working class stiff wrote:
...I don't even oppose the v**er ID laws in principle. ...But when the Pa. governor said they did it to deliver Pa. to Romney, my antenna went up.
From some of the other things you've written, it appear that we may have a lot more in common than I thought, and I welcome this discussion. I can even occasionally change an opinion, if you have a long enough lever and a rock-solid fulcrum (data, data, data, not conjecture).
And look, I actually agree with you, that v***r r**********n should not be aimed at giving any party an advantage. But you have joined the mainstream media in misquoting PA Republican House Leader Mike Turzai (...yeah, that's right, it wasn't the governor). On June 23 or 24, 2012, Turzai was listing several recent Republican accomplishments in the PA legislature, the last of which was this:
"...V**er ID, which is gonna allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania, done."
He did NOT mean that the new PA v***r r**********n law was passed in order to give Romney a victory, although many MSM outlets made that inference, purposefully misquoting him. For example, Annie-Rose Strasser, writing for Think Progress on 25-Jun 2012, utterly distorted his meaning: "This weekend, Pennsylvania Republican House Leader Mike Turzai (R-PA) finally admitted what so many have speculated: V**er identification efforts are meant to suppress Democratic v**es in this years e******n." That is NOT what Turzai said. Note Turzai's use of the word, "allow". He meant that v***r r**********n would help to ensure a clean e******n, without v***r f***d, AND THIS WOULD ALLOW ROMNEY TO WIN, IF HE GOT THE MOST V**ES. I admit he could have phrased it better, but he never said what was claimed, and many PA Housemembers who know Turzai, even Democrats, repudiated the claims made by Strasser and others.