I smell another filthy Rat!!!
Mar 10, 2015 17:56:27 #
Matt Drudge
Clinton met the press but refused to address the toughest, and most important, three questions she faced about her use of private email accounts for all of her official government business during her tenure as secretary of state:
Would she have an independent arbiter look at her private email server?
What lengths would she go to prove she did not delete emails?
Did she clear the server with State Department security officials, or anyone?
Former Minnesota Rep. Michelle Bachmann, R-Minn., critiqued Clintons performance by rhetorically asking WND, What difference does it make?
That was a pointed reference to Hillarys previous attempt to dodge tough questions during her Senate testimony over the importance of finding out who was responsible for the deadly terrorist attack on B******i.
Bachmann called Clintons comments, A liberals view on emails: If its government servers holding Lois Lerners emails, they cant be found. If they are Hillarys, theyre on a private server and we can forget about ever getting them. This is her Nixon moment. It is her 18-minute gap on the tape.
Clare Lopez, a foreign policy expert with the Center for Security Policy, member of the Citizens Commission on B******i and a former CIA officer, told WND, The only way to know with certainty what all was on that server is for an official, neutral party to take custody of that server and conduct a thorough investigation to retrieve everything that was ever on it and make a determination about whether there was ever an actual security breach or even the potential for unauthorized access.
Lopez said Clinton already has demonstrated a willingness to circumvent official policy in ways that reasonably may be viewed as a deliberate attempt to conceal her communications from appropriate official as well as public scrutiny. Relying on her word that she provided the lawfully required access for proper government archiving and records retrieval becomes problematic with that kind of track record.
One of the alibis Clinton offered for using a private email account was the convenience of using just one device to retrieve emails.
You can have two email accounts on one smartphone. I do, retorted Bachmann. You dont need to use two phones.
Why wouldnt a Yale law grad use her government email account for work and her personal account for personal?
Bachmann answered her own question, speculating, She feared access to her government emails more than getting found out. Certainly no one would ever think their official emails would never come under scrutiny, especially when she obviously planned to run for president.
She was certainly confidant the press would cover for this. One set of rules for the Clintons, another for us.
Reaction was swift and strong from Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., the chair of the Select Committee on B******i.
Immediately following Clintons remarks at a press conference held after her speech at the United Nations, Gowdy released a statement lamenting, Regrettably, we are left with more questions than answers.
The chairman said he now plans to call Clinton before his committee at least twice: the first time to clear up her use of emails, the second time to discuss her role in the deadly B******i debacle.
Gowdy insisted there remain serious questions about the security of the system she employed from a national security standpoint, and who authorized the exclusive use of personal email despite, guidance to the contrary from both her State Department and the White House.
He also said there were serious question about who had access to the server from the time Secretary Clinton left office until the time almost two years later the State Department asked for these public records back.
And, who culled through the records to determine which were personal and which were public.
Without access to Secretary Clintons personal server, there is no way for the State Department to know it has acquired all documents that should be made public, and given States delay in disclosing the fact Secretary Clinton exclusively used personal email to conduct State business, there is no way to accept States or Secretary Clintons certification she has turned over all documents that rightfully belong to the American people.
Bachmann also provided WND with a series of pointed questions that Gowdys committee is certain to address:
Who pawed through Hillarys emails, separating government from personal?
It was all in one account, so someone had to read all that content. Was it a government employee?
Was it someone from the Clinton Foundation?
Why did Hillary incur the very expensive, technical step of setting up a private server in her home if she wasnt trying to hide something?
How much would something like this cost?
Did she personally pay for the server and the connections?
What part of any of this did the U.S. government pay for?
Certainly she would have asked someone at the State Department if it was legal to do so.
She had to comply with ethics requirements as a U.S. senator. Didnt her legal team at the State Department warn her she was out of compliance with federal record-keeping requirements since she was busy emailing the people who worked for her?
Is the presidents email account so unsecured that no one on his account noticed this was a private email address coming to him from the secretary of state?
How does Clinton know she wasnt hacked?
Shouldnt that be evaluated by a third-party evaluator?
Clinton met the press but refused to address the toughest, and most important, three questions she faced about her use of private email accounts for all of her official government business during her tenure as secretary of state:
Would she have an independent arbiter look at her private email server?
What lengths would she go to prove she did not delete emails?
Did she clear the server with State Department security officials, or anyone?
Former Minnesota Rep. Michelle Bachmann, R-Minn., critiqued Clintons performance by rhetorically asking WND, What difference does it make?
That was a pointed reference to Hillarys previous attempt to dodge tough questions during her Senate testimony over the importance of finding out who was responsible for the deadly terrorist attack on B******i.
Bachmann called Clintons comments, A liberals view on emails: If its government servers holding Lois Lerners emails, they cant be found. If they are Hillarys, theyre on a private server and we can forget about ever getting them. This is her Nixon moment. It is her 18-minute gap on the tape.
Clare Lopez, a foreign policy expert with the Center for Security Policy, member of the Citizens Commission on B******i and a former CIA officer, told WND, The only way to know with certainty what all was on that server is for an official, neutral party to take custody of that server and conduct a thorough investigation to retrieve everything that was ever on it and make a determination about whether there was ever an actual security breach or even the potential for unauthorized access.
Lopez said Clinton already has demonstrated a willingness to circumvent official policy in ways that reasonably may be viewed as a deliberate attempt to conceal her communications from appropriate official as well as public scrutiny. Relying on her word that she provided the lawfully required access for proper government archiving and records retrieval becomes problematic with that kind of track record.
One of the alibis Clinton offered for using a private email account was the convenience of using just one device to retrieve emails.
You can have two email accounts on one smartphone. I do, retorted Bachmann. You dont need to use two phones.
Why wouldnt a Yale law grad use her government email account for work and her personal account for personal?
Bachmann answered her own question, speculating, She feared access to her government emails more than getting found out. Certainly no one would ever think their official emails would never come under scrutiny, especially when she obviously planned to run for president.
She was certainly confidant the press would cover for this. One set of rules for the Clintons, another for us.
Reaction was swift and strong from Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., the chair of the Select Committee on B******i.
Immediately following Clintons remarks at a press conference held after her speech at the United Nations, Gowdy released a statement lamenting, Regrettably, we are left with more questions than answers.
The chairman said he now plans to call Clinton before his committee at least twice: the first time to clear up her use of emails, the second time to discuss her role in the deadly B******i debacle.
Gowdy insisted there remain serious questions about the security of the system she employed from a national security standpoint, and who authorized the exclusive use of personal email despite, guidance to the contrary from both her State Department and the White House.
He also said there were serious question about who had access to the server from the time Secretary Clinton left office until the time almost two years later the State Department asked for these public records back.
And, who culled through the records to determine which were personal and which were public.
Without access to Secretary Clintons personal server, there is no way for the State Department to know it has acquired all documents that should be made public, and given States delay in disclosing the fact Secretary Clinton exclusively used personal email to conduct State business, there is no way to accept States or Secretary Clintons certification she has turned over all documents that rightfully belong to the American people.
Bachmann also provided WND with a series of pointed questions that Gowdys committee is certain to address:
Who pawed through Hillarys emails, separating government from personal?
It was all in one account, so someone had to read all that content. Was it a government employee?
Was it someone from the Clinton Foundation?
Why did Hillary incur the very expensive, technical step of setting up a private server in her home if she wasnt trying to hide something?
How much would something like this cost?
Did she personally pay for the server and the connections?
What part of any of this did the U.S. government pay for?
Certainly she would have asked someone at the State Department if it was legal to do so.
She had to comply with ethics requirements as a U.S. senator. Didnt her legal team at the State Department warn her she was out of compliance with federal record-keeping requirements since she was busy emailing the people who worked for her?
Is the presidents email account so unsecured that no one on his account noticed this was a private email address coming to him from the secretary of state?
How does Clinton know she wasnt hacked?
Shouldnt that be evaluated by a third-party evaluator?
Mar 10, 2015 18:27:56 #
alex
Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
ldsuttonjr wrote:
Matt Drudge br Clinton met the press but refused t... (show quote)
when have you ever heard any Clinton tell the t***h in public?and obozo is taking lessons from them
Mar 10, 2015 18:38:18 #
alex wrote:
when have you ever heard any Clinton tell the t***h in public?and obozo is taking lessons from them
alex: Bill and Hillary are classic Hucksters of the worse variety! What is even worse is the serfs love their snake oil!
Mar 10, 2015 18:42:59 #
Quote:
when have you ever heard any Clinton tell the t***h in public?and obozo is taking lessons from them
This is going to get good.
Mar 10, 2015 19:20:46 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
Have you noticed even Democrats aren't to enthused with Hillary?
Sons of Liberty wrote:
This is going to get good.
Mar 10, 2015 20:35:36 #
JFlorio wrote:
Have you noticed even Democrats aren't to enthused with Hillary?
Oh yeah! I do believe the house is coming down. :thumbup:
Mar 10, 2015 20:37:40 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
She's just not very likable or believable. I'm beginning to think Heap little squaw Warren could get the nomination. Especially if she could get the red skin v**e.
Sons of Liberty wrote:
Oh yeah! I do believe the house is coming down. :thumbup:
Mar 10, 2015 23:24:34 #
JFlorio wrote:
She's just not very likable or believable. I'm beginning to think Heap little squaw Warren could get the nomination. Especially if she could get the red skin v**e.
That so called Indian speak with forked tongue! She has been raped by Harvard and their socialist ilk!
Mar 11, 2015 07:21:12 #
Ronald Hatt
Loc: Lansing, Mich
ldsuttonjr wrote:
Matt Drudge br Clinton met the press but refused t... (show quote)
This whole "debacle", committed by yet another Liberal cockroach, can be settled by a very simple edict! Hillary, & Bill: { alias "Slick perverted Willie", & "K**lery"}.......Must never be allowed to be public servants ever again!
Isn't that the best way to solve this current American embarrassment?
Mar 11, 2015 11:23:49 #
good question....who paid for installation and ongoing operation of the server?
if the gov't paid any part of this, then there's no doubt that the server belongs to "the people".
if the gov't paid any part of this, then there's no doubt that the server belongs to "the people".
ldsuttonjr wrote:
Matt Drudge br Clinton met the press but refused t... (show quote)
Mar 11, 2015 12:22:42 #
Ronald Hatt
Loc: Lansing, Mich
"k**LERY".......JUST
LOOKS LIKE SHE HAS BEEN "HACKED"....{ IN THE FACE}.....Why is everyone picking on "poor "K**lery"? America "knows' just how honest & moral she is...... :shock:
With such a "fine example" of integrity....{ "Slick perverted Willie"}.......How could she ever "go wrong"? ? ? ??
Just wondering, if anything will ever be reveled about "Slick perverted Willie, visiting Chelsea's Father in law, at his "Child molesting villa".....where it is reported that this guy........had sex s***es, & some at under legal age.......{ just can't imagine "Slick perverted willie", partaking in any of that activity!}........CAN YOU?........... :shock: :arrow: :?: :arrow: :roll: :arrow: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
LOOKS LIKE SHE HAS BEEN "HACKED"....{ IN THE FACE}.....Why is everyone picking on "poor "K**lery"? America "knows' just how honest & moral she is...... :shock:
With such a "fine example" of integrity....{ "Slick perverted Willie"}.......How could she ever "go wrong"? ? ? ??
Just wondering, if anything will ever be reveled about "Slick perverted Willie, visiting Chelsea's Father in law, at his "Child molesting villa".....where it is reported that this guy........had sex s***es, & some at under legal age.......{ just can't imagine "Slick perverted willie", partaking in any of that activity!}........CAN YOU?........... :shock: :arrow: :?: :arrow: :roll: :arrow: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.