One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Chelsea's A-Learning Da Fambly Bid'nez
Jun 30, 2015 21:57:13   #
karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!
 
UMKC booked Chelsea for $65,000

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/a-college-balks-at-hillary-clintons-fee-so-books-chelsea-for-65000-instead/2015/06/29/b1918e42-1e78-11e5-84d5-eb37ee8eaa61_story.html

Check This Out:

When the University of Missouri at Kansas City was looking for a celebrity speaker to headline its gala luncheon marking the opening of a women’s hall of fame, one of the names that came to mind was Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Why The Hell HER ??....Anything ??

But when the former secretary of state’s representatives quoted a fee of $275,000, officials at the public university balked.
What ??...They Think She Works For CHARITY ??

So the school booked the next best option: her daughter, Chelsea.

The university paid $65,000 for Chelsea Clinton’s brief appearance Feb. 24, 2014, a demonstration of the celebrity appeal and marketability that the former and possibly second-time first daughter employs on behalf of her mother’s p**********l campaign and family’s global charitable empire.

More than 500 pages of e-mails, contracts and other internal documents obtained by The Washington Post from the university under Missouri public record laws detail the school’s long courtship of the Clintons
I Actually Can't Believe The WaPo Hunted This Story Down

As with Hillary Clinton’s paid speeches at universities, Chelsea Clinton made no personal income from the appearance, her spokesman said,
and directed her fee to the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation.
Of Course. Demanding Pay For Appearances And Awards Would Be.....tacky

Chelsea Was Chosen Over, And Paid More
Than The Less Qualified, And Less Expensive:


Journalists Cokie Roberts ($40,000), Tina Brown ($50,000) and Lesley Stahl ($50,000)

Reply
Jun 30, 2015 22:34:42   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
karpenter wrote:
UMKC booked Chelsea for $65,000

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/a-college-balks-at-hillary-clintons-fee-so-books-chelsea-for-65000-instead/2015/06/29/b1918e42-1e78-11e5-84d5-eb37ee8eaa61_story.html

Check This Out:

When the University of Missouri at Kansas City was looking for a celebrity speaker to headline its gala luncheon marking the opening of a women’s hall of fame, one of the names that came to mind was Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Why The Hell HER ??....Anything ??

But when the former secretary of state’s representatives quoted a fee of $275,000, officials at the public university balked.
What ??...They Think She Works For CHARITY ??

So the school booked the next best option: her daughter, Chelsea.

The university paid $65,000 for Chelsea Clinton’s brief appearance Feb. 24, 2014, a demonstration of the celebrity appeal and marketability that the former and possibly second-time first daughter employs on behalf of her mother’s p**********l campaign and family’s global charitable empire.

More than 500 pages of e-mails, contracts and other internal documents obtained by The Washington Post from the university under Missouri public record laws detail the school’s long courtship of the Clintons
I Actually Can't Believe The WaPo Hunted This Story Down

As with Hillary Clinton’s paid speeches at universities, Chelsea Clinton made no personal income from the appearance, her spokesman said,
and directed her fee to the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation.
Of Course. Demanding Pay For Appearances And Awards Would Be.....tacky

Chelsea Was Chosen Over, And Paid More
Than The Less Qualified, And Less Expensive:


Journalists Cokie Roberts ($40,000), Tina Brown ($50,000) and Lesley Stahl ($50,000)
UMKC booked Chelsea for $65,000 br br http://www.... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:



Reply
Jun 30, 2015 22:58:31   #
karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!
 
Chelsea Clinton: I tried to care about money but couldn't

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/chelsea-clinton-care-money-article-1.1840138

The daughter of former President Bill Clinton and ex-secretary of state Hillary Clinton explained in a recent interview why she left lucrative professions and opted for working with her family’s philanthropic foundation. ‘I was curious if I could care about (money) on some fundamental level, and I couldn’t,’ she said.

Gosh, These Clintons Are So Selfless...

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.