no propaganda please wrote:
In order to include homosexuals in the definition of marriage, the definition MUST be changed, so it no longer is the original concept. Once that has been done, the concept of adult incest as a legal form of marriage is next up, and is already being debated. After all if two adults love each other, should it be anyone else's business if they are brother and sister, or mother and son? Or should that be valid only if it is non reproductive such as father and son, or two brothers? The concept of a marriage between a man and a woman has always been to provide a safe and nurturing place to raise children, with the required mother and father, not two people of the same sex, or three siblings. Unfortunately, as part of an orchestrated move to destroy society same sex "marriage" is gaining ground, as step one. That is for the detriment of the family, the culture and the nation.
In order to include homosexuals in the definition ... (
show quote)
You are right on the money, I concur. Agree, Marriage is one man one woman, for some four thousand years and the minority is trying to overcome the majority. Yes the definition would have to be changed, just to allow the minority to pervert
years.
the childeren haven't been taught, about what life is.A lot of them are just turned loose and are influenced by the wrong croud. Should be taught about nature, one can learn a whole lot from nature.