiliation registered v**er. I don't believe in party affiliation. Both major party have big problems. Me I look for what politicians are not saying not so much as what they say. Example: Gun Control is a good example. It is what advocates such as our president aren't saying. To me it is an example of people talking all day and never say a word. They just blabber the same old rubbish. This gives people reading my replies an idea where I stand politically.
So, let me see if I perceive exactly what you are not saying -
If the party of the first part has nothing to say, you will post what he did not say? And if the party of the second part has nothing to say, you will post what he did not say for comparison with that which the party of the first part also did not say?
At what time of day will you not post what they did not say? Or are you going to not say what they did not say in the posts they did not make?
er...
um...
wait a min....
Theo wrote:
So, let me see if I perceive exactly what you are not saying -
If the party of the first part has nothing to say, you will post what he did not say? And if the party of the second part has nothing to say, you will post what he did not say for comparison with that which the party of the first part also did not say?
At what time of day will you not post what they did not say? Or are you going to not say what they did not say in the posts they did not make?
er...
um...
wait a min....
So, let me see if I perceive exactly what you are ... (
show quote)
That's what I'm saying!!!!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.