As a Christian and A Catholic(as people say to day, I think it is moronic, because a Catholic is a Christian for they believe in Christ), I have a tendency of arguing first, what is the sin?, then secondly, how do we help the sinner not sin?
I can never get past the first part of what is the sin. Using the bible to define the sin (I also use history, and the synod of Bishops), to clarify what the sin is, so that when I get to the second part we can be clear on how to help the sinner.
Because of extreme anger it seems against Christianity, people have completely lost their minds. No longer do they use reason, but rather their fears and imagination to discredit that sin even exists. So, it is here that the anger begins. Based in fear and imagination, then the defense is using terms like Bigotry and Discrimination, in order to persecute the person defining the sin.
The ridiculousness has went as far as trying to read the mind of the offended, before the offense is made. Part of the blame is placed on the Clinton administration's "Politically Correctness", it is not fat it it obtuse; it is not skinny it is thin, etc.
Now we are at crossroads of rewriting the bible to mean something it was never meant to mean. Pick a sin any of them, and discuss it with people and you will be amazed at how "touchy" they are about it. For most of us that do not partake in the sin, it is just a topic, subject, or principle. But for those who partake in the sin, it seems like it is an addiction.
I am only going to briefly discuss a sin compared to drug addiction and hopefully people will not "feel" in this analogy but see how the sin and addiction are practically the same.
To the pot smoker, Marijuana they can't live without they need it. Therefore, they smoke it any chance they got. Not all pot smokers, do this, I am just talking about the extreme addicts.
On the other hand we have the current events of the homosexual argument(hopefully no one argues this point here. I am using it as an example to show the addiction of sin is the same as the addiction to pot or alcohol, not to start a theological debate.)For over 3000 years this action has been deemed a sin.
Now, if you were to take alcohol away from the alcoholic, or pot away from the Marijuana user, you will have statements like, "Oh you are just drug phobia, or you never did pot how do you know, or smoking pot will not hurt you." and this is the same with alcohol.
Yet, when the same analogy is applied to current events we see the same slurs. "Your a bigot", or "you are h********c", "homosexuality hurts no one."
These statements from both addicts tend to defend their addiction. And through observation it festers into a fight. By defining the sin, what I have done is establish why Christians in my case cannot support certain actions that condone the sin. But as a human being with the love of God in my heart, there must be a way of solving the problem, without allowing the sin to continue, but at the same time keeping the sinner happy. This is a tall task. And only through the love of Jesus Christ can this be accomplished.
But first the facts must be established to keep us within the guidelines of God first, then we can establish the proper and appropriate responsible actions that Jesus compels us to do in the name of Love. This is very hard to do, when people will not use simple etiquette, and reason, even when the evidence is presented.
Al Pacino, at the end of the "Devil's advocate" stated a scary line, "Ah Vanity, my favorite Sin"
It is this Vanity that sinners use as an excuse to empower them to sin. God granted us free will, I don't remember the actor who stated this but he stated in a movie, I cannot recall, but his statement was, "Free will, its a b***h", it may have been Al but I don't remember.
I read a comment recently, that not too long ago, our parents fought the Government, to get the Government out of the bedroom. This prompted Daddy Bush, when he was confronted with the argument to invoke the thinking, "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"
It worked and was brilliant, for with this policy, if people didn't know, they will not care, and if they don't care, its not an argument. The Liberals and Bill Clinton did not like that. So Bill Clinton stopped the practice, and the battle began. But in those days we Christians kept quiet. Then Bush Jr. became president, and re invoked with some changes, the Don't ask, Don't tell policy once again. And even though we hit rough times during his administration, this issue died down to inactive status, until Obama exclaimed to the world, to accept them.
Look at what has happened. This country is on the verge of war, because a gay person wanted to by a cake from a Christian baker. The Christian baker refused to sell. The country went to war. Where's the love.
Here on my forum, fifty pages of h**e, were posted. Where's the reason? For I stated the sin, to establish the sin. But I was constantly attacked with racial names such as a bigot. I never once called him a heretic. But even I too got caught up into the moment, and at one point asked the administration to shut down the Topic, I created, because of the h**e being posed at me, in the name of a false love.
Wouldn't it be funny if I said to you, "The sun rises in the west and sets in the east". Most people would laugh right? Well, what if I backed that up, by saying that for 3000 years humans got the directions wrong, east is west and west is east. Wouldn't that just confuse the facts? However, this is what was done, when the scriptures were written verbatim, and the sin was denied. He was unwilling to compromise on the definition of the sin, and he called it my h**e.
When I debate, I look at the subject not as any person, I look at it as a principle and I argue principle. Where is h**e in arguing a non human? But nevertheless I was labeled, and to drive the point home, the old fashioned labels that were used in the 1960s by the KKK, but directed to religion instead of race, were used against me. This I called religious persecution.
Where in this whole analogy is there love? And that is the problem. Look how love c*********d with the pot smoker....Look how love c*********d with the alcoholic, but now love will not compromise with the sin. (Love does not condone sin, but love can be used to help the sinner, let me be clear on that.)
A priest once told me, "Pretend, you are the priest. With all the knowledge of the Bible as taught by the seminary, in your head, and you are in the confessional. Bound by mortal sin not to divulge any information in the confessional, and a sinner truly sorry of his sin comes to you and confesses his sin. Say the sin was of a controversial topic, causing the country to be up in arms. What advice would you give the sinner? What sermon for "love" of the sinner would you give to the community?"
"That is a really tough question father, I do not know", I told the priest.
"My son, " he said, "that is what it is for me too. But only in the faith and love in Jesus Christ can we, together as Christians, find the answer"
Goodnight and God Bless!