Wisconsins Right to Work Law Will Boost Walkers Run: Even Democrats and union workers support RTW legislation.

JMHO Loc: Utah

Even Democrats and union workers support RTW legislation.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/415074/wisconsins-right-work-law-will-boost-walkers-run-deroy-murdock

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

This law is common sense. Now if we could get rid of public employee unions we would really start to heat up the economy.

JMHO wrote:

Even Democrats and union workers support RTW legislation.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/415074/wisconsins-right-work-law-will-boost-walkers-run-deroy-murdock

robert66

JMHO wrote:

Even Democrats and union workers support RTW legislation.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/415074/wisconsins-right-work-law-will-boost-walkers-run-deroy-murdock

The article cites some polls as to some kind of proof that unions would want "right to work". Has there been a public announcement by a union representative stating such ? Very doubtful. Right to work is bad and only benefits people who don't actually break a sweat. Any working man would be a fool to support this. Of course everyone knows Walker could care less about a working man. http://www.mnaflcio.org/news/right-work-laws-get-facts

Kevyn

JMHO wrote:

Even Democrats and union workers support RTW legislation.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/415074/wisconsins-right-work-law-will-boost-walkers-run-deroy-murdock

Walker promised not to sign right to work but he reneged because he serves the Koch brothers not the people of Wisconson. This was just another of his lies to the people of Wisconson, Deceit and screwing middle class families is what the Koch brothers want and they will shovel millions in an attempt to buy Walker the nomination. Walker is bought and paid for by the Kochs. The question is are the American v**ers as a whole as easily deceived as the i***ts in Wisconson who v**ed for this crook and liar.

JMHO Loc: Utah

robert66 wrote:

The article cites some polls as to some kind of proof that unions would want "right to work". Has there been a public announcement by a union representative stating such ? Very doubtful. Right to work is bad and only benefits people who don't actually break a sweat. Any working man would be a fool to support this. Of course everyone knows Walker could care less about a working man. http://www.mnaflcio.org/news/right-work-laws-get-facts

Aaaahhhh, spoken like a true c*******t. Unions are nothing but money laundering services, members dues are funneled to the Democrat Party, without any say so by the member. A person should not have to be required to join a union, or pay union dues. Right-to-work works in every state it has been tried. Only a Democrap fool would not want to work in a RTW state.

JMHO Loc: Utah

Kevyn wrote:

Walker promised not to sign right to work but he r... (show quote)

More Kevyn bullcrap...your norm. Now you can resume your normal position, with your head up your rear. BTW, you might want to get a spellchecker...dummy.

mcjwelles

Don't believe everything you think.

JMHO wrote:

Even Democrats and union workers support RTW legislation.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/415074/wisconsins-right-work-law-will-boost-walkers-run-deroy-murdock

JMHO Loc: Utah

mcjwelles wrote:

Don't believe everything you think.

You do.

robert66

JMHO wrote:

Aaaahhhh, spoken like a true c*******t. Unions are nothing but money laundering services, members dues are funneled to the Democrat Party, without any say so by the member. A person should not have to be required to join a union, or pay union dues. Right-to-work works in every state it has been tried. Only a Democrap fool would not want to work in a RTW state.

You're right. Right to work does work in every state , just not for the people in those states that actually do work, in the sense that they get their hands dirty. It works great for the guy sitting at a desk and watching the value of his stock rise because employees at the companies he is invested in get paid less. The law is designed to break unions, period. Unions represent and advocate for workers. Right to work is bad for workers.

Kevyn

JMHO wrote:

More Kevyn bullcrap...your norm. Now you can resume your normal position, with your head up your rear. BTW, you might want to get a spellchecker...dummy.

Right to work states have far lower pay and higher numbers of on the job injurys than in states that respect workers rights. Walker clearly lied to the citizens he is supposed to be serving on this issue. As far as a spellchecker why bother? I already have a "Dummy spellchecker" it's you asshole!

Ricko Loc: Florida

robert66 wrote:

You're right. Right to work does work in every state , just not for the people in those states that actually do work, in the sense that they get their hands dirty. It works great for the guy sitting at a desk and watching the value of his stock rise because employees at the companies he is invested in get paid less. The law is designed to break unions, period. Unions represent and advocate for workers. Right to work is bad for workers.

robert66-Right to Work should be the law in every State. Furthermore, unions need to be banned from the Public Sector. Governments at any level, should not have to acquiesce to the demands of unions nor should they have to face a union lawsuit when attempting to replace a non-productive union employee. Disband the SEIU as a start. If a worker in the Private Sector determines that it would be beneficial for him/her to join a union, let them make that choice. Nobody should be forced to pay dues to any organization which they do not want to join to be able to work. For anyone to say that "Right to Work" is bad for workers is basically saying that giving the person the right to make that determination is bad. Let the worker decide-not the union. Good Luck America !!!

Mollypitcher1

robert66 wrote:

You're right. Right to work does work in every state , just not for the people in those states that actually do work, in the sense that they get their hands dirty. It works great for the guy sitting at a desk and watching the value of his stock rise because employees at the companies he is invested in get paid less. The law is designed to break unions, period. Unions represent and advocate for workers. Right to work is bad for workers.

Since it appears that all the states with RTW laws fare better than those that don't, it would seem to any THINKING person that being Ruled, Regulated, and Robbed by Unions is NOT beneficial to working people. The biggest reason to kick out compulsory unionism is because it is UNAMERICAN.

Antisocialist Loc: Florida

Mollypitcher1 wrote:

Since it appears that all the states with RTW laws fare better than those that don't, it would seem to any THINKING person that being Ruled, Regulated, and Robbed by Unions is NOT beneficial to working people. The biggest reason to kick out compulsory unionism is because it is UNAMERICAN.

There's your answer; it takes someone who can think on their own.

That's why Libtards h**e Right to Work laws, they are incapable of having thoughts on their own. They need unions and the gubmnt to tell them how to do everything. I have to wonder how they can wipe their own ass.

Ricko Loc: Florida

JMHO wrote:

More Kevyn bullcrap...your norm. Now you can resume your normal position, with your head up your rear. BTW, you might want to get a spellchecker...dummy.

Kevyn-lets have a round of applause for the Koch brothers who elected Walker three times -all without Wisconsin v**ers . We need to get those Kochs to elect Walker to the presidency. Why waste all that time and money holding primaries and rounding up v**ers when the Kochs can do it all by themselves. Do you think the Kochs could make Hillary disappear ?
Guess not-we need a real magician or a jailer for that one. Good Luck America !!!

Ricko Loc: Florida

Mollypitcher1 wrote:

Since it appears that all the states with RTW laws fare better than those that don't, it would seem to any THINKING person that being Ruled, Regulated, and Robbed by Unions is NOT beneficial to working people. The biggest reason to kick out compulsory unionism is because it is UNAMERICAN.

Molly-for the democrats its all about control. They have benefited from union largesse for decades and to see that being reduced is more than they can bear. You are absolutely correct that to force someone to join a union in order to ply their trade is unamerican. As a matter of fact, RTW does not go far enough as it allows unions. Good Luck America !!!