Bush vs. Clinton in 2016 . . .
Feb 7, 2015 12:29:01 #
Bush vs. Clinton in 2016 . . .
http://americanfreepress.net/?p=22256
The very real possibility of a Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton face-off in the 2016 p**********l e******n has elicited a collective groan across many parts of America. One political activist voicing his disapproval is Nelson Hultberg, director of Americans for a Free Republic and president of the Dallas-based National Independent Party.
During a January 7 interview, Hultberg told this reporter: Jeb Bush running against Hillary Clinton would be a total disaster because it epitomizes what people are against, specifically a Democrat-Republican monopoly. Bush and Mrs. Clinton are both big government statists. We dont have two political parties any longer. As Pat Buchanan remarked, Theyre two wings of the same bird of prey. Democrats and Republicans are taking us down the road to tyranny.....
- See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=22256#sthash.AtFr1dmT.dpuf
http://americanfreepress.net/?p=22256
The very real possibility of a Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton face-off in the 2016 p**********l e******n has elicited a collective groan across many parts of America. One political activist voicing his disapproval is Nelson Hultberg, director of Americans for a Free Republic and president of the Dallas-based National Independent Party.
During a January 7 interview, Hultberg told this reporter: Jeb Bush running against Hillary Clinton would be a total disaster because it epitomizes what people are against, specifically a Democrat-Republican monopoly. Bush and Mrs. Clinton are both big government statists. We dont have two political parties any longer. As Pat Buchanan remarked, Theyre two wings of the same bird of prey. Democrats and Republicans are taking us down the road to tyranny.....
- See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=22256#sthash.AtFr1dmT.dpuf
Feb 7, 2015 12:36:25 #
eagleye13 wrote:
Bush vs. Clinton in 2016 . . . br br http://ame... (show quote)
Well, I'll be damned...we actually agree on something. But, probably for different reasons.
Feb 7, 2015 12:51:12 #
Forget them they don't stand a chance against Walker or Ben Carson. People going to elect fresh blood
eagleye13 wrote:
Bush vs. Clinton in 2016 . . . br br http://ame... (show quote)
Feb 7, 2015 13:11:33 #
alex
Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
eagleye13 wrote:
Bush vs. Clinton in 2016 . . . br br http://ame... (show quote)
Bush is a democrat, Clinton is a c*******t what a choice
Feb 7, 2015 13:15:35 #
jimahrens wrote:
Forget them they don't stand a chance against Walker or Ben Carson. People going to elect fresh blood
Carson should not even be in the running. His attitude on the Second Amendment will k**l him even if his ignorance on Foreign Affairs doesn't. He is not a politician, he is a doctor. I would put him at Surgeon General. We've had enough ignorance with Obama. We don't need to follow with more. Carson's a fine man, but doesn't belong in the White House.
Bush will never make it even though the media and big government backers want him. Common Core will k**l him and he can't carry Florida, his home state, because of it. Floridians are fighting Common Core tooth and nail and they are not about to back another Bush
Walker is a proven fighter and he's young and tough. For the moment, he's my pick. As I said, For the moment.....
Feb 7, 2015 13:20:37 #
I agree about Walker, but he will have to overcome Big left Wing and Right Wing Money, and the MSM bias.
Mollypitcher1 wrote:
Carson should not even be in the running. His atti... (show quote)
Feb 7, 2015 13:22:17 #
Feb 7, 2015 14:30:03 #
eagleye13 wrote:
I agree about Walker, but he will have to overcome Big left Wing and Right Wing Money, and the MSM bias.
True, but the one with the most money won't necessarily be the winner.
Feb 7, 2015 14:35:26 #
Yes this is a trend Last e******n Several wonusing very little money. They met People face to face.
JMHO wrote:
True, but the one with the most money won't necessarily be the winner.
Feb 7, 2015 15:05:15 #
I hope we can get paper b****t, and photo ID's to verify v****g. If not; anything can be posted as the results. A big reason how Ron Paul was c***ted in the primaries.
jimahrens wrote:
Yes this is a trend Last e******n Several wonusing very little money. They met People face to face.
Feb 7, 2015 15:08:15 #
When dead people can v**e Strange things happen.
eagleye13 wrote:
I hope we can get paper b****t, and photo ID's to verify v****g. If not; anything can be posted as the results. A big reason how Ron Paul was c***ted in the primaries.
Feb 7, 2015 15:12:16 #
eagleye13 wrote:
I hope we can get paper b****t, and photo ID's to verify v****g. If not; anything can be posted as the results. A big reason how Ron Paul was c***ted in the primaries.
Ron Paul wasn't a serious contender...only to a small rabid fan base is all.
Ron Paul would have made a good Secretary of Treasury, but that's about it.
Feb 7, 2015 15:15:35 #
We just need to v**e out the dead wood.
JMHO wrote:
Ron Paul wasn't a serious contender...only to a small rabid fan base is all.
Ron Paul would have made a good Secretary of Treasury, but that's about it.
Ron Paul would have made a good Secretary of Treasury, but that's about it.
Feb 7, 2015 15:52:15 #
JMHO wrote:
Ron Paul wasn't a serious contender...only to a small rabid fan base is all.
Ron Paul would have made a good Secretary of Treasury, but that's about it.
Ron Paul would have made a good Secretary of Treasury, but that's about it.
I agree.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Feb 7, 2015 16:00:03 #
Paul Sec. Treasury Gowdy AG, Walker President, Any body got more ideas?
Mollypitcher1 wrote:
I agree.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.