Mark Kirk is a ScumBag T*****R Republican Senator from Illinois
Apr 6, 2015 22:52:44 #
This is the kind of betrayal you v**e for time and time again...
Remember this the next time you go to V**E !
Witness the attack on your foundations by a T*****R tried and true.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
51 v**es: Republican Mark Kirk signals hell v**e for Loretta Lynch as AG, ensuring confirmation
POSTED AT 6:41 PM ON APRIL 2, 2015 BY ALLAHPUNDIT
DID ANYONE THINK ONE OF THE SENATES MOST RELIABLE RINOS, WHOS UP FOR REE******N NEXT YEAR NOT JUST IN A VERY BLUE STATE BUT IN BARACK OBAMAS HOME STATE, AND WHO SUPPORTED THE SCHUMER/RUBIO GANG OF EIGHT AMNESTY BILL, WAS GOING TO GO TO THE MAT TO BLOCK OBAMAS PICK FOR AG TO PROTEST EXECUTIVE AMNESTY?
Conservative Republicans wont stick up for religious liberty even in red states for fear of being called bigots. The odds of a moderate Republican opposing the first black woman Attorney General of the United States in a Democratic stronghold were precisely zero.
I am confident from my conversation with Loretta Lynch that she will be a valuable partner in confronting the gang violence that is robbing families of their children every day in Chicago, Kirk, a senator from Illinois, said in a statement.
All 44 Senate Democrats and two independents are expected to v**e for Lynch, who would be the first African-American woman to head the Justice Department
Prior to Thursday, four Republicans indicated they would v**e for Lynchs nomination, and with Kirk, there potentially would be a majority in the Senate to confirm her.
Kirk has an excuse: A no v**e here could hurt him next year in his Senate race in Illinois. Whats the excuse for Jeff Flake, Lindsey Graham, and Orrin Hatch, all three of whom come from red states and none of whom is up in 2016? (Susan Collins is the other Republican supporting Lynch.) I realize that Graham and Flake are amnesty shills, but even they should be capable of rebuking Obama for seizing Congresss power over immigration for himself.
So yeah, we can let Kirk slide on that, if only in the interest of protecting the GOPs Senate majority in 2016. You ready to let him slide on this, though?
Only days after a high-profile Democrat opponent announced a run to take his seat, Illinois Republican Senator Mark Kirk is coming out swinging. Not against his opponent, but against fellow Republican Mike Pence for signing Indianas Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
On Wednesday, Kirk attacked Indianas Republican Governor for signing his states much-dissected Religious Freedom Restoration Act, saying that he strongly opposes the governors actions
We should not enshrine bigotry under the cover of religion. Its not just bad practiceits un-American, he said in his statement.
There are tactful ways to pander to moderates on Indiana and RFRA just ask Jeb Bush and then there are ways so demagogic that even many Democrats are staying away from them. Why is Kirk in the latter camp and not the former? Take it from me, its possible to support gay rights without also thinking Christian business owners should be forced on pain of sanction to participate in gay weddings. Maybe Kirks convinced that nothing short of over-the-top condemnation of religious liberty will satisfy blue-state v**ers at this point. Or maybe hes just a jackhole. Exit quotation via Sean Davis: [Senator Kirk] says religious freedom literally Americas reason for existence is un-American.
Remember this the next time you go to V**E !
Witness the attack on your foundations by a T*****R tried and true.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
51 v**es: Republican Mark Kirk signals hell v**e for Loretta Lynch as AG, ensuring confirmation
POSTED AT 6:41 PM ON APRIL 2, 2015 BY ALLAHPUNDIT
DID ANYONE THINK ONE OF THE SENATES MOST RELIABLE RINOS, WHOS UP FOR REE******N NEXT YEAR NOT JUST IN A VERY BLUE STATE BUT IN BARACK OBAMAS HOME STATE, AND WHO SUPPORTED THE SCHUMER/RUBIO GANG OF EIGHT AMNESTY BILL, WAS GOING TO GO TO THE MAT TO BLOCK OBAMAS PICK FOR AG TO PROTEST EXECUTIVE AMNESTY?
Conservative Republicans wont stick up for religious liberty even in red states for fear of being called bigots. The odds of a moderate Republican opposing the first black woman Attorney General of the United States in a Democratic stronghold were precisely zero.
I am confident from my conversation with Loretta Lynch that she will be a valuable partner in confronting the gang violence that is robbing families of their children every day in Chicago, Kirk, a senator from Illinois, said in a statement.
All 44 Senate Democrats and two independents are expected to v**e for Lynch, who would be the first African-American woman to head the Justice Department
Prior to Thursday, four Republicans indicated they would v**e for Lynchs nomination, and with Kirk, there potentially would be a majority in the Senate to confirm her.
Kirk has an excuse: A no v**e here could hurt him next year in his Senate race in Illinois. Whats the excuse for Jeff Flake, Lindsey Graham, and Orrin Hatch, all three of whom come from red states and none of whom is up in 2016? (Susan Collins is the other Republican supporting Lynch.) I realize that Graham and Flake are amnesty shills, but even they should be capable of rebuking Obama for seizing Congresss power over immigration for himself.
So yeah, we can let Kirk slide on that, if only in the interest of protecting the GOPs Senate majority in 2016. You ready to let him slide on this, though?
Only days after a high-profile Democrat opponent announced a run to take his seat, Illinois Republican Senator Mark Kirk is coming out swinging. Not against his opponent, but against fellow Republican Mike Pence for signing Indianas Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
On Wednesday, Kirk attacked Indianas Republican Governor for signing his states much-dissected Religious Freedom Restoration Act, saying that he strongly opposes the governors actions
We should not enshrine bigotry under the cover of religion. Its not just bad practiceits un-American, he said in his statement.
There are tactful ways to pander to moderates on Indiana and RFRA just ask Jeb Bush and then there are ways so demagogic that even many Democrats are staying away from them. Why is Kirk in the latter camp and not the former? Take it from me, its possible to support gay rights without also thinking Christian business owners should be forced on pain of sanction to participate in gay weddings. Maybe Kirks convinced that nothing short of over-the-top condemnation of religious liberty will satisfy blue-state v**ers at this point. Or maybe hes just a jackhole. Exit quotation via Sean Davis: [Senator Kirk] says religious freedom literally Americas reason for existence is un-American.
Apr 7, 2015 04:42:54 #
Sicilianthing wrote:
This is the kind of betrayal you v**e for time and... (show quote)
We have the same problems in Ohio. Republican Rob Portman was against homosexuals while running for e******n, now that
his son has come out of the closet, Portman is wearing a dress too. Sometimes I wonder just how many leg lickers we have in government...
Apr 7, 2015 06:35:58 #
Foodbandid wrote:
We have the same problems in Ohio. Republican Rob Portman was against homosexuals while running for e******n, now that
his son has come out of the closet, Portman is wearing a dress too. Sometimes I wonder just how many leg lickers we have in government...
his son has come out of the closet, Portman is wearing a dress too. Sometimes I wonder just how many leg lickers we have in government...
First, Mark Kirk is from Illinois. There are no Republicans from Illinois, no matter which letter comes after their name. 'Nuff said.
Regarding leg lickers, did you mean left, right, or middle?
If you wish betrayers and sellouts, look no further than Mitch "I'm Obama's B***h" McConnell. Even though there is a Republican majority in the Senate, there is still a Democrat in charge. Talk about coming out of the closet. McConnell finally has. Kentucky owes us one for this bastard.
Apr 7, 2015 09:33:18 #
Foodbandid wrote:
We have the same problems in Ohio. Republican Rob Portman was against homosexuals while running for e******n, now that
his son has come out of the closet, Portman is wearing a dress too. Sometimes I wonder just how many leg lickers we have in government...
his son has come out of the closet, Portman is wearing a dress too. Sometimes I wonder just how many leg lickers we have in government...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This is why I scream at you all about the need for STRICT Constitutionalists taking office and no one else...
Apr 7, 2015 09:34:40 #
Loki wrote:
First, Mark Kirk is from Illinois. There are no Re... (show quote)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's Right LOKI... I'm on the floor everytime you say that ...
Obama's B***h Mitch !....
Ha! LMFAO
wooooo hhoooooooooo !
So True.
Apr 7, 2015 09:44:00 #
Sicilianthing wrote:
This is the kind of betrayal you v**e for time and... (show quote)
How stupid can you be? Holding up the AG confirmation just keeps Eric Holder in office longer. The republicans are about as effective as little kids holding their breath until they get their way.
Apr 7, 2015 10:07:26 #
Kevyn wrote:
How stupid can you be? Holding up the AG confirmation just keeps Eric Holder in office longer. The republicans are about as effective as little kids holding their breath until they get their way.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
WRONG Answer Kevyn... she's worse than Eric....
Holder can't do much more damage anyway he's under Constant threat by the M*****as and told to Curb his appearances anywhere....
That's why you don't hear much out of him lately....
If he's replaced now with this WhoreB***h we're in seriously troubled waters until they either K**l or Impeach Barry the Arab ScumBag Backed Imposter...
You need to seriously reconsider the situation with the AG dilemmas.
T*****RS Flat out !
Apr 7, 2015 10:52:52 #
Kevyn wrote:
How stupid can you be? Holding up the AG confirmation just keeps Eric Holder in office longer. The republicans are about as effective as little kids holding their breath until they get their way.
I agree with you on this one.. Democrats AND Republicans are afraid of losing v**es...
Apr 7, 2015 10:57:03 #
Foodbandid wrote:
I agree with you on this one.. Democrats AND Republicans are afraid of losing v**es...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Tough choices have to be made like the Founders warned us of....
I No longer care what the Rinos & Dinos T*****RS are afraid of in V**es...
GAME OVER !
Apr 8, 2015 07:21:46 #
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>&g... (show quote)
Threat by m*****as? are you kidding? you realy think that the Justice Department is threatened by a hand full of pathetic half bright clowns dressed up in costume playing soldier in the woods? The threat posed by these asshats is that one or two go off the rails and shoot up another elementary school or dairy queen parking lot and this is why we need to keep an eye on them.
Apr 8, 2015 11:00:43 #
Kevyn wrote:
Threat by m*****as? are you kidding? you realy think that the Justice Department is threatened by a hand full of pathetic half bright clowns dressed up in costume playing soldier in the woods? The threat posed by these asshats is that one or two go off the rails and shoot up another elementary school or dairy queen parking lot and this is why we need to keep an eye on them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yep I figured you'd say that... you did miss the last threat they sent him...
The news just won't put stuff out there like that...
I don't have the patience to find it for you...
You are seriously detached pal.
Hint: Last year before he stepped down he was suppose to attend a Graduation as speaker... the town and campus were surrounded by locals, Oathkeepers and m*****a to arrest him....
He NO Showed... and he was told to curb his appearances after that....
You can take it from there...
Good Luck with the Clowns
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.