Its a simple fact of our Constitution Tom Cotton tells Bob Schieffer: I caught this part of Schieffer's left leaning weekly show where he tries to save the left leaning politics of...

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

I caught this part of Schieffer's left leaning weekly show where he tries to save the left leaning politics of Washington, DC. Cotton took him to the wood shed, in my opinion, and told him some things that Iranians won't like.

Have any of you heard just how many v**es the Republicans have lined up to outv**e an Obama veto about this subject? As of this morning the count was only needing 2 more v**es. That is saying that the GOP, all 54 of them are going along with 10 or 11 Dems. Duck, Obama and Carry. They are coming to get you.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/03/15/its-a-simple-fact-of-our-constitution-freshman-senator-schools-veteran-cbs-journalist-on-nuclear-negotiations/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_term=Firewire&utm_campaign=Firewire%20-%20HORIZON%203-16-15%20Final-MON

Loki Loc: Georgia

oldroy wrote:

I caught this part of Schieffer's left leaning wee... (show quote)

I think, as more people are realizing that Obama and Kerry are giving the Iranians everything they want, and getting promises that Iran is notorious for breaking in return, they may get those 2 v**es.

JimMe

oldroy wrote:

I caught this part of Schieffer's left leaning wee... (show quote)

How does USA CongressFolk letting ANY Foreign Nation's Leaders know that ANY Agreement ANY USA President Signs with ANY Foreign Nation's Leaders is NOT binding NOR enforceable without USA Congressional Approval hurt the USA?!?

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

JimMe wrote:

How does USA CongressFolk letting ANY Foreign Nation's Leaders know that ANY Agreement ANY USA President Signs with ANY Foreign Nation's Leaders is NOT binding NOR enforceable without USA Congressional Approval hurt the USA?!?

It's simple.

It's the same reason that it's so swell for Iran to get Nuclear ICBM capability.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Super Dave wrote:

It's simple.

It's the same reason that it's so swell for Iran to get Nuclear ICBM capability.

Didn't you see my thing about their newly ready ICBMs well IRBMs that they think they can deliver to any place and the fire. We are not safe and Obama long ago destroyed a heavy amount of our nuclear capability.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

JimMe wrote:

How does USA CongressFolk letting ANY Foreign Nation's Leaders know that ANY Agreement ANY USA President Signs with ANY Foreign Nation's Leaders is NOT binding NOR enforceable without USA Congressional Approval hurt the USA?!?

It only hurts us if Iran gets the "bomb" and all the necessaries to deliver those bombs to us. However, it does lots of damage to I Won who is sobbing like a spanked baby.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Loki wrote:

I think, as more people are realizing that Obama and Kerry are giving the Iranians everything they want, and getting promises that Iran is notorious for breaking in return, they may get those 2 v**es.

If Fox didn't miscount that is all they need and that would be enough Democrats to tell him something.

Ricko Loc: Florida

oldroy wrote:

If Fox didn't miscount that is all they need and that would be enough Democrats to tell him something.

oldroy-it is hard to believe that any congressional democrat would not oppose a deal that in fact assures Iran that they can have the bomb if they are patient. We all know that Iran would develop the bomb and have it ready to go way before the 10 years are up. This is stupid. The sanctions were working-reimpose those and make them more stringent. Keep the pressure on until Iran's economy tanks. They will get the message. PS.Need 67 V**es in the Senate and 291 v**es in the House to override a p**********l veto. How many does the House have ? Good Luck America !!!

jimmy.mahuron

The Iranians don't need a bomb now or anytime in the future.
They already have a vehicle for delivery of a bomb. No Deal is the best deal. They would not only destroy Israel, they could target anyone anywhere with a Nuclear armed ICBM.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

jimmy.mahuron wrote:

The Iranians don't need a bomb now or anytime in the future.
They already have a vehicle for delivery of a bomb. No Deal is the best deal. They would not only destroy Israel, they could target anyone anywhere with a Nuclear armed ICBM.

They are sure that they are safe as long as I Won is our president but they may to be so safe if he is railroaded out of office after his second term is completed. Their problem is now that they don't know that they can destroy Israel before Israel gets enough nukes on the way to them. Back in the Cold War the US and the USSR had to take stock of the fact that the other guys would have plenty of time to get some rockets headed their way before the 1st shooter could get some landed. Iran and Israel are a bit closer than the other two were.

Many people have suggested over and over that we just turn the Middle East into a huge mass of glass starting with Iran. I don't think The One would approve of that, but I would, along with many others.