The myth of Jewish community solidarity with Israel: Part I -- The Illusion of Solidarity The insistence that Israel is somehow the national embodiment of the Jewish people has always...

payne1000

Part I -- The Illusion of Solidarity

The insistence that Israel is somehow the national embodiment of the Jewish people has always been dangerous. This is so because it tied a diverse group spread over the globe to the apron strings of a single political entity and its ideology (Z*****m). Thus identified, the Jews were allegedly what a bunch of Z*****t ideologues said they were, and were also supposedly exemplified by the consistently unsavory practices of the Israeli state.

The Z*****ts tried to force the Jews into this Procrustean bed through the monopolization of elite Jewish organizations and the emotional blackmail of those who might have dissenting views. The mantra here was that if a Jewish person had disagreements with Israel, he or she should express them behind closed doors and never in public. Behind closed doors the dissenter could be contained. However, if he or she went public with their differences, they undercut the myth of Jewish community solidarity with Israel. To go public in this fashion was a mortal sin, and one risked being shamed within one's community. Those who persisted were labeled "self-hating" t*****rs.

It is a long-standing effort at censorship. Some people might get upset with those who publicly accuse Charles Schumer of having dual loyalties involving Israel, but no one seemed to get equally upset with those Z*****ts who have accused thousands of Jews worldwide of being "self-h**ers" because they publicly came out against Israel's atrocious treatment of the Palestinians.

Part II -- On the "Verge of Fratricide"

It was inevitable that the Z*****t requirement of public silence would get harder to enforce the more outrageous the behavior of Israel's political leadership became. On the American scene, the combination of the brazen intrusion of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu into U.S. politics (particularly his 3 March 2015 address to Congress) and the warmongering position on Iran taken by Jewish organizations openly allied to Israel seems to have been the tipping point. The combined adamance of this Z*****t front has forced American Jewish congress-people and senators to make a choice, and do so publicly. Those who have chosen, against the wishes of the Israeli government, to support the Iran nuclear agreement as reflecting the long-term interests of the United States (and Israel) are now treated to the same degree of defamation as those Jews called "self-h**ers."

Read more . . .
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Communal-Upheaval-by-Lawrence-Davidson-Community_Iran_Israel_Netanyahu-150905-19.html

JMHO Loc: Utah

payne1000 wrote:

Part I -- The Illusion of Solidarity

The insistence that Israel is somehow the national embodiment of the Jewish people has always been dangerous. This is so because it tied a diverse group spread over the globe to the apron strings of a single political entity and its ideology (Z*****m). Thus identified, the Jews were allegedly what a bunch of Z*****t ideologues said they were, and were also supposedly exemplified by the consistently unsavory practices of the Israeli state.

The Z*****ts tried to force the Jews into this Procrustean bed through the monopolization of elite Jewish organizations and the emotional blackmail of those who might have dissenting views. The mantra here was that if a Jewish person had disagreements with Israel, he or she should express them behind closed doors and never in public. Behind closed doors the dissenter could be contained. However, if he or she went public with their differences, they undercut the myth of Jewish community solidarity with Israel. To go public in this fashion was a mortal sin, and one risked being shamed within one's community. Those who persisted were labeled "self-hating" t*****rs.

It is a long-standing effort at censorship. Some people might get upset with those who publicly accuse Charles Schumer of having dual loyalties involving Israel, but no one seemed to get equally upset with those Z*****ts who have accused thousands of Jews worldwide of being "self-h**ers" because they publicly came out against Israel's atrocious treatment of the Palestinians.

Part II -- On the "Verge of Fratricide"

It was inevitable that the Z*****t requirement of public silence would get harder to enforce the more outrageous the behavior of Israel's political leadership became. On the American scene, the combination of the brazen intrusion of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu into U.S. politics (particularly his 3 March 2015 address to Congress) and the warmongering position on Iran taken by Jewish organizations openly allied to Israel seems to have been the tipping point. The combined adamance of this Z*****t front has forced American Jewish congress-people and senators to make a choice, and do so publicly. Those who have chosen, against the wishes of the Israeli government, to support the Iran nuclear agreement as reflecting the long-term interests of the United States (and Israel) are now treated to the same degree of defamation as those Jews called "self-h**ers."

Read more . . .
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Communal-Upheaval-by-Lawrence-Davidson-Community_Iran_Israel_Netanyahu-150905-19.html

b Part I -- The Illusion of Solidarity /b br br... (show quote)

Blah...blah...blah...yawn...ho hum...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

sissymary

I see your protecting your handlers and pay check as usual.

payne1000

sissymary wrote:

I see your protecting your handlers and pay check as usual.

JMHO, being a Z*****t troll, validates every topic he shows up on as being a valid account of Z*****m's evil ways.

Jerry A. Loc: California

payne1000 wrote:

Part I -- The Illusion of Solidarity

The insistence that Israel is somehow the national embodiment of the Jewish people has always been dangerous. This is so because it tied a diverse group spread over the globe to the apron strings of a single political entity and its ideology (Z*****m). Thus identified, the Jews were allegedly what a bunch of Z*****t ideologues said they were, and were also supposedly exemplified by the consistently unsavory practices of the Israeli state.

The Z*****ts tried to force the Jews into this Procrustean bed through the monopolization of elite Jewish organizations and the emotional blackmail of those who might have dissenting views. The mantra here was that if a Jewish person had disagreements with Israel, he or she should express them behind closed doors and never in public. Behind closed doors the dissenter could be contained. However, if he or she went public with their differences, they undercut the myth of Jewish community solidarity with Israel. To go public in this fashion was a mortal sin, and one risked being shamed within one's community. Those who persisted were labeled "self-hating" t*****rs.

It is a long-standing effort at censorship. Some people might get upset with those who publicly accuse Charles Schumer of having dual loyalties involving Israel, but no one seemed to get equally upset with those Z*****ts who have accused thousands of Jews worldwide of being "self-h**ers" because they publicly came out against Israel's atrocious treatment of the Palestinians.

Part II -- On the "Verge of Fratricide"

It was inevitable that the Z*****t requirement of public silence would get harder to enforce the more outrageous the behavior of Israel's political leadership became. On the American scene, the combination of the brazen intrusion of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu into U.S. politics (particularly his 3 March 2015 address to Congress) and the warmongering position on Iran taken by Jewish organizations openly allied to Israel seems to have been the tipping point. The combined adamance of this Z*****t front has forced American Jewish congress-people and senators to make a choice, and do so publicly. Those who have chosen, against the wishes of the Israeli government, to support the Iran nuclear agreement as reflecting the long-term interests of the United States (and Israel) are now treated to the same degree of defamation as those Jews called "self-h**ers."

Read more . . .
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Communal-Upheaval-by-Lawrence-Davidson-Community_Iran_Israel_Netanyahu-150905-19.html

b Part I -- The Illusion of Solidarity /b br br... (show quote)

Payne1000: In 1948, when the new "State of Israel" was created by the U.N. in Palestine territory a famous Jew Physicist named "Albert Einstein" a 1921, Nobel Prize recommended the new ISRAEL leaders the following: Do not enter the land of "ISRAEL" in a kind of colonial assertitive mood, if we don't find a way for honest cooperation and dealing with the Arabs, we have not learned anything during the last 2000 years of suffering. Albert Einstein was a men for peace, and his ideas made possible the "atomic bomb" but he was very disappointed when U.S. used the atomic bomb in Japan and said: Man could now destroy the world and the end of life on the earth, and he was right.

Jerry A. Loc: California

payne1000 wrote:

Part I -- The Illusion of Solidarity

The insistence that Israel is somehow the national embodiment of the Jewish people has always been dangerous. This is so because it tied a diverse group spread over the globe to the apron strings of a single political entity and its ideology (Z*****m). Thus identified, the Jews were allegedly what a bunch of Z*****t ideologues said they were, and were also supposedly exemplified by the consistently unsavory practices of the Israeli state.

The Z*****ts tried to force the Jews into this Procrustean bed through the monopolization of elite Jewish organizations and the emotional blackmail of those who might have dissenting views. The mantra here was that if a Jewish person had disagreements with Israel, he or she should express them behind closed doors and never in public. Behind closed doors the dissenter could be contained. However, if he or she went public with their differences, they undercut the myth of Jewish community solidarity with Israel. To go public in this fashion was a mortal sin, and one risked being shamed within one's community. Those who persisted were labeled "self-hating" t*****rs.

It is a long-standing effort at censorship. Some people might get upset with those who publicly accuse Charles Schumer of having dual loyalties involving Israel, but no one seemed to get equally upset with those Z*****ts who have accused thousands of Jews worldwide of being "self-h**ers" because they publicly came out against Israel's atrocious treatment of the Palestinians.

Part II -- On the "Verge of Fratricide"

It was inevitable that the Z*****t requirement of public silence would get harder to enforce the more outrageous the behavior of Israel's political leadership became. On the American scene, the combination of the brazen intrusion of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu into U.S. politics (particularly his 3 March 2015 address to Congress) and the warmongering position on Iran taken by Jewish organizations openly allied to Israel seems to have been the tipping point. The combined adamance of this Z*****t front has forced American Jewish congress-people and senators to make a choice, and do so publicly. Those who have chosen, against the wishes of the Israeli government, to support the Iran nuclear agreement as reflecting the long-term interests of the United States (and Israel) are now treated to the same degree of defamation as those Jews called "self-h**ers."

Read more . . .
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Communal-Upheaval-by-Lawrence-Davidson-Community_Iran_Israel_Netanyahu-150905-19.html

b Part I -- The Illusion of Solidarity /b br br... (show quote)

Payne1000: In 1948, when the new "State of Israel" was created by the U.N. in Palestine territory a famous Jew Physicist named "Albert Einstein" a 1921, Nobel Prize recommended the new ISRAEL leaders the following: Do not enter the land of "ISRAEL" in a kind of colonial assertitive mood, if we don't find a way for honest cooperation and dealing with the Arabs, we have not learned anything during the last 2000 years of suffering. Albert Einstein was a men for peace, and his ideas made possible the "atomic bomb" but he was very disappointed when U.S. used the atomic bomb in Japan and said: Man could now destroy the world and the end of life on the earth, and he was right.

payne1000

Jerry A. wrote:

Payne1000: In 1948, when the new "State of I... (show quote)

Einstein also said, "The (Israeli) state idea is not according to my heart. I cannot understand why it is needed. It is connected with many difficulties and a narrow-mindedness. I believe it is bad."

Jerry A. Loc: California

payne1000 wrote:

Einstein also said, "The (Israeli) state idea is not according to my heart. I cannot understand why it is needed. It is connected with many difficulties and a narrow-mindedness. I believe it is bad."

Payne1000: Albert Einstein was a great man, and he was right, Israel's Prime Minister Mr. Ben Gurion came to U.S. to offered him to be President of Israel and he refused.

payne1000

Jerry A. wrote:

Payne1000: Albert Einstein was a great man, and he was right, Israel's Prime Minister Mr. Ben Gurion came to U.S. to offered him to be President of Israel and he refused.

Too bad he refused. He might have been able to move Israel in the direction of peace instead of perpetual war. But most likely the Z*****ts would have assassinated him if he tried.

JMHO Loc: Utah

payne1000 wrote:

JMHO, being a Z*****t troll, validates every topic he shows up on as being a valid account of Z*****m's evil ways.

Payne being an i***t, and in every ridiculously stupid posting validates my opinion of him...just an ignorant old fool.

payne1000

JMHO wrote:

Payne being an i***t, and in every ridiculously stupid posting validates my opinion of him...just an ignorant old fool.

Most readers have figured out by now that you have no rebuttal for anything I post.

Rebuttal would require the ability to think logically. Insults are the defense of the mentally challenged.

JMHO Loc: Utah

payne1000 wrote:

Most readers have figured out by now that you have no rebuttal for anything I post.

Rebuttal would require the ability to think logically. Insults are the defense of the mentally challenged.

And, your posts are insults to anyone who has a brain. Never seen any logic in your posts, just a lot of bulls**t and extreme ignorance...you are mentally challenged, pal.

payne1000

JMHO wrote:

And, your posts are insults to anyone who has a brain. Never seen any logic in your posts, just a lot of bulls**t and extreme ignorance...you are mentally challenged, pal.

If there is no logic in my posts, why have you never been able to refute them? Defending lies is very difficult. You're not up to it. This testimony by a high-level FBI officer is another one which you can't refute:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRaezLTU2a0

JMHO Loc: Utah

payne1000 wrote:

If there is no logic in my posts, why have you never been able to refute them? Defending lies is very difficult. You're not up to it. This testimony by a high-level FBI officer is another one which you can't refute:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRaezLTU2a0

Not worth my time refuting bulls**t. Post something that is true and factual that I disagree with and I'll debate you...but, instead you just post Jew hating nonsensical bulls**t.

payne1000

JMHO wrote:

Not worth my time refuting bulls**t. Post something that is true and factual that I disagree with and I'll debate you...but, instead you just post Jew hating nonsensical bulls**t.

A top level FBI agent with 27 years experience says 9/11 was an inside job and you claim it's bulls**t?
What are your reasons for saying it's bulls**t?

Here's a General who's listed in the Military Intelligence Hall of Fame who says no plane hit the Pentagon and that the three WTC towers were controlled demolitions. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=71c_1311362426