I respectfully disagree with the Betrayel papers. They are written in a format that draws the reader in much like a writing student would do in an arguementive essay. I don't care if you don't like Obama or any one who has been close to him. I look for something believable in all written articles that I read. I saw conjecture aimed at convincing the receptive. I am not.
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
I respectfully disagree with the Betrayel papers. They are written in a format that draws the reader in much like a writing student would do in an arguementive essay. I don't care if you don't like Obama or any one who has been close to him. I look for something believable in all written articles that I read. I saw conjecture aimed at convincing the receptive. I am not.
Show me just one thing that is not fact or t***h in The Betrayal Papers Tom.
bdamage wrote:
Show me just one thing that is not fact or t***h in The Betrayal Papers Tom.
Barack !!!HUSSAIN!!! Obama. When I see the presidents full name used I see red f**gs pop up all over.
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
Barack !!!HUSSAIN!!! Obama. When I see the presidents full name used I see red f**gs pop up all over.
Why?
It's HIS name.....as far as we know.
The POTUS uses his full name at times.
Do the "red f**gs" go up then also?
Deer are a big problem, its ridiculous. Can't talk to them about it, they run away. Netting? They chew through it and spit it out.
archie bunker wrote:
Is it 'e******y' for a few sodomites, and rug munchers, or do we have bigger problems? Soooo s**k of the gay agenda!! #thinkboutthefuturehomos!
I think I'm done here. Bye!!
archie bunker wrote:
Is it 'e******y' for a few sodomites, and rug munchers, or do we have bigger problems? Soooo s**k of the gay agenda!! #thinkboutthefuturehomos!
I think I'm done here. Bye!!
You realize that I am a lesbian, don't you? I prefer women.
Loki wrote:
You realize that I am a lesbian, don't you? I prefer women.
I'm a lesbian too
:cry: Is that a good thing :?:
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
I'm a lesbian too
:cry: Is that a good thing :?:
Personally, I'm into oral sex myself...at this stage in my life, all I can do is I talk about it.
bdamage wrote:
Why?
It's HIS name.....as far as we know.
The POTUS uses his full name at times.
Do the "red f**gs" go up then also?
Good come back but when it is written for an audience already predisposed to have a negative outlook of the president or all things Democrat I am warey of what to buy into.
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
Good come back but when it is written for an audience already predisposed to have a negative outlook of the president or all things Democrat I am warey of what to buy into.
It was written after months of research and content verification from many sources including our own government websites.
Repubs as well as Dems do not want this info out there for it will expose everything "they"(both sides) don't want you know.
Both sides of the aisle are in on this charade and we MUST put a stop to it or we will lose our country and everything we have fought for since it's founding.
So Tom....if you want to play these stupid little political games, go right ahead.
In the meantime I will continue to inform others what the "establishment" is trying to do to ALL of us.
There's no "red" side or "blue" side here buddy....this is US against THEM my friend.
mwdegutis wrote:
Personally, I'm into oral sex myself...at this stage in my life, all I can do is I talk about it.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: getting there myself. :lol: :lol: :cry:
bdamage wrote:
It was written after months of research and content verification from many sources including our own government websites.
Repubs as well as Dems do not want this info out there for it will expose everything "they"(both sides) don't want you know.
Both sides of the aisle are in on this charade and we MUST put a stop to it or we will lose our country and everything we have fought for since it's founding.
So Tom....if you want to play these stupid little political games, go right ahead.
In the meantime I will continue to inform others what the "establishment" is trying to do to ALL of us.
There's no "red" side or "blue" side here buddy....this is US against THEM my friend.
It was written after months of research and conten... (
show quote)
I play no games I just don't believe half the political crap I hear. our Politicians tend to do what they think is best for us more often than what we think is best for us so in that respect yes it is Us against Them
bdamage wrote:
It was written after months of research and content verification from many sources including our own government websites.
Repubs as well as Dems do not want this info out there for it will expose everything "they"(both sides) don't want you know.
Both sides of the aisle are in on this charade and we MUST put a stop to it or we will lose our country and everything we have fought for since it's founding.
So Tom....if you want to play these stupid little political games, go right ahead.
In the meantime I will continue to inform others what the "establishment" is trying to do to ALL of us.
There's no "red" side or "blue" side here buddy....this is US against THEM my friend.
It was written after months of research and conten... (
show quote)
Yes, it is, "US against them".
In 2010, this excellent essay,
America's Ruling Class: the Perils of Revolution, was written by Angelo Codevilla. He is professor emeritus of international relations at Boston University. He served as a U.S. Navy officer, a foreign service officer, and professional staff member of the Select Committee on Intelligence of the United States Senate.
I have yet to check out the betrayal papers, but Codevilla's piece lays out the division between the Ruling class (them) and the Country class (US). Worth reading.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.