BOHICA

I barely glanced at this in posting it to Headlines because I thought I already knew what it would say. Holder’s whining last week about how high the standard is to convict someone of a federal civil rights violation suggested that the tone of the DOJ’s Ferguson report would be more “he’s probably guilty but we just can’t prove it” than “he’s innocent and was railroaded by the media.”

http://hotair.com/archives/2015/03/04/must-read-doj-report-totally-vindicates-darren-wilson-in-michael-brown-shooting/

jelun

Totally vindicated? Where do you get that?
There were no witnesses who could say what was or was not in the little k**ler's head to know if he feared for his life.
There is no requirement that it be a rational fear, just fear.
There was no proof that he INTENTIONALLY confronted him due to race.
No proof other than the report that shows what a dismal failure Ferguson is at protecting and serving.

BOHICA

Did you even read the article? Eric Holder said he was not guilty.

jelun

One can only be found not guilty with being charged.
The DOJ found that they could not charge him.
He may never be found guilty of murder, he is still a k**ler.
That such a corrupt department let him go is very telling.

MajorAhrens Loc: Myrtle Beach

BOHICA, I too thought this circus act called an administration was going to do it's, "we know officer Wilson is guilty we just can't prove it routine" in its report. The left always has egg on its face after every "situation" they try and stir up. You would think that after so many years of always being on the wrong side of every issue they would at least wait until the facts were presented. But I've never met a liberal, or progressive, or c****e or wh**ever they are this week who let facts get in the way of a chance to slam the mean ol white folks and America. The democrat party should change their name and logo to the S&M party of perverts, freaks and Meshugahs. Good post.

BOHICA

The department of Justice, and Eric Holder, determined that there was not even enough evidence to charge him? You still didn't read the article, did you? I thought you couldn't possibly be any dumber. Guess I was wrong.

BOHICA

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

jelun

Why is it not surprising that some backward retired Army officer would like it that b****s are once again shown to be used as revenue enhancers for the white power brokers in the community?
How about that police officer (wonder if it was Darren Wilson?) who breached...well, read it from the report...

These incidents are not without repercussions for those wrongfully arrested:

"Even relatively routine misconduct by Ferguson police officers can have significant consequences for the people whose rights are violated. For example, in the summer of 2012, a 32-year-old African-American man sat in his car cooling off after playing basketball in aFerguson public park.An officer pulled up behind the man’s car, blocking him in, and demanded the man’s Social Security number and identification. Without any cause, the officer accused the man of being a p*******e, referring to the presence of children in the park, and ordered the man out of his car for a pat-down, although the officer had no reason to believe the man was armed. The officer also asked to search the man’s car. The man objected, citing his constitutional rights. In response, the officer arrested the man, reportedly at gunpoint, charging him with eight violations of Ferguson’s municipal code. One charge, Making a False Declaration, was for initially providing the short form of his first name (e.g., “Mike” instead of“Michael”), and an address which, although legitimate, was different from the one on his driver’s license. Another charge was for not wearing a seat belt, even though he was seated in a parked car. The officer also charged the man both with having an expired operator’s license, and with having no operator’s license in his possession. The man told us that, because of these charges,he lost his job as a contractor with the federal government that he had held for years."

But you are probably right, it is all just soft leftys' crocodile tears not people like you who are filled with h**e and fear.

jelun

Why would I read an article about the report when I read the report?
YOU said that you barely looked at it, LOL, I sure look to you as an authority.
Aren't these your words?

I barely glanced at this in posting it to Headlines because I thought I already knew what it would say. Holder’s whining last week about how high the stan...

Hemiman Loc: Communist California

If they are so corrupt they must work for Obama,he has a corner on the corruption market.
One can only hope you and the rest of the ass holes like you are arrested for a crime you didn't commit and are convicted and sent to prison.
Did you sneak over the fence to get into this country??

Hemiman Loc: Communist California

Bottom line if the guy didn't break the law he would still be working.If brown the thug had surrendered he would still be alive.The left wing nuts don't get to decide what laws they are going to obey,you have to obey them ALL.

BOHICA

Apparently you ARE as dumb as a post. That was a quote from the article I posted. You would have realized that, if you had read it. If I was as dumb as you, I'd k**l myself.

jelun

And with the world watching, Ferguson law enforcement and courts won't be able to pick and choose which laws they get to follow.
That will be the real change.

jelun

Again. I read the report. I did not read the twisted pieces some rwn wants me to read.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

Go to the document.... go to page 80 and read all the way through page 85. Sorry....knowing that some people would not find the link embedded.... here is the link to the actual document. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/03/04/us/doj-report-on-shooting-of-michael-brown.html?_r=0