A q***rs quandary in c*******t Russia: In Russia it is now illegal to even speak about homosexuality around minors, much less openly display gay p***e. Technically the ban is against...

TheCracker

In Russia it is now illegal to even speak about homosexuality around minors, much less openly display gay p***e.

Technically the ban is against "propaganda of nontraditional sexual relations" around minors, but the implication for openly gay individuals is clear. Public displays of affection by gays, including holding hands or displaying symbols like a rainbow f**g, are now banned. Violators face steep fines and jail time; foreigners face similar penalties plus deportation.

Will CNN send Anderson Cooper to officiate their coverage?

What is a good C*******t loving f*got to do?

Ps. Forget the normal pronunciation of "Russia" in America. It is properly pronounced "Russ'ei'ah" by Russ'ei'ans.... Go figure.

CrazyHorse Loc: Kansas

TheC*****r wrote:

In Russia it is now illegal to even speak about ho... (show quote)

Quid Pro Quo, TheC*****r: I guess a-dog and his master, CHE maybe? who knows, who ever it is need to stay out of Russia, you think.

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

CrazyHorse wrote:

Quid Pro Quo, TheC*****r: I guess a-dog and his master, CHE maybe? who knows, who ever it is need to stay out of Russia, you think.

The picture is very confusing for me. My perception is these two individuals are of the same g****r proclivities. Why would you put a picture such as that over the the statements underneath the picture. Feel free to laugh at Aunti. My spouse and progeny both laugh at my inability to understand such things. In fact, they basically avoid, like the plague, explaining such new social genre type pictures.

Loki Loc: Georgia

AuntiE wrote:

The picture is very confusing for me. My perception is these two individuals are of the same g****r proclivities. Why would you put a picture such as that over the the statements underneath the picture. Feel free to laugh at Aunti. My spouse and progeny both laugh at my inability to understand such things. In fact, they basically avoid, like the plague, explaining such new social genre type pictures.

My own view is that what two consenting adults do in private is none of my business, whether or not I approve is not a consideration. I do have a problem with children being raised by gay couples of either g****r, simply because the kids will more than likley face a hard time so their "parents" can prove a point. There is a type of "in your face" gay that I cannot stand. If I mind my business, why do they not mind theirs?

hprinze Loc: Central Florida

banjojack wrote:

My own view is that what two consenting adults do in private is none of my business, whether or not I approve is not a consideration. I do have a problem with children being raised by gay couples of either g****r, simply because the kids will more than likley face a hard time so their "parents" can prove a point. There is a type of "in your face" gay that I cannot stand. If I mind my business, why do they not mind theirs?

hprinze Loc: Central Florida

banjojack wrote:

My own view is that what two consenting adults do in private is none of my business, whether or not I approve is not a consideration. I do have a problem with children being raised by gay couples of either g****r, simply because the kids will more than likley face a hard time so their "parents" can prove a point. There is a type of "in your face" gay that I cannot stand. If I mind my business, why do they not mind theirs?

Allowing q***rs to control kids is child abuse

Loki Loc: Georgia

hprinze wrote:

Allowing q***rs to control kids is child abuse

I believe you are correct. I will grant that the abuse may not be intentional, but it still exists.

CrazyHorse Loc: Kansas

AuntiE wrote:

The picture is very confusing for me. My perception is these two individuals are of the same g****r proclivities. Why would you put a picture such as that over the the statements underneath the picture. Feel free to laugh at Aunti. My spouse and progeny both laugh at my inability to understand such things. In fact, they basically avoid, like the plague, explaining such new social genre type pictures.

Quid Pro Quo, AuntiE: The reason you are confused is that I didn't do anything to put the picture over the confederate f**g. I just copied the picture as it was posted on the a-dog post. The title they, or he, or it, or whoever, had put on the picture was: "rednecks sux", so I guess they were giving the finger to conservatives. I don't know for sure you understand, I never tried to figure out sick stick bundles.

mohadib

TheC*****r wrote:

In Russia it is now illegal to even speak about ho... (show quote)

Creaker your rabid homophobia leads me to believe that you have been spending too much time in the mens room at the airport.

CrazyHorse Loc: Kansas

Quid Pro Quo, TheC*****r: "Will CNN send Anderson Cooper to officiate their coverage?"

The rumor is MSNBC is going to send Rachel Madcow to start an interse wahine fight with Anderson Cooper. I let you figure out which one, or both, is a wahine.

mohadib

CrazyHorse wrote:

Quid Pro Quo, TheC*****r: "Will CNN send Anderson Cooper to officiate their coverage?"

The rumor is MSNBC is going to send Rachel Madcow to start an interse wahine fight with Anderson Cooper. I let you figure out which one, or both, is a wahine.

I'll bet on Maddow, Anderson is a Nancy-Boy.

Maddow is a Hardy Boy.