Washington Post l*****ts masking as journalists finding Scott Walker to be a very real threat to Hillary Clinton (Internal DNC polling from Wisconsin) moved quickly to attempt to belittle his 'intelligence' in eyes of v**ers.
Walker dropped out of college in his 4th year to work for the Red Cross. It was a good salaried position. After he married and had kids, responsibilities that led him down another path.
So. Walker's record shows he was smart enough to attend post secondary curriculum, speaks a second language quite well, and attended math, chemistry, and biology courses in College. By the way the current President does not speak a second language, and his degree is in political science, a curriculum that does not involve ANY material of a physical scientific nature.
IQ. I am aware of behavior traits that indicate where a person's should lie. Obama due to lack to understand algebra beyond a grade 9 level (he admits this), and inability to speak a second language (he admits this too), means his IQ is not that spectacular. Of note Harvard records show affirmative action students average a SAT score of 1100. That is not spectacular at all, and Obama by hiding his records it indicates this is where he lies and that would not have played well in a P**********l campaign. Walker on the other hand by understanding math least at a second year post secondary level, and speaking a second language, means his IQ is higher than Obama's.
This is similar to the Bush and Gore intelligence debate that fell apart once those interested found George W. Bush's was higher than Al Gore's.
Walker is a successful governor who won three e******ns against the left in his State. It is obvious the left is seeking to find any problem with this man by reason his successful background will be compared to Hillary Clinton's long list of failures. The left wants the debate as far away from that as possible.
greatnesslostislegend wrote:
Washington Post l*****ts masking as journalists finding Scott Walker to be a very real threat to Hillary Clinton (Internal DNC polling from Wisconsin) moved quickly to attempt to belittle his 'intelligence' in eyes of v**ers.
Walker dropped out of college in his 4th year to work for the Red Cross. It was a good salaried position. After he married and had kids, responsibilities that led him down another path.
So. Walker's record shows he was smart enough to attend post secondary curriculum, speaks a second language quite well, and attended math, chemistry, and biology courses in College. By the way the current President does not speak a second language, and his degree is in political science, a curriculum that does not involve ANY material of a physical scientific nature.
IQ. I am aware of behavior traits that indicate where a person's should lie. Obama due to lack to understand algebra beyond a grade 9 level (he admits this), and inability to speak a second language (he admits this too), means his IQ is not that spectacular. Of note Harvard records show affirmative action students average a SAT score of 1100. That is not spectacular at all, and Obama by hiding his records it indicates this is where he lies and that would not have played well in a P**********l campaign. Walker on the other hand by understanding math least at a second year post secondary level, and speaking a second language, means his IQ is higher than Obama's.
This is similar to the Bush and Gore intelligence debate that fell apart once those interested found George W. Bush's was higher than Al Gore's.
Walker is a successful governor who won three e******ns against the left in his State. It is obvious the left is seeking to find any problem with this man by reason his successful background will be compared to Hillary Clinton's long list of failures. The left wants the debate as far away from that as possible.
Washington Post l*****ts masking as journalists fi... (
show quote)
It is a bit early to call him a successful governor.
Attending classes doesn't really say much about qualifications to be POTUS.
The man did after all "punt" on a question about evolution because showing knowledge is unseemly for a pol?
I am not so sure that a semester of college matters.
More concerning is his choice to cut back on University budgets.
I have the most worry about Rand Paul's possible lies to get into medical school.
BTW, SAT scores don't mean a thing in law school admissions. LSAT scores were looked at.
You are either poor at fleshing out an argument or you don't know diddly about IQ indicators.
jelun wrote:
It is a bit early to call him a successful governor.
Attending classes doesn't really say much about qualifications to be POTUS.
The man did after all "punt" on a question about evolution because showing knowledge is unseemly for a pol?
I am not so sure that a semester of college matters.
More concerning is his choice to cut back on University budgets.
I have the most worry about Rand Paul's possible lies to get into medical school.
BTW, SAT scores don't mean a thing in law school admissions. LSAT scores were looked at.
You are either poor at fleshing out an argument or you don't know diddly about IQ indicators.
It is a bit early to call him a successful governo... (
show quote)
Not early at all to call Scott a successful Governor, Jelun. I don't know of any other Governor who beat-off the c*******t wolves in anti-American national Labor Unions, from 50 states, actually three times; once in the e******n and twice in separate re-calls. And if Gov. Walker got through all the investigation BS the left conducts on ALL conservatives, [he's] my man!!! Now the same "investigators" should do a few rounds with "Barry," [or wh**ever (his) name really is].
As n "Tom Jones" novel ad movie "It is possible to not have attended the University and know something as it is to have attended the University and know nothing!" Pres. Obama typifies the later.
jelun wrote:
It is a bit early to call him a successful governor.
Attending classes doesn't really say much about qualifications to be POTUS.
The man did after all "punt" on a question about evolution because showing knowledge is unseemly for a pol?
I am not so sure that a semester of college matters.
More concerning is his choice to cut back on University budgets.
I have the most worry about Rand Paul's possible lies to get into medical school.
BTW, SAT scores don't mean a thing in law school admissions. LSAT scores were looked at.
You are either poor at fleshing out an argument or you don't know diddly about IQ indicators.
It is a bit early to call him a successful governo... (
show quote)
I find anyone that supports Obama and Hillary, questioning someone else's qualifcations about as serouis as a turd in the punchbowl at the democratic national convention.
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
I guess as funny as if the afterbirth lives and the baby dies, the world has another liberal idoit on it's hands! You talk bad about Fox News in comparision to The New Yorker. Go find a dark place and play with selfs liberal swine!! :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
DamnYANKEE wrote:
MORONIC FOOL :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Yeah, no doubt you have all sorts of smarts on Borowitz.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.