The crackpot nonsensical claim of lawfare.
After you read the indictments charging trump and the text of the laws he is charged with breaking do you still think he did not commit the crimes for which he was charged? It is damn cut and dry with loads of supporting evidence. Numerous others have been charged and convicted of the same crimes in this jurisdiction by the same DA, so no one can complain his right to equal protection has been violated. This leaves the only gripe is that he should be above the law because he was once president. Is this your belief? He is being handed with kid gloves, any other defendant who disrespected the courts and violated restraining orders the way trump is would be sitting in Reikers for contempt.
Kevyn wrote:
After you read the indictments charging trump and the text of the laws he is charged with breaking do you still think he did not commit the crimes for which he was charged? It is damn cut and dry with loads of supporting evidence. Numerous others have been charged and convicted of the same crimes in this jurisdiction by the same DA, so no one can complain his right to equal protection has been violated. This leaves the only gripe is that he should be above the law because he was once president. Is this your belief? He is being handed with kid gloves, any other defendant who disrespected the courts and violated restraining orders the way trump is would be sitting in Reikers for contempt.
After you read the indictments charging trump and ... (
show quote)
***After you read the indictments charging trump and the text of the laws he is charged with breaking do you still think he did not commit the crimes for which he was charged?
>>>Yes.
***It is damn cut and dry with loads of supporting evidence.
>>>That is speculation and a lie.
Troll alert
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.