One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Women in the Rangers....Wrong Decision!d`
Aug 19, 2015 10:34:46   #
GrampaG
 
I was just discussing this with a friend last night after the news broke that two women had passed Army Ranger school. My first comment was "I wonder how much they lowered the standards to get these women through?" It's a well known fact that Obama is doing everything he can to cross off all the barriers to women in specialized jobs in the military, including t*********rs. This is a big mistake. The following article short of brought it home for me, and this is written by a woman!

http://clashdaily.com/2015/08/combat-vet-says-female-army-rangers-dont-have-what-it-takes-to-be-rangers/#

The statistics of this class of rangers is also right along with what the article says. Of the approx. 400 beginning trainees, fewer than 20 were women. Of those 380 males (just to round things off) fewer than 100 passed, and of the about 18 women, only two passed. Passing or not, the females still fail to bring many vital intangibles to the battle field that could result in the deaths of their team mates. Bad decision, JCOS, Obama!

Reply
Aug 19, 2015 11:02:58   #
EL Loc: Massachusetts
 
GrampaG wrote:
I was just discussing this with a friend last night after the news broke that two women had passed Army Ranger school. My first comment was "I wonder how much they lowered the standards to get these women through?" It's a well known fact that Obama is doing everything he can to cross off all the barriers to women in specialized jobs in the military, including t*********rs. This is a big mistake. The following article short of brought it home for me, and this is written by a woman!

http://clashdaily.com/2015/08/combat-vet-says-female-army-rangers-dont-have-what-it-takes-to-be-rangers/#

The statistics of this class of rangers is also right along with what the article says. Of the approx. 400 beginning trainees, fewer than 20 were women. Of those 380 males (just to round things off) fewer than 100 passed, and of the about 18 women, only two passed. Passing or not, the females still fail to bring many vital intangibles to the battle field that could result in the deaths of their team mates. Bad decision, JCOS, Obama!
I was just discussing this with a friend last nigh... (show quote)


I can't understand why a woman would even WANT to be a Ranger.

Reply
Aug 19, 2015 11:19:36   #
boatbob2
 
The 2 SOLDIERS (ladies) that are now RANGERS,will NOT be allowed to join a RANGER regiment,but,they are authorized to wear the RANGER tab,obozo had nothing to do,with these soldiers passing the course,The RANGER instructors,will have told obozo to go piss in his hat,if he tried to interfere,Im betting the Ranger instructors,cut those ladies NO SLACK..AND,were probably harder on them than the men trainees.

Reply
 
 
Aug 24, 2015 08:54:53   #
GrampaG
 
boatbob2 wrote:
The 2 SOLDIERS (ladies) that are now RANGERS,will NOT be allowed to join a RANGER regiment,but,they are authorized to wear the RANGER tab,obozo had nothing to do,with these soldiers passing the course,The RANGER instructors,will have told obozo to go piss in his hat,if he tried to interfere,Im betting the Ranger instructors,cut those ladies NO SLACK..AND,were probably harder on them than the men trainees.


Please tell us why you are so convinced of this, Boatbob...I've kept my eyes on this story, and haven't seen anything to indicate the t***h of what you say. Thanks.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.