Yankee Clipper

This should open some eyes. The shame I see is that I believe the vast majority of all races in this nation would like to live together in piece. The soul exception is of course Muslims, they have no desire to get along with anyone not even each other in many cases.


http://conservativetribune.com/black-violence-infographic/

Loki Loc: Georgia

I believe the actual figure is about 73% non-Hispanic white, according to the last census. This would alter the numbers somewhat, but not substantively.

pappadeux Loc: Phoenix AZ

So what does that have to do with "black Violence" in America? We would not have "Black Violence" had we as a new nation not allowed s***ery. More so since we proclaimed freedom for all in 1776. For that one lie and mistake we are paying dearly for.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

BS. There has been black violence in almost every country they are in. When they are the majority or minority. Using s***ery 200 years later is a bogus excuse.

Loki Loc: Georgia

There was s***ery in Africa for a thousand years before the first white European ever set foot there.
Europeans did not ens***e Africans. Almost every single s***e who arrived in what became the US was ALREADY a s***e, made so by other b****s. This was an accepted practice, a result of the constant internecine tribal warfare that went on in sub-Saharan Africa.
White Europeans bought s***es from black Africans, and t***sported them to this country, where they were bought once more. S***ery, at the time, was an accepted practice all over the entire world, not just in the US. It was practiced, worldwide, in every country at one time or another.
You are probably unaware that from 1400 AD to 1800 AD, nearly 1.25 million white Europeans were kidnapped and ens***ed by Muslims, many of whom were black, and at the time of the American civil war, there were several hundred thousand white s***es in Africa and the middle East.
You claim there would be no black violence if there had been no s***ery. Canada has never had s***ery, yet b****s in Canada commit about half the violent crime, in a country where they represent barely 3% of the population. This is how they repay Canadian generosity in giving sanctuary to escaped s***es. Their descendents murder their liberators.
S***ery was abolished in the US in 1865. It was abolished officially in Africa, (although it is still practiced unofficially ), in I believe it was 2005. So b****s commit violence all out of proportion to their numbers because of something that ended 150 years ago?
You might be interested to know that the very first officially recognized s***e owner in North America was a black man who owned another black man outright, and whose ownership was recognized by the courts of what was then the colony of Virginia.
The 1830 US census listed 1,276 b****s as s***e owners. About half "owned" one or two family members to protect them. The other half bought and sold their black brothers and sisters just like white s***e owners did. There were a number of black s***e owners who owned more than 50 s***es, and a few who owned more than 100.
By the way,my source for this information is MSNBC. I doubt you could call them "right wing."

pappadeux Loc: Phoenix AZ

Not an excuse but reality. Had we not had s***ery 200 years ago we would not have this so called black problem today, simply because the s***e ships would not would have never gotten here in the first place. I don't like the f ...ers anymore than you.only about 10% have the ability to think and morally discern right from wrong. There are exceptions such Dr. Ben Carson. Herman Cain, and unfortunately so few others. If we only had more good ones and less of the entitlement and free stuff ones this whole argument would be seen in a different light. Look at Detr**t,Chicago, Cleveland, etc, etc, etc... all run by b****s.
,

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

I see your point. What you are saying is they would have never been here in these numbers to begin with.

Yankee Clipper

Yankee Clipper