One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Introduce Yourself
Old Mad Lady is here
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Jul 1, 2013 13:18:54   #
alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
 
Kay wrote:
I've been around for 84 years and I'm fed up with what's going on in America also. I don't think we have ever had such corruption in our government as we're having now. The uneducated v**e, the plantation is alive and well, ignorance abounds and so here we are in this mess with a leader who is inept (on purpose). He's adding more people to the plantation, which is his plan as nothing he's going lacks purpose. We'd better change that come 2014 and definitely in 2016. If not, we're dead in the water.
I've been around for 84 years and I'm fed up with ... (show quote)


welcome aboard Kay, didn't you hear polosi said she was going to drain that swamp all she did was quadruple the alligators so it would look like there was less water as for this "leader"he was not elected because he knew anything but because he is an obedient puppet

Reply
Jul 1, 2013 13:40:04   #
Kay
 
Thanks Alex. Ah yes! OB is a puppet....to his father's dreams I believe. He's getting back at the white people for all the bad things he thinks they did to black people
in the past. He's a misinformed, angry black man. I'm sorry for the dumbing down of America that allowed such a man to get elected to the office of president. As for Pelosi, I like the way you described her, she and her cohorts are as vicious as a hungry alligator tearing America to pieces. I enjoy reading your thoughts.

Reply
Jul 1, 2013 14:14:09   #
oldmadlady Loc: louisiana
 
And if 2014 is not too late. :cry:

Reply
 
 
Jul 1, 2013 22:59:01   #
usmc4
 
oldmadlady wrote:
Hello all. I am glad I found this page. I have become so angry at the way our government has become so untrustworthy. If anyone comes up to me and says" I am from the 'gummit' and be here to help you" he/she better be running hard. I am so sick at what our once great nation has become with all the stinking crud in DC.
I have a couple of question and I'm sure I will get many answers:
Why has impeachment proceedings against obama and biden not been started??
Plus if they were to be impeached at the same time, does that put Boehner in line for president?
Thank you and look forward to replies. :evil: :twisted: :thumbdown:
Hello all. I am glad I found this page. I have be... (show quote)


Yes, the House Speaker would be next if both were thrown out. Welcome to you.

Reply
Jul 21, 2013 23:02:27   #
TheCracker
 
CrazyHorse wrote:
Quid Pro Quo, AuntiE:


Twins???
That photo indicates a real problem maintaining balance. Could easily wind up face down in dirt. Well maybe not face in dirt.... Hmmm.

Reply
Jul 22, 2013 04:14:41   #
Kay
 
I understand that if the President and his Vice are impeached all the bills he signed would be still in place and getting rid of all that would be time consuming. They could be thrown out of office if fraud was proven re the birth certificate (which is still under investigation). This nation is in deep doo doo and something needs to be done about it. Where are all our representatives they're rather quiet and it's past time to make some real noise and force something be done. It's almost too late.

Reply
Jul 22, 2013 09:18:49   #
CrazyHorse Loc: Kansas
 
Kay wrote:
I understand that if the President and his Vice are impeached all the bills he signed would be still in place and getting rid of all that would be time consuming. They could be thrown out of office if fraud was proven re the birth certificate (which is still under investigation). This nation is in deep doo doo and something needs to be done about it. Where are all our representatives they're rather quiet and it's past time to make some real noise and force something be done. It's almost too late.
I understand that if the President and his Vice ar... (show quote)


Quid Pro Quo, Kay: I suspect it would depend upon what he was Impeached for re: whether or not all the bills he signed would still be in place. If he was removed from office by the Senate because he was not constitutionally qualified to hold the office, I would believe everything he signed would legally be void ab initio. If the Alabama Supreme Court should ultimately find that Obama is not constitutionally qualified to hold the office, then that decision could be enrolled in every state in the union pursuant to the full faith and credit clause of the constitution. The effect would probably be that Alabama would vitiate all of Obama's v**es in the last e******n and Romney would be declared the winner in Alabama. If sufficient states did likewise, so that Romney ended up with more e*******l v**es, then Romney would have the standing to claim the office. Maybe the e*******l college v**e would control notwithstanding, I'm not sure, except that I am confident it has never been previously decided and should be a first blush issue. But it is potentially possible that the states could effectively take Obama out of office, but I suspect the Congress would be involved in the process even if Impeachment was used and qualification was the single issue of the Impeachment bill of particulars. As to handling the bills signed into law, I don't see that as too big a problem. In 1661 King Charles II came back from exile and installed a new Parliament. The newly summoned Parliament of 1661 by "Restoration Act Rescissory" annulled every piece of legislation passed by the Covenanting Parliaments between 1639 and 1651. So if the Brits could do it 350 years ago, it would seem we should be able to follow the president and accomplish the same thing. Moreover, as I said above, if he is not constitutionally qualified, every piece of legislation and all his executive orders should be void ab initio. Just my opinion.

Reply
 
 
Jul 23, 2013 05:39:33   #
Kay
 
Any way to do it would be fine with me. It's time to get it going before he totally destroys this country. I still find it hard to believe people v**ed for him a second time. How sick is that? It didn't take much to buy them did it? free sell phones, a debit card for Walmart and a paid for stay at home job doing nothing and a raise for each new child. They didn't realize what a prison they got them selves into. The plantation is still in existence and OB is working hard to send the rest of us onto it. T***h will out....God is in Control!

Reply
Jul 23, 2013 15:52:51   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
CrazyHorse wrote:
Quid Pro Quo, Kay: I suspect it would depend upon what he was Impeached for re: whether or not all the bills he signed would still be in place. If he was removed from office by the Senate because he was not constitutionally qualified to hold the office, I would believe everything he signed would legally be void ab initio. If the Alabama Supreme Court should ultimately find that Obama is not constitutionally qualified to hold the office, then that decision could be enrolled in every state in the union pursuant to the full faith and credit clause of the constitution. The effect would probably be that Alabama would vitiate all of Obama's v**es in the last e******n and Romney would be declared the winner in Alabama. If sufficient states did likewise, so that Romney ended up with more e*******l v**es, then Romney would have the standing to claim the office. Maybe the e*******l college v**e would control notwithstanding, I'm not sure, except that I am confident it has never been previously decided and should be a first blush issue. But it is potentially possible that the states could effectively take Obama out of office, but I suspect the Congress would be involved in the process even if Impeachment was used and qualification was the single issue of the Impeachment bill of particulars. As to handling the bills signed into law, I don't see that as too big a problem. In 1661 King Charles II came back from exile and installed a new Parliament. The newly summoned Parliament of 1661 by "Restoration Act Rescissory" annulled every piece of legislation passed by the Covenanting Parliaments between 1639 and 1651. So if the Brits could do it 350 years ago, it would seem we should be able to follow the president and accomplish the same thing. Moreover, as I said above, if he is not constitutionally qualified, every piece of legislation and all his executive orders should be void ab initio. Just my opinion.
Quid Pro Quo, Kay: I suspect it would depend upon... (show quote)


We should probably hand this off to one of our research gurus; however, let me throw out some (non researched) thoughts.

Even if the sitting president was found to be ineligible, Romney would not become president. The ticket you v**e for is by party not individual person; hence my belief you would end up with Biden. More to be addressed on this further in the post.

Again, not researched, my belief is, if declared ineligible for the office, all EOs, Cabinet appointments, Judicial appointments, and other Executive appointments would become null and void. Various legislation would be a major question. His signing it, if ineligible, is a very sticky area. Would laws passed by Congress become null and void just because he signed them? Would they remain in effect as they were passed by duly elected representatives? Biden would simply hall them out and sign them. The massive confusion would be ....words fail me (pretty scary that).

Now, on to a subject near and dear to me. When people accuse some of wanting to "go backwards", I willingly raise my hand. I want to go back to the original b****ting form. Our first e******ns did NOT group candidates by party but by position they sought. Candidates for President were listed and followed by candidates for Vice President. Individuals v**ed for their candidate of choice not a party. STOP, before you even try the, "You can't have President and VP from different parties." Such a statement has no basis in fact. The Commonwealth of Virginia, several decades ago, had a governor and Ltg from opposing parties. Last time I checked they are still around. We frequently talk about "checks and balances", what better way to have such a practice. Just more of my wonky ideas.

Reply
Jul 23, 2013 16:07:12   #
CrazyHorse Loc: Kansas
 
AuntiE wrote:
We should probably hand this off to one of our research gurus; however, let me throw out some (non researched) thoughts.

Even if the sitting president was found to be ineligible, Romney would not become president. The ticket you v**e for is by party not individual person; hence my belief you would end up with Biden. More to be addressed on this further in the post.

Again, not researched, my belief is, if declared ineligible for the office, all EOs, Cabinet appointments, Judicial appointments, and other Executive appointments would become null and void. Various legislation would be a major question. His signing it, if ineligible, is a very sticky area. Would laws passed by Congress become null and void just because he signed them? Would they remain in effect as they were passed by duly elected representatives? Biden would simply hall them out and sign them. The massive confusion would be ....words fail me (pretty scary that).

Now, on to a subject near and dear to me. When people accuse some of wanting to "go backwards", I willingly raise my hand. I want to go back to the original b****ting form. Our first e******ns did NOT group candidates by party but by position they sought. Candidates for President were listed and followed by candidates for Vice President. Individuals v**ed for their candidate of choice not a party. STOP, before you even try the, "You can't have President and VP from different parties." Such a statement has no basis in fact. The Commonwealth of Virginia, several decades ago, had a governor and Ltg from opposing parties. Last time I checked they are still around. We frequently talk about "checks and balances", what better way to have such a practice. Just more of my wonky ideas.
We should probably hand this off to one of our res... (show quote)


Quid Pro Quo, AuntiE: Let me potentially throw in another factor. Isn't there some kind of time limit on how long a president has to sign a bill before it becomes obsolete and void? I would think there should be some time limit, of at least a congressional term. But I don't know as I haven't tried to look it up. And, if the signature is void ab initio, maybe the bills would become time barred. In the alternative, do bills become law automatically if not signed or vetoed by the president by a certain time limit? Again, I don't know, but just have a vague memory of both the issues.

Reply
Jul 23, 2013 17:22:40   #
alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
 
CrazyHorse wrote:
Quid Pro Quo, AuntiE: Let me potentially throw in another factor. Isn't there some kind of time limit on how long a president has to sign a bill before it becomes obsolete and void? I would think there should be some time limit, of at least a congressional term. But I don't know as I haven't tried to look it up. And, if the signature is void ab initio, maybe the bills would become time barred. In the alternative, do bills become law automatically if not signed or vetoed by the president by a certain time limit? Again, I don't know, but just have a vague memory of both the issues.
Quid Pro Quo, AuntiE: Let me potentially throw in... (show quote)


they don't automatically become law that is known as a pocket veto

Reply
 
 
Jul 23, 2013 18:59:47   #
CrazyHorse Loc: Kansas
 
alex wrote:
they don't automatically become law that is known as a pocket veto


Quid Pro Quo, AuntiE: Thanks, I told you I didn't know the answer, I just remembered something about it. If that is the case, then if his signature would be found to be null and void ab initio, then it would appear all the bills he signed into law would be considered to be pocket vetoed, without any valid signature. Eh?

Reply
Jul 23, 2013 20:00:09   #
alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
 
CrazyHorse wrote:
Quid Pro Quo, AuntiE: Thanks, I told you I didn't know the answer, I just remembered something about it. If that is the case, then if his signature would be found to be null and void ab initio, then it would appear all the bills he signed into law would be considered to be pocket vetoed, without any valid signature. Eh?


that would be my guess but only a guess

Reply
Jul 24, 2013 03:35:30   #
Kay
 
Hopefully all the problems this administration has dumped on America will wake us up to how wonderfully put together our government was. If they don't teach real American History in the schools parents need to do it at home. Our young folks go off to college not knowing what they truly have and are easily swayed to the left. Most of them are totally unprepared and buy into the liberal left's lies. God bless us all! We need it!

Reply
Jul 24, 2013 19:31:45   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
CrazyHorse wrote:
Quid Pro Quo, AuntiE: Thanks, I told you I didn't know the answer, I just remembered something about it. If that is the case, then if his signature would be found to be null and void ab initio, then it would appear all the bills he signed into law would be considered to be pocket vetoed, without any valid signature. Eh?


I think we need to know what the Constitution says about signing of bills. The document says that he has 10 days in which to sign or veto, but if they go out of session during that period he does not have to sign and that becomes a pocket veto.

I jumped in here because I want people to know that he has a specified amount of time to sign or veto and that period is 10 days, unless the Congress adjourns for the session.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Introduce Yourself
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.