One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Two Americas
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Jul 10, 2013 22:54:31   #
rumitoid
 
Every ugly thing we ever had to rightfully say about totalitarian and oppressive regimes is done far more effectively here, in the US:. IRS, NSA, DOH. DOD.

This is not the direct Work of Obama, though he is integrally involved and culpable, nor the will of Congress but the choice of "we the peope": we took fear willingly as our guide to the future. Expected our reps to respond with impressive defensive stratigies based on security and not the highest ideals of this country. We got what we paid for.

Reply
Jul 10, 2013 23:09:57   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
rumitoid wrote:
Every ugly thing we ever had to rightfully say about totalitarian and oppressive regimes is done far more effectively here, in the US:. IRS, NSA, DOH. DOD.

This is not the direct Work of Obama, though he is integrally involved and culpable, nor the will of Congress but the choice of "we the peope": we took fear willingly as our guide to the future. Expected our reps to respond with impressive defensive stratigies based on security and not the highest ideals of this country. We got what we paid for.
Every ugly thing we ever had to rightfully say abo... (show quote)


Speak for yourself. I opposed the "Patriot Act," (THERE is some irony) when practically all conservatives and a majority of liberals couldn't wait to pass it. This legislation, besides being of dubious constitutionality, is wide open for the abuse that is now happening. Once the government camel gets is nose under "We the People's" tent flap, it does not tamely withdraw.

Reply
Jul 10, 2013 23:15:16   #
ABBAsFernando Loc: Ohio
 
When the United States Constitution ensures the FREEDOM and LIBERTY to engage in the FREE MARKET SYSTEM that enables prosperity. Only a Christian moral society can be a FREE society, any other society is unworkable as individuals do not respect the rights and property of others.

Most liberals have absolutely no morals whatsoever and cannot live FREE having no respect for the rights of others. Such individuals must be controlled. C*******t agents seeking to take control of America subvert the United States Constitution.

Freedom requires strict compliance to the United States Constitution and the rule of LAW!

John Adams in a speech to the military in 1798 warned his fellow countrymen stating, “We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion . . . Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”…



Reply
Jul 10, 2013 23:23:37   #
rumitoid
 
banjojack wrote:
Speak for yourself. I opposed the "Patriot Act," (THERE is some irony) when practically all conservatives and a majority of liberals couldn't wait to pass it. This legislation, besides being of dubious constitutionality, is wide open for the abuse that is now happening. Once the government camel gets is nose under "We the People's" tent flap, it does not tamely withdraw.


You are not a country, banjojack, even if you feel like one. Lies about the "majority of liberals" approval; shame. In the second round of extentions, nine democrats and one independent opposed; the rest agreed. Third Round extentions: surprising Republican support, despite earlier resistance to everything with a whiff of Obama.

Reply
Jul 10, 2013 23:43:56   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
rumitoid wrote:
You are not a country, banjojack, even if you feel like one. Lies about the "majority of liberals" approval; shame. In the second round of extentions, nine democrats and one independent opposed; the rest agreed. Third Round extentions: surprising Republican support, despite earlier resistance to everything with a whiff of Obama.


He is responding to your wording in your first sentence, "Everything ugly [we] ever had....". As you use the word "we", you did not state "we" as a nation; therefor, it would be grammatically "we" individually, hence his statement, "I opposed the Patriot Act" is correct. He is one of the "we".

Reply
Jul 10, 2013 23:49:09   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
AuntiE wrote:
He is responding to your wording in your first sentence, "Everything ugly [we] ever had....". As you use the word "we", you did not state "we" as a nation; therefor, it would be grammatically "we" individually, hence his statement, "I opposed the Patriot Act" is correct. He is one of the "we".


Muchas gracias.

Reply
Jul 11, 2013 06:32:40   #
Michael Nestorick Loc: Northeastern Pa.
 
I admit I don't like O'Bama but you have to also blame The Clinton's and the Bush's. You have to connect the dots . We the people have been deceived by our government for a very long time. They are all puppets who sold their soul to the evil rich elitest who really run this country, and are trying to destroy our Constitution and our American way of life.

Reply
 
 
Jul 11, 2013 12:32:28   #
Tom Fico
 
"Either you're with us or you're against us" will be the downfall of the human race! Mankind's true progress as a species must evolve by a scientifically-based, technology driven, CONFLICT AVERSE and non-monetary system.
As such, I implore the cons and the libs to see the Zeitgeist video series starting with Zeitgeist the Movie, then Zeitgeist Addendum ending with Zeitgeist Moving Forward. Indeed, globally and drastic, well throughout change must occur if we are to survive as a species!

Reply
Jul 12, 2013 01:45:21   #
badmikiev
 
"Either you're with us or you're against us” That is SO true. Either you are with ‘the WORLD’ building up your treasures here, on this earth. Or you are not for laying up your treasures here, but rather in heaven. So in order to have a world that is ‘FOR’ the same thing. A common faith but be. Right now the devil has this earth…and until that changes. 'WE' will not be for the same thing.

Reply
Jul 12, 2013 07:39:00   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
rumitoid wrote:
Every ugly thing we ever had to rightfully say about totalitarian and oppressive regimes is done far more effectively here, in the US:. IRS, NSA, DOH. DOD.

This is not the direct Work of Obama, though he is integrally involved and culpable, nor the will of Congress but the choice of "we the peope": we took fear willingly as our guide to the future. Expected our reps to respond with impressive defensive stratigies based on security and not the highest ideals of this country. We got what we paid for.
Every ugly thing we ever had to rightfully say abo... (show quote)


Yes, we did. I agree with your post entirely. I just wish more people would educate themselves on these realities but they are so preoccupied with hatred - which is *so* politically controllable.

Reply
Jul 12, 2013 07:48:28   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
banjojack wrote:
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Speak for yourself. I opposed the "Patriot Act," (THERE is some irony) when practically all conservatives and a majority of liberals couldn't wait to pass it. This legislation, besides being of dubious constitutionality, is wide open for the abuse that is now happening. Once the government camel gets is nose under "We the People's" tent flap, it does not tamely withdraw.


I'm glad you did. I opposed the PATRIOT Act too. Not sure where you're getting your information from but a majority of liberals were actually opposed to it as well. Maybe you're referring specifically to the members of Congress who were rushed into v****g on the bill on the same day it was introduced as an emergency response to "clear and present danger" - which of course turned out to be a lie.

Reply
Jul 12, 2013 07:58:57   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
AuntiE wrote:
He is responding to your wording in your first sentence, "Everything ugly we ever had....". As you use the word "we", you did not state "we" as a nation; therefor, it would be grammatically "we" individually, hence his statement, "I opposed the Patriot Act" is correct. He is one of the "we".


I understood rumatoids wording and it appears you did to. Within his context "we" clearly implies we as a nation. I also understood banjojacks divergence from that context to announce his personal standing and I think rumatoid was only clarifying the difference.

BTW, grammar is an imperfect exercise in explaining our language it's not the end all. Just thought I'd add to the pedantic sidebar. ;)

Reply
Jul 12, 2013 08:05:19   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
Tom Fico wrote:
"Either you're with us or you're against us" will be the downfall of the human race! Mankind's true progress as a species must evolve by a scientifically-based, technology driven, CONFLICT AVERSE and non-monetary system.
As such, I implore the cons and the libs to see the Zeitgeist video series starting with Zeitgeist the Movie, then Zeitgeist Addendum ending with Zeitgeist Moving Forward. Indeed, globally and drastic, well throughout change must occur if we are to survive as a species!
"Either you're with us or you're against us&q... (show quote)


I haven't see that series... but what you say makes sense to me. I'll have to check it out. Thanks for the reference!

Reply
Jul 12, 2013 08:10:53   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
Michael Nestorick wrote:
I admit I don't like O'Bama but you have to also blame The Clinton's and the Bush's. You have to connect the dots . We the people have been deceived by our government for a very long time. They are all puppets who sold their soul to the evil rich elitest who really run this country, and are trying to destroy our Constitution and our American way of life.


I've tried to make that point many times... I might have been more successful in this forum had I not started by questioning an attack on Obama - now they all think I'm a fan. LOL. I *did* v**e for him because I think he was the better option available but you know what they say... lesser of two evils.

Reply
Jul 12, 2013 08:24:03   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
ABBAsFernando wrote:
When the United States Constitution ensures the FREEDOM and LIBERTY to engage in the FREE MARKET SYSTEM that enables prosperity. Only a Christian moral society can be a FREE society, any other society is unworkable as individuals do not respect the rights and property of others.

Most liberals have absolutely no morals whatsoever and cannot live FREE having no respect for the rights of others. Such individuals must be controlled. C*******t agents seeking to take control of America subvert the United States Constitution.

Freedom requires strict compliance to the United States Constitution and the rule of LAW!

John Adams in a speech to the military in 1798 warned his fellow countrymen stating, “We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion . . . Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”…
i When the United States Constitution ensures the... (show quote)


LOL - 'always good for a laugh.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.