One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Liberals Finally Admit that Media Matters Exists to "Misinform," "Misdirect" and "Obfuscate"!
May 27, 2015 03:19:11   #
Danielle Loc: Las Cruces, NM
 
Quick and interesting tidbit I picked up from Freedom Outpost on April 26:
http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/04/liberals-finally-admit-that-media-matt...

"The folks at Media Matters have long been a thorn in the sides of conservatives everywhere. For years the liberal media has pretended that Media Matters was some kind of objective media watchdog or think tank -- when the t***h was far seedier. Media Matters has always existed to spin, spin, spin, liberal failures into victories and conservative comments into scandals. And they've done their job fairly well.

"So it's nice when Media Matters steps into a trap of their own making. They recently chose to enter the Clinton scandalpalooza fray by defending the Clintons from accusations of corruption, bribery and criminality. The only problem is that these accusations didn't come from conservative sources like Fox News, Drudge or Breitbart ... they came from the New York Times and respected journalists like Peter Schweizer, Jo Becker and Mike McIntire. So when Media Matters went on the assault to defend the Clintons, the liberal media responded incredulously and finally unmasked Media Matters for what they truly are -- partisan Hacks who Lie to Cover for Democrat failures.

["Watch as Media Matters Gets Dismantled"]

"Alex Wagner: Jeremy, there's also the question of Bill Clinton, independent of whether the Secretary was doing anything that favored Clinton Foundation donors. There are the actions and the speeches and the money taken by Bill Clinton personally. The Washington Post reports that Bill Clinton was paid $26 million in speech fees by companies and organizations that were also major donors. You know, what happens to Bill Clinton's activities going forward? And I guess I wonder what you think happens to CGI (Clinton Global Initiative) between now and November, 2016?

"Jeremy Peters: The Clinton campaign is certainly already taken some steps to try to get ahead of public relations problems like that, for example, Hillary resigned from the board. I think they're going to have to be more t***sparent about the speaking fees because those questions are just going to keep on piling up.

"What I wonder is if the Clinton message machine ever decides to kind of recalibrate and dial it back a little bit. Because right now, and this isn't all coming from the Clinton camp itself but from the orbit around them where you have these people whose main goal is to misdirect and obfuscate every time there's the slightest bit of criticism about the Clintons' leadership.

"Alex Wagner: Well, in their mind they're not misinforming and obfuscating, they're 'clarifying.'

"Joshua Green: I don't think that's true at all Alex. They know what they are doing.

"Jeremy Peters: Exactly. They are definitely misdirecting here. I mean, this is what Media Matters exists to do."

(End of article)

My, how refreshing. Now, if we could just get Soros and c*******t monetary backing out of the liberal mainstream media, we might get a bit more of the t***h. (But, all in all, I guess that's just asking for too much of the t***h.)

Reply
May 27, 2015 07:30:50   #
Mom8052 Loc: Lost in the mountains of New Mexico
 
Danielle wrote:
Quick and interesting tidbit I picked up from Freedom Outpost on April 26:
http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/04/liberals-finally-admit-that-media-matt...

"The folks at Media Matters have long been a thorn in the sides of conservatives everywhere. For years the liberal media has pretended that Media Matters was some kind of objective media watchdog or think tank -- when the t***h was far seedier. Media Matters has always existed to spin, spin, spin, liberal failures into victories and conservative comments into scandals. And they've done their job fairly well.

"So it's nice when Media Matters steps into a trap of their own making. They recently chose to enter the Clinton scandalpalooza fray by defending the Clintons from accusations of corruption, bribery and criminality. The only problem is that these accusations didn't come from conservative sources like Fox News, Drudge or Breitbart ... they came from the New York Times and respected journalists like Peter Schweizer, Jo Becker and Mike McIntire. So when Media Matters went on the assault to defend the Clintons, the liberal media responded incredulously and finally unmasked Media Matters for what they truly are -- partisan Hacks who Lie to Cover for Democrat failures.

["Watch as Media Matters Gets Dismantled"]

"Alex Wagner: Jeremy, there's also the question of Bill Clinton, independent of whether the Secretary was doing anything that favored Clinton Foundation donors. There are the actions and the speeches and the money taken by Bill Clinton personally. The Washington Post reports that Bill Clinton was paid $26 million in speech fees by companies and organizations that were also major donors. You know, what happens to Bill Clinton's activities going forward? And I guess I wonder what you think happens to CGI (Clinton Global Initiative) between now and November, 2016?

"Jeremy Peters: The Clinton campaign is certainly already taken some steps to try to get ahead of public relations problems like that, for example, Hillary resigned from the board. I think they're going to have to be more t***sparent about the speaking fees because those questions are just going to keep on piling up.

"What I wonder is if the Clinton message machine ever decides to kind of recalibrate and dial it back a little bit. Because right now, and this isn't all coming from the Clinton camp itself but from the orbit around them where you have these people whose main goal is to misdirect and obfuscate every time there's the slightest bit of criticism about the Clintons' leadership.

"Alex Wagner: Well, in their mind they're not misinforming and obfuscating, they're 'clarifying.'

"Joshua Green: I don't think that's true at all Alex. They know what they are doing.

"Jeremy Peters: Exactly. They are definitely misdirecting here. I mean, this is what Media Matters exists to do."

(End of article)

My, how refreshing. Now, if we could just get Soros and c*******t monetary backing out of the liberal mainstream media, we might get a bit more of the t***h. (But, all in all, I guess that's just asking for too much of the t***h.)
Quick and interesting tidbit I picked up from Free... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
May 27, 2015 07:30:58   #
Mom8052 Loc: Lost in the mountains of New Mexico
 
Danielle wrote:
Quick and interesting tidbit I picked up from Freedom Outpost on April 26:
http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/04/liberals-finally-admit-that-media-matt...

"The folks at Media Matters have long been a thorn in the sides of conservatives everywhere. For years the liberal media has pretended that Media Matters was some kind of objective media watchdog or think tank -- when the t***h was far seedier. Media Matters has always existed to spin, spin, spin, liberal failures into victories and conservative comments into scandals. And they've done their job fairly well.

"So it's nice when Media Matters steps into a trap of their own making. They recently chose to enter the Clinton scandalpalooza fray by defending the Clintons from accusations of corruption, bribery and criminality. The only problem is that these accusations didn't come from conservative sources like Fox News, Drudge or Breitbart ... they came from the New York Times and respected journalists like Peter Schweizer, Jo Becker and Mike McIntire. So when Media Matters went on the assault to defend the Clintons, the liberal media responded incredulously and finally unmasked Media Matters for what they truly are -- partisan Hacks who Lie to Cover for Democrat failures.

["Watch as Media Matters Gets Dismantled"]

"Alex Wagner: Jeremy, there's also the question of Bill Clinton, independent of whether the Secretary was doing anything that favored Clinton Foundation donors. There are the actions and the speeches and the money taken by Bill Clinton personally. The Washington Post reports that Bill Clinton was paid $26 million in speech fees by companies and organizations that were also major donors. You know, what happens to Bill Clinton's activities going forward? And I guess I wonder what you think happens to CGI (Clinton Global Initiative) between now and November, 2016?

"Jeremy Peters: The Clinton campaign is certainly already taken some steps to try to get ahead of public relations problems like that, for example, Hillary resigned from the board. I think they're going to have to be more t***sparent about the speaking fees because those questions are just going to keep on piling up.

"What I wonder is if the Clinton message machine ever decides to kind of recalibrate and dial it back a little bit. Because right now, and this isn't all coming from the Clinton camp itself but from the orbit around them where you have these people whose main goal is to misdirect and obfuscate every time there's the slightest bit of criticism about the Clintons' leadership.

"Alex Wagner: Well, in their mind they're not misinforming and obfuscating, they're 'clarifying.'

"Joshua Green: I don't think that's true at all Alex. They know what they are doing.

"Jeremy Peters: Exactly. They are definitely misdirecting here. I mean, this is what Media Matters exists to do."

(End of article)

My, how refreshing. Now, if we could just get Soros and c*******t monetary backing out of the liberal mainstream media, we might get a bit more of the t***h. (But, all in all, I guess that's just asking for too much of the t***h.)
Quick and interesting tidbit I picked up from Free... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Jun 1, 2015 04:32:15   #
Danielle Loc: Las Cruces, NM
 
Mom8052 wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:


Hi, Mom8052, Sorry to be so long getting back to you. Dad is now, at age 94, in passing. Sadly, he became ceptic about a month ago from bacteria in his blood and he almost died overnight. He's still h*****g in there, but it's a day to day, minute to minute thing now.

Today, he wanted to go outside for a little ride in the wheelchair and he seemed to enjoy it. I thank God that he has excellent care. I put him back in his room at the assisted living where the caretakers are God's little angels, and Hospice is providing support, as well. I didn't want to throw him in a nursing home and put in life support such as ventilators or stomach tubes. And, again, I thank God that I didn't.

I go every day to see him, pray with him, sing to him, talk about old memories from my childhood, and old memories of America when America was America. My sister came down from Idaho for a couple of days last week and we got all of the family in touch with him by phone.

He's still very coherent, but this particular infection was just too much for him at his age. This is a very difficult time for me, but it's all in God's hands. One day he seems so much stronger; the next nobody knows if he'll make it to the next day. Thankfully, too, Dad knows the Lord and he's a very wonderful Christian man.

Still working, too, as much as I can, so I'm a little worn out now. OPP is kind of an escape for me -- it takes my mind off of things right now, but I can't always get back to all of the posts unto pronto.

Hope you are doing well. And God bless you. Always enjoy touching base with you.

Reply
Jun 2, 2015 09:48:02   #
Mom8052 Loc: Lost in the mountains of New Mexico
 
Danielle wrote:
Hi, Mom8052, Sorry to be so long getting back to you. Dad is now, at age 94, in passing. Sadly, he became ceptic about a month ago from bacteria in his blood and he almost died overnight. He's still h*****g in there, but it's a day to day, minute to minute thing now.

Today, he wanted to go outside for a little ride in the wheelchair and he seemed to enjoy it. I thank God that he has excellent care. I put him back in his room at the assisted living where the caretakers are God's little angels, and Hospice is providing support, as well. I didn't want to throw him in a nursing home and put in life support such as ventilators or stomach tubes. And, again, I thank God that I didn't.

I go every day to see him, pray with him, sing to him, talk about old memories from my childhood, and old memories of America when America was America. My sister came down from Idaho for a couple of days last week and we got all of the family in touch with him by phone.

He's still very coherent, but this particular infection was just too much for him at his age. This is a very difficult time for me, but it's all in God's hands. One day he seems so much stronger; the next nobody knows if he'll make it to the next day. Thankfully, too, Dad knows the Lord and he's a very wonderful Christian man.

Still working, too, as much as I can, so I'm a little worn out now. OPP is kind of an escape for me -- it takes my mind off of things right now, but I can't always get back to all of the posts unto pronto.

Hope you are doing well. And God bless you. Always enjoy touching base with you.
Hi, Mom8052, Sorry to be so long getting back to ... (show quote)

******************************
My prayers go out to you and your family, I have been there and know what you are going through. Enjoy your father as long as you can, as things can happen so quick......at a blink of an eye. It was that way with Aunt Dee and my father. Again, my prayers are with you. May God shower you with love.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.