One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Want to watch liberals dance?
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
Sep 3, 2013 16:21:21   #
The Cracker
 
You might try reminding liberals that we went into Irag to replace Saddam Husein for k*****g his own people with his weapons of mass destruction.

Remind them how they have cried like little whores about Bush and his sending our troops into Iraq.. Years and years now. Whine, b***h, belch and whimper. So very trying.

Of course they will step back in shock and immediately tell you that Bush never found any of those weapons of Mass Destruction. The fact that Saddam used his weapons of mass destruction on his own people, Just as Bashar al-Assad has now murdered his using the same methods; means nothing.

Obama promises that he is not going to send our troops into Syria, that he only wants to bomb away their capability to use those weapons. (can you hear it now?)

NOW FOR THE FINAL QUESTION;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

Just how the hell do you think we will know if Obama has destroyed the Syrians gas and their ability to deliver it, without putting boots on the ground and checking it out, just like Bush did in Iraq?

Do we take Kerry or Obama at their word when they finish their three days of offshore bombing and declare "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED"? Not a chance in hell as far as I am concerned.

How about you?

Now watch the liberals dance.....



Reply
Sep 3, 2013 17:00:25   #
The Cracker
 
How sweet it is when the hen crows....

They weren’t personally home yesterday, but if John and Teresa* were angry that anti-war protestors were pounding on the door of their Beacon Hill townhouse, they might want to dust off their copy of Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, or borrow a copy from Kerry’s boss, who trained under Alinsky acolytes in Chicago.

Cock a diddle do.

Reply
Sep 3, 2013 17:07:22   #
rumitoid
 
The C*****r wrote:
You might try reminding liberals that we went into Irag to replace Saddam Husein for k*****g his own people with his weapons of mass destruction.

Remind them how they have cried like little whores about Bush and his sending our troops into Iraq.. Years and years now. Whine, b***h, belch and whimper. So very trying.

Of course they will step back in shock and immediately tell you that Bush never found any of those weapons of Mass Destruction. The fact that Saddam used his weapons of mass destruction on his own people, Just as Bashar al-Assad has now murdered his using the same methods; means nothing.

Obama promises that he is not going to send our troops into Syria, that he only wants to bomb away their capability to use those weapons. (can you hear it now?)

NOW FOR THE FINAL QUESTION;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

Just how the hell do you think we will know if Obama has destroyed the Syrians gas and their ability to deliver it, without putting boots on the ground and checking it out, just like Bush did in Iraq?

Do we take Kerry or Obama at their word when they finish their three days of offshore bombing and declare "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED"? Not a chance in hell as far as I am concerned.

How about you?

Now watch the liberals dance.....
You might try reminding liberals that we went into... (show quote)


I didn't think Hillary had such nice legs or could move like that. Thank you for enlightening me.

Reply
Sep 3, 2013 17:07:32   #
The Cracker
 
Democratic Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton said Tuesday that at the current time, the only reason she would v**e in favor of an attack on Syria was out of loyalty to Barack Obama.

Appearing on radio's Bill Press Show, the non-v****g delegate from the District of Columbia also said if the President actually gets the v**es he needs, "it’ll be because of loyalty of Democrats. They just don’t want to see him shamed and humiliated on the national stage"

Comment: He has already been shamed and humiliated on the national stage. Over and over again.



Reply
Sep 3, 2013 17:12:47   #
rumitoid
 
The C*****r wrote:
Democratic Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton said Tuesday that at the current time, the only reason she would v**e in favor of an attack on Syria was out of loyalty to Barack Obama.

Appearing on radio's Bill Press Show, the non-v****g delegate from the District of Columbia also said if the President actually gets the v**es he needs, "it’ll be because of loyalty of Democrats. They just don’t want to see him shamed and humiliated on the national stage"

Comment: He has already been shamed and humiliated on the national stage. Over and over again.
Democratic Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton sai... (show quote)


I am no mastermind on political strategy, or even close to having more than just a common sense approach. To me, acting on either side in that civil war is acting against the free world and our nation's best interest, never mind what a huge mess it could stir up. Party line should never be the basis of a decision; both sides make that abundantly clear.

Reply
Sep 3, 2013 17:13:04   #
The Cracker
 
Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz said the U.S. would be bolstered with support from “dozens” of international allies if the United States makes military strikes against Syria.

“I mean we have, from the briefings that I’ve received, there are dozens of countries who are going to stand with the United States, who will engage with us on military action and also that back us up,” Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer on “Piers Morgan Live.”

“In both military and diplomatic and political support, there are dozens of nations who had committed to back us up,” she said.

However, Wasserman Schultz said she was not at “liberty to say” specifically what countries have expressed supporting in missile strikes, because some of the information she received was classified.

Uh, Uh.... Sure, wh**ever you say!

Reply
Sep 3, 2013 17:14:12   #
rumitoid
 
The C*****r wrote:
Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz said the U.S. would be bolstered with support from “dozens” of international allies if the United States makes military strikes against Syria.

“I mean we have, from the briefings that I’ve received, there are dozens of countries who are going to stand with the United States, who will engage with us on military action and also that back us up,” Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer on “Piers Morgan Live.”

“In both military and diplomatic and political support, there are dozens of nations who had committed to back us up,” she said.

However, Wasserman Schultz said she was not at “liberty to say” specifically what countries have expressed supporting in missile strikes, because some of the information she received was classified.

Uh, Uh.... Sure, wh**ever you say!
Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wa... (show quote)


We are in wonderland, Mr. C*****r.

Reply
Sep 3, 2013 18:40:21   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
I an not convinced Assad used the sarin gas on his people. I believe it was used by the 'rebels' to get world (US) opinion on their side. Why would Assad use it, he is winning the civil war. I am definitely NOT a fan nor supporter of Assad. He is an evil dictator as was Quadaffi and Hussein. The world, ME, would be better off without him. But, I still believe he is being framed by those with more to gain than he is by using the gas.

Reply
Sep 3, 2013 20:46:57   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
The C*****r wrote:
You might try reminding liberals that we went into Irag to replace Saddam Husein for k*****g his own people with his weapons of mass destruction.

Remind them how they have cried like little whores about Bush and his sending our troops into Iraq.. Years and years now. Whine, b***h, belch and whimper. So very trying.

Of course they will step back in shock and immediately tell you that Bush never found any of those weapons of Mass Destruction. The fact that Saddam used his weapons of mass destruction on his own people, Just as Bashar al-Assad has now murdered his using the same methods; means nothing.

Obama promises that he is not going to send our troops into Syria, that he only wants to bomb away their capability to use those weapons. (can you hear it now?)

NOW FOR THE FINAL QUESTION;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

Just how the hell do you think we will know if Obama has destroyed the Syrians gas and their ability to deliver it, without putting boots on the ground and checking it out, just like Bush did in Iraq?

Do we take Kerry or Obama at their word when they finish their three days of offshore bombing and declare "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED"? Not a chance in hell as far as I am concerned.

How about you?

Now watch the liberals dance.....
You might try reminding liberals that we went into... (show quote)


I have always wondered why Dirty Harry didn't get in that picture.

Reply
Sep 3, 2013 20:50:49   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
rumitoid wrote:
I am no mastermind on political strategy, or even close to having more than just a common sense approach. To me, acting on either side in that civil war is acting against the free world and our nation's best interest, never mind what a huge mess it could stir up. Party line should never be the basis of a decision; both sides make that abundantly clear.


Here we go again, agreeing about something. Have you heard that Dennis Kucinich has said that if we go into Syria we will automatically become the al Qaeda air force. I have to agree with that too.

Reply
Sep 3, 2013 20:53:48   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Old_Gringo wrote:
I an not convinced Assad used the sarin gas on his people. I believe it was used by the 'rebels' to get world (US) opinion on their side. Why would Assad use it, he is winning the civil war. I am definitely NOT a fan nor supporter of Assad. He is an evil dictator as was Quadaffi and Hussein. The world, ME, would be better off without him. But, I still believe he is being framed by those with more to gain than he is by using the gas.


I guess we old farts still think alike, Gringo. He had too much to lose and nothing to gain unless it was Iran that called the shot to show the world just how much Obama would back down in the end.

Reply
Sep 3, 2013 20:59:02   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
oldroy wrote:
I guess we old farts still think alike, Gringo. He had too much to lose and nothing to gain unless it was Iran that called the shot to show the world just how much Obama would back down in the end.


That is a possibility but but probable. Assad has everything to lose and nothing to gain by using the gas.

Reply
Sep 3, 2013 21:01:20   #
rumitoid
 
oldroy wrote:
Here we go again, agreeing about something. Have you heard that Dennis Kucinich has said that if we go into Syria we will automatically become the al Qaeda air force. I have to agree with that too.


Agreed, but and worse, I think.

Reply
Sep 4, 2013 07:12:23   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
The C*****r wrote:
How sweet it is when the hen crows....

They weren’t personally home yesterday, but if John and Teresa* were angry that anti-war protestors were pounding on the door of their Beacon Hill townhouse, they might want to dust off their copy of Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, or borrow a copy from Kerry’s boss, who trained under Alinsky acolytes in Chicago.

Cock a diddle do.


C*****r, I salute you for the funniest video I've seen in a long while. Anyone who can't laugh at that, has no sense of humor! You got to give 'em credit for their moves, LOL!

This reply was meant for your initial post, of course...my bad.

Reply
Sep 4, 2013 11:40:03   #
Navysnipe Loc: Old West
 
The C*****r wrote:
Democratic Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton said Tuesday that at the current time, the only reason she would v**e in favor of an attack on Syria was out of loyalty to Barack Obama.

Appearing on radio's Bill Press Show, the non-v****g delegate from the District of Columbia also said if the President actually gets the v**es he needs, "it’ll be because of loyalty of Democrats. They just don’t want to see him shamed and humiliated on the national stage"

Comment: He has already been shamed and humiliated on the national stage. Over and over again.
Democratic Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton sai... (show quote)


D********g hypocrites!

Reply
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.