One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
DIFFICULT CHOICES FOR 2016 E******N
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
May 7, 2015 08:11:06   #
ANTISTATIST Loc: Toledo
 
DIFFICULT CHOICES FOR 2016 E******N


No doubt with so many well qualified choices for Republican candidates for the 2016 e******n, this seems like
an insurmountable task for those of us on the right. However, the Democrats may have the more arduous undertaking
but maybe not. Their choice may be most easily summed up by the question:

ARE TWO BOOBS BETTER THAN ONE?

For those on the left the choice is simple because it is not a matter of competence, sk**l or fitness for the job
but a mere matter of numbers.

Two is better than one.

Two terrorists are better than one conservative.

Two alien, jobless democrat v**ers dependent on the government
is better than one hard working, tax paying citizen.

Two c*******t dictators are better than any one Republican congressman.

Two islamof*****t regimes are better than one solid democratic ally in the middle east.

So... Maybe the for the Democrats this will not be a difficult as it seems given the predisposition to prefer boobs.
With all the boobs on the v**er roles, even the f**e ones and the media overrun
with liberal boobs of every kind, all the country has to do is determine that:

TWO BOOBS IN THE OVAL OFFICE IS BETTER
THAN THE ONE THAT NOW OCCUPIES IT!!!

BRUCE, THE ANTISTATIST

Reply
May 7, 2015 08:13:00   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
What a great mixture of reality and humor. Thank you.
ANTISTATIST wrote:
DIFFICULT CHOICES FOR 2016 E******N


No doubt with so many well qualified choices for Republican candidates for the 2016 e******n, this seems like
an insurmountable task for those of us on the right. However, the Democrats may have the more arduous undertaking
but maybe not. Their choice may be most easily summed up by the question:

ARE TWO BOOBS BETTER THAN ONE?

For those on the left the choice is simple because it is not a matter of competence, sk**l or fitness for the job
but a mere matter of numbers.

Two is better than one.

Two terrorists are better than one conservative.

Two alien, jobless democrat v**ers dependent on the government
is better than one hard working, tax paying citizen.

Two c*******t dictators are better than any one Republican congressman.

Two islamof*****t regimes are better than one solid democratic ally in the middle east.

So... Maybe the for the Democrats this will not be a difficult as it seems given the predisposition to prefer boobs.
With all the boobs on the v**er roles, even the f**e ones and the media overrun
with liberal boobs of every kind, all the country has to do is determine that:

TWO BOOBS IN THE OVAL OFFICE IS BETTER
THAN THE ONE THAT NOW OCCUPIES IT!!!

BRUCE, THE ANTISTATIST
DIFFICULT CHOICES FOR 2016 E******N br br br No ... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
May 7, 2015 08:29:39   #
jaydee
 
ANTISTATIST wrote:
DIFFICULT CHOICES FOR 2016 E******N


No doubt with so many well qualified choices for Republican candidates for the 2016 e******n, this seems like
an insurmountable task for those of us on the right. However, the Democrats may have the more arduous undertaking
but maybe not. Their choice may be most easily summed up by the question:

ARE TWO BOOBS BETTER THAN ONE?

For those on the left the choice is simple because it is not a matter of competence, sk**l or fitness for the job
but a mere matter of numbers.

Two is better than one.

Two terrorists are better than one conservative.

Two alien, jobless democrat v**ers dependent on the government
is better than one hard working, tax paying citizen.

Two c*******t dictators are better than any one Republican congressman.

Two islamof*****t regimes are better than one solid democratic ally in the middle east.

So... Maybe the for the Democrats this will not be a difficult as it seems given the predisposition to prefer boobs.
With all the boobs on the v**er roles, even the f**e ones and the media overrun
with liberal boobs of every kind, all the country has to do is determine that:

TWO BOOBS IN THE OVAL OFFICE IS BETTER
THAN THE ONE THAT NOW OCCUPIES IT!!!

BRUCE, THE ANTISTATIST
DIFFICULT CHOICES FOR 2016 E******N br br br No ... (show quote)




More than likely, there won't be an e******n.
I pray I'm wrong. Martial law is rising up. If Pres Porky can pull it off, there won't be an e******n.

Good day.

Reply
 
 
May 7, 2015 08:35:29   #
karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!
 
Well, There Is Always That Distant Possibility

I Was Going To Point Out
The Wide And Varied Democrat Field Of Contenders

Reply
May 7, 2015 09:10:14   #
Bruce Kennedy Loc: Kansas
 
More "Loonacy", from the "Right, as expected.

Reply
May 7, 2015 09:14:44   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
Now that is an in-depth commentary on political candidates. How did you get so much time to explain your point of view? BTW, Loonacy.... did you mean lunacy?
Bruce Kennedy wrote:
More "Loonacy", from the "Right, as expected.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Reply
May 7, 2015 10:33:51   #
Jerry A. Loc: California
 
ANTISTATIST wrote:
DIFFICULT CHOICES FOR 2016 E******N


No doubt with so many well qualified choices for Republican candidates for the 2016 e******n, this seems like
an insurmountable task for those of us on the right. However, the Democrats may have the more arduous undertaking
but maybe not. Their choice may be most easily summed up by the question:

ARE TWO BOOBS BETTER THAN ONE?

For those on the left the choice is simple because it is not a matter of competence, sk**l or fitness for the job
but a mere matter of numbers.

Two is better than one.

Two terrorists are better than one conservative.

Two alien, jobless democrat v**ers dependent on the government
is better than one hard working, tax paying citizen.

Two c*******t dictators are better than any one Republican congressman.

Two islamof*****t regimes are better than one solid democratic ally in the middle east.

So... Maybe the for the Democrats this will not be a difficult as it seems given the predisposition to prefer boobs.
With all the boobs on the v**er roles, even the f**e ones and the media overrun
with liberal boobs of every kind, all the country has to do is determine that:

TWO BOOBS IN THE OVAL OFFICE IS BETTER
THAN THE ONE THAT NOW OCCUPIES IT!!!

BRUCE, THE ANTISTATIST
DIFFICULT CHOICES FOR 2016 E******N br br br No ... (show quote)


Mr. BRUCE: You are right, we had many Republican Presidents before very competent, intelligent, and sk**l for the job like Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Bush Sr. and the best was Bush Jr., for that reason we had the economic catastrophe now, and everything is made in CHINA.

Reply
 
 
May 7, 2015 10:39:32   #
Bruce Kennedy Loc: Kansas
 
Jerry A. wrote:
Mr. BRUCE: You are right, we had many Republican Presidents before very competent, intelligent, and sk**l for the job like Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Bush Sr. and the best was Bush Jr., for that reason we had the economic catastrophe now, and everything is made in CHINA.


I liked Ford, Regan and Bush Sr....Nixon and Bush Jr., not so much. Really the only Republican President, in my lifetime, that I truly admired was Eisenhower.

Reply
May 7, 2015 11:04:53   #
Jerry A. Loc: California
 
Bruce Kennedy wrote:
I liked Ford, Regan and Bush Sr....Nixon and Bush Jr., not so much. Really the only Republican President, in my lifetime, that I truly admired was Eisenhower.


Mr. Kennedy: I agree with you Gral. Eisenhower was better, the U.S. economy was better, the cost of living was lower, everything was made in U.S.A. the Federal deficit was very low after WW-II, and the U.S. dollars was guaranteed by GOLD or SILVER, later the U.S. Congress removed the U.S. dollars from the GOLD standard and President Nixon signed into law, that was the beginning of the end printing daily f**e U.S. dollars paper to pay for the Federal deficit, and everything now is made in CHINA.

Reply
May 7, 2015 11:22:12   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Jerry A. wrote:
Mr. Kennedy: I agree with you Gral. Eisenhower was better, the U.S. economy was better, the cost of living was lower, everything was made in U.S.A. the Federal deficit was very low after WW-II, and the U.S. dollars was guaranteed by GOLD or SILVER, later the U.S. Congress removed the U.S. dollars from the GOLD standard and President Nixon signed into law, that was the beginning of the end printing daily f**e U.S. dollars paper to pay for the Federal deficit, and everything now is made in CHINA.
Mr. Kennedy: I agree with you Gral. Eisenhower was... (show quote)


Nixon made that move unilaterally under the direction of the illegal unConstitutional, privately owned federal reserve. Congress had nothing to do with it.

The illegal, unConstitutional, privately owned federal reserve could then and still does print unlimited money charged at interest when borrowed by the government and guarantee inflation. Under the gold standard, a government is limited – both legally and practically – as to how much paper money it can print.

Dimwits and repulsives are just the left and right arm of the corporate party. The sheople are only given the illusion of choice when v****g. Corporations care not which arm of the corporate party the sheople elect for POTUS as long as they get to call the shots.

If v****g really made a difference it would be illegal.

Reply
May 7, 2015 11:26:57   #
CDM Loc: Florida
 
karpenter wrote:
Well, There Is Always That Distant Possibility

I Was Going To Point Out
The Wide And Varied Democrat Field Of Contenders


It's important to understand that Democrats don't v**e for people, ideas or right and wrong; Democrats are a hive; they v**e for Democrats, period.

As such they only need one participant; so long as it has Democrat burned across it's forehead. That it's a vile, evil narcissistic sociopath matters not...it's Democrat. They all v**e as prescribed for them.

Conservatives on the other hand are at a huge disadvantage. We are pressed to independent thought and analysis...the decision making process weighs heavily on us...One of the downsides of American individuality I suppose...

Reply
 
 
May 7, 2015 11:47:14   #
hprinze Loc: Central Florida
 
ANTISTATIST wrote:
DIFFICULT CHOICES FOR 2016 E******N


No doubt with so many well qualified choices for Republican candidates for the 2016 e******n, this seems like
an insurmountable task for those of us on the right. However, the Democrats may have the more arduous undertaking
but maybe not. Their choice may be most easily summed up by the question:

ARE TWO BOOBS BETTER THAN ONE?

For those on the left the choice is simple because it is not a matter of competence, sk**l or fitness for the job
but a mere matter of numbers.

Two is better than one.

Two terrorists are better than one conservative.

Two alien, jobless democrat v**ers dependent on the government
is better than one hard working, tax paying citizen.

Two c*******t dictators are better than any one Republican congressman.

Two islamof*****t regimes are better than one solid democratic ally in the middle east.

So... Maybe the for the Democrats this will not be a difficult as it seems given the predisposition to prefer boobs.
With all the boobs on the v**er roles, even the f**e ones and the media overrun
with liberal boobs of every kind, all the country has to do is determine that:

TWO BOOBS IN THE OVAL OFFICE IS BETTER
THAN THE ONE THAT NOW OCCUPIES IT!!!

BRUCE, THE ANTISTATIST
DIFFICULT CHOICES FOR 2016 E******N br br br No ... (show quote)


===============================

If the repub candidates follow their 2012 style, they will attack and smear one another all through the primaries, giving the dems plenty of ammo for the general e******n campaign

Reply
May 7, 2015 12:58:04   #
CDM Loc: Florida
 
Bruce Kennedy wrote:
More "Loonacy", from the "Right, as expected.


Absolutely well said and thoughtful. I can't understand what's wrong with these rightists. I think they simply never take time to look at the facts like we do...For example;

According to the Library of Congress, for the period January 1931 to January 2015 Socialist Democrats have held majority and/or supermajority control of congress and the presidency for 67 of those years. That's about 78% of the total time, rounded off. For 40 of those years the president was Democrat with majority Democrat House and Senate (quasi super majority).

And just look at what we have done in that time and with that dominance...

Our education system ranks about 15th in the developed world.

Higher education debt is now past $1 trillion...while colleges and universities raise tuitions and other costs linearly with available government funding (again, taxpayers should be happy) anyones son or daughter can get a degree in say, ' 500 B.C. Cave Drawings of the Mikkenmoo Tribe of Central Brazil ' opening the door to a $300 thousand management job right out of school.

Our national infrastructure cost are finally under control...we don't allow frivolous spending on things like roads and bridges...We have managed this tightly for over 40 years.

Our welfare system now encompasses more than one-third of our population, and growing. More people than ever are getting exactly what they have coming to them.

Our entire government is unionized and in a position to hold these uppity tax payers feet to the fire for a 'living wage' and lifetime benefits. Just because the taxpayer does not get these benefits is no reason to punish our government workers. This was of course accomplished by Democrat presidents looking out for the people..Huge wins for us...

We have installed the largest tax in the history of man in the guise of free health care...And we were right; the Supreme Court said so...so there.

We are very close to implementing the ultimate tax under the guise of c*****e c****e; taxation of such magnitude that even we cannot estimate it's total value. That it will brings pain and misery to the people is unquestionable; well, that's the price of saving the planet.

We print $60-75 billion/month (just shy of a trillion dollars annually) in 'Quantitative Easing' and give it to the central bank who in turn give it to the lower banks who in turn loan it to rich people on Wall Street. At the same time we have managed the interest returns the average man can make on his savings to under 2%. This is a great system for a) getting a lot of that new money to flow back to our cause and b) buy v**es. A strategy the right will never understand.

We have finally pissed all over these stupid Israelis (can I get a Praise Allah?); about time. And we have finally told our so called allies that they are on their own and most significantly we have reached out to the Muslim World. We are very close to peace in the middle east; something the right could never accomplish.

We are ending the argument about the right of a sovereign country like Iran to have nuclear weapons if they want them. Who are we to dictate what they do? And this will of course bring all the other middle eastern countries into the nuclear world when they develop their own weapons. Balance means peace...again, a concept beyond the neanderthal right...

We have stopped all this wasteful spending on the military. We have gutted the military -industrial complex. We have removed all the experience from the senior ranks of the military and replaced them with people who think as we do. We are the only ones who understand that you don't need an army when you have full command of diplomatic options. We have John Kerry...(or 'Pickle Man' as Theresa affectionately refers to him).

The land of the free and home of the brave is now open to all people...something righties don't understand. We are opening the doors to them to come in their millions...never mind silly laws made by paranoid white people 200 years ago. Just get those future vot...oops...citizens in here and get them on the dol....oops again, and feed and educate them. What are taxes for after all? Its the 'right' thing to do...

We have established racial understanding...

Of course we could go on and on with these examples of progress we, the Democrat Party, have made single handedly when we have control. What could we do if we could just get these stupid, pesky righties out of the way once and for all?

Go Hilary...lets finish the job.

Reply
May 7, 2015 13:54:53   #
Jerry A. Loc: California
 
ANTISTATIST wrote:
DIFFICULT CHOICES FOR 2016 E******N


No doubt with so many well qualified choices for Republican candidates for the 2016 e******n, this seems like
an insurmountable task for those of us on the right. However, the Democrats may have the more arduous undertaking
but maybe not. Their choice may be most easily summed up by the question:

ARE TWO BOOBS BETTER THAN ONE?

For those on the left the choice is simple because it is not a matter of competence, sk**l or fitness for the job
but a mere matter of numbers.

Two is better than one.

Two terrorists are better than one conservative.

Two alien, jobless democrat v**ers dependent on the government
is better than one hard working, tax paying citizen.

Two c*******t dictators are better than any one Republican congressman.

Two islamof*****t regimes are better than one solid democratic ally in the middle east.

So... Maybe the for the Democrats this will not be a difficult as it seems given the predisposition to prefer boobs.
With all the boobs on the v**er roles, even the f**e ones and the media overrun
with liberal boobs of every kind, all the country has to do is determine that:

TWO BOOBS IN THE OVAL OFFICE IS BETTER
THAN THE ONE THAT NOW OCCUPIES IT!!!

BRUCE, THE ANTISTATIST
DIFFICULT CHOICES FOR 2016 E******N br br br No ... (show quote)


I am sorry, none of the 19 Republicans running for President in 2016, will be elected because they represent the special interest only who pay for their campaign. The majority american people are poor, unemployed, underemployed and are sick and tired of politicians representing the Corporations and the special interest to hurt the poor and feed the rich only.

Reply
May 7, 2015 15:34:38   #
irondoor827
 
Pennylynn wrote:
What a great mixture of reality and humor. Thank you.

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:


You know - President Obama is the best friend for the (99%) of us ............better than all US Presidents ;

Reply
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.