oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

I guess Rasmussen must have called mostly some Republican people last night. They have Obama at 45% approval and that is the first time in months this has been that low. My favorite result is his -20 when you consider those who approve fully and those who disapprove the same way. He has never been much below -20 although some as low as -22 or -24 have showed up in the years before the scandals started being talked about.


http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/political_updates/daily_p**********l_tracking_poll

bahmer

When Rasmussen takes it's poll and finds that OIllegal is at 45% approval do they clarify that by saying that the 45% is the black caucus coupled with the demoncrats combined. I think if they went outside of the demoncrat party they might find that the approval rate is significantly lower like maybe 0-5%. Most all of the rest of us can't stand the *** and would like to see him in a different position and I won't elaborate on the position.

RETW Loc: Washington

:x :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

BoJester

It must be galling to conservaturds when they see that President Obama is still popular despite the phony scandals tha conservaturd/teaabags like the fools at faux and fat limburg constantly whine about. The president is more popular than shrub bush was at this point in the second term.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Do you know quite a bit about how Rasmussen conducts their polls? I wonder because they don't get lists of liberal and conservative and go. They just go to certain areas for each poll and just ask questions. Maybe the weakest part of their method could be that they make their calls after 5 pm so most people are home from work when they call. I surely think they get screwed around more these days because there are so many unemployed sitting around with so little to do and the manage to get them in their random calling. I think that most of their polling takes place in urban areas since I have only been approached by them one time and that one was on a******n. From my answers they may have put my name on a no call list.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

I am sure that you as one of those libtards (a name I have never called anyone but you earned it) will never know about the numbers Rasmussen has had for Obama since e******n day in 2012. They have had him between 47% and more during most of that period.

Hey, libturd (who earned the name) can you tell me what Stink Prog and MM are saying about people these days. I know you never hear anything from Fox News or Limbaugh because you want to remain uniformed at e******n time, but surely you can tell us some of their words from Stink Prog or HuffPo. Maybe you could share with some words of wit from Daily Kos.

Comment Loc: California

Bojangles; Please stop the name calling just because you are opposed to another ideology. Why can't u socialist Democratic C*******t debate the issues with out all the side bars. Is it that you cannot refute the facts so you attack the messenger. I equate you with a loyalist who wanted to shoot Paul Revere before he shouted , "the British are coming." Shoot the messenger because you can not dispel the facts the messenger brings. Is it, also, true that Socialist Democrats soon to be C*******ts, if conservatives don't stop them in their tracts, have no new ideas. They are just following the C*******T MANIFESTO of a 160 yrs ago?

bahmer

I have never really checked as to there methodology as to where and how but now that you bring it up I have never been contacted by any poling group. Mostly I supposed that the reason being is that I live in fly over country and no one from Washington or any place else gives two cents about us as we are just tax revenue to them. I know that you can go to different places in urban areas and by choosing your area that alone can sway your answers in one direction or the other. I know for a fact that if I did my survey in Chicago, New York, Washington DC, St.Louis, New Orleans or any large metropolis you could pretty much determine that the survey will favor demoncrats at a much higher rate than out here in the burgs. Out here we tend to respect people more and try to retain our freedoms from the government as much as possible, while in the large cities is where most of all the freebees go. It is the large cities in this country that are destroying our country not the burgs. Out here we still believe in a hard days work for a days pay and if a neighbor is down on his luck we pick him up and help him get back on his feet. A mans word is still his bond and in most cases we get married to each other because we love and respect each other and we stay married a good long time also. we are the ones against the q***r lifestyle because we still believe in Gods laws and we are still smart enough to know that you can't make a chicken from two roosters and I don't care how hard you try it ain't gonna work. So I guess I can some it up this way you can take your Rasmussen Poll and all of your other polls as well and shove them where the sun don't shine I know the people I live around and there good God fearing people and just by talking to them I don't need no poll to tell you this countries going to hell in a handbasket and going down quick if we don't stop all these freebees and give away's for doing nothing there won't be nothing left.

Comment Loc: California

So entertaining my fiend. Your right, of course. Let me share with you my thoughts about polls. Your talking about where you live relative to the coasts which are predominately Democratic. The pollsters never tell us in which state the poll was taken , nor in which metro area or, if rural areas were sampled. This info is vital in order to have any type of meaningful interpretation of the results. Without this data any poll is meaningless. It's just a spot check of a liberal area or a conservative area, or of neither. They could say, "we sampled Kansas, or Missouri. We sampled 500 Democrats and Republicans and 500 independents or others. To my recollection, which ant much, haven't seen this info supplied with any pole taken

Dave Loc: Upstate New York

So Bush is the barometer you'd like to use, and the scandals are all phoney? Did Obama lie when he commented, for example, on the IRS scandal? Did Holder lie to Congress when he said he never even heard of a reporter being named on a warrant, or is the AG lieing not a scandal - unless he's not a liberal?

BoJester

So conservaturds don't like name calling? Yet you use the term c*******t/socialist like you actually know what you are talking about. Conservaturds are noted for name calling, just listen to fat limburg or hanuty or the savage weiner, any day of the week. Just another of the many reasons why bobby jindal refers to conservatrds/teabags as the party of the stupid. Thanks so much for proving it.

Comment Loc: California

Bojangles, you are so full of s**t that a prick in your shin would draw millions of flies to blow your ass to hell.

bahmer

Me thinks dear Bill that you have touched a raw nerve in the dear boy. It appears that he has no concept of socialism, c*******m, progressive, liberal, or Marxist that it is not name calling, it is defining what a particular persons political beliefs are. His spelling is very immature as he can't spell conservative very well. I am proud of my conservative belief and mindset and I would think that if that is their persuasion that they would also be proud to be called any of the above. This is a free country and they can believe as they wish but why do they get so upset when you make mention of their political persuasion i wonder.

BoJester

The only real scandals are the conservaturd/teabag obstructionists who listen to fat limburg and the fools at faux, who tell one digusting lie after another. Obviouly this site is filled with the un-informed and mis-informed who watch and listen the aforementioned i***ts and rightwing nuts.
The rest of the scandals exist omly in the tiny, little r****ded brains of conservaturds and teabags, and they hope something will get traction, but so far, not so much.

Comment Loc: California

And bahmer I want you in my fox hold.. I recommend bahmer for president! Yeah! Perhaps, he has such an aversion to conservative thought that it cannot be t***smitted to his fingers to t***smit to his keyboard. U know! His fingers refuse to do what his brain commands. Says a lot about his biological make up. And what comes out of it. I agree that debate on an issue is warranted and enjoyed but not the side bars that socialist desire. Have you noticed that Jay carney derails every question that reflects the Democrats in a negative light? Universally, as a group the Democrats use the same tactic to avoid the difficult questions posed by conservatives.