Evidence for a naturalistic origin of life: Made you look! Actually, there is none. Even evolutionary scientists admit this. The concept is contrary to all established science. In...

BOHICA

Made you look! Actually, there is none. Even evolutionary scientists admit this. The concept is contrary to all established science. In fact, the story that evolutionists want us to swallow is just that. A story, with no scientific evidence to support it. If this sounds familiar, it's because it is. It's called blind faith. Advocates point the mountain of evidence they claim supports it, but I don't even an anthill.

peter11937 Loc: NYS

WOW, really! I await any atheist to explain where the Universe came from. Not just the ten percent of matter we can see but the dark matter twenty percent and the seventy percent of the universe that is all unknown matter. Where did it all come from?

BOHICA

I'm convinced that most people believe in evolution simply because the only alternative is abhorrent to them. A living God that they must one day answer too.

peter11937 Loc: NYS

is how the universe was designed. I have had my moment of clarity, the two ideas of a Godly creation and evolution are not only compatible but required. Unless you think God is a wholesale deceiver, than we're not talking God, but the opposite.....

BOHICA wrote:

I'm convinced that most people believe in evolution simply because the only alternative is abhorrent to them. A living God that they must one day answer too.

MrEd Loc: Georgia

BOHICA wrote:

Made you look! Actually, there is none. Even evolutionary scientists admit this. The concept is contrary to all established science. In fact, the story that evolutionists want us to swallow is just that. A story, with no scientific evidence to support it. If this sounds familiar, it's because it is. It's called blind faith. Advocates point the mountain of evidence they claim supports it, but I don't even an anthill.

Tell you what. The first time ANYONE of these i***ts can explain to me how all this life came from a rock I will think about believing them. Until then, no way............

peter11937 Loc: NYS

Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny look it up.

9th Marines

BOHICA wrote:

Made you look! Actually, there is none. Even evolutionary scientists admit this. The concept is contrary to all established science. In fact, the story that evolutionists want us to swallow is just that. A story, with no scientific evidence to support it. If this sounds familiar, it's because it is. It's called blind faith. Advocates point the mountain of evidence they claim supports it, but I don't even an anthill.

A subject in which almost everyone gets emotionally involved--people of faith and those whose faith is only in science. I am a Christian, but believe in the process of evolution--that is selective evolution. Having grown up in the "corn patch" I was enrolled in agriculture classes all four years of high school and was involved in evaluating grains and seeds and judging all manner of farm animals--chickens, hogs, and cattle.

I am not convinced that God created the many different breeds of dairy cattle as distinct breeds--Ayrshire, Guernsey, Jersey, Brown Swiss, Holstein, and Belted Dutch. Or that he created the many distinct breeds of chickens, hogs, sheep, goats, and horses.

I do, however, believe that the ancestors of the vast variety of breeds of domesticated animals and those that have not been domesticated are the product of his creation.

Thanks for stimulating my interest again.

BOHICA

9th Marines wrote:

A subject in which almost everyone gets emotionall... (show quote)

I believe the same thing. But it's not evolution. It's adaptation. Nature can only work with what's already there. Nothing new is added. It's simply the expression of genetic traits that already exist. This is why every breed of dog is fertile with every other breed of dog, no matter how different they appear.

9th Marines

BOHICA wrote:

I believe the same thing. But it's not evolution. It's adaptation. Nature can only work with what's already there. Nothing new is added. It's simply the expression of genetic traits that already exist. This is why every breed of dog is fertile with every other breed of dog, no matter how different they appear.

I'm in agreement--selective adaptation is a better term, but I will stick with the use of the term selective, because humans have selected the traits they have found useful for the trait(s) they are wanting to utilize. Thanks for the reply.

JW

BOHICA wrote:

Made you look! Actually, there is none. Even evolutionary scientists admit this. The concept is contrary to all established science. In fact, the story that evolutionists want us to swallow is just that. A story, with no scientific evidence to support it. If this sounds familiar, it's because it is. It's called blind faith. Advocates point the mountain of evidence they claim supports it, but I don't even an anthill.

Actually, there is a world full of evidence out there but you need to be able to see what you are looking at.

peter11937 Loc: NYS

JW wrote:

Actually, there is a world full of evidence out there but you need to be able to see what you are looking at.

There is a Universe of evidence. Everything including the Universe itself. If this were not so, if the Creator of all would not have placed it so clearly in out view.

BOHICA

JW wrote:

Actually, there is a world full of evidence out there but you need to be able to see what you are looking at.

There is no evidence to support the theory of abiogenesis. On the contrary, there is plenty of hard scientific evidence that suggests it is impossible.