One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
If Netanyahu’s speech is a success, Obama’s foreign policy will be indefensible.
Page <<first <prev 3 of 6 next> last>>
Feb 25, 2015 01:15:48   #
Xavier Reign
 
She Wolf wrote:
The last time we listened to Netanyahu: "If you take out Saddam's regime, I guarantee you will have enormous positive reverberations on the region." Spoken to congress in 2002. How did that work out our military?

I understand some members of Congress are forcing members of their staff to attend this speech in order to obtain standing ovations for this gentlemen. I would like to hear both sides of the situation. If that can't be arranged, then I feel my country is being used to benefit Netanyahu's political career. By making it appear he controls the U.S. he is threatening his neighbors.

I do not want this man to be allowed to disrespect the Commander In Chief of the American Military. He should be addressing the many problems in his own country.
The last time we listened to Netanyahu: "If ... (show quote)

Unfortunately when Iran acquires the capability to launch a nuke and hit one of our allies or us it will be to late for you to say," oh oops maybe we were wrong". They have said time and time again, "death to America" and Israel, would you not fear complete annihilation for your people and do anything to stop it. Who would you call on in times of trouble if you were in a bad neighborhood? The police or a friend, lady we are both to Israel. What does the rest of the world do when there are atrocities, they call the US world police to save there as*es and then h**e us for it.

Reply
Feb 25, 2015 01:21:30   #
Xavier Reign
 
Mollypitcher1 wrote:
I am in no mood to be civil to the very people who are destroying my country! Do not even begin to imagine you and your cohorts will be able to destroy my first amendment rights to say what I think, anywhere and anytime I wish. I consider the socialists lily livered whiners who want their entire life taken care of by the government at the expense of others, so why shouldn't I say so? Being "CIVIL" has long passed its time to be useful. We are at war for the future of the United States and I don't believe in Rules of Engagement that say I have to be shot at twice before I can shoot back!
I am in no mood to be civil to the very people who... (show quote)

AMEN SISTER!!!!!!!!!! Just give me a glimpse you might think about it and I won't hesitate. The rules in war are like a bar brawl for me, HIT FIRST, HIT HARD AND DON'T STOP TIL ITS OVER.

Reply
Feb 25, 2015 08:03:20   #
Mollypitcher1
 
Xavier Reign wrote:
AMEN SISTER!!!!!!!!!! Just give me a glimpse you might think about it and I won't hesitate. The rules in war are like a bar brawl for me, HIT FIRST, HIT HARD AND DON'T STOP TIL ITS OVER.


Ya Gotta Love Patton!

:thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Feb 25, 2015 08:20:30   #
J Anthony Loc: Connecticut
 
Mollypitcher1 wrote:
Whether or not you want to admit it, you are an indoctrinated liberal! Even suggesting that Netanyahu is coming through the back door is insulting to EVERY American who UNDERSTANDS the BALANCE of POWERS in the United States CONSTITUTION.

You seem to feel HIS MAJESTY'S RUDENESS should be bowed to and that his IGNORING the THIRD MAN in Succession to the White House should be the law of the land.

UNDERSTAND THIS, The House of Representatives is the PEOPLE'S HOUSE! THE CONGRESS IS ONE THIRD OF A TRILATERAL STRUCTURE OF EQUAL POWER. We DO NOT HAVE A KING who RULES ALL! By IGNORING the Speakers Invitation and Netanyahu's address in an effort to destroy Netanyahu's ree******n YOUR so-called president has shown his filthy drawers to the PEOPLE of the United STATES of America and the leader of our staunchest friend in the M.E.
Frankly I do not care whether or not he shows up or whether or not the revolting left wing i***ts in our government show up. I am interested in WHAT NETANYAHU HAS TO SAY ABOUT IRAN. And any "THINKING" person should feel the same way. Of course lilly-livered soft in the head touchy feely people like you are not known for their thinking abilities.
Whether or not you want to admit it, you are an in... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 25, 2015 08:28:10   #
J Anthony Loc: Connecticut
 
Mollypitcher1 wrote:
Whether or not you want to admit it, you are an indoctrinated liberal! Even suggesting that Netanyahu is coming through the back door is insulting to EVERY American who UNDERSTANDS the BALANCE of POWERS in the United States CONSTITUTION.

You seem to feel HIS MAJESTY'S RUDENESS should be bowed to and that his IGNORING the THIRD MAN in Succession to the White House should be the law of the land.

UNDERSTAND THIS, The House of Representatives is the PEOPLE'S HOUSE! THE CONGRESS IS ONE THIRD OF A TRILATERAL STRUCTURE OF EQUAL POWER. We DO NOT HAVE A KING who RULES ALL! By IGNORING the Speakers Invitation and Netanyahu's address in an effort to destroy Netanyahu's ree******n YOUR so-called president has shown his filthy drawers to the PEOPLE of the United STATES of America and the leader of our staunchest friend in the M.E.
Frankly I do not care whether or not he shows up or whether or not the revolting left wing i***ts in our government show up. I am interested in WHAT NETANYAHU HAS TO SAY ABOUT IRAN. And any "THINKING" person should feel the same way. Of course lilly-livered soft in the head touchy feely people like you are not known for their thinking abilities.
Whether or not you want to admit it, you are an in... (show quote)


Right, and you're so tough in the way you don't give a s**t about anything but .your own self-interests. Good for you.
Last I checked, Netanyahu is not running for president of the United States. I'm sure you would v**e for him if he did. If you're so interested in what he has to say, you don't need to have him address Congress to do so.
She-Wolf being civil and respectful bothers you. Why? Because you've been indoctrinated yourself by a narrow ideology that espouses selfishness as a virtue, war as peace, and ignorance as strength. You are Orwell's worst nightmare.

Reply
Feb 25, 2015 08:44:19   #
Mollypitcher1
 
J Anthony wrote:
Right, and you're so tough in the way you don't give a s**t about anything but .your own self-interests. Good for you.
Last I checked, Netanyahu is not running for president of the United States. I'm sure you would v**e for him if he did. If you're so interested in what he has to say, you don't need to have him address Congress to do so.
She-Wolf being civil and respectful bothers you. Why? Because you've been indoctrinated yourself by a narrow ideology that espouses selfishness as a virtue, war as peace, and ignorance as strength. You are Orwell's worst nightmare.
Right, and you're so tough in the way you don't gi... (show quote)


You sure have swallowed the Cool Aid! You'd have Stalin address Congress if you had your chance! She Wolf is an indoctrinated Fool and hasn't the slightest clue about the real world we live in, nor do you.

Reply
Feb 25, 2015 08:50:34   #
J Anthony Loc: Connecticut
 
Mollypitcher1 wrote:
You sure have swallowed the Cool Aid! You'd have Stalin address Congress if you had your chance! She Wolf is an indoctrinated Fool and hasn't the slightest clue about the real world we live in, nor do you.


I don't drink Kool-Aid. Obviously you do.
I also don't presume to know the minds of others that I can't possibly know. Obviously you do.
She -Wolf,judging by her posts here, is a thinking, feeling human-being. Obviously you're not.
Have a taste of your own medicine, let me know what you think.

Reply
Feb 25, 2015 09:42:49   #
Richard Rowland
 
Mollypitcher1 wrote:
Speak for yourself and do not ever imagine yourself capable to speak for me. You can have all the imagined illusions you wish to have, but you do not know me, do not know my history, and do not know what doors are open to me. Continue to spout all you wish but you DO NOT speak for me.
I know you as well as you indicated you know She Wolf. I told you before that you probably don't know what you're talking about, and most of your posts indicate that. Look, I have no particular ax to grind with you, except for that you seem to think you have all the right answers, much like some others on this forum, and your lack of civility when addressing others who have an opinion that you disagree with,again, much like some others on this forum.

Reply
Feb 25, 2015 11:34:26   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
Mollypitcher1 wrote:
You sure have swallowed the Cool Aid! You'd have Stalin address Congress if you had your chance! She Wolf is an indoctrinated Fool and hasn't the slightest clue about the real world we live in, nor do you.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 25, 2015 17:40:36   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
Netanyahu Says Obama And West Have ‘Given Up’ On A Non-Nuclear Iran

Geoffrey Grider | February 25, 2015

Israeli Prime Minister exposes Obama’s agenda for what it truly is

“Let them all be confounded and turned back that h**e Zion.” Psalm 129:5 (KJV)

Benjamin Netanyahu spoke some serious t***h today when he said that Obama and his administration has given up on their promise to keep the nation of Iran non-nuclear. That is 100%, dead on t***h. But if Netanyahu had the liberty, I am sure he would of gone further by saying that Obama never had any intention of a non-nuclear Iran. That would be 100% t***h as well.

JERUSALEM, ISRAEL – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday rebuffed criticism in Washington of his plans to speak in Congress, accusing world powers of forsaking a pledge to prevent Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

“I respect the White House and the President of the United States but on such a fateful matter, that can determine whether or not we survive, I must do everything to prevent such a great danger for Israel,” Netanyahu said in a speech.

He said world powers had pledged to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, adding that “from the agreement coming together it appears they have given up on this commitment“.

Barack Obama is the declared enemy of the nation of Israel.
Barack Obama is the declared enemy of the nation o...

Reply
Feb 25, 2015 17:46:59   #
Mollypitcher1
 
And now the Democrats want to have a Closed Door Session with Netanyahu. They have issued him an invitation which he politely REFUSED.

BRAVO Netanyahu. It is SO nice to see a TRUE LEADER!

Reply
Feb 25, 2015 17:56:09   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
Mollypitcher1 wrote:
And now the Democrats want to have a Closed Door Session with Netanyahu. They have issued him an invitation which he politely REFUSED.

BRAVO Netanyahu. It is SO nice to see a TRUE LEADER!


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 25, 2015 20:53:07   #
Richard Rowland
 
bdamage wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
While I have no love for Obama, and I'm not sure about Netanyahu's motives either, it would seem,though, that it isn't a good idea for Iran to aquire nuclear weapons. But then, it isn't good that North Korea has them either,but they do! I would point out that President Bush's foray into Iraq started a snowball effect, of turmoil, in the middle east that seems to have gotten out of hand, and continues with this administration. And, maybe that's the objective, but it's hard to imagine the endgame. One thing I do know, is that all we armchair foreign policy experts don't have a clue about anything. It will take future decades, for history to provide the answers regarding today's issues. There was much angst, and consternation, during Lincoln's Presidency ,also, but history tells us he was one of our greatest presidents ever. I suppose, though, that that depends on which side of the Mason/Dixon line one resides on. However, those of us on this form, on both sides of the debate, won't be around for the final assessment. So set back, and relax, what-will-be-will-be, and if the time comes that calls for a greater effort, we'll know it when it happens.

Reply
Feb 25, 2015 21:02:20   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
Richard Rowland wrote:
While I have no love for Obama, and I'm not sure about Netanyahu's motives either, it would seem,though, that it isn't a good idea for Iran to aquire nuclear weapons. But then, it isn't good that North Korea has them either,but they do! I would point out that President Bush's foray into Iraq started a snowball effect, of turmoil, in the middle east that seems to have gotten out of hand, and continues with this administration. And, maybe that's the objective, but it's hard to imagine the endgame. One thing I do know, is that all we armchair foreign policy experts don't have a clue about anything. It will take future decades, for history to provide the answers regarding today's issues. There was much angst, and consternation, during Lincoln's Presidency ,also, but history tells us he was one of our greatest presidents ever. I suppose, though, that that depends on which side of the Mason/Dixie line one resides on. However, those of us on this form, on both sides of the debate, won't be around for the final assessment. So set back, and relax, what-will-be-will-be, and if the time comes that calls for a greater effort, we'll know it when it happens.
While I have no love for Obama, and I'm not sure a... (show quote)


It's happening now Richard....and time is running out!
I feel that N Korea is being kept in check by China....as long as they have a stake in our country they won't take the chain off of the "Kid".
Iran, however, has no one to hold them back.
They MUST be dealt with....one way or another.

Reply
Feb 25, 2015 21:23:43   #
Mollypitcher1
 
Richard Rowland wrote:
While I have no love for Obama, and I'm not sure about Netanyahu's motives either, it would seem,though, that it isn't a good idea for Iran to aquire nuclear weapons. But then, it isn't good that North Korea has them either,but they do! I would point out that President Bush's foray into Iraq started a snowball effect, of turmoil, in the middle east that seems to have gotten out of hand, and continues with this administration. And, maybe that's the objective, but it's hard to imagine the endgame. One thing I do know, is that all we armchair foreign policy experts don't have a clue about anything. It will take future decades, for history to provide the answers regarding today's issues. There was much angst, and consternation, during Lincoln's Presidency ,also, but history tells us he was one of our greatest presidents ever. I suppose, though, that that depends on which side of the Mason/Dixon line one resides on. However, those of us on this form, on both sides of the debate, won't be around for the final assessment. So set back, and relax, what-will-be-will-be, and if the time comes that calls for a greater effort, we'll know it when it happens.
While I have no love for Obama, and I'm not sure a... (show quote)


And if the "Rebels" had waited around and cow towed to George III instead of saying "Enough is Enough", where would we be now? FORTUNATELY a third of the country got off their rocking chairs and fought for freedom. They didn't wait for history to tell them what happened. People like you make me sick.
You could start to educate yourself by reading See No Evil, by Robert Baer.
Follow that with The Iranian Time Bomb by Michael A. Ledeen, and then try The Enemy Within by Trevor Louden. When you've read them I'll give you a list of another couple of hundred that should help clear away the cobwebs and help you see where we are in this country. I suppose you've heard of the Trojan Horse!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.