Era of business VS. Era of science: We live in the era of the business man or some call it the era of the Rothschild. I believe that the world would be better off if we ended this era...

Anonymous Loc: Hamtucket jersey city

We live in the era of the business man or some call it the era of the Rothschild. I believe that the world would be better off if we ended this era and brought about what I'm calling the era of science. Now I'm not claiming to be a genius with all the answers, understand what I'm posting is only a thought I had. 310,000,000 people work creating resources and services but hardly any of them have the money to have any say so in where these resources go. 400 people now have roughly %50 percent of Americas wealth and they are not using this wealth properelly. It could be used to solve, or at least drastically reduce g****l w*****g and feed the hungry. But instead this money sits rendering it useless. Now I'm not talking about the rich, I have no problem with someone getting a high paying job and then buying a yacht or ten, or a mansion or ten. I'm talking about the people so rich they can sway and control industries and in some cases like the stock market crash and the Rothschilds gold muniplation they even play, or rather gamble with or economy. You might be thinking taking this money would be stealing but I don't look at it that way. These people do not work hard enough to be as rich as they are. They might work harder than your average citizen so maybe some people do deserve to get double, triple, quadruple, or maybe even more than that of the less successful citizen. But I highly doubt these people work hard enough to equal hundreds of thousands of citizens. At that point I look at it as these people are stealing from us. Now that being said we have the resources and technology available to fix many problems one being g****l w*****g. things like solar panels that give us renewable, completely clean energy and would fix the problem, won't be used because they fix the problem. If we fixed the problem there'd be no money to make and apparently money's that damn important. You can't make money off of something that effective, so these companies that make solar panels... Well let's just say their ceo might make a good living but their not even coming close to the top 400. With are national debt around 18 trillion, 9 trillion missing from the federal reserve (which by the way is ran like a private business and %60 of Americas debt is owed) I think it might be time to come up with an entirely new system. One where we simply make agreements to have resources put aside to fix these problems that if we try to take on with or money driven system or at least our current money system would break the bank. But money don't heat your home, our technologically advanced society does and the men and women that work their buns off do. Money doesn't feed you, food from farms do. Now at the moment banks seem necessary because we need those loans to afford houses and cars and ect. But the money system is why these thing are so costly. There are around 120,000,000 households NOT including apartments condos and ect. With 310,000,000 Americans averaging 2.6 people per household this comes out at roughly 115,000,000 people that need roofs. Why are banks kicking people out of houses when there are 5,000,000 extra to begin with. Because apparently money is that damn important. Why if a little girl goes to the hospital with cancer and she can't pay out of pocket, doesn't have insurance or does not want to take a loan out because that would mean the bank taking everything they own later down the road. Which for those of you who think the people losing their houses and are foreclosing where just lazy people who should have worked harder, your wrong, the majority of these people are hard workers with families or like the example above just fell on hard times. Back to the point, if she can't find a way to pay they have to turn her away, not by the nurses choice but because it would be illegal for them to help this child because they don't own the MRI machines or other facilities. Now it honestly baffles me on why we can't give this girl treatment, I mean the machine is their the electricity to power it costs close to nothing and I doubt there's a shortage of people that want to save lives. In fact education to become a doctor can cost 120,000 to 200,000 which I think is a pretty hefty price for dedicating your life towards helping people, but despite this hefty price people do it anyways because people are amazing. Which brings me to education and why in the hell is it so pricey, think about it, the amount of students paying their huge tuitions that often doesn't even include room and food which is two of the only things I can think of that would make it cost so much. The third being the professors salary and if you do the math that was covered along time ago. The first 40 students, give or take, pay enough tuition to cover all the professors. Where the hell is all this money going? That shinny statue in the yard to impress the other colleges? text books do not cost this much. If your a Desseil mechanic like my good friend you might think it goes towards the cars you work on but oh no those are donated because who wouldn't love to have their car fixed for free. Not all colleges might be the same after all I don't exactly have the time to research every college. why can't we simply educate people so they have the know how to be a more productive member of society, why can't we just simply let people live in their houses, why can't we just give people health care and electricity. I'll tell you why because apparently money is just that damn important. Are technologically advanced society has out grown the need for money and I would say it's actually holding us back big time. Now I'm not completely against money, after all it gives people the incentive to go out and work. But let the rewards stay the same, if you work your buns off here have a car and fancy clothes and that pool in your backyard. but their is absolutely no need for people to be homeless or hungry other than for a bank to make money and in a lot of cases for a single individual or a small group to rep profits. Instead of a group of business men sitting at a table brainstorming on the best way to make money or congress trying to figure out the best budget, how about a group of scientists thinking about the best solution. Not based off what makes money but simply what would work the best in terms of easing human suffering. we have the resources and the technology to solve these problems so why do we not solve them. It's time to bring about the era of the scientist and end this era of greed. This is not an anti religion post either for being a pro science post, think about it would Jesus care about money or would he rather ease human suffering. Also why does God disprove evolution or evolution disprove God? Couldn't God have made evolution. I mean creating a universe whether you're God or not is extremely complicated, a lot more complicated than he sneezed and bam there's the universe, or he just willed it into existence.

alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa

Anonymous wrote:

We live in the era of the business man or some call it the era of the Rothschild. I believe that the world would be better off if we ended this era and brought about what I'm calling the era of science. Now I'm not claiming to be a genius with all the answers, understand what I'm posting is only a thought I had. 310,000,000 people work creating resources and services but hardly any of them have the money to have any say so in where these resources go. 400 people now have roughly %50 percent of Americas wealth and they are not using this wealth properelly. It could be used to solve, or at least drastically reduce g****l w*****g and feed the hungry. But instead this money sits rendering it useless. Now I'm not talking about the rich, I have no problem with someone getting a high paying job and then buying a yacht or ten, or a mansion or ten. I'm talking about the people so rich they can sway and control industries and in some cases like the stock market crash and the Rothschilds gold muniplation they even play, or rather gamble with or economy. You might be thinking taking this money would be stealing but I don't look at it that way. These people do not work hard enough to be as rich as they are. They might work harder than your average citizen so maybe some people do deserve to get double, triple, quadruple, or maybe even more than that of the less successful citizen. But I highly doubt these people work hard enough to equal hundreds of thousands of citizens. At that point I look at it as these people are stealing from us. Now that being said we have the resources and technology available to fix many problems one being g****l w*****g. things like solar panels that give us renewable, completely clean energy and would fix the problem, won't be used because they fix the problem. If we fixed the problem there'd be no money to make and apparently money's that damn important. You can't make money off of something that effective, so these companies that make solar panels... Well let's just say their ceo might make a good living but their not even coming close to the top 400. With are national debt around 18 trillion, 9 trillion missing from the federal reserve (which by the way is ran like a private business and %60 of Americas debt is owed) I think it might be time to come up with an entirely new system. One where we simply make agreements to have resources put aside to fix these problems that if we try to take on with or money driven system or at least our current money system would break the bank. But money don't heat your home, our technologically advanced society does and the men and women that work their buns off do. Money doesn't feed you, food from farms do. Now at the moment banks seem necessary because we need those loans to afford houses and cars and ect. But the money system is why these thing are so costly. There are around 120,000,000 households NOT including apartments condos and ect. With 310,000,000 Americans averaging 2.6 people per household this comes out at roughly 115,000,000 people that need roofs. Why are banks kicking people out of houses when there are 5,000,000 extra to begin with. Because apparently money is that damn important. Why if a little girl goes to the hospital with cancer and she can't pay out of pocket, doesn't have insurance or does not want to take a loan out because that would mean the bank taking everything they own later down the road. Which for those of you who think the people losing their houses and are foreclosing where just lazy people who should have worked harder, your wrong, the majority of these people are hard workers with families or like the example above just fell on hard times. Back to the point, if she can't find a way to pay they have to turn her away, not by the nurses choice but because it would be illegal for them to help this child because they don't own the MRI machines or other facilities. Now it honestly baffles me on why we can't give this girl treatment, I mean the machine is their the electricity to power it costs close to nothing and I doubt there's a shortage of people that want to save lives. In fact education to become a doctor can cost 120,000 to 200,000 which I think is a pretty hefty price for dedicating your life towards helping people, but despite this hefty price people do it anyways because people are amazing. Which brings me to education and why in the hell is it so pricey, think about it, the amount of students paying their huge tuitions that often doesn't even include room and food which is two of the only things I can think of that would make it cost so much. The third being the professors salary and if you do the math that was covered along time ago. The first 40 students, give or take, pay enough tuition to cover all the professors. Where the hell is all this money going? That shinny statue in the yard to impress the other colleges? text books do not cost this much. If your a Desseil mechanic like my good friend you might think it goes towards the cars you work on but oh no those are donated because who wouldn't love to have their car fixed for free. Not all colleges might be the same after all I don't exactly have the time to research every college. why can't we simply educate people so they have the know how to be a more productive member of society, why can't we just simply let people live in their houses, why can't we just give people health care and electricity. I'll tell you why because apparently money is just that damn important. Are technologically advanced society has out grown the need for money and I would say it's actually holding us back big time. Now I'm not completely against money, after all it gives people the incentive to go out and work. But let the rewards stay the same, if you work your buns off here have a car and fancy clothes and that pool in your backyard. but their is absolutely no need for people to be homeless or hungry other than for a bank to make money and in a lot of cases for a single individual or a small group to rep profits. Instead of a group of business men sitting at a table brainstorming on the best way to make money or congress trying to figure out the best budget, how about a group of scientists thinking about the best solution. Not based off what makes money but simply what would work the best in terms of easing human suffering. we have the resources and the technology to solve these problems so why do we not solve them. It's time to bring about the era of the scientist and end this era of greed. This is not an anti religion post either for being a pro science post, think about it would Jesus care about money or would he rather ease human suffering. Also why does God disprove evolution or evolution disprove God? Couldn't God have made evolution. I mean creating a universe whether you're God or not is extremely complicated, a lot more complicated than he sneezed and bam there's the universe, or he just willed it into existence.

We live in the era of the business man or some cal... (show quote)

I had only to read your first paragraph to know that your annon. is a c*******t trying to tell others how best to spend whet they have earned IT AIN'T YOUR BUSINESS

Anonymous Loc: Hamtucket jersey city

alex wrote:

I had only to read your first paragraph to know that your annon. is a c*******t trying to tell others how best to spend whet they have earned IT AIN'T YOUR BUSINESS

They haven't earned it in my mind. I fail to see how one person or a group of a select few work hard enough within their company to have all the say so. And I'm not talking about the rich people you're thinking of. And as long as we're using simple words to describe something so complicated a company that has a 1000s of workers with one or a few people making the choices that technically a dictatorship within the governing of that company. And I insist I'm not talking about the rich people you think I am.

alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa

Anonymous wrote:

They haven't earned it in my mind. I fail to see h... (show quote)

it doesn't seem like you have clarified the story much it sounds like you are still saying the same thing, of course a company has one man in charge he is called the boss

Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan

Anonymous wrote:

We live in the era of the business man or some call it the era of the Rothschild. I believe that the world would be better off if we .....

We live in the era of the business man or some call it the era of the Rothschild. I believe that the world would be better off if we ended this era and brought about what I'm calling the era of science.

We did, it was called the age of enlightenment. Just because we dont agree with science blindly doesnt mean we dont live in that age. As long as there is money, there will business.

Now I'm not claiming to be a genius with all the answers, understand what I'm posting is only a thought I had. 310,000,000 people work creating resources and services but hardly any of them have the money to have any say so in where these resources go. 400 people now have roughly %50 percent of Americas wealth and they are not using this wealth properely.
...because the only way to help everyone is to redistribute the wealth? Wasnt this tried before.ever hear of Karl Marx?
It could be used to solve, or at least drastically reduce g****l w*****g and feed the hungry. But instead this money sits rendering it useless. Now I'm not talking about the rich, I have no problem with someone getting a high paying job and then buying a yacht or ten, or a mansion or ten. I'm talking about the people so rich they can sway and control industries and in some cases like the stock market crash and the Rothschilds gold muniplation they even play, or rather gamble with or economy.
True: no matter how much regulation is created never underestimate the motives of a good business plan. G****l w*****g will not be solved because no matter what we do, never underestimate the fact that we dont understand what causes it. If we asked the Sierra Club we would live huttled under trees with no clothes, and hold our poop. No Thanks.
You might be thinking taking this money would be stealing but I don't look at it that way. These people do not work hard enough to be as rich as they are. They might work harder than your average citizen so maybe some people do deserve to get double, triple, quadruple, or maybe even more than that of the less successful citizen. But I highly doubt these people work hard enough to equal hundreds of thousands of citizens.

True, but who decides how it gets distributed? A lottery?

At that point I look at it as these people are stealing from us. Now that being said we have the resources and technology available to fix many problems one being g****l w*****g. things like solar panels that give us renewable, completely clean energy and would fix the problem, won't be used because they fix the problem. If we fixed the problem there'd be no money to make and apparently money's that damn important. You can't make money off of something that effective, so these companies that make solar panels... Well let's just say their ceo might make a good living but their not even coming close to the top 400.
Apparently you dont work in the energy business".

Please explain to me a practical method of storing solar energy that isn't 100 times more expensive than gas and electricity as currently provided.

With are national debt around 18 trillion, 9 trillion missing from the federal reserve (which by the way is ran like a private business and %60 of Americas debt is owed) I think it might be time to come up with an entirely new system. One where we simply make agreements to have resources put aside to fix these problems that if we try to take on with or money driven system or at least our current money system would break the bank. But money don't heat your home, our technologically advanced society does and the men and women that work their buns off do. Money doesn't feed you, food from farms do.

What would you suggest: bitcoins, wouldnt we have the same problem?

Now at the moment banks seem necessary because we need those loans to afford houses and cars and ect. But the money system is why these thing are so costly. There are around 120,000,000 households NOT including apartments condos and ect. With 310,000,000 Americans averaging 2.6 people per household this comes out at roughly 115,000,000 people that need roofs. Why are banks kicking people out of houses when there are 5,000,000 extra to begin with. Because apparently money is that damn important. Why if a little girl goes to the hospital with cancer and she can't pay out of pocket, doesn't have insurance or does not want to take a loan out because that would mean the bank taking everything they own later down the road. Which for those of you who think the people losing their houses and are foreclosing where just lazy people who should have worked harder, your wrong, the majority of these people are hard workers with families or like the example above just fell on hard times. Back to the point, if she can't find a way to pay they have to turn her away, not by the nurses choice but because it would be illegal for them to help this child because they don't own the MRI machines or other facilities. Now it honestly baffles me on why we can't give this girl treatment, I mean the machine is their the electricity to power it costs close to nothing and I doubt there's a shortage of people that want to save lives. In fact education to become a doctor can cost 120,000 to 200,000 which I think is a pretty hefty price for dedicating your life towards helping people, but despite this hefty price people do it anyways because people are amazing. Which brings me to education and why in the hell is it so pricey, think about it, the amount of students paying their huge tuitions that often doesn't even include room and food which is two of the only things I can think of that would make it cost so much.
Im just going to lump this in one coherent strategy, we pay for something in a way that provides a vision of what its worth. An education isnt even a guarantee of financial success its a building block. Medical care associated with cancer of such extreme investment of time is costly. Cancer is generally uncommon with children, therefore it will be expensive, since the medical model or care protocols have to duplicated all over the country. The only way to bring the cost down is to have key locations that can provide volume discounted services. The same is true of education.
It's time to bring about the era of the scientist and end this era of greed. This is not an anti religion post either for being a pro science post, think about it would Jesus care about money or would he rather ease human suffering. Also why does God disprove evolution or evolution disprove God? Couldn't God have made evolution. I mean creating a universe whether you're God or not is extremely complicated, a lot more complicated than he sneezed and bam there's the universe, or he just willed it into existence.
This is a lot of hyperbole. Its Marxism. Clearly no government is above making a mess of things no matter which side seems more honorable. What makes you believe that individuals given such power to make sweeping change wouldnt get their hands dirty?

JMHO Loc: Utah

Dummy Boy wrote:

We live in the era of the business man or some ca... (show quote)

:thumbup:

J Anthony Loc: Connecticut

Anonymous wrote:

They haven't earned it in my mind. I fail to see h... (show quote)

J Anthony Loc: Connecticut

Anonymous wrote:

They haven't earned it in my mind. I fail to see h... (show quote)

You'll have to ignore the knee-jerk reactionaries here. Any talk that isn't in line with the neoliberal corporatism of the day gets them foaming at the mouth and seeing c****es under their beds.

alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa

J Anthony wrote:

You'll have to ignore the knee-jerk reactionaries here. Any talk that isn't in line with the neoliberal corporatism of the day gets them foaming at the mouth and seeing c****es under their beds.

you seem to be a bit confused those neoliberals you mention are the c****es

Anonymous Loc: Hamtucket jersey city

J Anthony wrote:

You'll have to ignore the knee-jerk reactionaries here. Any talk that isn't in line with the neoliberal corporatism of the day gets them foaming at the mouth and seeing c****es under their beds.

Dummy boy does acctually bring up some good points and that's a good thing cause it'll help me revise my opinion and tweak what needs to be tweaked. I actually thank dummy boy and later tonight when I got time try and answer his questions the best I can. After all if you can't explain why you're right then you're probably not right. However that first guy was annoying and really has no right judging my opinion before really getting to know it. He just thinks c*******m and automatically gets pissed. Plus this page does need a bit of revising some of the things didn't quite come out or sound as I intended. But after all I wrote it in like 10 mins and spent maybe ten revising it.

alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa

Anonymous wrote:

They haven't earned it in my mind. I fail to see h... (show quote)

if your mind is as small as displayed here it's no wonder

Dave Loc: Upstate New York

Anonymous wrote:

We live in the era of the business man or some call it the era of the Rothschild. I believe that the world would be better off if we ended this era and brought about what I'm calling the era of science. Now I'm not claiming to be a genius with all the answers, understand what I'm posting is only a thought I had. 310,000,000 people work creating resources and services but hardly any of them have the money to have any say so in where these resources go. 400 people now have roughly %50 percent of Americas wealth and they are not using this wealth properelly. It could be used to solve, or at least drastically reduce g****l w*****g and feed the hungry. But instead this money sits rendering it useless. Now I'm not talking about the rich, I have no problem with someone getting a high paying job and then buying a yacht or ten, or a mansion or ten. I'm talking about the people so rich they can sway and control industries and in some cases like the stock market crash and the Rothschilds gold muniplation they even play, or rather gamble with or economy. You might be thinking taking this money would be stealing but I don't look at it that way. These people do not work hard enough to be as rich as they are. They might work harder than your average citizen so maybe some people do deserve to get double, triple, quadruple, or maybe even more than that of the less successful citizen. But I highly doubt these people work hard enough to equal hundreds of thousands of citizens. At that point I look at it as these people are stealing from us. Now that being said we have the resources and technology available to fix many problems one being g****l w*****g. things like solar panels that give us renewable, completely clean energy and would fix the problem, won't be used because they fix the problem. If we fixed the problem there'd be no money to make and apparently money's that damn important. You can't make money off of something that effective, so these companies that make solar panels... Well let's just say their ceo might make a good living but their not even coming close to the top 400. With are national debt around 18 trillion, 9 trillion missing from the federal reserve (which by the way is ran like a private business and %60 of Americas debt is owed) I think it might be time to come up with an entirely new system. One where we simply make agreements to have resources put aside to fix these problems that if we try to take on with or money driven system or at least our current money system would break the bank. But money don't heat your home, our technologically advanced society does and the men and women that work their buns off do. Money doesn't feed you, food from farms do. Now at the moment banks seem necessary because we need those loans to afford houses and cars and ect. But the money system is why these thing are so costly. There are around 120,000,000 households NOT including apartments condos and ect. With 310,000,000 Americans averaging 2.6 people per household this comes out at roughly 115,000,000 people that need roofs. Why are banks kicking people out of houses when there are 5,000,000 extra to begin with. Because apparently money is that damn important. Why if a little girl goes to the hospital with cancer and she can't pay out of pocket, doesn't have insurance or does not want to take a loan out because that would mean the bank taking everything they own later down the road. Which for those of you who think the people losing their houses and are foreclosing where just lazy people who should have worked harder, your wrong, the majority of these people are hard workers with families or like the example above just fell on hard times. Back to the point, if she can't find a way to pay they have to turn her away, not by the nurses choice but because it would be illegal for them to help this child because they don't own the MRI machines or other facilities. Now it honestly baffles me on why we can't give this girl treatment, I mean the machine is their the electricity to power it costs close to nothing and I doubt there's a shortage of people that want to save lives. In fact education to become a doctor can cost 120,000 to 200,000 which I think is a pretty hefty price for dedicating your life towards helping people, but despite this hefty price people do it anyways because people are amazing. Which brings me to education and why in the hell is it so pricey, think about it, the amount of students paying their huge tuitions that often doesn't even include room and food which is two of the only things I can think of that would make it cost so much. The third being the professors salary and if you do the math that was covered along time ago. The first 40 students, give or take, pay enough tuition to cover all the professors. Where the hell is all this money going? That shinny statue in the yard to impress the other colleges? text books do not cost this much. If your a Desseil mechanic like my good friend you might think it goes towards the cars you work on but oh no those are donated because who wouldn't love to have their car fixed for free. Not all colleges might be the same after all I don't exactly have the time to research every college. why can't we simply educate people so they have the know how to be a more productive member of society, why can't we just simply let people live in their houses, why can't we just give people health care and electricity. I'll tell you why because apparently money is just that damn important. Are technologically advanced society has out grown the need for money and I would say it's actually holding us back big time. Now I'm not completely against money, after all it gives people the incentive to go out and work. But let the rewards stay the same, if you work your buns off here have a car and fancy clothes and that pool in your backyard. but their is absolutely no need for people to be homeless or hungry other than for a bank to make money and in a lot of cases for a single individual or a small group to rep profits. Instead of a group of business men sitting at a table brainstorming on the best way to make money or congress trying to figure out the best budget, how about a group of scientists thinking about the best solution. Not based off what makes money but simply what would work the best in terms of easing human suffering. we have the resources and the technology to solve these problems so why do we not solve them. It's time to bring about the era of the scientist and end this era of greed. This is not an anti religion post either for being a pro science post, think about it would Jesus care about money or would he rather ease human suffering. Also why does God disprove evolution or evolution disprove God? Couldn't God have made evolution. I mean creating a universe whether you're God or not is extremely complicated, a lot more complicated than he sneezed and bam there's the universe, or he just willed it into existence.

We live in the era of the business man or some cal... (show quote)

Very early in your screed I learned you have no real knowledge about money, wealth, science or business - you do have a lot of opinion though - and seems you might be interested in applying yourself to learn a bit more about the subjects to either hone your opinions or be able to explain why you have them.

Anonymous Loc: Hamtucket jersey city

If you don't mind me asking what proves I have no knowledge of money, wealth, science or business.

Anonymous Loc: Hamtucket jersey city

Dave wrote:

Very early in your screed I learned you have no real knowledge about money, wealth, science or business - you do have a lot of opinion though - and seems you might be interested in applying yourself to learn a bit more about the subjects to either hone your opinions or be able to explain why you have them.

If you don't mind me asking what proves that I don't have any knowledge of money, wealth, science and business?

Anonymous Loc: Hamtucket jersey city

And if you're talking about how what I'm proposing seems unaffordable, you're right. In fact that was the whole point. That resources (not all resources but a minuet amount) have price tags taken off of them and be used to solve g****l w*****g which I would still wait tenish years to do, to be 100 percent certain that it exists. I Myself am 99 percent convinced it does exist because when I think about the fact that 1 billion cars are running at one time and it would take me 40 years to count to a billion, I worry that it's almost undeniable that this will eventually takes its toll after it adds up day after day, year after year. Plus 97 percent of sientist agree it's real and caused by humans. I would like for us to take measures as soon as possible but it looks like we might have to wait until half of Florida is underwater until some people finally realize it's real. And not solve g****l w*****g I worded that poorly what I ment was slowing it down as much as possible by converting to clean energy. Which if you think my lack of science knowledge comes from their are no clean energy a that would work you'd be mistaken. Puerto Rico is proven me right they ran 75 straight days completely off clean energy. And this is including it being affordable. If we dived head first into it we could stop g****l w*****g. And poo on it if it's not affordable destroying the only earth we have in my mind is much less affordable.