C*****e c****e: Seven indisputable facts: President Obama last week visited Alaska to preach about the inevitable doomsday scenarios the world will face if Americans fail to embrace...

teaman

President Obama last week visited Alaska to preach about the inevitable doomsday scenarios the world will face if Americans fail to embrace his extreme c*****e c****e agenda. Like all climate alarmists, the president wants Americans to believe there is no uncertainty about c*****e c****e. They pretend to know exactly how much human actions contribute to the changing climate. By denying any uncertainty, their goal is to shut off debate. Just trust us. We know whats best for you.

But the t***h is there are more questions about c*****e c****e than there are answers. For instance, even the most advanced climate models all failed to predict the lack of warming the Earth has experienced over the last 18 years. But the president and his Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) refuse to let facts get in the way of their determination to impose greater government control over the lives of the American people.

Below are seven irrefutable facts about c*****e c****e that are ignored because they do not fit into the alarmists scare tactics. These facts are not disputed.
1. For the past 18 years, weather satellites have not measured a global increase in temperatures although carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has increased over that same period. Weather satellites are the most advanced instruments for measuring global temperatures. The fact that these satellites have not detected a measureable temperature increase despite an increased concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere calls into question the correlation c*****e c****e alarmists preach between carbon emissions and temperature.

2. According to EPAs own data, U.S. carbon emissions have decreased nine percent since 2005. These carbon reductions have occurred as a result of technological advancements and free market forces, which will continue. This raises the question of whether burdensome regulations are necessary.

3. The natural cycle of global temperatures has resulted in both higher and lower temperatures over the past 1,000 years than exist today. These temperature fluctuations occurred before significant fossil energy use. So temperatures the Earth is experiencing now have been seen before.

4. If implemented, the Obama administrations Climate Action Plan would reduce global temperatures by only 0.01, or one one-hundredth of a degree Celsius. President Obamas former Deputy Secretary for Fossil Energy at the Department of Energy, Charles McConnell, said that EPAs carbon rules will have only a minor impact on global c*****e c****e. Yet regulations will cost billions of dollars and jeopardize thousands of jobs.

5. The Intergovernmental Panel on C*****e C****e (IPCC) has reported that there is little or no connection between e*****e w*****r and c*****e c****e. According to a 2012 report, IPCC stated that there is high agreement that long-term trends in weather disasters have not been attributed to c*****e c****e. C*****e c****e alarmists point toward hurricanes, tornadoes and other global weather disasters as a proof that man-made carbon emissions are hurting our planet. However, as the IPCC report stated, the opposite is true. There is scientific agreement that weather disasters are not caused by c*****e c****e, despite President Obama repeatedly trying to connect the two.

6. Population growth, especially in the developing world, will account for even more global carbon emissions. Carbon emissions from developing countries are projected to increase by over 125 percent by 2040. And world population is expected to surge by over 2 billion people by 2050, an increase of more than 30 percent. Yet few climate scientists acknowledge the potential impact of population growth on carbon emissions.

7. Carbon dioxide accounts for a very small part of the Earths overall atmosphere and those levels have fluctuated throughout the Earths history. Carbon dioxide currently accounts for only .038 percent of our planets atmosphere. And human-made carbon dioxide only makes up about three percent of that. Put another way, if all the gases in the atmosphere were represented by the length of a football field, only the last 1/10 of an inch would be carbon emissions caused by humans. Its hard to believe that such a small amount would supposedly have such huge consequences.

The EPA and other government agencies too often fail to present all the facts. Their agenda comes first, accuracy comes second. C*****e c****e has many explanations - and unanswered questions. The American people need good science, not science fiction promoted by alarmists.

skdvr1 Loc: Mexizonia

One indisputable fact: Climates change.

mtman2

teaman wrote:

President Obama last week visited Alaska to preach about the inevitable doomsday scenarios the world will face if Americans fail to embrace his extreme c*****e c****e agenda. Like all climate alarmists, the president wants Americans to believe there is no uncertainty about c*****e c****e. They pretend to know exactly how much human actions contribute to the changing climate. By denying any uncertainty, their goal is to shut off debate. Just trust us. We know whats best for you.

But the t***h is there are more questions about c*****e c****e than there are answers. For instance, even the most advanced climate models all failed to predict the lack of warming the Earth has experienced over the last 18 years. But the president and his Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) refuse to let facts get in the way of their determination to impose greater government control over the lives of the American people.

Below are seven irrefutable facts about c*****e c****e that are ignored because they do not fit into the alarmists scare tactics. These facts are not disputed.
1. For the past 18 years, weather satellites have not measured a global increase in temperatures although carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has increased over that same period. Weather satellites are the most advanced instruments for measuring global temperatures. The fact that these satellites have not detected a measureable temperature increase despite an increased concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere calls into question the correlation c*****e c****e alarmists preach between carbon emissions and temperature.

2. According to EPAs own data, U.S. carbon emissions have decreased nine percent since 2005. These carbon reductions have occurred as a result of technological advancements and free market forces, which will continue. This raises the question of whether burdensome regulations are necessary.

3. The natural cycle of global temperatures has resulted in both higher and lower temperatures over the past 1,000 years than exist today. These temperature fluctuations occurred before significant fossil energy use. So temperatures the Earth is experiencing now have been seen before.

4. If implemented, the Obama administrations Climate Action Plan would reduce global temperatures by only 0.01, or one one-hundredth of a degree Celsius. President Obamas former Deputy Secretary for Fossil Energy at the Department of Energy, Charles McConnell, said that EPAs carbon rules will have only a minor impact on global c*****e c****e. Yet regulations will cost billions of dollars and jeopardize thousands of jobs.

5. The Intergovernmental Panel on C*****e C****e (IPCC) has reported that there is little or no connection between e*****e w*****r and c*****e c****e. According to a 2012 report, IPCC stated that there is high agreement that long-term trends in weather disasters have not been attributed to c*****e c****e. C*****e c****e alarmists point toward hurricanes, tornadoes and other global weather disasters as a proof that man-made carbon emissions are hurting our planet. However, as the IPCC report stated, the opposite is true. There is scientific agreement that weather disasters are not caused by c*****e c****e, despite President Obama repeatedly trying to connect the two.

6. Population growth, especially in the developing world, will account for even more global carbon emissions. Carbon emissions from developing countries are projected to increase by over 125 percent by 2040. And world population is expected to surge by over 2 billion people by 2050, an increase of more than 30 percent. Yet few climate scientists acknowledge the potential impact of population growth on carbon emissions.

7. Carbon dioxide accounts for a very small part of the Earths overall atmosphere and those levels have fluctuated throughout the Earths history. Carbon dioxide currently accounts for only .038 percent of our planets atmosphere. And human-made carbon dioxide only makes up about three percent of that. Put another way, if all the gases in the atmosphere were represented by the length of a football field, only the last 1/10 of an inch would be carbon emissions caused by humans. Its hard to believe that such a small amount would supposedly have such huge consequences.

The EPA and other government agencies too often fail to present all the facts. Their agenda comes first, accuracy comes second. C*****e c****e has many explanations - and unanswered questions. The American people need good science, not science fiction promoted by alarmists.

President Obama last week visited Alaska to preach... (show quote)

It is ridiculous for the sheeple-media to keep covering up the t***h.
So it should be pushed by us in every available venue hard, as it's OUR nation not the Far-Left socialists.
Nor are the facts honest, accurate or on their side of their steady attempting to usurp control of OUR lives by any way possible.
T***h and knowledge are power, esp in the hands of the righteous, but that also takes responsible dedication called good citizenship ~!

CowboyMilt

skdvr1 wrote:

One indisputable fact: Climates change.

The fact the "c*****e c****es" has been happening by natural cycles that do "naturally" happen in time. It's a natural process of the world & the universe. What we need to do is rid of EPA & the leader who keeps insisting otherwise for capital gain for his elite buddies. But the uninformed put him where he is to do wh**ever he wants & he will continue to press his agenda as long as he is not stopped. Why does the EPA & the F**E stop coal production in the USA & sell it to China? Wh**ever we do to reduce emissions in USA is counteracted by the increases elsewhere in the world...China & others...duh!

TunTav75

teaman wrote:

President Obama last week visited Alaska to preach about the inevitable doomsday scenarios the world will face if Americans fail to embrace his extreme c*****e c****e agenda. Like all climate alarmists, the president wants Americans to believe there is no uncertainty about c*****e c****e. They pretend to know exactly how much human actions contribute to the changing climate. By denying any uncertainty, their goal is to shut off debate. Just trust us. We know whats best for you.

But the t***h is there are more questions about c*****e c****e than there are answers. For instance, even the most advanced climate models all failed to predict the lack of warming the Earth has experienced over the last 18 years. But the president and his Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) refuse to let facts get in the way of their determination to impose greater government control over the lives of the American people.

Below are seven irrefutable facts about c*****e c****e that are ignored because they do not fit into the alarmists scare tactics. These facts are not disputed.
1. For the past 18 years, weather satellites have not measured a global increase in temperatures although carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has increased over that same period. Weather satellites are the most advanced instruments for measuring global temperatures. The fact that these satellites have not detected a measureable temperature increase despite an increased concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere calls into question the correlation c*****e c****e alarmists preach between carbon emissions and temperature.

2. According to EPAs own data, U.S. carbon emissions have decreased nine percent since 2005. These carbon reductions have occurred as a result of technological advancements and free market forces, which will continue. This raises the question of whether burdensome regulations are necessary.

3. The natural cycle of global temperatures has resulted in both higher and lower temperatures over the past 1,000 years than exist today. These temperature fluctuations occurred before significant fossil energy use. So temperatures the Earth is experiencing now have been seen before.

4. If implemented, the Obama administrations Climate Action Plan would reduce global temperatures by only 0.01, or one one-hundredth of a degree Celsius. President Obamas former Deputy Secretary for Fossil Energy at the Department of Energy, Charles McConnell, said that EPAs carbon rules will have only a minor impact on global c*****e c****e. Yet regulations will cost billions of dollars and jeopardize thousands of jobs.

5. The Intergovernmental Panel on C*****e C****e (IPCC) has reported that there is little or no connection between e*****e w*****r and c*****e c****e. According to a 2012 report, IPCC stated that there is high agreement that long-term trends in weather disasters have not been attributed to c*****e c****e. C*****e c****e alarmists point toward hurricanes, tornadoes and other global weather disasters as a proof that man-made carbon emissions are hurting our planet. However, as the IPCC report stated, the opposite is true. There is scientific agreement that weather disasters are not caused by c*****e c****e, despite President Obama repeatedly trying to connect the two.

6. Population growth, especially in the developing world, will account for even more global carbon emissions. Carbon emissions from developing countries are projected to increase by over 125 percent by 2040. And world population is expected to surge by over 2 billion people by 2050, an increase of more than 30 percent. Yet few climate scientists acknowledge the potential impact of population growth on carbon emissions.

7. Carbon dioxide accounts for a very small part of the Earths overall atmosphere and those levels have fluctuated throughout the Earths history. Carbon dioxide currently accounts for only .038 percent of our planets atmosphere. And human-made carbon dioxide only makes up about three percent of that. Put another way, if all the gases in the atmosphere were represented by the length of a football field, only the last 1/10 of an inch would be carbon emissions caused by humans. Its hard to believe that such a small amount would supposedly have such huge consequences.

The EPA and other government agencies too often fail to present all the facts. Their agenda comes first, accuracy comes second. C*****e c****e has many explanations - and unanswered questions. The American people need good science, not science fiction promoted by alarmists.

President Obama last week visited Alaska to preach... (show quote)

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

teaman wrote:

President Obama last week visited Alaska to preach about the inevitable doomsday scenarios the world will face if Americans fail to embrace his extreme c*****e c****e agenda. Like all climate alarmists, the president wants Americans to believe there is no uncertainty about c*****e c****e. They pretend to know exactly how much human actions contribute to the changing climate. By denying any uncertainty, their goal is to shut off debate. Just trust us. We know whats best for you.

But the t***h is there are more questions about c*****e c****e than there are answers. For instance, even the most advanced climate models all failed to predict the lack of warming the Earth has experienced over the last 18 years. But the president and his Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) refuse to let facts get in the way of their determination to impose greater government control over the lives of the American people.

Below are seven irrefutable facts about c*****e c****e that are ignored because they do not fit into the alarmists scare tactics. These facts are not disputed.
1. For the past 18 years, weather satellites have not measured a global increase in temperatures although carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has increased over that same period. Weather satellites are the most advanced instruments for measuring global temperatures. The fact that these satellites have not detected a measureable temperature increase despite an increased concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere calls into question the correlation c*****e c****e alarmists preach between carbon emissions and temperature.

2. According to EPAs own data, U.S. carbon emissions have decreased nine percent since 2005. These carbon reductions have occurred as a result of technological advancements and free market forces, which will continue. This raises the question of whether burdensome regulations are necessary.

3. The natural cycle of global temperatures has resulted in both higher and lower temperatures over the past 1,000 years than exist today. These temperature fluctuations occurred before significant fossil energy use. So temperatures the Earth is experiencing now have been seen before.

4. If implemented, the Obama administrations Climate Action Plan would reduce global temperatures by only 0.01, or one one-hundredth of a degree Celsius. President Obamas former Deputy Secretary for Fossil Energy at the Department of Energy, Charles McConnell, said that EPAs carbon rules will have only a minor impact on global c*****e c****e. Yet regulations will cost billions of dollars and jeopardize thousands of jobs.

5. The Intergovernmental Panel on C*****e C****e (IPCC) has reported that there is little or no connection between e*****e w*****r and c*****e c****e. According to a 2012 report, IPCC stated that there is high agreement that long-term trends in weather disasters have not been attributed to c*****e c****e. C*****e c****e alarmists point toward hurricanes, tornadoes and other global weather disasters as a proof that man-made carbon emissions are hurting our planet. However, as the IPCC report stated, the opposite is true. There is scientific agreement that weather disasters are not caused by c*****e c****e, despite President Obama repeatedly trying to connect the two.

6. Population growth, especially in the developing world, will account for even more global carbon emissions. Carbon emissions from developing countries are projected to increase by over 125 percent by 2040. And world population is expected to surge by over 2 billion people by 2050, an increase of more than 30 percent. Yet few climate scientists acknowledge the potential impact of population growth on carbon emissions.

7. Carbon dioxide accounts for a very small part of the Earths overall atmosphere and those levels have fluctuated throughout the Earths history. Carbon dioxide currently accounts for only .038 percent of our planets atmosphere. And human-made carbon dioxide only makes up about three percent of that. Put another way, if all the gases in the atmosphere were represented by the length of a football field, only the last 1/10 of an inch would be carbon emissions caused by humans. Its hard to believe that such a small amount would supposedly have such huge consequences.

The EPA and other government agencies too often fail to present all the facts. Their agenda comes first, accuracy comes second. C*****e c****e has many explanations - and unanswered questions. The American people need good science, not science fiction promoted by alarmists.

President Obama last week visited Alaska to preach... (show quote)

Teaman,

everything in your post is wrong and has been debunked again and again.

Rather then go down your list, which I have done before when others posted the same points.. I will simply give you one of many URL and if you feel llike it, you can have a look.

as closed mind as you and others are, I have no great expectations.. However, I will point the way, if you choose not to use it, that is only a minuscule number...

http://billmoyers.com/2014/05/16/eight-pseudo-scientific-climate-claims-debunked-by-real-scientists/

Richard94611

permafrost wrote:

Teaman, br br everything in your post is wrong an... (show quote)

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: