Is Scott Walker really who we want? (Page 8): Right.

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

jelun wrote:

Why don't you try researching how many times you have repeated what someone already said on a thread?

Right.

no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

astrolite wrote:

If you are familiar with Teacher and Fire unions and their contempt for the taxpayers, you will understand perfectly!

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: I heard his follow up explanation where he said that by that statement he meant that he stayed the course and did not back down to the unions and that h would surround himself with knowledgeable men and women who were also not willing to back down and turn tail and run. sounds good to me.

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

According to the latest Rasmussen poll, Walker is closing in on Hillary:
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/e******ns/e******n_2016/clinton_vs_walker_it_s_very_close

jelun

LAPhil wrote:

According to the latest Rasmussen poll, Walker is closing in on Hillary:
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/e******ns/e******n_2016/clinton_vs_walker_it_s_very_close

Neither one of them has even declared yet. Why feed into the 24 hour news media silliness?

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

jelun wrote:

Neither one of them has even declared yet. Why feed into the 24 hour news media silliness?

It's only silliness to those who have any doubt that either of them is going to run.

jelun

LAPhil wrote:

It's only silliness to those who have any doubt that either of them is going to run.

They can run, at least one will never make it through the primary season.

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

jelun wrote:

They can run, at least one will never make it through the primary season.

Now who's being premature?

Miss Mostly

LAPhil wrote:

I think you may have been addressing me but there was nothing quoted in your post so I can't be sure. Please use the Quote Reply button so everyone knows who you're talking to, because as you can see the posts are not sequential and we won't be able to tell otherwise. Thanks.

I'm sorry I'm new here not exactly sure how this works, just winging it! Something was said by whom I don't remember, about the fcc. I called it Obamanet and they liked it!! I made mention of another bogus piece of crap u have to v**e on before u can read it! Well this one is 312 pages and to my knowledges it's still not out there for us to read!!!!

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

Miss Mostly wrote:

I'm sorry I'm new here not exactly sure how this works, just winging it! Something was said by whom I don't remember, about the fcc. I called it Obamanet and they liked it!! I made mention of another bogus piece of crap u have to v**e on before u can read it! Well this one is 312 pages and to my knowledges it's still not out there for us to read!!!!

Now you've got it.

richard0135 Loc: little rock, arkansas

PaulPisces wrote:

I realize politicians are prone to sound bites and their opponents tend to leverage those in ways that distort them. But really, Scott Walker's comment at CPAC was pretty careless, and Elizabeth Warren's come-back a perfect response. Thoughts?

Well, I consider Gov. Walker's comment spot on. The Union's are a dying breed. The Gov. found that, Wisconsin's education system was broken. The Union teacher's could not teach. They could not be fired because of the Teacher's Union. They were down on the national level of education. Now that the Teacher's Union's are history, the latest on Wisconsin's standing in education was the 2nd best in the nation. Now I ask you; is that proof that the Union's are k*****g education in the U.S.? The new teacher's salary is based on performance. They also have continued education. something that was lacking prior to Gov. Walker's action. Even the libtards deep down know education is failing in the U.S. They also know it is because of Union's protection of stupid teacher's. Look at the private schools; do they have Union's? NO, they do not. Then look at the results verus public schools.

richard0135 Loc: little rock, arkansas

PaulPisces wrote:

I realize politicians are prone to sound bites and their opponents tend to leverage those in ways that distort them. But really, Scott Walker's comment at CPAC was pretty careless, and Elizabeth Warren's come-back a perfect response. Thoughts?

Well, I consider Gov. Walker's comment spot on. The Union's are a dying breed. The Gov. found that, Wisconsin's education system was broken. The Union teacher's could not teach. They could not be fired because of the Teacher's Union. They were down on the national level of education. Now that the Teacher's Union's are history, the latest on Wisconsin's standing in education was the 2nd best in the nation. Now I ask you; is that proof that the Union's are k*****g education in the U.S.? The new teacher's salary is based on performance. They also have continued education. something that was lacking prior to Gov. Walker's action. Even the libtards deep down know education is failing in the U.S. They also know it is because of Union's protection of stupid teacher's. Look at the private schools; do they have Union's? NO, they do not. Then look at the results verus public schools.

LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA

richard0135 wrote:

Well, I consider Gov. Walker's comment spot on. Th... (show quote)

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

jelun

richard0135 wrote:

Well, I consider Gov. Walker's comment spot on. Th... (show quote)

You have no idea what happened in WI at all, do you?