One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Mass Murders After Reb F**g and Guns Abolished
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Jun 20, 2015 15:17:01   #
UncleJesse Loc: Hazzard Co, GA
 
What will libs do when all the rebel f**gs are burned and all guns are rounded up and abolished but there are still males age 13-27 blowing up movie theaters, high schools, elementary schools and churches with IEDs?

Ban fertilizer or better yet, ban all matches?

Reply
Jun 20, 2015 15:18:46   #
Unclet Loc: Amarillo, Tx
 
UncleJesse wrote:
What will libs do when all the rebel f**gs are burned and all guns are rounded up and abolished but there are still males age 13-27 blowing up movie theaters, high schools, elementary schools and churches with IEDs?

Ban fertilizer or better yet, ban all matches?


Learn to speak Arabic and follow Sharia Law.

Reply
Jun 20, 2015 15:27:48   #
UncleJesse Loc: Hazzard Co, GA
 
Probably expand c*******t Cuba here to get rid of sharia followers hay day with no guns in USA.

Unclet wrote:
Learn to speak Arabic and follow Sharia Law.

Reply
 
 
Jun 20, 2015 15:30:58   #
Unclet Loc: Amarillo, Tx
 
UncleJesse wrote:
Probably expand c*******t Cuba here to get rid of sharia followers hay day with no guns in USA.


All things are possible. Probably not enough Cubans though.

Reply
Jun 20, 2015 15:41:31   #
W8_4_It
 
UncleJesse wrote:
What will libs do when all the rebel f**gs are burned and all guns are rounded up and abolished but there are still males age 13-27 blowing up movie theaters, high schools, elementary schools and churches with IEDs?

Ban fertilizer or better yet, ban all matches?


They will try to ban forks. Using liberal logic, forks are the reason people are fat.

Reply
Jun 20, 2015 15:55:55   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
W8_4_It wrote:
They will try to ban forks. Using liberal logic, forks are the reason people are fat.


You said liberal logic!! Heh! Heh! Heh!

If I can't have my guns, I will live the rest of my life in abject fear of Bigfoot!! Liberals are so cruel!!

Reply
Jun 20, 2015 16:06:43   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
UncleJesse wrote:
What will libs do when all the rebel f**gs are burned and all guns are rounded up and abolished but there are still males age 13-27 blowing up movie theaters, high schools, elementary schools and churches with IEDs?

Ban fertilizer or better yet, ban all matches?


Matches, though preferable for easy use, aren't required to start fires. There are many other methods that can be utilized.

Reply
 
 
Jun 20, 2015 16:52:35   #
Airforceone
 
UncleJesse wrote:
What will libs do when all the rebel f**gs are burned and all guns are rounded up and abolished but there are still males age 13-27 blowing up movie theaters, high schools, elementary schools and churches with IEDs?

Ban fertilizer or better yet, ban all matches?


Don't know of any liberal who is trying to take your guns. I know someday we will have some kind of gun registration, and background checks to keep guns out of the hands of mental patients, and convicted felons. But your BS of liberals wanting to take your gun is just BS. 90% Of the people in this country want some kind of gun control, but we have i***ts that post absolute garbage and flat out lies. Show me one bill that's takes your right to own a gun. It's just ignorant people who would make such a statement.

Reply
Jun 20, 2015 17:43:51   #
W8_4_It
 
tdsrnest wrote:
90% Of the people in this country want some kind of gun control, but we have i***ts that post absolute garbage and flat out lies. Show me one bill that's takes your right to own a gun. It's just ignorant people who would make such a statement.


As for people posting flat out lies, that would be YOU.

Obama already tried to outlaw specific rifles already. Not regulate, but OUTLAW. He got slapped on that.

Obama came after the ammo for that rifle and got slapped again.

There are already areas where the law abiding citizens cannot get a permit to carry a gun. Recent court cases showed that was unconstitutional.

You guys never let up. Neither do we. We will slap down every gun grab you make. The people and the constitution are against it.

Reply
Jun 20, 2015 18:00:45   #
reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.
 
PoppaGringo wrote:
Matches, though preferable for easy use, aren't required to start fires. There are many other methods that can be utilized.


If libs rubbed two brain cells together reeeel fast, would there be smoke? just asking

Reply
Jun 20, 2015 18:33:53   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
reconreb wrote:
If libs rubbed two brain cells together reeeel fast, would there be smoke? just asking


A very slight wisp. Drifting out of the bong.

Reply
 
 
Jun 20, 2015 22:21:26   #
Airforceone
 
W8_4_It wrote:
As for people posting flat out lies, that would be YOU.

Obama already tried to outlaw specific rifles already. Not regulate, but OUTLAW. He got slapped on that.

Obama came after the ammo for that rifle and got slapped again.

There are already areas where the law abiding citizens cannot get a permit to carry a gun. Recent court cases showed that was unconstitutional.

You guys never let up. Neither do we. We will slap down every gun grab you make. The people and the constitution are against it.
As for people posting flat out lies, that would be... (show quote)


He tried to outlaw Assult rifles and rifles for military use you i***t.

Reply
Jun 20, 2015 22:26:53   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
UncleJesse wrote:
What will libs do when all the rebel f**gs are burned and all guns are rounded up and abolished but there are still males age 13-27 blowing up movie theaters, high schools, elementary schools and churches with IEDs?

Ban fertilizer or better yet, ban all matches?


Just write a law banning h**e and another law requiring all criminals to obey the other laws. Apparently, we still think criminals have a sense of honor and, if enough laws are written, the sheer number will require them to obey.

Perhaps, we might try actually punishing criminals, harshly and see if that works. The more lenient we've become, the more criminals repeat crimes they've already been found guilty of at least once before.

Think about it; when a child is raped, the first place cops look - is at people who have already raped a child. The same thing occurs for most other crimes too. What if there were no possibility for a second crime? Who would the cops look at then?

Perhaps, if an automatic death penalty, without appeal, was standard for violent crimes - there'd be fewer of those. Perhaps, if an automatic life without parole were standard, for child sex crimes and adult rape - there'd be fewer of those too.

Until we make up our minds to PUNISH those who commit crimes and PREVENT them from committing additional crimes - everything else is just rhetoric - and useless.

Reply
Jun 20, 2015 22:35:35   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
lpnmajor wrote:
Just write a law banning h**e and another law requiring all criminals to obey the other laws. Apparently, we still think criminals have a sense of honor and, if enough laws are written, the sheer number will require them to obey.

Perhaps, we might try actually punishing criminals, harshly and see if that works. The more lenient we've become, the more criminals repeat crimes they've already been found guilty of at least once before.

Think about it; when a child is raped, the first place cops look - is at people who have already raped a child. The same thing occurs for most other crimes too. What if there were no possibility for a second crime? Who would the cops look at then?

Perhaps, if an automatic death penalty, without appeal, was standard for violent crimes - there'd be fewer of those. Perhaps, if an automatic life without parole were standard, for child sex crimes and adult rape - there'd be fewer of those too.

Until we make up our minds to PUNISH those who commit crimes and PREVENT them from committing additional crimes - everything else is just rhetoric - and useless.
Just write a law banning h**e and another law requ... (show quote)


I agree with you all the way on this one!!
Everyone should have their day in court. If found guilty, punishment should be swift, and harsh!!

Reply
Jun 20, 2015 23:29:06   #
W8_4_It
 
tdsrnest wrote:
He tried to outlaw Assualt rifles and rifles for military use you i***t.


First of all you can't even spell Assault correctly, you nincompoop.

Assault rifles and assault weapons are often confused by libtards.

You are the i***t. There is no such thing as an 'Assault weapon" which is what Obama tried to outlaw. It's a term made up by hoplophobic, libtard, gun grabbers such as yourself for a "scary looking" rifle.

There is such a thing as an assault rifle. It's a machine gun. It fires full auto. They are already severely restricted. Obama did not try to ban them, they are already banned.

Obama tried to ban semi automatic hunting and sporting rifles (one of them was the most popular rifle in the US- an AR 15). All the things he tried to ban were semi automatic rifles many people use for hunting.

Rifles for military use? The military does not use AR 15's Dumbass. The military does not use any of the rifles Herr Obama tried to ban.

Why is it that people such as yourself, who are the most ignorant concerning firearms, always have the most to say about gun control?

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.