One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
As Immigration Rises, US Wages Drop
Page 1 of 2 next>
May 3, 2015 09:13:02   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
1. As Immigration Rises, US Wages Drop

Wages for the overwhelming majority of Americans have fallen below 1970s levels as the percentage of the population that is foreign-born has surged.

A memo from the Congressional Research Service (CRS), released in response to a request for data from the Senate Judiciary Committee, shows on the other hand that in the decades prior to 1970, when the percentage of foreign-born Americans dropped, wages for most Americans rose.

From 1945 to 1970, the foreign-born population in the United States decreased from 10.97 million to 9.74 million, a decline of 11.2 percent.

During that 25-year period, the reported income of the bottom 90 percent of tax filers rose from an average of $18,418, in 2013 dollars, to $33,621 in 1970, an increase of 82.5 percent.

The share of total income held by the bottom 90 percent also rose during this period, from 67.4 percent to 68.5 percent.

The CRS also disclosed that from 1970 through 2013, the foreign-born population in the U.S. increased from 9.74 million to 41.34 million, a rise of an astounding 324.5 percent.

During that period, the income of the bottom 90 percent of tax filers fell from an average of $33,621 in 1970 to $30,980 in 2013, and the share of income they held sank from 68.5 percent to 53 percent, a decline of 15.5 percentage points over this 43-year period.

The CRS report "questions claims that native Americans are economically helped by greater immigration," The Washington Examiner observed in an article about the report.

"The report could throw cold water on congressional efforts to expand immigration for tech and other jobs. One bill, sponsored by Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch and backed by p**********l candidate Marco Rubio, would boost guest worker levels and remove any cap on green cards for certain foreign graduates of American colleges and universities."

The U.S. each year already admits a million immigrants, half a million immigrant students, 700,000 guest workers, and 70,000 refugees and persons seeking political asylum.

The CRS report follows an analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) estimating that in the next eight years, the foreign-born population will reach a record high of 51 million.

Another CIS analysis disclosed that since 2000 all net employment growth among working-age adults went to immigrants, while the number of U.S-born adults not working rose by 17 million.

In an op-ed piece for The New York Times last year, Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest, wrote: "It defies reason to argue that the record admission of new foreign workers has no negative effect on the wages of American workers, including the wages of past immigrants hoping to climb into the middle class.

"Why would many of the largest business groups in the United States spend millions lobbying for the admission of more foreign workers if such policies did not cut labor costs?"

Reply
May 3, 2015 09:24:44   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
no propaganda please wrote:
1. As Immigration Rises, US Wages Drop

Wages for the overwhelming majority of Americans have fallen below 1970s levels as the percentage of the population that is foreign-born has surged.

A memo from the Congressional Research Service (CRS), released in response to a request for data from the Senate Judiciary Committee, shows on the other hand that in the decades prior to 1970, when the percentage of foreign-born Americans dropped, wages for most Americans rose.

From 1945 to 1970, the foreign-born population in the United States decreased from 10.97 million to 9.74 million, a decline of 11.2 percent.

During that 25-year period, the reported income of the bottom 90 percent of tax filers rose from an average of $18,418, in 2013 dollars, to $33,621 in 1970, an increase of 82.5 percent.

The share of total income held by the bottom 90 percent also rose during this period, from 67.4 percent to 68.5 percent.

The CRS also disclosed that from 1970 through 2013, the foreign-born population in the U.S. increased from 9.74 million to 41.34 million, a rise of an astounding 324.5 percent.

During that period, the income of the bottom 90 percent of tax filers fell from an average of $33,621 in 1970 to $30,980 in 2013, and the share of income they held sank from 68.5 percent to 53 percent, a decline of 15.5 percentage points over this 43-year period.

The CRS report "questions claims that native Americans are economically helped by greater immigration," The Washington Examiner observed in an article about the report.

"The report could throw cold water on congressional efforts to expand immigration for tech and other jobs. One bill, sponsored by Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch and backed by p**********l candidate Marco Rubio, would boost guest worker levels and remove any cap on green cards for certain foreign graduates of American colleges and universities."

The U.S. each year already admits a million immigrants, half a million immigrant students, 700,000 guest workers, and 70,000 refugees and persons seeking political asylum.

The CRS report follows an analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) estimating that in the next eight years, the foreign-born population will reach a record high of 51 million.

Another CIS analysis disclosed that since 2000 all net employment growth among working-age adults went to immigrants, while the number of U.S-born adults not working rose by 17 million.

In an op-ed piece for The New York Times last year, Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest, wrote: "It defies reason to argue that the record admission of new foreign workers has no negative effect on the wages of American workers, including the wages of past immigrants hoping to climb into the middle class.

"Why would many of the largest business groups in the United States spend millions lobbying for the admission of more foreign workers if such policies did not cut labor costs?"
1. As Immigration Rises, US Wages Drop br br Wage... (show quote)


Yep, Obama is systematically destroying this great nation, one executive order at a time. With a gutless GOP leadership, I don't see this country recovering anytime soon, or ever.

Reply
May 3, 2015 09:36:06   #
son of witless
 
no propaganda please wrote:
1. As Immigration Rises, US Wages Drop

Wages for the overwhelming majority of Americans have fallen below 1970s levels as the percentage of the population that is foreign-born has surged.

A memo from the Congressional Research Service (CRS), released in response to a request for data from the Senate Judiciary Committee, shows on the other hand that in the decades prior to 1970, when the percentage of foreign-born Americans dropped, wages for most Americans rose.

From 1945 to 1970, the foreign-born population in the United States decreased from 10.97 million to 9.74 million, a decline of 11.2 percent.

During that 25-year period, the reported income of the bottom 90 percent of tax filers rose from an average of $18,418, in 2013 dollars, to $33,621 in 1970, an increase of 82.5 percent.

The share of total income held by the bottom 90 percent also rose during this period, from 67.4 percent to 68.5 percent.

The CRS also disclosed that from 1970 through 2013, the foreign-born population in the U.S. increased from 9.74 million to 41.34 million, a rise of an astounding 324.5 percent.

During that period, the income of the bottom 90 percent of tax filers fell from an average of $33,621 in 1970 to $30,980 in 2013, and the share of income they held sank from 68.5 percent to 53 percent, a decline of 15.5 percentage points over this 43-year period.

The CRS report "questions claims that native Americans are economically helped by greater immigration," The Washington Examiner observed in an article about the report.

"The report could throw cold water on congressional efforts to expand immigration for tech and other jobs. One bill, sponsored by Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch and backed by p**********l candidate Marco Rubio, would boost guest worker levels and remove any cap on green cards for certain foreign graduates of American colleges and universities."

The U.S. each year already admits a million immigrants, half a million immigrant students, 700,000 guest workers, and 70,000 refugees and persons seeking political asylum.

The CRS report follows an analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) estimating that in the next eight years, the foreign-born population will reach a record high of 51 million.

Another CIS analysis disclosed that since 2000 all net employment growth among working-age adults went to immigrants, while the number of U.S-born adults not working rose by 17 million.

In an op-ed piece for The New York Times last year, Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest, wrote: "It defies reason to argue that the record admission of new foreign workers has no negative effect on the wages of American workers, including the wages of past immigrants hoping to climb into the middle class.

"Why would many of the largest business groups in the United States spend millions lobbying for the admission of more foreign workers if such policies did not cut labor costs?"
1. As Immigration Rises, US Wages Drop br br Wage... (show quote)


If we want to use the expansive logic of our liberal friends we can honestly say that i*****l i*********n caused the Baltimore r**ts. Kinda the way G****l W*****g causes everything from prostitution to famine to Hurricanes.

The liberals say that one of the root causes of the Baltimore r**ts is lack of opportunity and lack of jobs for minority youth in Baltimore. Okay lets us go with that. When you have millions and millions and millions and millions of i******s pouring into America, just whom are they competing with for jobs? Gee I don't know.

Are they competing with rich white liberals for Wall Street money? Not likely. Are they competing in the sk**led trades with w****s for middle class money. Hmmmm, not so much. So whom are they competing with? Is it B****s at the bottom of the economic pyramid? Do i******s depress wages so much that B****s cannot find the entry level work, necessary to begin the climb into the upper classes? Could this be the reason for the frustration that lead to r**ts?

I wonder whom is mostly responsible for the flood of i******s competing at the low end of the job spectrum? No it could not be our first Black President, or could it? Would he betray those would v**ed 93% for him? No! I refuse to believe it!

Reply
May 3, 2015 09:49:30   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
son of witless wrote:
If we want to use the expansive logic of our liberal friends we can honestly say that i*****l i*********n caused the Baltimore r**ts. Kinda the way G****l W*****g causes everything from prostitution to famine to Hurricanes.

The liberals say that one of the root causes of the Baltimore r**ts is lack of opportunity and lack of jobs for minority youth in Baltimore. Okay lets us go with that. When you have millions and millions and millions and millions of i******s pouring into America, just whom are they competing with for jobs? Gee I don't know.

Are they competing with rich white liberals for Wall Street money? Not likely. Are they competing in the sk**led trades with w****s for middle class money. Hmmmm, not so much. So whom are they competing with? Is it B****s at the bottom of the economic pyramid? Do i******s depress wages so much that B****s cannot find the entry level work, necessary to begin the climb into the upper classes? Could this be the reason for the frustration that lead to r**ts?

I wonder whom is mostly responsible for the flood of i******s competing at the low end of the job spectrum? No it could not be our first Black President, or could it? Would he betray those would v**ed 93% for him? No! I refuse to believe it!
If we want to use the expansive logic of our liber... (show quote)


You hit the nail on the head! :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
May 3, 2015 11:39:54   #
missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore
 
Out with the old, in with the new. Massive cheap labor squeezing out what has been a fairly well to do middle class in world market terms. Big money wins, progressives of all colors win, our once very accomplished, very productive middle class is wiped out. Along with the other society k*****g measures of Obamas campaign, this seals the deal. Change we can believe in. It's real. It's happening. Our Republic is near dead.

The collective will be massive. Gray cloths for everyone.



Thank a Dem. for allowing their party to be highjacked. Then thank a Repub. for allowing this to happen.

Last but not least, if you have been silent on all these issues for the last six G.D. Years, then Damn You Lazy Lethargic Sheep. You've aided and abetted.



no propaganda please wrote:
1. As Immigratiaimpain Rises, US Wages Drop

Wages for the overwhelming majority of Americans have fallen below 1970s levels as the percentage of the population that is foreign-born has surged.

A memo from the Congressional Research Service (CRS), released in response to a request for data from the Senate Judiciary Committee, shows on the other hand that in the decades prior to 1970, when the percentage of foreign-born Americans dropped, wages for most Americans rose.

From 1945 to 1970, the foreign-born population in the United States decreased from 10.97 million to 9.74 million, a decline of 11.2 percent.

During that 25-year period, the reported income of the bottom 90 percent of tax filers rose from an average of $18,418, in 2013 dollars, to $33,621 in 1970, an increase of 82.5 percent.

The share of total income held by the bottom 90 percent also rose during this period, from 67.4 percent to 68.5 percent.

The CRS also disclosed that from 1970 through 2013, the foreign-born population in the U.S. increased from 9.74 million to 41.34 million, a rise of an astounding 324.5 percent.

During that period, the income of the bottom 90 percent of tax filers fell from an average of $33,621 in 1970 to $30,980 in 2013, and the share of income they held sank from 68.5 percent to 53 percent, a decline of 15.5 percentage points over this 43-year period.

The CRS report "questions claims that native Americans are economically helped by greater immigration," The Washington Examiner observed in an article about the report.

"The report could throw cold water on congressional efforts to expand immigration for tech and other jobs. One bill, sponsored by Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch and backed by p**********l candidate Marco Rubio, would boost guest worker levels and remove any cap on green cards for certain foreign graduates of American colleges and universities."

The U.S. each year already admits a million immigrants, half a million immigrant students, 700,000 guest workers, and 70,000 refugees and persons seeking political asylum.

The CRS report follows an analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) estimating that in the next eight years, the foreign-born population will reach a record high of 51 million.

Another CIS analysis disclosed that since 2000 all net employment growth among working-age adults went to immigrants, while the number of U.S-born adults not working rose by 17 million.

In an op-ed piece for The New York Times last year, Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest, wrote: "It defies reason to argue that the record admission of new foreign workers has no negative effect on the wages of American workers, including the wages of past immigrants hoping to climb into the middle class.

"Why would many of the largest business groups in the United States spend millions lobbying for the admission of more foreign workers if such policies did not cut labor costs?"
1. As Immigratiaimpain Rises, US Wages Drop br br... (show quote)

Reply
May 3, 2015 12:38:58   #
She Wolf Loc: Currently Georgia
 
Of course US wages drop. We give government subsidies to immigrant workers thus enabling corporations to pay them less, offer no benefit packages, and less hours. If the government was paying for you housing, food, furniture, medical, dental, and giving you cash each month you too could live on these wages. What angers me the most is my tax dollars are being used to rob my fellow citizens of their jobs.

Notice BOTH parties have no problem with this criminal behavior. They funded it.

Reply
May 3, 2015 12:48:52   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
She Wolf wrote:
Of course US wages drop. We give government subsidies to immigrant workers thus enabling corporations to pay them less, offer no benefit packages, and less hours. If the government was paying for you housing, food, furniture, medical, dental, and giving you cash each month you too could live on these wages. What angers me the most is my tax dollars are being used to rob my fellow citizens of their jobs.

Notice BOTH parties have no problem with this criminal behavior. They funded it.



You are absolutely correct, unfortunately.

Reply
May 3, 2015 13:30:38   #
son of witless
 
She Wolf wrote:
Of course US wages drop. We give government subsidies to immigrant workers thus enabling corporations to pay them less, offer no benefit packages, and less hours. If the government was paying for you housing, food, furniture, medical, dental, and giving you cash each month you too could live on these wages. What angers me the most is my tax dollars are being used to rob my fellow citizens of their jobs.

Notice BOTH parties have no problem with this criminal behavior. They funded it.


So tell me WHO will not build the border fence? WHO stopped the States from enforcing i*********n l*w when his POS Attorney General will not do his job?

Who arranged for Central American children to come into America illegally and gave them sanctuary? Was it BOTH PARTIES????

Reply
May 3, 2015 13:35:10   #
dennisimoto Loc: Washington State (West)
 
It is NOT "immigration." It's an invasion. Who says you need guns, soldiers and tanks when the nation you're invading stands by and watches you come in?

Reply
May 4, 2015 11:09:22   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
NPP,

Your statistics may be correct, but it does not follow that immigration is the cause of lower wages.

Starting in the 80s, corporations were given great incentives to move offshore. Tax credits, even loan guarantees to move to foreign countries yet sell their products in America.

Shutting down the American infrastructure after building on foreign soil easily left millions of those low sk**led factory/labor workers with no future.

A ton of reasons working together to get the result of more labor than jobs for them to go to.. Far from only immigration increases..

As for why so a cluster of difficulty on immigration, we can blame both parties. The wealthy of both parties are encouraging immigration. They like the excess labor, it boosts the bottom line..

I think that is the strongest reason for gridlock on immigration reform or reinforcement...

Reply
May 4, 2015 13:10:58   #
She Wolf Loc: Currently Georgia
 
son of witless wrote:
So tell me WHO will not build the border fence? WHO stopped the States from enforcing i*********n l*w when his POS Attorney General will not do his job?

Who arranged for Central American children to come into America illegally and gave them sanctuary? Was it BOTH PARTIES????


Who had control of the House and Senate and funded the program rather than passing laws that would make this executive order mute? Both parties sold you out for the interest of the 1%.

Reply
 
 
May 4, 2015 20:52:16   #
Sicilianthing
 
no propaganda please wrote:
1. As Immigration Rises, US Wages Drop

Wages for the overwhelming majority of Americans have fallen below 1970s levels as the percentage of the population that is foreign-born has surged.

A memo from the Congressional Research Service (CRS), released in response to a request for data from the Senate Judiciary Committee, shows on the other hand that in the decades prior to 1970, when the percentage of foreign-born Americans dropped, wages for most Americans rose.

From 1945 to 1970, the foreign-born population in the United States decreased from 10.97 million to 9.74 million, a decline of 11.2 percent.

During that 25-year period, the reported income of the bottom 90 percent of tax filers rose from an average of $18,418, in 2013 dollars, to $33,621 in 1970, an increase of 82.5 percent.

The share of total income held by the bottom 90 percent also rose during this period, from 67.4 percent to 68.5 percent.

The CRS also disclosed that from 1970 through 2013, the foreign-born population in the U.S. increased from 9.74 million to 41.34 million, a rise of an astounding 324.5 percent.

During that period, the income of the bottom 90 percent of tax filers fell from an average of $33,621 in 1970 to $30,980 in 2013, and the share of income they held sank from 68.5 percent to 53 percent, a decline of 15.5 percentage points over this 43-year period.

The CRS report "questions claims that native Americans are economically helped by greater immigration," The Washington Examiner observed in an article about the report.

"The report could throw cold water on congressional efforts to expand immigration for tech and other jobs. One bill, sponsored by Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch and backed by p**********l candidate Marco Rubio, would boost guest worker levels and remove any cap on green cards for certain foreign graduates of American colleges and universities."

The U.S. each year already admits a million immigrants, half a million immigrant students, 700,000 guest workers, and 70,000 refugees and persons seeking political asylum.

The CRS report follows an analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) estimating that in the next eight years, the foreign-born population will reach a record high of 51 million.

Another CIS analysis disclosed that since 2000 all net employment growth among working-age adults went to immigrants, while the number of U.S-born adults not working rose by 17 million.

In an op-ed piece for The New York Times last year, Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest, wrote: "It defies reason to argue that the record admission of new foreign workers has no negative effect on the wages of American workers, including the wages of past immigrants hoping to climb into the middle class.

"Why would many of the largest business groups in the United States spend millions lobbying for the admission of more foreign workers if such policies did not cut labor costs?"
1. As Immigration Rises, US Wages Drop br br Wage... (show quote)


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

That's right, this is exactly their design, to keep the newblood invaders in here with cheaper labor than we've ever seen....

I hope it backfires...

We're in serious serious trouble here peeps...

Reply
May 4, 2015 21:19:31   #
son of witless
 
She Wolf wrote:
Who had control of the House and Senate and funded the program rather than passing laws that would make this executive order mute? Both parties sold you out for the interest of the 1%.


I don't know that Republicans had huge majorities in both Houses during Bush. I know that Democrats had it for two years under Obama. I also know that under Obama it was he who blocked border enforcement not the Republicans!

Reply
May 5, 2015 13:28:49   #
She Wolf Loc: Currently Georgia
 
son of witless wrote:
I don't know that Republicans had huge majorities in both Houses during Bush. I know that Democrats had it for two years under Obama. I also know that under Obama it was he who blocked border enforcement not the Republicans!


In order to obtain more tax breaks for the elite, both parties v**ed to fund President Obama's immigration plan. Right after an e******n where they promised to right this wrong, they funded it. Both Democrats and Republicans approved the budget containing the funding for this so called immigration reform.

It does not matter weather you have a Democrat or a Republican Congress because they are the same. Don't listen to their BS look at their v****g records. Neither party cares or is even in touch with us working people. They protect the elite.

Reply
May 5, 2015 15:59:47   #
Sicilianthing
 
son of witless wrote:
I don't know that Republicans had huge majorities in both Houses during Bush. I know that Democrats had it for two years under Obama. I also know that under Obama it was he who blocked border enforcement not the Republicans!


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Rinos & Dinos both work for the Banksters...

eliminate the 2 party Sham system and install a

Constitutional Party, close the borders, Stop all Visas and End the Federal Reserve and you will see more prosperity than ever before in history !

End of subject !

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.