Doc110 Loc: York PA

7/15/15 Ignorant V**ers Poised To Crown Hillary

http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/ignorant-v**ers-posed-to-crown-hillary/

Erik Rush figures if we chose 'criminal' Obama, same thing will occur in 2016


ERIK RUSH http://www.wnd.com/author/erush/

There have been some pretty potent reactions in the alternative press to Judge Andrew Napolitano’s WND column of July 1, “Hillary’s secret war.”
http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/hillarys-secret-war/

In it, the judge analyzes a shocking interview with an international arms dealer that centers around the man’s dealings with the State Department under Hillary Clinton, as well as evidence in the same vein that has surfaced through other sources, Clinton’s destruction of emails covering that period and testimony she gave at a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee in January of 2013.


Napolitano is one of the first of his stature and background in the law to pull no punches pertaining to the former secretary of state’s criminality. Yet despite his usual unambiguous legal opinions – or judgments, if you will – written and broadcast, here he doesn’t provide any, instead leaving the reader to digest the weighty revelations.


I could almost hear the Judge intone to his readers: You’re smart; you figure it out. What do we typically do with people who commit serial criminal offenses?


Writing for T***hRevolt.org last week, Mark Tapson made a case for arresting and charging Ms. Clinton, as well as expressing an almost passionate yearning that this would take place with all due speed. http://www.t***hrevolt.org/news/time-arrest-hillary



Judge Napolitano’s column ends with the following:

“Hillary Clinton lied to Congress, gave arms to terrorists and destroyed her emails. How much longer can she hide the t***h?

How much longer can her lawlessness go unchallenged and unprocessed?

Does she really think the American v**ers will overlook her criminal behavior and put her in the White House where she can pardon herself?”


Strong words, and Napolitano certainly echoes my sentiments. The urgency contained in that final paragraph reminded me of an editorial comment I made elsewhere just this past weekend. http://instigatornews.com/islamist-obama-state-dept-denied-visas-to-persecuted-assyrian-christians/


This one addressed the Obama State Department denying visas to Assyrian Christians who were in imminent danger of persecution from the ISIS terror group several weeks ago, while continuing to allow every potential jihadi who wishes it entry into the United States:

“When will Americans – American Christians in particular – stand up and demand that … Barack Hussein Obama II be d**gged from the White House in chains?”

Strong words? I suppose – but certainly in keeping with the opinions I usually express here.


Back to Judge Napolitano’s pointed questions, specifically the last one.


Does Hillary Clinton think American v**ers will overlook her criminal behavior and elect her president?

For me, that gave rise to yet another question: Why are she and the president still walking around free, committing crimes and lying their faces off about them on a daily basis?


The answer to that one might very well answer the last question posed by the judge.


Here’s the reasoning: It would be very easy for American v**ers to overlook Clinton’s criminal behavior if they didn’t know about it in the first place.


Why wouldn’t v**ers put Hillary Clinton in the White House if her crimes are systematically overlooked by the press and the Republican leadership in the same manner Barack Obama’s identity fraud, lack of a valid birth certificate, forged Selective Service registration, invalid Social Security number, sealed academic records, ties to criminals, terrorists, radicals, and r****ts, and possible ties to several Chicago murders were systematically overlooked by the press and by Republicans during the 2008 e******n cycle?


Bereft of such information as discussed in the judge’s column, revealed in the Fox News investigation he references, other evidence gleaned by unbiased news sources and by Congress, American v**ers would have little more than the Clinton hype machine and shallow cult of personality upon which to base their estimations of her.

Add to that an establishment press fawning over her in the same obsequious manner as they fawned over Obama in 2008, and she’s well on her way to the White House.

And wouldn’t it’d be so cool for America to finally have her first woman president?



Within days of the attack on the U.S. compound in B******i on Sept. 11, 2012, I voiced my concern that as opposed to having botched or nixed a rescue of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and the three other Americans who perished, the White House might actually have orchestrated the event to erase (or at least obscure) evidence of their criminal activities with regard to arming terrorists, which was indeed occurring at the time.



Should this have been the case, the order certainly would not have come from Hillary Clinton. Testimony has been given asserting that agents of the later deposed Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi were participants in the B******i attack.

Obama himself bulldozed the way for Morsi and his Muslim Brotherhood thugs into Cairo. Obama and both Bill and Hillary Clinton have been extremely close with Morsi and the ‘Brotherhood for years – in the case of the Clintons, it’s been decades.

That’s likely one of the reasons Egyptian-born Huma Abedin, Hillary Clinton’s deputy chief of staff at the State Department and current campaign staffer, has been doing her share to stonewall the probe into the B******i massacre. http://instigatornews.com/hillary-clintons-girl-friday-huma-abedin-stonewalling-investigation-into-b******i/

Abedin comes from a good, solid Muslim Brotherhood family, and while her attorney insists that she’s been “searching her personal records,” she still hasn’t turned over documents that the House Select Committee on B******i claims could clarify questions about the origins of the bogus “anti-Islam YouTube video” memorandum the White House used to explain the motive for the attack.


Perhaps Abedin inadvertently saved her work files on Hillary’s email server



Last Friday, Tom Fitton, president of the watchdog group Judicial Watch, said that his organization’s independent investigation produced evidence that Hillary Clinton herself was instrumental in crafting the counterfeit B******i talking points, as opposed to simply reciting the false narrative.



None of this information, however, is reaching the v**ers Judge Napolitano referenced.

I am certainly not offering this to discredit the Judge’s estimation of this case in any way, but the titanic mound of damning evidence against the president, Ms. Clinton and scores of complicit White House appointees that is so familiar to WND readers and other astute citizens is wholly unknown to the vast majority of Americans who will cast v**es in 2016. Think about that.

Like the facts which should have rendered Barack Obama unelectable in 2008, this evidence could very well remain unknown to them, giving Ms. Clinton an excellent shot at the presidency.

In the current radically corrupted political climate, why wouldn’t we expect such a thing to occur?

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Ready for another ass kickin Doc?

Doc110 Loc: York PA

As usual boob, you have less eloquence and no substance of any political rebuttal's, except for your one-liner comments, and your stupidly one finger salute.

Can't get passed the adult coloring book's, or your Mad magazines this morning.

You have got to be the most boring, uneducated liberal OPP reader with your replies.

Go drink another Billy Bob beer and get soused then many your be able to hen-peck another one-liner.

An original one-liner that deserves an annoyance reply.

Okay boob.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Get ready Doc for 4 years of Hillary.

Doc110 Loc: York PA

I see you finished drinking a Billy Bob beer quota, are you swilled yet, in your liberal brain, enough brain power to henpeck your keyboard boob.

Your as predictable as sitting on the crapper every day, keep taking those brain cramping stool softeners of you're's, Might I suggest "Conservative-All-bran" to constipate your brain even more.

Then when your liberal progressive brain can think past a rare one-liner boob you can s**t something, substantive in a reply, boob.

But hey, wh**ever float's your turd brain.

Doc110 Loc: York PA

Hillary The Most Pathological Habitual Narcissistic Lying Major-Party Candidate Ever

http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/the-worst-major-party-candidate-ever/


If Richard Nixon had run for president after Watergate, he would have been a more credible candidate than Hillary Rodham Clinton is in 2016.

If Vice President Aaron Burr ran for president after shooting Alexander Hamilton, he would have had far fewer notches on his belt than Hillary does in 2016.

If Warren G. Harding had survived his first term and run for re-e******n in 1924, he would have seemed positively Lincolnesque compared to Hillary.


Yes, she is that bad.

Hard as it is to be a Republican today, if I were a Democrat, I would be seriously depressed.



On Jan. 26, 1992, America writ large first met Hillary Clinton.

Earlier that month, Arkansas state employee Gennifer – with a “G” – Flowers confessed to a tabloid that Bill Clinton had been dallying with her for some 12 years.

In a desperate attempt to save Bill’s candidacy for president, the Clintons agreed to be interviewed by Steve Kroft on CBS’ “60 Minutes.”

To his credit, Kroft forcefully stuck it to the Clintons.

In the not so distant past news people expected the t***h from public officials, even Democratic frontrunners for the presidency.

Starting with this interview, the Clintons would dramatically lower that expectation.

When Kroft asked Bill if he had an affair with Flowers, he answered, “That allegation is false.”

Hillary, her hands lovingly intertwined with Bill’s, nodded in affirmation.

“We reached out to them,” said Hillary of Bill’s accusers.

“I felt terrible about what was happening to them.”



Hillary had reason to feel terrible.

Her private investigators were, in the memorable words of one woman, threatening to break their “pretty little legs.”

Later in the “60 Minutes” interview, Bill swore, “I have absolutely leveled with the American people.”

He had done no such thing, and Kroft knew it.



The Clinton era was a turning point in the history of journalism.

Although liberals had been on a long march through America’s newsrooms for years, never before had they collectively championed a scoundrel, let alone two.

Throughout Clinton’s presidency, Bill and Hillary lied as necessary to protect the Clinton brand.



Appalled by Hillary’s performance in particular, the usually restrained William Safire famously designated her “a cong*****l liar” in a 1996 New York Times op-ed titled “Blizzard of Lies.”

In the piece, Safire made no reference to Clinton’s sexual misadventures.

He referred instead to Hillary’s commodity-trading scandal, her obstruction of justice in the aftermath of White House counsel Vince Foster’s death, her role in the Whitewater affair and her machinations in a grubby in-house scandal known as “Travelgate.”

In each case, wrote Safire, “She lied for good reason.”

Lying preserved Bill Clinton’s shot at re-e******n and spared Hillary a pants suit of prison orange.




Speaking of re-e******n, when Bill handed Hillary responsibility for health-care reform, she managed it so sneakily, illicitly and badly it cost the Democrats the House for the first time in 40 years.



After the 1994 e*******l implosion, it was Hillary who called in Dick Morris.

To fund Morris’ TV campaigns, Hillary helped orchestrate what Sen. Fred Thompson called “the most corrupt political campaign in modern history.”

According to the Thompson committee, “The president and his aides demeaned the offices of the president and vice president, took advantage of minority groups, pulled down all the barriers that would normally be in place to keep out illegal contributions, pressured policy makers, and left themselves open to strong suspicion that they were selling not only access to high-ranking officials, but policy as well.”



Concluded the committee, “Millions of dollars were raised in illegal contributions, much of it from foreign sources.”

Sound familiar?

Of course it does.

The Clintons would repeat the pattern with their foundations.



But it was sex that riveted the American people, and that scandal was the only scandal that really stuck – to Bill, but not to Hillary, the indispensable enabler of the predator-in-chief.



Six years and a day after she lied on “60 Minutes” to protect Bill’s candidacy, Hillary lied on the “Today” show to protect his presidency.


“There isn’t any fire,” she told Matt Lauer about the “smoke” surrounding her husband’s involvement with intern Monica Lewinsky.



Unlike Steve Kroft in 1992, Lauer did not challenge her.

He shifted his inquiry from the perjury and obstruction of justice charges facing the president to the unfairness of independent counsel Ken Starr’s “30 million dollar” investigation.



This was all the license Hillary needed to introduce a new and memorable sub-plot.


”The great story here,” she said ominously, “is this vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for president.”


The late Christopher Hitchens easily saw through the subterfuge.

Said he of the Clintons in his indispensable book, “No One Left to Lie To,” “Like him, she is not just a liar but a lie; a phony construct of shreds and patches and hysterical, self-pitying demagogic improvisations.”



The proudly left-of-center Hitchens took his title from a quote by Democrat David Schippers, the chief investigative counsel for the House Judiciary Committee.

Said Schippers for the ages: “The president, then, has lied under oath in a civil deposition, lied under oath in a criminal grand jury.

He lied to the people, he lied to his cabinet, he lied to his top aides, and now he’s lied under oath to the Congress of the United States.

"There’s no one left to lie to.”



That was 16 years ago.

Since then Democrats have created a brand new, rainbow f**g-flying generation of airheads, potheads and people who don’t speak English.


In short, there are people left to lie to.

They are better known as the Democratic base.

thats your gal Hillary a Pathological Habitual Narcissistic Lying Liberal

Doc110 Loc: York PA

Hey boob look at this quote from Clinton's own, James Carville. He makes sense boob, you should listen to a democrat for once.

James Carville Claims Democrats Clueless
http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/103846

Democrats say his rhetoric is the "Liberal Word,"
But Republicans have been claiming James Carville is nuts for years now.

Are they right or is what James Carville said right?

Her's is what he said:

“Ideologies aren't all that important. What's important is psychology.

The Democratic constituency is just like a herd of cows. All you have to do is lay out enough silage and they come running.

That's why I became an operative working with Democrats.

With Democrats all you have to do is make a lot of noise, lay out the hay, and be ready to use the ole cattle prod in case a few want to bolt the herd.

Eighty percent of the people who call themselves Democrats don't have a clue as to political reality.

What amazes me is that you could take a group of people who are hard workers and convince them that they should support social programs that were the exact opposite of their own personal convictions.

Put a little fear here and there and you can get people to v**e any way you want.

The Democrat v**er is basically dumb and lazy.

The reason I became a Democratic operative instead of a Republican was because there were more Democrats that didn't have a clue than there were Republicans.

T***h is relative.

T***h is what you can make the v**er believe is the t***h. If you're smart enough, t***h is what you make the v**er think it is.

That's why I'm a Democrat. I can make the Democratic v**ers think wh**ever I want them to.” ― James Carville

Boob their's some good advice coming from a good-old-boy Democrat.

Dumb as a box of rocks.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Hillary will kick ya ass too.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Doc110 Loc: York PA

The Democrat v**er is basically dumb and lazy.

The reason I became a Democratic operative instead of a Republican was because there were more Democrats that didn't have a clue than there were Republicans.

Doc110 Loc: York PA

Hillary will be in a 4 x 6 prison cell before she gets elected.

rico, rico, RICO, RICO, rico, rico, SING IT BOOB, RICO, Rico.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Ya got your ass kicked by "dumb and lazy" v**ers???

Doc110 Loc: York PA

7/16/15 PROOF Liberals are DONE With Hillary: MSNBC Reporters LAUGH AT
http://patriotupdate.com/2015/07/proof-liberals-are-done-with-hillary-msnbc-reporters-laugh-at-hillary-on-live-tv-video/

Robotic Hillary does not endear herself to anyone, not even the sycophant, liberal media.

Her arrogant behavior is so elitist, it is just a wonder to behold. And she evidently just doesn’t care how she is perceived.

She puts on that plastic, never-ending Cheshire grin and just keeps on walking.

Keeps on smiling. Never mind those pesky questions on Iran.

MSNBC is incredulous over her response, but shouldn’t be. Hillary feels she is above the press and the briefing was probably craptastic on Iran.

What can you say when all of America… all of the world… knows that your president has betrayed his own country, sided with her enemies and has all but ensured World War III?

You smile and walk is what you do and you keep your trap shut like a good little elitist politician. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/07/hah-msnbc-laughs-out-loud-at-hillary-clintons-bizarre-robotic-response-to-question-on-iran-deal-video/


From Gateway Pundit:

Even the folks at MSNBC are amused by Hillary Clinton’s odd robotic delivery and plastic smile.

The MSNBC hosts laughed out loud at Hillary’s bizarre response to a question by Kristen Welker on Iran.

MSNBC Host Thomas Roberts: Hah, hmf, Oh Kristen! Hah, hah, hah, hah, hah…

Kristen Welker: I got no answer…

Roberts: Yeah, just keep walking. Keep smiling.

Welker: Exactly. I got a similar response when I asked her if she actually supports the deal. I asked her that question several times.


Liberals are pretty much done with Hillary and have turned to Socialist Bernie Sanders. She’s a

detestable human being and always has been.

I’ve heard stories for years about her temper and how she treats those around her like dirt.

Why should she change now? She feels the presidency is owed to her.

That’s her reality.

And, by the way, one of her trademarks has always been to avoid the press. She doesn’t like them.

Ever since she hurt her head and went on her boozing across the globe tours, I have wondered if there is something wrong with the Hildebeast.

Perhaps her handlers are trying to cover it up.

Or maybe, Hillary really is a robot and she’s on some beach boozing somewhere.

No one would be able to tell the difference.