no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

Anti-Christian Bigot and Bully c
In Newsweek, $1 magazine gets Savage’s 2 cents on ‘future of sex.’
Published: 5/19/2015 2:31 PM ET
Subscribe to Andrew Miller
By Andrew Miller

You have to wonder if there’s anything Dan Savage could do that would cost him the love of the media elites. His being a nasty bigot hasn’t kept ABC from developing a prime time sitcom based on his life, and now Newsweek thinks readers would benefit from Savage’s thoughts on the state of sex in America.

Lauded by the magazine as “the mouthpiece of modern sex,” the gay activist and sleazy sex columnist focused many of his answers on consent and respect. “We should be kind and considerate and compassionate and forthright and honest. What matters is consent, joy and consideration for one another,” he says.

That’s kind of funny coming from a guy who declared his desire to have violent, h**e sex with p**********l candidates Rick Santorum and Michele Bachmann in 2011. Either consent is a recently developed concept for Savage, or he loses interest in it when faced with opposition.

Yet in the interview, Savage claims, “We have to figure out how to channel [sex] – how to incorporate it into our lives in a healthy way, in a way that makes us feel fulfilled, and that doesn’t destroy us or our partners.” It’s hard to imagine a scenario where h**e sex would fulfill any of these criteria. Savage seems to be only interested in these when they suit his own interests.

Back in 2012, some high school students walked out of an anti-bullying speech given by Savage that had turned into an attack on Christianity and traditional values. He proceeded to call these students ‘pansy-assed’ for their unwillingness to listen to his diatribe. So much for “kind and considerate.”

Savage showed more of that trademark consideration when Pope Benedict retired, headlining his column: “That Motherfucking Power-Hungry, Self-Aggrandized Bigot In the Stupid Fucking Hat Announces His Retirement.”

Later in the article and in continuity with his previous approval of fringe sexual acts like incest and BDSM, Savage describes robotic sex toys as a promising development in the future. “There are people out there who’ve always had giantess fetishes or centaur fetishes. There are no centaurs or 30-foot women out there right now. There will be.”

A bright future indeed, if we’re to believe Newsweek’s sexpert.

Ricktloml

These people worship having a reprobate mind. Everything that is d*****t, base and vile is what is appealing.

Academic Conference Seeks to Normalize P********a

Baltimore Md., August 16, 2011-Researchers from several prominent U.S. Universities will participate tomorrow in a Baltimore conference reportedly aiming to normalize p********a. According yo the sponsoring organization's website, the event will examine ways in which "minor-attracted persons" can be involved in a revision of the American Psychological Association (APA) classification of p********a.
B4U-Act, a group of pro-p*******e activists and mental health professionals, is behind the August 17 conference, which will; include panelists from Harvard University, the John Hopkins University, the University of Louisville, and the University of Illinois.
B4U-Act science director Howard Kline has criticized the definition of p********a by the APA, describing it's treatment of "minor attracted persons" as "inaccurate" and "misleading".
"It is based on data from prison studies, which completely ignore the existence of those who are law abiding", Kline said in a July 25 press release. "The proposed new diagnostic criteria specify ages and frequencies with no scientific basis whatsoever."
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) should meet a higher standard than that," he added "We can help them because we are the people they are writing about."
On their website B4U-Act classifies p********a as simply another sexual orientation and decries the "stigma" attached to p********a observing: No one chooses to be sexually attracted to children or adolescents. The cause is unknown; in fact, the development of attraction to adults is not understood." The group says that it does not advocate treatment to change feelings of attraction to children or adolescents.
n their press release B4U-ct announced a letter the group has sent to the APA criticizing it's classification of p********a as a mental illness.
In an interview with Life Site News (LSN), Liberty University Professor of Law Judith Reisman, an expert on sexual ethics and pornography, criticized the Baltimore conference, saying, "This has been on the agenda for decades."
"I first met up with what I had come to call "The Academic P*******e Lobby" in 1977 at the British Psychological Society Conference on Love and Attraction, Swansea, Wales," she said. "I delivered a research paper on child pornography in Playboy in 1954-1977." Other conference academicians, some hired by pornographers, presented 'scientific' papers advocating the legalization of child pornography, prostitution and an end to age of consent." she said. "They promoted their 'scientific' claims for early childhood sexuality to lawmakers and fellow academicians via both legitimate and pornographic media."
"The DSM is typical of this degeneracy since they already had highlighted the diagnosis of p********a as to make it almost meaningless, requiring that the p*******e be 'bothered' by his or her abuse of children and so on." Reisman said "we now have women and children sexually violating children as well as men. This will continue to spiral down into, well, we'd have to say the abyss of hell, unless we retrieve our laws, our mass media and our schools."
As previously reported by LSN, similar lobbying then by homosexual activists led to declassification of homosexuality as a mental disorder in 1973 in the DSM. As a result of the DSM declassification, debate regarding homosexuality and the many documented harms associated with the homosexual lifestyle has all been shut down in academic psychological circles.


Highlights of the Baltimore Conference

* P*******es are "unfairly stigmatized and demonized" by society.
* There was concern about "vice-laden diagnostic criteria" and "cultural baggage of wrongfulness"
* "We are not required to interfere with or inhibit our child's sexuality"
* "Children are not inherently unable to consent to sex with an adult"
* "In Western culture sex id taken too seriously"
* "Anglo-American standards on age of consent is new [Puritanical]. In Europe it was always set at 10 or 12. Ages of consent beyond that are relatively new and very strange, especially for boys. They've always been able to have sex at any age."
* An adult's desire to have sex with children is "normative"
* Our society should "maximize individual liberty. ...We have a highly moralistic that is not consistent with liberty." *"Assuming children are unable to consent lends itself to criminalization and stigmatization."
* "These things are not black and white; there are various shades of grey."
* A consensus belief by both speakers and p*******es in attendance was that, because it vilifies MAPs, p********a should be removed from the APA's DSM, in the same manner homosexuality was removed in 1973.
* Dr. Fred Berlin acknowledged that it was political activism, similar to that witnessed at the conference, rather than scientific considerations that successfully led to the declassification of homosexuality as a mental disorder. The reason "homosexuality was taken out of the DSM is that people didn't want the government in the bedroom." he said.
* Dr Berlin appeared to endorse the politically maligned clinical practice of "reparative therapy" for homosexuals and p*******es alike, saying "If someone for their own reasons, doesn't want to live a homosexual lifestyle, I tell them that it is hard, but I'll try yo help them."
* The DSM ignores that p*******es "have feelings of love and romance for children" in the same way adult heterosexuals and homosexuals have romantic feelings for one another.
* "The majority of p*******es are gentle and rational"
* The DSM should "focus on the needs" of the p*******e, and should have "a minimal ficus in social control," rather than obsessing about the "need to protect children."
* Self described "gay activist" and speaker Jacob Breslow said that children can properly be "the object of our attraction." He further objectified children, suggesting that p*******es needn't gain consent from a child to have sex with "it" any more than we need consent from a shoe to wear it. He then used graphic language to favorably describe the act of climaxing (ejaculating) "on or with" a child. No one in attendance objected to this explicit depiction of child sexual assault

no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

Thank you for posting this information. Kinsey did much of the "research" during WWII and attempted to normalize sexual attraction to children. With the help of p*******es and pederasts (of which he was one) he collected the data that strengthened the movement toward "normalizing" homosexuality and also, by claiming boys in particular were born sexually receptive, validated the movement toward legalizing sex with children. Much of the NAMBLA literature says that both the L***Q movement and the "man- boy love" movement should be forever grateful to Kinsey. It has been in the works for some time to legalize intergenerational sexual activity, using EXACTLY the same arguments that the L***Q movement has used to convince people that same sex behavior is honorable healthy and even to claim that it is holy or God would not have made people same sex attracted. Of course there is no evidence that anyone is born same sex attracted, or opposite sex attracted either, for that matter. Of course, now NAMBLA and the L***Q movements are separate and, it is claimed, not connected even though they have the same language and the same heroes and examples. While the percentage of men who are homosexual and attracted to young teens is apparently about 5% (at least of those who act upon their desires) and the percentage of men who have sex with young girls is about one half of one percent, you can be assured that unless the claims are that there are no homosexuals who are attracted to children or young teenagers the L***Q activists will protest anyone comparing the figures. Keep in mind that the culture that the L***Q members use to validate their desire to normalize the attraction are really cultures that primarily validate man-boy sex. Even those on OPP who say they find sex with boys abhorrent are among the ones who say the age of consent should be lowered to ten, because at that age boys are capable of making informed adult decisions as to who they will have sex with.