One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
R****t Texist
Page <prev 2 of 13 next> last>>
Jun 28, 2013 07:19:17   #
ifishalott
 
right after Bush and Cheney's trial for war crimes is over.

Reply
Jun 28, 2013 08:30:59   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Worried for our children wrote:
rumiTARD:

"Gerrymandering by Red States"
-if this was not the case, it would be refered to as a Blue State.
Are you suggesting that you Marxists are not guilt of this in the Blue States? Do you believe in such maneuvers ?

"Is it all just a political game, just try to outfox your opponents, or should basic American principles and ideals be the guide?"

- interesting word choice here, considering how many foxes you Marxists have in the henhouse . Yes they should be the guide, but principles and ideals vary from person to person, which is why I always seem to conflict with you and yours. It's tough to find a compromise between two opposing forces. What you may be ok with sacrificing (Bill of Rights), I may not be ok with doing the same.

" Every Red State has sought to restrict v**er rights, made it harder, instead of easier, to cast a v**e."

- Wow! You blew me away with this one. Just put the cup of kool-aid down slowly.... and back away, I hear the effects subside in about 3 1/2 years from now, for you however, based on the apparent rate of ingestion, I'll have to enlist a psychological analyst .
rumiTARD: br br "Gerrymandering by Red State... (show quote)


Blue states are at least as guilty of gerrymandering as are red ones. I suppose if it happens in a blue state it's called "empowerment?" What is your comment on redistricting in areas that are predominantly Hispanic, and have a large number of i******s counted as legitimate American Citizens? It's not like they have to prove it, usually, that would be "profiling." It is not "r****t" to illegally stack the deck in favor of Hispanics, by counting their wetback brethren as citizens? Profiling is one of the stupidest ideas I have ever heard of. If someone answering my description commits a crime, and I am the subject of a good faith stop by law enforcement because I resemble the suspect, am I a victim of profiling? Of course not.
I digress. Gerrymandering is a fact of life, and Dems are at least as guilty of it as Republicans. I would question "V****g rights" in general. Originally, v**ers had to have some "skin in the game." I have paid taxes my whole life, I am a veteran, I was a business owner, and manager of another, providing jobs for people. Why should some illiterate peckerhead who has never paid taxes, served in the military, or contributed anything to society have as much right to v**e as I do? Do you hold the view that some ignorant, lazy gangbanger who only contribution to society has been to raise the crime rate has just as much right to v**e himself another handout, as I do to oppose it?

Reply
Jun 28, 2013 08:40:09   #
hprinze Loc: Central Florida
 
rumitoid wrote:
Lol, you guys rarely address the question. Comment on the blog: your h**e for what you perceive as a "lib" is well-known. I am reporting on the reality of blatant r****m by the Texist (Texas) legislature. I do not want to assume that you are attacking me instead of addressing the subject because it is indefensible and ugly discrimination being openly practiced by a Red State. Please, find some justifiable reason behind their redistricting--where all the w****s kept their seats and all the minorities lost theirs--that is not "blatant r****m."
Lol, you guys rarely address the question. Comment... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Jun 28, 2013 08:44:45   #
hprinze Loc: Central Florida
 
rumitoid wrote:
Lol, you guys rarely address the question. Comment on the blog: your h**e for what you perceive as a "lib" is well-known. I am reporting on the reality of blatant r****m by the Texist (Texas) legislature. I do not want to assume that you are attacking me instead of addressing the subject because it is indefensible and ugly discrimination being openly practiced by a Red State. Please, find some justifiable reason behind their redistricting--where all the w****s kept their seats and all the minorities lost theirs--that is not "blatant r****m."
Lol, you guys rarely address the question. Comment... (show quote)



Not much point in addressing the question or commenting on the blog when replying to someone who does not have the ability or desire to understand the reply.

Reply
Jun 28, 2013 08:56:36   #
tin can navy Loc: South Carolina
 
Right down the road from nextis and missist, but nuch closer to lousannist. :roll: :lol: :?: :?:

Reply
Jun 28, 2013 08:58:14   #
tin can navy Loc: South Carolina
 
Right down the road from nextis and missist, but nuch closer to lousannist. :roll: :lol: :?: :?:

Reply
Jun 28, 2013 09:20:06   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
LOL yourself. It is not "blatant r****m," it is blatant "politics as usual," and Democrats are just as guilty of it as Republicans. Look what happened to Alan West in Florida. It happens all the time on a local level. It is as I said, If Republicans do it, it's "r****m." If Democrats do it, it's "empowerment."

Reply
 
 
Jun 28, 2013 09:31:01   #
bahmer
 
rumitoid first off boo hoo for you in Texas. Why don't you come up to Illinois where I live you would enjoy it immensely because everything that you accuse the Republicans of doing in Texas the Demoncrats are doing ore doing in spades here. They are also doing it in spades in Michigan and every other blue state out there. The Demoncrat party here in Illinois is still run by the mafia which by the way is what is keeping that illegal Obummer afloat. In Illinois they don't care what you think or like because the great city of Chicago dictates to all just like in New York and Bloomberg.

Reply
Jun 28, 2013 09:55:57   #
mmccarty12 Loc: Zionsville, Indiana
 
rumitoid wrote:
It is a free country only when those elected to govern respect and honor that freedom. Obviously, many Red States just want to win no matter what price to liberty. The Texist legislature is a disgrace to democracy.

It is only a free country when I do not have MY rights violated so someone else can benefit from MY hard work because they refuse to work.
It is only a free country when those who have 'skin in the game', as banjojack put it, are allowed to v**e and those with no 'skin in the game' are not.
It is idiocy to believe that a person who pays no taxes, or is sponging off the government, would v**e any other way than for the person or people who promises to GIVE them more UNEARNED 'stuff'.

You complain about gerrymandering when done by Republicans, and say nothing, I assume, when the Democrats do it. How typically hypocritical of you, if it is the case that you keep your mouth shut when Democrats do it. You want all people in this country to be able to v**e when they:
- should not be eligible because
---- they are not paying taxes
---- they are not contributing to the betterment of society
---- they are an element of the criminal class(yes those in prison now have v****g rights, at least most do)
- are not eligible because
---- they are not a legal resident
---- they are not a citizen

You Liberals want yourself in power so you can take more in taxes from the working class to give to the mooching class.
You Liberals want to say the rich are not paying their fair share in taxes.
You Liberals lie out both sides of your mouth to achieve your goals (no Conservatives are not guiltless in that one either).
You Liberals want to make sure EVERYONE is a s***e to a very few, just as you accuse Conservatives of being, but you instantly deny the allegation and go on the defensive or attack without rationalizing, legitimately, your stances.
You Liberals shout down dissent instead of trying to compromise, but whoa be damned if a Conservative will not sit and engage in legitimate compromise.
You Liberals want to do nothing but take and distribute, not equally, but to your chosen go the best and the dregs will go to everyone else.
I could go on and on and you damned well know I could and you also know I would be completely correct in everything I say, especially when I say the same applies to the Conservatives.

Since I have touched upon the topic of giving away, you might be interested to know that when it comes to giving things away, Liberals are willing to give away someone else's earnings without reservation, but when it comes to their own, guess what....

You should be able to believe the first article as it comes from one of your ilks favorite websites.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-peron/conservatives-charitable-giving_b_1835201.html
http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2012/08/22/jacoby/NXAEKAAJzDeSuxK8QqG7iI/story.html?camp=pm
http://www.newsmax.com/ThomasSowell/Conservatives-Donate-Liberals-compassion/2012/09/10/id/451295

The next article seemingly contradicts those above until you look at the metrics used to come to the conclusion.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/10/21/study-conservatives-and-liberals-are-equally-charitable-but-they-give-to-different-charities/

Reply
Jun 28, 2013 10:19:30   #
AfricanAtheist
 
I couldn't have said it better my friend.

Reply
Jun 28, 2013 10:42:04   #
mmccarty12 Loc: Zionsville, Indiana
 
AfricanAtheist wrote:
I couldn't have said it better my friend.

Once again, you have posted without acknowledging to whom you refer. What is so hard about hitting the 'Quote Reply' link instead of the 'Reply' link when you are going to reply to someone's post? Or are you just posting in the Quick Reply section? Even there you can tell us to whom you refer.

Reply
 
 
Jun 28, 2013 10:45:50   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
mmccarty12 wrote:
Once again, you have posted without acknowledging to whom you refer. What is so hard about hitting the 'Quote Reply' link instead of the 'Reply' link when you are going to reply to someone's post? Or are you just posting in the Quick Reply section? Even there you can tell us to whom you refer.


I still screw that one up occasionally, particularly on these late night forums.

Reply
Jun 28, 2013 10:48:17   #
mmccarty12 Loc: Zionsville, Indiana
 
banjojack wrote:
I still screw that one up occasionally, particularly on these late night forums.

Once in a while is acceptable. This person has not done it once. And I was engaged in a long discussion with AfricanAtheist last night until Lasher went all W***e S*********t.

Reply
Jun 28, 2013 10:50:26   #
alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
 
Worried for our children wrote:
rumiTARD:

"Gerrymandering by Red States"
-if this was not the case, it would be refered to as a Blue State.
Are you suggesting that you Marxists are not guilt of this in the Blue States? Do you believe in such maneuvers ?

"Is it all just a political game, just try to outfox your opponents, or should basic American principles and ideals be the guide?"

- interesting word choice here, considering how many foxes you Marxists have in the henhouse . Yes they should be the guide, but principles and ideals vary from person to person, which is why I always seem to conflict with you and yours. It's tough to find a compromise between two opposing forces. What you may be ok with sacrificing (Bill of Rights), I may not be ok with doing the same.

" Every Red State has sought to restrict v**er rights, made it harder, instead of easier, to cast a v**e."

- Wow! You blew me away with this one. Just put the cup of kool-aid down slowly.... and back away, I hear the effects subside in about 3 1/2 years from now, for you however, based on the apparent rate of ingestion, I'll have to enlist a psychological analyst .
rumiTARD: br br "Gerrymandering by Red State... (show quote)


any time a marxist accuses a republican of doing something unethical it tells you that is what he is doing that's how he thought of it

Reply
Jun 28, 2013 10:57:53   #
dkylady11
 
some one needs to change his - her rose colored glasses to red white and blue

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 13 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2023 IDF International Technologies, Inc.