One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
Federal court reaffirms t***s rights.
Page 1 of 2 next>
Apr 29, 2024 16:00:23   #
Kevyn
 
A federal appellate court in Richmond became the first in the country to rule that state health-care plans must pay for g****r-affirming surgeries, a major win for t*********r rights amid a nationwide wave of anti-t***s activism and legislation.
The decision came from a set of cases out of North Carolina and West Virginia, where state officials argued that their policies were based on cost concerns rather than bias. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit rejected that argument, saying the plans were discriminating against t***s people in need of treatment.
Judge Roger L. Gregory, an appointee of President Clinton, wrote for the majority that the restrictions were “obviously discriminatory” based on both sex and g****r.
“In this case, discriminating on the basis of diagnosis is discriminating on the basis of g****r identity and sex,” Gregory wrote, because “g****r dysphoria is so intimately related to t*********r status as to be virtually indistinguishable from it.”
The majority ruled that West Virginia’s policy also violated the Affordable Care Act’s anti-discrimination provision, a finding that has broad implications for other states’ Medicaid programs.

Reply
Apr 29, 2024 16:20:33   #
liberalhunter Loc: Your mom's house
 
Kevyn wrote:
A federal appellate court in Richmond became the first in the country to rule that state health-care plans must pay for g****r-affirming surgeries, a major win for t*********r rights amid a nationwide wave of anti-t***s activism and legislation.
The decision came from a set of cases out of North Carolina and West Virginia, where state officials argued that their policies were based on cost concerns rather than bias. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit rejected that argument, saying the plans were discriminating against t***s people in need of treatment.
Judge Roger L. Gregory, an appointee of President Clinton, wrote for the majority that the restrictions were “obviously discriminatory” based on both sex and g****r.
“In this case, discriminating on the basis of diagnosis is discriminating on the basis of g****r identity and sex,” Gregory wrote, because “g****r dysphoria is so intimately related to t*********r status as to be virtually indistinguishable from it.”
The majority ruled that West Virginia’s policy also violated the Affordable Care Act’s anti-discrimination provision, a finding that has broad implications for other states’ Medicaid programs.
A federal appellate court in Richmond became the f... (show quote)







Reply
Apr 29, 2024 16:29:49   #
Rose42
 
Kevyn wrote:
A federal appellate court in Richmond became the first in the country to rule that state health-care plans must pay for g****r-affirming surgeries, a major win for t*********r rights amid a nationwide wave of anti-t***s activism and legislation.
The decision came from a set of cases out of North Carolina and West Virginia, where state officials argued that their policies were based on cost concerns rather than bias. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit rejected that argument, saying the plans were discriminating against t***s people in need of treatment.
Judge Roger L. Gregory, an appointee of President Clinton, wrote for the majority that the restrictions were “obviously discriminatory” based on both sex and g****r.
“In this case, discriminating on the basis of diagnosis is discriminating on the basis of g****r identity and sex,” Gregory wrote, because “g****r dysphoria is so intimately related to t*********r status as to be virtually indistinguishable from it.”
The majority ruled that West Virginia’s policy also violated the Affordable Care Act’s anti-discrimination provision, a finding that has broad implications for other states’ Medicaid programs.
A federal appellate court in Richmond became the f... (show quote)


I***tic. This country is going downhill quickly.

Reply
 
 
Apr 29, 2024 16:32:42   #
AuH20
 
Kevyn wrote:
A federal appellate court in Richmond became the first in the country to rule that state health-care plans must pay for g****r-affirming surgeries, a major win for t*********r rights amid a nationwide wave of anti-t***s activism and legislation.
The decision came from a set of cases out of North Carolina and West Virginia, where state officials argued that their policies were based on cost concerns rather than bias. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit rejected that argument, saying the plans were discriminating against t***s people in need of treatment.
Judge Roger L. Gregory, an appointee of President Clinton, wrote for the majority that the restrictions were “obviously discriminatory” based on both sex and g****r.
“In this case, discriminating on the basis of diagnosis is discriminating on the basis of g****r identity and sex,” Gregory wrote, because “g****r dysphoria is so intimately related to t*********r status as to be virtually indistinguishable from it.”
The majority ruled that West Virginia’s policy also violated the Affordable Care Act’s anti-discrimination provision, a finding that has broad implications for other states’ Medicaid programs.
A federal appellate court in Richmond became the f... (show quote)


Treatment for their psychosis would be more cost effective than wasting a surgeons time when more important surgeries are required.

Reply
Apr 29, 2024 16:33:14   #
Steven smith
 
Rose42 wrote:
I***tic. This country is going downhill quickly.


It looks like Kevyn has embraced the idea that being q***r is something to be celebrated and promoted at taxpayer expense.

Reply
Apr 29, 2024 17:12:12   #
Liberty Tree
 
Kevyn wrote:
A federal appellate court in Richmond became the first in the country to rule that state health-care plans must pay for g****r-affirming surgeries, a major win for t*********r rights amid a nationwide wave of anti-t***s activism and legislation.
The decision came from a set of cases out of North Carolina and West Virginia, where state officials argued that their policies were based on cost concerns rather than bias. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit rejected that argument, saying the plans were discriminating against t***s people in need of treatment.
Judge Roger L. Gregory, an appointee of President Clinton, wrote for the majority that the restrictions were “obviously discriminatory” based on both sex and g****r.
“In this case, discriminating on the basis of diagnosis is discriminating on the basis of g****r identity and sex,” Gregory wrote, because “g****r dysphoria is so intimately related to t*********r status as to be virtually indistinguishable from it.”
The majority ruled that West Virginia’s policy also violated the Affordable Care Act’s anti-discrimination provision, a finding that has broad implications for other states’ Medicaid programs.
A federal appellate court in Richmond became the f... (show quote)


You can schedule yours

Reply
Apr 29, 2024 17:22:16   #
Rose42
 
Steven smith wrote:
It looks like Kevyn has embraced the idea that being q***r is something to be celebrated and promoted at taxpayer expense.


T***s people are mentally ill and need help - not enabling. This is definitely not something the taxpayers should be paying for

Reply
Apr 29, 2024 17:52:49   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
Kevyn wrote:
A federal appellate court in Richmond became the first in the country to rule that state health-care plans must pay for g****r-affirming surgeries, a major win for t*********r rights amid a nationwide wave of anti-t***s activism and legislation.
The decision came from a set of cases out of North Carolina and West Virginia, where state officials argued that their policies were based on cost concerns rather than bias. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit rejected that argument, saying the plans were discriminating against t***s people in need of treatment.
Judge Roger L. Gregory, an appointee of President Clinton, wrote for the majority that the restrictions were “obviously discriminatory” based on both sex and g****r.
“In this case, discriminating on the basis of diagnosis is discriminating on the basis of g****r identity and sex,” Gregory wrote, because “g****r dysphoria is so intimately related to t*********r status as to be virtually indistinguishable from it.”
The majority ruled that West Virginia’s policy also violated the Affordable Care Act’s anti-discrimination provision, a finding that has broad implications for other states’ Medicaid programs.
A federal appellate court in Richmond became the f... (show quote)


Ur safe for now! Go to Iran and protest for t***s

Reply
Apr 29, 2024 21:45:42   #
BIRDMAN
 
Kevyn wrote:
A federal appellate court in Richmond became the first in the country to rule that state health-care plans must pay for g****r-affirming surgeries, a major win for t*********r rights amid a nationwide wave of anti-t***s activism and legislation.
The decision came from a set of cases out of North Carolina and West Virginia, where state officials argued that their policies were based on cost concerns rather than bias. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit rejected that argument, saying the plans were discriminating against t***s people in need of treatment.
Judge Roger L. Gregory, an appointee of President Clinton, wrote for the majority that the restrictions were “obviously discriminatory” based on both sex and g****r.
“In this case, discriminating on the basis of diagnosis is discriminating on the basis of g****r identity and sex,” Gregory wrote, because “g****r dysphoria is so intimately related to t*********r status as to be virtually indistinguishable from it.”
The majority ruled that West Virginia’s policy also violated the Affordable Care Act’s anti-discrimination provision, a finding that has broad implications for other states’ Medicaid programs.
A federal appellate court in Richmond became the f... (show quote)
🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪





Reply
Apr 30, 2024 14:55:34   #
WEBCO
 
Kevyn wrote:
A federal appellate court in Richmond became the first in the country to rule that state health-care plans must pay for g****r-affirming surgeries, a major win for t*********r rights amid a nationwide wave of anti-t***s activism and legislation.
The decision came from a set of cases out of North Carolina and West Virginia, where state officials argued that their policies were based on cost concerns rather than bias. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit rejected that argument, saying the plans were discriminating against t***s people in need of treatment.
Judge Roger L. Gregory, an appointee of President Clinton, wrote for the majority that the restrictions were “obviously discriminatory” based on both sex and g****r.
“In this case, discriminating on the basis of diagnosis is discriminating on the basis of g****r identity and sex,” Gregory wrote, because “g****r dysphoria is so intimately related to t*********r status as to be virtually indistinguishable from it.”
The majority ruled that West Virginia’s policy also violated the Affordable Care Act’s anti-discrimination provision, a finding that has broad implications for other states’ Medicaid programs.
A federal appellate court in Richmond became the f... (show quote)


Why do you want to butcher mentally disturbed children? What sick satisfaction do you derive from permanently ruining childrens lives?

Reply
Apr 30, 2024 15:37:05   #
pegw
 
There isn't a doctor in the US that would risk their medical license by doing g****r surgery on a minor. The only exception is on intersex people. Why can't you i***ts out there accept that?

Reply
Apr 30, 2024 16:24:47   #
WEBCO
 
pegw wrote:
There isn't a doctor in the US that would risk their medical license by doing g****r surgery on a minor. The only exception is on intersex people. Why can't you i***ts out there accept that?


You should have fact checked this lie. Why can't you i***ts realize it is happening

Damn you are ignorant
Damn you are ignorant...

Reply
Apr 30, 2024 16:25:53   #
Jim0001 Loc: originally from Tennessee, now Virginia, USA
 
pegw wrote:
There isn't a doctor in the US that would risk their medical license by doing g****r surgery on a minor. The only exception is on intersex people. Why can't you i***ts out there accept that?


Does anyone know what an intersex person is? As far as I know there is male and female.



Reply
Apr 30, 2024 16:54:44   #
martsiva
 
Steven smith wrote:
It looks like Kevyn has embraced the idea that being q***r is something to be celebrated and promoted at taxpayer expense.


Yup all the time!!

Reply
Apr 30, 2024 23:23:51   #
WEBCO
 
Does this mean they will pay for other elective surgeries? Can women, those with and without penisis, get breast augmentation

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.