jurisconsultus
Jan 31, 2015 06:17:01 #
I have a need for one of these. Very hard to find. I am demanding due process of law; no color of law; I am in propria persona. Not pro se.
Two very technical questions.
This is way above the paygrades of any islamajammas. pseudo intellects such as glaucon.
What is JURISCONSULTUS?
Lat In Roman law. An expert in juridical science; a person thoroughly versed in the laws, who was habitually resorted to, for information and advice, both by private persons as his clients, and also by the magistrates, advocates, and others employed in administering justice. Jurisdictio est potestas de publico in- troducta, cum necessitate juris dicendi. Jurisdiction is a po>ver introduced for the public good, ou account of the necessity of dispensing justice. 10 Coke, 73a.
Law Dictionary: What is JURISCONSULTUS? definition of JURISCONSULTUS (Black's Law Dictionary)
Two very technical questions.
This is way above the paygrades of any islamajammas. pseudo intellects such as glaucon.
What is JURISCONSULTUS?
Lat In Roman law. An expert in juridical science; a person thoroughly versed in the laws, who was habitually resorted to, for information and advice, both by private persons as his clients, and also by the magistrates, advocates, and others employed in administering justice. Jurisdictio est potestas de publico in- troducta, cum necessitate juris dicendi. Jurisdiction is a po>ver introduced for the public good, ou account of the necessity of dispensing justice. 10 Coke, 73a.
Law Dictionary: What is JURISCONSULTUS? definition of JURISCONSULTUS (Black's Law Dictionary)
Jan 31, 2015 07:08:17 #
ron vrooman wrote:
I have a need for one of these. Very hard to find.... (show quote)
Interesting way to ask for assistance.
Jan 31, 2015 09:13:17 #
I specifically deny your help.
jelun wrote:
Interesting way to ask for assistance.
Jan 31, 2015 09:32:39 #
http://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/upload/2015/1/27/thumb-1422400701698-captureminnsign.jpg
jelun, considering how Minnesotans think, I'm surprised this law passed. I mean that law is rather harsh, don't you think? Kind of restricts the individual's rights to "Smoke Under Water". I could see where this could easily affect well over 85% of the population, of Minnesota. But I suppose the risk of "Second Hand Bubbles" was too much of a health risk. I wonder if the law extends to "No Chewing Tobacco Under Water"?
jelun, considering how Minnesotans think, I'm surprised this law passed. I mean that law is rather harsh, don't you think? Kind of restricts the individual's rights to "Smoke Under Water". I could see where this could easily affect well over 85% of the population, of Minnesota. But I suppose the risk of "Second Hand Bubbles" was too much of a health risk. I wonder if the law extends to "No Chewing Tobacco Under Water"?
Jan 31, 2015 13:55:16 #
Bruce Kennedy wrote:
I would assume they allow no tobacco products under water. Many of their citizens are underwater mentally/philosophically/politically. If in doubt, just look at who they elect as their 'leaders' and Congress Critters.
Jan 31, 2015 16:55:03 #
ron vrooman wrote:
I have a need for one of these. Very hard to find.... (show quote)
Sounds like you need a lawyer.
Which of course reminds me of the old joke:
"What's the difference between an attorney and a catfish?"
"One's a bottom-feeding scum sucker. The other one's a fish."
Jan 31, 2015 17:11:43 #
You think? neither the word attorney nor lawyer appear in the B****s Law Dictionary.
Something about mucks around the fountain. How can it be science? If arguable the 9 on SCOTUS are quite good and they do 5 to 4 all the time.That is more like art.
Something about mucks around the fountain. How can it be science? If arguable the 9 on SCOTUS are quite good and they do 5 to 4 all the time.That is more like art.
PaulPisces wrote:
Sounds like you need a lawyer.
Which of course reminds me of the old joke:
"What's the difference between an attorney and a catfish?"
"One's a bottom-feeding scum sucker. The other one's a fish."
Which of course reminds me of the old joke:
"What's the difference between an attorney and a catfish?"
"One's a bottom-feeding scum sucker. The other one's a fish."
Feb 1, 2015 07:43:00 #
Feb 1, 2015 18:10:31 #
that is not much to go on. Do you have a jurisconsultus in mind or are you just yanking chains?
I need no attorney, lawyer, jd I am in propria persona. I always need and appreciate council.
I need no attorney, lawyer, jd I am in propria persona. I always need and appreciate council.
rebob14 wrote:
UUUMMMMMM.............representation??
Feb 1, 2015 23:31:49 #
Feb 2, 2015 20:22:34 #
So, you are a waste of time.
rebob14 wrote:
"Supreme" court?? Elected by and representing whom??
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.