One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Sharia Law ? Muslim Scumbag Murdering - Consequences to Women!
Page <<first <prev 8 of 9 next>
Feb 19, 2015 00:43:13   #
Rod Riddle
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

That temperament mostly applys to Gay Marriage...


And your point is???

Reply
Feb 19, 2015 00:46:05   #
Sicilianthing
 
Rod Riddle wrote:
And your point is???


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Marriage is between man and women ...

Ying/Yang

This - that

If you're gay then you guys can have a union for taxes and death and wh**ever else you think you need...

But you don't get to redefine the definition of Marriage across 5,000 denominations on this planet, in this life !

So are you gay or something or was that a big joke...

WTF Man ?

Reply
Feb 19, 2015 01:03:50   #
Rod Riddle
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Marriage is between man and women ...

Ying/Yang

This - that

If you're gay then you guys can have a union for taxes and death and wh**ever else you think you need...

But you don't get to redefine the definition of Marriage across 5,000 denominations on this planet, in this life !

So are you gay or something or was that a big joke...

WTF Man ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>&g... (show quote)


I am a woman who was forced to use a pseudonym to post with. I am happily married with two grown boys who are doing well in life. They are both married to life long partners and have great careers. Thx for asking kindly.

Reply
 
 
Feb 19, 2015 01:25:35   #
EconomistDon
 
Rod Riddle wrote:
You Extremists call us stupid??!!! The IQ Level of a Progressive is on avg 30 pts higher than you Rednecks! That is a very lengthy gap in our higher thinking ability over yours. You say you throw data at us??!!! It is all Right Wing Propaganda made up to simply give you talking points. See that right there shows me your IQ Level. You Extremists believe wh**ever the H**e Groups place on the Internet means it must be true just cuz you read it. So, you take it and disseminate it as t***h!!


Rod, why do you lie like that? You tried this crap on another thread, and I called your bluff. I provided solid evidence and you had nothing to support your wild claim. So you slunk off into the darkness. Researchers keep trying to prove that liberals are smarter than conservatives, but they keep proving the opposite. A researcher named Noah Carl, an Oxford socialists, tried, but came up with statistics that showed Republicans have a 5.48 IQ point advantage over Democrats. When I pointed that out, you said "well that includes b****s. Remove them and the conservative edge goes away." Fact is, even with b****s excluded, Republicans are smarter.

Another study was conducted by Dan Kahan, a professor of law and psychology at Yale. He conducted a cross-analysis of intelligence and political affiliation, expecting to find that people who identified with the tea party knew less about science than the average person. Instead, he discovered the opposite: tea party members have higher than average rates of scientific comprehension.

Rod, AGAIN I challenge you to provide the source of your outlandish IQ claim.

Reply
Feb 19, 2015 01:29:59   #
EconomistDon
 
Rod Riddle wrote:
I am a woman who was forced to use a pseudonym to post with. I am happily married with two grown boys who are doing well in life. They are both married to life long partners and have great careers. Thx for asking kindly.


OMG Rod!!! A t*********r male cannot have two grown boys. How stupid do you think we are? Did you spawn these offspring with a woman before you changed sex?

Reply
Feb 19, 2015 01:37:27   #
Rod Riddle
 
EconomistDon wrote:
Rod, why do you lie like that? You tried this crap on another thread, and I called your bluff. I provided solid evidence and you had nothing to support your wild claim. So you slunk off into the darkness. Researchers keep trying to prove that liberals are smarter than conservatives, but they keep proving the opposite. A researcher named Noah Carl, an Oxford socialists, tried, but came up with statistics that showed Republicans have a 5.48 IQ point advantage over Democrats. When I pointed that out, you said "well that includes b****s. Remove them and the conservative edge goes away." Fact is, even with b****s excluded, Republicans are smarter.

Another study was conducted by Dan Kahan, a professor of law and psychology at Yale. He conducted a cross-analysis of intelligence and political affiliation, expecting to find that people who identified with the tea party knew less about science than the average person. Instead, he discovered the opposite: tea party members have higher than average rates of scientific comprehension.

Rod, AGAIN I challenge you to provide the source of your outlandish IQ claim.
Rod, why do you lie like that? You tried this cra... (show quote)


It was a study done at Harvard a few years ago. I really don't know why they spent the Federal Funds to support such a project as I could have told them the answer up front. They took 100 test subjects. 50 who declared themselves Conservative in a majority of issues and 50 Progressives. They had 50 students who had just graduated from Harvard who were their Liberal test subjects take the test. Then they went to SE Ky and found 50 random folks who considered themselves Conservatives. They had them take the same exact test and the avg IQ level was a mean avg of 30 points difference. I can't recall the exact avgs. It was like 138 to 108. I will find it for you and post it to you. Thx for reminding me Don. Thx for not using foul language or threatening me harm like many others here do.

Reply
Feb 19, 2015 02:13:19   #
Rod Riddle
 
EconomistDon wrote:
OMG Rod!!! A t*********r male cannot have two grown boys. How stupid do you think we are? Did you spawn these offspring with a woman before you changed sex?


No dodo! FYI we adopted them when I was going thru my t***sformation. By the time they were of age I was complete except for several additional refinement procedures. But, all they have know me as their whole lives is their Mommy. Yes they think I had them. We never saw the need to tell them any different.

Reply
 
 
Feb 19, 2015 03:09:08   #
Ricktloml
 
jaydee wrote:
Absolutely. I've seen it first hand. Worked in oilfield in Saudie. America has never really known tyreny in its own border like it's fixing to see if the GOP don't impeach him or we the people March on DC & throw all the bums out. We better do it quick. The c*******t have taken New York & already started k*****g people in their gun confiscation operations. It's just not on the the news. Not even Fox.
Folks we better wake up. We are about to loose our freedom. This bunch of c*******t has to go.
My opinion is he will most likely declair martial law in the spring. Once that's done we have had it.
There have already been @ least 2 battles taken place where the national guard in 2 different states was defeated in a severe shoot out. Several m*****amen were k**led. Not on the news. Folks this should scare the hell out of you people that think we can settle this by e******n.
Why in the heck do you think they want our guns so bad. They say it will stop crime. Has it worked every where it's tried. No. 3 examples, Chicago, new York & California.
Ask the American Indian what happens when you surrender your weapons over to the US government. "The trail of tears" follows. They starved, froze to death, beaten to death, forced off their land & out of their homes.
Why don't the gov give up its weapons up their weapons. No they getting armoured vehicles.For police dept. Sad.

Good day.



Not to mention all the ammo the Obama administration is hoarding, and the purges in the military. We are in the early stages of world war three
.
.




.
Absolutely. I've seen it first hand. Worked in oil... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 19, 2015 03:13:24   #
Rod Riddle
 
Oh no! We already got suckered into all the wars since 9-11 by Bush, Cheney & Rumsfeld and now ole Jaydee and Ricktloml are pounding the drums for yet another!!!

Reply
Feb 19, 2015 03:38:57   #
Ricktloml
 
EconomistDon wrote:
Rod, why do you lie like that? You tried this crap on another thread, and I called your bluff. I provided solid evidence and you had nothing to support your wild claim. So you slunk off into the darkness. Researchers keep trying to prove that liberals are smarter than conservatives, but they keep proving the opposite. A researcher named Noah Carl, an Oxford socialists, tried, but came up with statistics that showed Republicans have a 5.48 IQ point advantage over Democrats. When I pointed that out, you said "well that includes b****s. Remove them and the conservative edge goes away." Fact is, even with b****s excluded, Republicans are smarter.

Another study was conducted by Dan Kahan, a professor of law and psychology at Yale. He conducted a cross-analysis of intelligence and political affiliation, expecting to find that people who identified with the tea party knew less about science than the average person. Instead, he discovered the opposite: tea party members have higher than average rates of scientific comprehension.

Rod, AGAIN I challenge you to provide the source of your outlandish IQ claim.
Rod, why do you lie like that? You tried this cra... (show quote)


That claim was debunked, by a regular on OPP several months ago. It would take some doing but I'm sure it could be found. The left has this false inflated sense of superiority, I guess to make try to make up for their lack of morals, decency and t***hfulness.

Reply
Feb 19, 2015 09:48:23   #
EconomistDon
 
Rod Riddle wrote:
No dodo! FYI we adopted them when I was going thru my t***sformation. By the time they were of age I was complete except for several additional refinement procedures. But, all they have know me as their whole lives is their Mommy. Yes they think I had them. We never saw the need to tell them any different.


Good for you. There are a lot of orphaned kids who need good homes.

Reply
 
 
Feb 19, 2015 10:04:26   #
Sicilianthing
 
Rod Riddle wrote:
I am a woman who was forced to use a pseudonym to post with. I am happily married with two grown boys who are doing well in life. They are both married to life long partners and have great careers. Thx for asking kindly.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Who forced you to use what ?

Huh ?

Reply
Feb 19, 2015 10:10:11   #
Sicilianthing
 
Rod Riddle wrote:
It was a study done at Harvard a few years ago. I really don't know why they spent the Federal Funds to support such a project as I could have told them the answer up front. They took 100 test subjects. 50 who declared themselves Conservative in a majority of issues and 50 Progressives. They had 50 students who had just graduated from Harvard who were their Liberal test subjects take the test. Then they went to SE Ky and found 50 random folks who considered themselves Conservatives. They had them take the same exact test and the avg IQ level was a mean avg of 30 points difference. I can't recall the exact avgs. It was like 138 to 108. I will find it for you and post it to you. Thx for reminding me Don. Thx for not using foul language or threatening me harm like many others here do.
It was a study done at Harvard a few years ago. I ... (show quote)


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I really don't care who has what brains so long as their not a T*****R !

So were you a girl and bought a dick to put on or

a dick and used the parts tucked into the pelvis ?

I've only heard things but have no clear picture nor care to see the results.


Just be a Patriot and defend the homeland and the Constitution...
Someone not doing that I will destroy !

Reply
Feb 19, 2015 10:13:11   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
EconomistDon wrote:
Good for you. There are a lot of orphaned kids who need good homes.


The boys must have been very young to not remember anything before he and his partner obtained them. Is it good that someone who advocates lowering the age of consent for adult and child sexual behavior to 9 or 10 to have access to children? The boys they adopted grew up to be homosexuals just like their "parents" and have "married" their life long partners. Just how long have they been lifelong partners? In was just recently that same sex "marriages" were legal in California. He has stated several times that he goes to NAMBLA meetings and listens to young men who had sex with adults when the boys were as young as 10. These boys say they invited the relationships because they needed someone to love them. NAMBLA published a book called Boys Speak Out On Man Boy Love with quotes from an 11 year old who says "I am not going to be kept away from my adult male partner" and a 12 year old "It shouldn't be a Crime to make love" and another 11 year old saying "This was the first time in my life I EVER FELT WANTED" which should indicate the vulnerability of the children NAMBLA and Rod-less Riddle advocate having sex with "for the good of the children. And somehow you think that he should have been allowed to adopt children?

Reply
Feb 19, 2015 10:22:26   #
EconomistDon
 
Rod Riddle wrote:
It was a study done at Harvard a few years ago. I really don't know why they spent the Federal Funds to support such a project as I could have told them the answer up front. They took 100 test subjects. 50 who declared themselves Conservative in a majority of issues and 50 Progressives. They had 50 students who had just graduated from Harvard who were their Liberal test subjects take the test. Then they went to SE Ky and found 50 random folks who considered themselves Conservatives. They had them take the same exact test and the avg IQ level was a mean avg of 30 points difference. I can't recall the exact avgs. It was like 138 to 108. I will find it for you and post it to you. Thx for reminding me Don. Thx for not using foul language or threatening me harm like many others here do.
It was a study done at Harvard a few years ago. I ... (show quote)


You don't have to explain any more. That research was extremely biased if it followed the process that you described. Here is why. The test subjects were not selected at random from an unbiased, stratified universe. The Conservatives were selected from the general population in Kentucky. The average IQ is 100, so the result for that group will come out close to 100. The Liberal group was selected from Harvard graduates. Since Harvard is a very selective college, only the smartest get accepted to study there. Furthermore, the weaker students fail, leaving only the very brightest to graduate. Any group, liberal or conservative, selected from Harvard graduates will have high IQs.

That research was intentionally biased to prove a fallacious point. It would be like setting out to prove that men are better drivers than women. So you select women form the general population, but the men in the test are all professional race car drivers. Viola -- test results prove that men are better drivers. Or did it prove that?

There is one piece of useful information in your research example. The average IQ is 100. If you select a group, any group, from the general population based on a specific characteristic and they get higher IQ test scores, then that characteristic is smarter than the population at large. If the test group of conservatives had an average IQ of 108, it conforms with other research that shows conservatives with a 5 IQ point advantage over liberals.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 9 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.