The Fix Is In! (Page 2): Rand Paul is the only potential p**********l candidate who even peeps about the t***h behind our "foreign policy" and the banking cartel's connection to it.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Orrie wrote:

There is always an ulterior motive behind what governments do to provoke war besides the money and power they gain from it. Human life means nothing to them as long it's not them being physically involved in it. It's easy for them to sacrifice the son's and daughters of others for gain. They don't like being told what they can and can't do by the people.

Rand Paul is the only potential p**********l candidate who even peeps about the t***h behind our "foreign policy" and the banking cartel's connection to it. Bonner thinks Rand Paul is far too nice a guy to be in politics!

Quote from War Pigs by Black Sabbath:

Politicians hide themselves away,
They only started the war.
Why should they go out to fight,
They leave that all to the poor.

Ozzy should have added "Central Bankers" to the mix.

4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory

Orrie wrote:

Any country and especially the United States will give weapons of war to agitate and provoke conflicts between the nations of the world. They enjoy seeing people k**l one another. It's a game to them. They play with human life for the sole purpose of their enjoyment.

Are you saying that it's alright to set by and let one group of people k**l off another group of people they don't like ?

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

BigMike wrote:

Rand Paul is the only potential p**********l candidate who even peeps about the t***h behind our "foreign policy" and the banking cartel's connection to it. Bonner thinks Rand Paul is far too nice a guy to be in politics!

Quote from War Pigs by Black Sabbath:

Politicians hide themselves away,
They only started the war.
Why should they go out to fight,
They leave that all to the poor.

Ozzy should have added "Central Bankers" to the mix.

Now, to be fair, war is a good way to provide employment for the poor/middle class young people. Should they have the audacity to survive the war and come home, well then, we have a problem, because they are no more use to us, they quickly go back to being unemployed and homeless - which is what they would have been without a good war.

The complaint, by some politicians, that Veterans cost too much, really should have considered that before they made more of them.

Orrie

4430 wrote:

Are you saying that it's alright to set by and let one group of people k**l off another group of people they don't like ?

Absolutely not! What I was referring to was that governments use war as a tool to gain power over a lesser country's ability to rule themselves. It is all about divide and conquer. They don't care how many people die.

4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory

Orrie wrote:

Absolutely not! What I was referring to was that governments use war as a tool to gain power over a lesser country's ability to rule themselves. It is all about divide and conquer. They don't care how many people die.

I guess I'm not following your line of thinking !

Which war on which country that's not able to rule themselves are you referring to ?

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

lpnmajor wrote:

Now, to be fair, war is a good way to provide employment for the poor/middle class young people. Should they have the audacity to survive the war and come home, well then, we have a problem, because they are no more use to us, they quickly go back to being unemployed and homeless - which is what they would have been without a good war.

The complaint, by some politicians, that Veterans cost too much, really should have considered that before they made more of them.

Politics, politicians and bureaucrats are what cost too much! :lol:

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

4430 wrote:

I guess I'm not following your line of thinking !

Which war on which country that's not able to rule themselves are you referring to ?

How about Iran...just to start. We destabilized their government and installed the Shah. A move which set the stage for Khomeni and all the grief that followed.

When one tosses a pebble into a pond, the ripples spread. We've tossed a lot of pebbles and I could give many examples (MANY).

4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory

BigMike wrote:

How about Iran...just to start. We destabilized their government and installed the Shah. A move which set the stage for Khomeni and all the grief that followed.

When one tosses a pebble into a pond, the ripples spread. We've tossed a lot of pebbles and I could give many examples (MANY).

Iran would sure love to blow Israel off the map so I guess we might as well help them and then there would be world peace !

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

BigMike wrote:

Politics, politicians and bureaucrats are what cost too much! :lol:

:thumbup: :thumbup:

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

4430 wrote:

Iran would sure love to blow Israel off the map so I guess we might as well help them and then there would be world peace !

Israel wasn't a nation for 2000 years. Was it peaceful then? But that's a bit beside the point. The US SERIOUSLY needs to reflect on 100 years of intervention and meddling all over the world. Wh**ever our goals have been, we haven't achieved them.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

BigMike wrote:

Israel wasn't a nation for 2000 years. Was it peaceful then? But that's a bit beside the point. The US SERIOUSLY needs to reflect on 100 years of intervention and meddling all over the world. Wh**ever our goals have been, we haven't achieved them.

Or have we? There's the "public information" and then there's the "for realz" and the two are NOT the same thing, at least where the Gubment is concerned.

There is a whole other world behind the scenes in DC, access to which is strictly limited and THAT world is actually running things. We ordinary humans only get glimpses, now and again, of that world and don't really know the why's and wherefor's of anything - just what we're told - and we're only told what they want us to know.

Just to be clear, there really AREN'T any scandals or secret revelations - only what is allowed - for purposes we have no real clue about.

Orrie

BigMike wrote:

How about Iran...just to start. We destabilized their government and installed the Shah. A move which set the stage for Khomeni and all the grief that followed.

When one tosses a pebble into a pond, the ripples spread. We've tossed a lot of pebbles and I could give many examples (MANY).

Thank you for your answer to 4430's question to me about how powerful governments interfere with the stability of smaller countries. It's all about power and control and it matters not to them who gets hurt or k**led.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

lpnmajor wrote:

Or have we? There's the "public information&q... (show quote)

Stated goals, then. :?

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Orrie wrote:

Thank you for your answer to 4430's question to me about how powerful governments interfere with the stability of smaller countries. It's all about power and control and it matters not to them who gets hurt or k**led.

What we've done in the name of "national interests" in the Mid-East, Africa, South America and Asia would sicken good people of all political persuasions. The cost alone is reason enough to rethink our policies.