How about this, Boys and Girls?
Jun 12, 2015 20:29:00 #
I have known of the reason for Sanger's advocacy of a******n for a long time, but this puts it in perspective for today's world.
It is said that this is a misquote, that Sanger did not say it or that it was out of context. It does not much matter as any reading of Sanger's work reveals her feeling that the poorer classes should be culled through the eugenics movement.
It is said that this is a misquote, that Sanger did not say it or that it was out of context. It does not much matter as any reading of Sanger's work reveals her feeling that the poorer classes should be culled through the eugenics movement.
Jun 12, 2015 20:45:58 #
Ox wrote:
=====================================I have known of the reason for Sanger's advocacy of a******n for a long time, but this puts it in perspective for today's world.
And Margaret Sanger is the founder of...say it with me kids....PLANNED PARENTHOOD. A most beloved program of the Left. But hey, at least they get their a******ns and contraception for free!!! And, after all, what's more important than free?
Too bad b****s are devoid of diversity of political thought. If they actually thought for themselves for once, they'd realize that the political factions that they support are the very ones that wish to control and eradicate them.
Paradoxical, don't ya think?
Jun 12, 2015 21:48:52 #
Bad Bob
Loc: Virginia
Ox wrote:
I have known of the reason for Sanger's advocacy of a******n for a long time, but this puts it in perspective for today's world.
It is said that this is a misquote, that Sanger did not say it or that it was out of context. It does not much matter as any reading of Sanger's work reveals her feeling that the poorer classes should be culled through the eugenics movement.
It is said that this is a misquote, that Sanger did not say it or that it was out of context. It does not much matter as any reading of Sanger's work reveals her feeling that the poorer classes should be culled through the eugenics movement.
Planned Parenthood :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Jun 12, 2015 21:53:05 #
Olden McGroen wrote:
===================================== br br And M... (show quote)
The right wing wants to get rid of all Black people. The right wing bans a******n and birth control in every state that they control. Paradoxical isn't it?
Jun 12, 2015 22:02:30 #
moldyoldy wrote:
The right wing wants to get rid of all Black people. The right wing bans a******n and birth control in every state that they control. Paradoxical isn't it?
Banning a******n would save untold thousands of black babies each year.
Jun 12, 2015 22:14:47 #
Ox wrote:
I have known of the reason for Sanger's advocacy of a******n for a long time, but this puts it in perspective for today's world.
It is said that this is a misquote, that Sanger did not say it or that it was out of context. It does not much matter as any reading of Sanger's work reveals her feeling that the poorer classes should be culled through the eugenics movement.
It is said that this is a misquote, that Sanger did not say it or that it was out of context. It does not much matter as any reading of Sanger's work reveals her feeling that the poorer classes should be culled through the eugenics movement.
This is a decades old propaganda piece regurgitated time after time by the people who want to deprive women of the right to make choices about their health. Not a bad plan as lies and propaganda go's as it is designed to drive a wedge between people by race which is a second goal of the nut job right. But a lie is a lie and the folks who pass on old lies are either fools or liars neither of which helps their credibility when on the rare occasion that have something worthwhile to post.
Jun 12, 2015 22:25:38 #
moldyoldy wrote:
I***t!The right wing wants to get rid of all Black people. The right wing bans a******n and birth control in every state that they control. Paradoxical isn't it?
Black Genocide
Jun 12, 2015 22:35:28 #
Bad Bob
Loc: Virginia
Kevyn wrote:
This is a decades old propaganda piece regurgitated time after time by the people who want to deprive women of the right to make choices about their health. Not a bad plan as lies and propaganda go's as it is designed to drive a wedge between people by race which is a second goal of the nut job right. But a lie is a lie and the folks who pass on old lies are either fools or liars neither of which helps their credibility when on the rare occasion that have something worthwhile to post.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Jun 12, 2015 22:41:34 #
Kevyn wrote:
So, you think that pregnancy is a health threat. OK, sometimes it is, BUT health concerns account for only 12% of a******ns. This is a decades old propaganda piece regurgitated time after time by the people who want to deprive women of the right to make choices about their health. Not a bad plan as lies and propaganda go's as it is designed to drive a wedge between people by race which is a second goal of the nut job right. But a lie is a lie and the folks who pass on old lies are either fools or liars neither of which helps their credibility when on the rare occasion that have something worthwhile to post.
85% of women who undergo a******ns are single mothers, their reasons for aborting are almost always economic--either because having a baby would interfere with work, school or other responsibilities or they cannot afford a child. About 1% abort due to rape.
Jun 12, 2015 22:48:54 #
Bad Bob
Loc: Virginia
Blade_Runner wrote:
So, you think that pregnancy is a health threat. OK, sometimes it is, BUT health concerns account for only 12% of a******ns.
85% of women who undergo a******ns are single mothers, their reasons for aborting are almost always economic--either because having a baby would interfere with work, school or other responsibilities or they cannot afford a child. About 1% abort due to rape.
85% of women who undergo a******ns are single mothers, their reasons for aborting are almost always economic--either because having a baby would interfere with work, school or other responsibilities or they cannot afford a child. About 1% abort due to rape.
Hey Blade, why are the lifers so opposed to birth control if it reduces a******n?
Jun 13, 2015 00:09:45 #
Bad Bob wrote:
Don't have a clue where that comes from. Most of the major polls show that as many as 89% of Pro-life advocates have no problem with contraception. Preventing a pregnancy isn't the same as terminating one. Using a condom or taking pills doesn't k**l a baby.Hey Blade, why are the lifers so opposed to birth control if it reduces a******n?
Making sh!t up again, hey booby?
Jun 13, 2015 00:19:00 #
Blade_Runner wrote:
Don't have a clue where that comes from. Most of the major polls show that as many as 89% of Pro-life advocates have no problem with contraception. Preventing a pregnancy isn't the same as terminating one. Using a condom or taking pills doesn't k**l a baby.
Making sh!t up again, hey booby?
Making sh!t up again, hey booby?
The GOP politicians are using every trick in the book to block contraceptives, not only here but all over the world.
Jun 13, 2015 00:21:21 #
Bad Bob wrote:
Hey Blade, why are the lifers so opposed to birth control if it reduces a******n?
Only the Catholics are opposed to birth control. Others are against having to pay for it for those too cheap to pay for it themselves.
Jun 13, 2015 00:44:27 #
PoppaGringo wrote:
Only the Catholics are opposed to birth control. Others are against having to pay for it for those too cheap to pay for it themselves.
Senate Republicans have blocked a bill aimed at restoring free contraception for women who get their health insurance from companies that object on religious grounds.
The v**e on Wednesday was 56-43 to move ahead on the measure, short of the 60 v**es necessary to proceed.
Democrats sponsored the e******n-year bill to reverse last month's Supreme Court ruling that closely held businesses with religious objections could deny coverage under President Barack Obama's health care law.
Jun 13, 2015 01:21:22 #
moldyoldy wrote:
Senate Republicans have blocked a bill aimed at restoring free contraception for women who get their health insurance from companies that object on religious grounds.
The v**e on Wednesday was 56-43 to move ahead on the measure, short of the 60 v**es necessary to proceed.
Democrats sponsored the e******n-year bill to reverse last month's Supreme Court ruling that closely held businesses with religious objections could deny coverage under President Barack Obama's health care law.
The v**e on Wednesday was 56-43 to move ahead on the measure, short of the 60 v**es necessary to proceed.
Democrats sponsored the e******n-year bill to reverse last month's Supreme Court ruling that closely held businesses with religious objections could deny coverage under President Barack Obama's health care law.
Why should companies with a religious objection have to pay for contraceptives?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.