Weasel wrote:
How does a stronger dollar weaken the economy?
I never heard that on before. I do not understand.
Your comment lends a complete lack of understanding of our economic position, global and or macroeconomics. What's driving Wallstreet? What are the effects countries turning from the petro dollar? When the fed has no buyers for T-bills, what happens? When Obama sent over 3.5 Trillion to Wallstreet not mainstreet, what are the effects long term? When the economic data states new home construction is up, yet lumber, concrete, is down what does that mean? When unemployment numbers come out, what is the BLS not telling us about U3 and U6? corporations have been at an all time historic high, buying back their stock, rather than expanding in R&D or brick and mortar, what does that mean? The last seven years there have been more business's close than open, comment's? Please explain if you understand how the policy makers come to use these.
They use key factors in the PDS called BRITS. B =borrowing costs, R=real inflation, I =inflation, T= taxes, S =spending.
R plus I = total value of goods and services produced also call nominal gross domestic product (NGPD)
Taxes minus spending is primary deficit which is the excess of what a country spends to what it collects in taxes (spending doesn't no count interest on national debt)
So deficit is sustainable if economic minus interest expense is greater than the primary deficit. It doesn't much matter what debt is but the trend as a percentage of GDP (to a point, I think we have over extended that point) but this is why experts always say 18 trillion debt doesn't matter.
So when you see the gov. numbers it means basically sustainable looks like this.
(R plus I)-B is greater than IT - SI it is sustainable. If (R plus I) - B is less than IT - SI it is not sustainable.
They make it sound like it is a process that is way to complex for us to ever understand and that is the whole formula used that took them 8 years of college to figure out. But maybe you can explain why a high dollar can exist in negative growth. First it starts with lies, With Fed mouthpiece Jon Hilsenrath warning - in no lesser status-quo narrative-deliverer than The Wall Street Journal - that The ECB's actions (and pre-emptive collapse in the EUR) means the U.S. economy must deal with a rapidly strengthening dollar that will make American goods more expensive abroad, potentially slowing both U.S. growth and inflation; and Treasury Secretary Lew coming out his crypt to mention "unfair FX moves," it appears The Fed (and powers that be) are worrying about King Dollar. This suggests, as Mises Canada's Patrick Barron predicts, the Fed will start charging negative interest rates on bank reserve accounts as the final tool in the war on savings and wealth in order to spur the Keynesian goal of increasing aggregate demand. If savers wont spend their money, the government will take it from them.
Lastly in a sentence, the stronger dollar can be better explained when looking at world currencies, oil, and the major players ...Bank's.