Parrothead Loc: In front of my laptop

From Total Conservative:



Oh, to be a fly on the wall in Hillary Clinton’s campaign headquarters. This year has not gone as the former first lady had hoped. She thought she would breeze right through the primaries to an easy nomination, face down another one of the GOP’s weak moderates in the general, and secure her spot in the Oval Office without breaking a sweat. With no Barack Obama to stand in her way, this was to be Hillary’s chance to make history.

And it’s been one disaster after another. The emails. The response to said emails. The further revelations about her private server and decidedly unorthodox approach to national security. The startling rise of Bernie Sanders. The even more startling rise of Donald Trump. If Hillary had been able to access a crystal ball back in January, one wonders if she would have put herself through the misery.

While Clintonites predict that the email scandal is getting ready to blow over, Hillary is already facing another problem. See, the DNC didn’t want a messy fight in the primaries. If they had their wish, they would have anointed Hillary from the start and skipped the whole thing altogether. At the outset, they scheduled only six debates, hoping to create the illusion that there really wasn’t any competition for their girl. And now that decision is coming back to bite them.

At a New Hampshire Democratic convention this weekend, DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz was interrupted repeatedly by chants of frustration from the audience. “We want debates…we want debates…we want debates.”



Finally, Schultz lost her cool. “What’s more important? Drawing a contrast with Republicans or arguing about debates?”

Well…seeing as how this is a primary, the answer is clearly DEBATES. Isn’t this supposed to be when the party decides which candidate to v**e for? It’s not just a sham e******n is it? You’re not desperately trying to keep the threads of your battle plan together in the face of a drastically different scenario, are you? No, of course not.

The crusade for more debates has been led by Martin O’Malley, and he has a vested interest in opening up the process. A debate would finally introduce him to the world and give him a name-recognition boost against one of the most famous women in America. But even if his intentions aren’t entirely altruistic, it’s hard to argue with his logic. “It’s bad for us as a Democratic Party to act in undemocratic ways and try to limit debates in some sort of misguided effort to prop up or circle the wagon around this year’s inevitable front-runner,” he told a local TV station in New Hampshire.

With or without the debates, Hillary is losing ground fast. Bernie Sanders – a self-professed socialist – is overtaking her in several regional polls and there is still talk of Vice President Joe Biden entering the race. The DNC can’t protect her forever. And the longer they try, the more her supporters will begin to lose faith.

- See more at: http://totalconservative.com/are-democrats-scared-to-put-hillary-in-a-debate/#sthash.8vb9NXMc.dpuf

Elwood Loc: Florida

:lol: :lol: Does the Titanic come to mind? :twisted:

jackinthebox

The best of the Hildabeest.



.

Harpooner1

And, these "things" are entirely of her own making. Of course the Democrats should have more debates, it is normal to see the candidates posed questions and answer them. The audience needs to differentiate between candidates. But, as Democrats seem to do, they have their "person' and the media goes with it. Now, that "person" is having some problems. One would have thought that it should have been smooth sailing for Hillary. However, the more people can see the connection to Obama and the failed policies, the more they question. Had Obama and his l*****t policies been beneficial to the country as a whole, the up swell of support to continue the policies and approach of a continuation of the general Democrat theme. But, Hillary can't run on the successes....She was and is part and parcel of these same policies that Americans discard as "going in the right direction" for the country as a whole. So, she can't distance herself as an outsider with bold,fresh ideas. She is status quo Democrat. Biden will have the same problem. Convincing America that the last eight years were better than it seems. They will go to" It could have been so much worse if Republicans had been able to do what they wanted to YOU..."....They simply can't run on the record of this administration. Hillary hasn't even seen the worst yet. If...if justice prevails, she will be indicted just as Patraeus was and convicted of National Security issues from mis handling classified information. But, really, her lies are mounting day by day...She can't tell the t***h.

missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore

I'll almost guarantee you that the server issue was greatly accepted by the powers that be in the White House so Clinton and her boss could keep pertinent info away from long term bureaucrats at State while the two i***ts F'd up the entire middle east.

Elwood Loc: Florida

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :lol: :lol: Good ones.
Welcome aboard. A little different from the Hog. :mrgreen:

Workinman Loc: Bayou Pigeon

The T***h and Time walk hand in hand...It's been just to much fun watching Hillary crash and burn...and watching her followers hide under rocks...Fun Times!! :thumbup: :thumbup:

Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas

Nice, like the way you think jackinthebox.