moldyoldy wrote:
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Just because you keep reposting this list of lies, does not make it true.
Old turd, i mean oldie moldy or is it moldyoldy.
Just because you keep on denying he post, does mean, thats it is still true
as I said to 3Jack, I mean low-jack
It appears to be we are at stale-mate on this issue and any other scandal that Hillary Rodham Clinton is involved in. It's called scandal, and controversy. Regardless, there still is the taint that surrounds her she, can wiggle and squirm all she wants. and moldy you can try to deflect and keep on trying to defend the Clinton turds.
Your opinion, logic and arguments just don't hold up in the facts and the reality arena of the Clinton turds that they have created all their political life. It's a vast right wing conspiracy, sounds more like paranoia, because they were caught red handed so many times and it's another episode of "House of Cards," the Clinton's turds have made up...
Call it wh**ever you want, Hillary was ( Let go, termination, fired, lost her job etc. ) its still the same thing, (Semantics) potato-patato." What are you trying to argue, its a mute point.
In Hillary's own words, "At this point, what difference does it make that four Americans died." Or put in a different way "At this point, after 47 years what difference does it make, that I was fired from my job with no political recommendation."
It's been 47 years since the Watergate hearings and Hillary Rodham political appointment and over-site by her legal supervisor Jerry Dorn and Democrat Jerry Zeifman, call it termination/fired its still the same thing, (Semantics) potato-patato."
What appears in Zeifman journal/diary is enough evidence and his Book that he wrote to address Hillary Rodham. It appears that no one has vetted that book and what he said in it. This is all "Clinton-esk" and the way she and her husband operate, right out of the Clinton political turd playbook.
Snoops did a fairly good job trying to explain Hillary Rodham position, but did not fully vet the Original 1974 Newspaper articles and came up short, no mater how you spin the words.
That's what needs to be done. This hear-say stuff with out the Original news reporting does no good. Many of these web check political organizations are for the democrats and or for republican.
Thats what journalism is all about, to slant political opinion, stylized writing. I remember reading the original newspaper article, in 1974, back in the day because I followed Watergate from the inception of the scandal and every news clipping.
Regardless, the taint and all the other 9 lies from Hillary Rodham Clinton it still stands. There is Inexplicable evidence that she has lied on numerous occasions. My claims and assertions still stand. You can argue this all you want, its a mute point on this one issue, not my post... Nice try though...but not good enough. Moldy
Hillary was ( Let go, termination, fired, lost her job etc. ) its still the same thing, (Semantics) potato-patato."
Was she unethical in the Watergate proceedings, Yes.
Did she try to deny Nixon legal representation in her opinions and brief, Yes. Did it pissed off Jerry Dorn and Democrat Jerry Zeifman, Yes it did.
Was Hillary Rodham trying to advance her career, Yes and to what end ?
Its not hard to look and walk see the sown, Clinton Turd Path of Life. But its really hard to defend her and bill's turds, they have made a lot of political enemies turds on the right and the left.
Clearly they are Clinton opportunists and turd controversy surrounds them all the way just like Obama. Hey look out for that Clinton turd, oh you stepped into it again.
http://www.newspapers.com/http://www.refdesk.com/paper.htmlhttp://www.onlinenewspapers.com/http://www.aim.org/aim-column/hillarys-crocodile-tears-in-connecticut/