Rose42

No they won’t you dictator wannabe. And its merely your disjointed opinion it would benefit all Americans. It would certainly benefit the bad guys

keepuphope Loc: Idaho

Funny how he sticks his fingers in his ears and SAYS nanana when someone points out that literal fact to him. He, and those who think like him are literally blind to facts and history. Oh well you can't fix stupid I guess.

Rose42

No you can’t. Its so obvious its a heart problem not a gun problem.

keepuphope Loc: Idaho

True.Good morning Rose.😊

Big Kahuna

These criminals should be mandated to live with the politicians, attorneys, judges and media whores who promote their criminality.

Big Kahuna

But you can't take the guns away from the criminals with guns. So the criminals can cause many deaths while the good guys end up in cemeteries. Typical demorat thinking, embolden the criminals and silence those that are being brutalized by the thugs.

Jim0001 Loc: originally from Tennessee, now Virginia, USA

Is this the best you can do, cupcake? Another stupid a$$ reply from you.
You fail to mention this technology you tout.
Have I missed something, there is Single Shot, Semi-Automatic and Automatic functioning in firearms.
There are break action, lever action, bolt action, gas operated, recoil operated, blowback operated, inertia driven means to accomplish one of the aforementioned functions.

None are new technology dip$hit.

America 1 Loc: South Miami

How the N**is used gun control
https://wyoleg.gov/InterimCommittee/2019/01-201910313-04Handout.pdf

To maintain its iron grip, the Soviet Union had to turn to the most proven form of suppression — gun confiscation. On December 10, 1918, the Council of People's Commissars mandated that Soviet citizens turn in their firearms.
Failure to do so led to criminal prosecution.
https://mises.org/mises-wire/brief-history-repressive-regimes-and-their-gun-laws#:~:text=To%20maintain%20its%20iron%20grip,so%2C%20led%20to%20criminal%20prosecution.

After the Guns Were Removed, the K*****g Fields Began
“All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The C*******t Party must command all the guns; that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party.”
The quote was from Mao Zedong, the founder of C*******t China.
Mao’s first act after gaining complete control of China in 1949 was to take away all guns from the population.
It was a policy he began in 1935 as he took over each rural province.
Anyone found with a gun post-confiscation was executed.

An estimated 65 million Chinese died as a result of Mao’s repeated, merciless attempts to create a new “socialist” China. Anyone who got in his way was done away with—by execution, imprisonment, or forced famine.
Mao k**led more people than either Stalin or Hitler during World War II.
And it all began after he took away the guns.

Dictators throughout much of history have disarmed their populations before they began their mass k*****gs. Examples abound beyond Mao: Hitler took guns from the Jews in November of 1938, and Kristallnacht and the Holocaust followed; and then there was Fidel Castro in Cuba and Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, to name but a few.

Cuba and Gun Control
Everybody ought to have a gun, Castro maintained—until he took over Cuba in 1959. At a rally in Havana before he assumed power, he explained: “This is how democracy works: It gives rifles to farmers, to students, to women, to Negroes, to the poor, and to every citizen who is ready to defend a just cause.”

Weapons ranging from Czech submachine guns to Belgian FN automatic rifles were handed out to 50,000 soldiers, 400,000 m*****amen, 100,000 members of the factory-guarding popular defense force, and to many men, women, and children in Cuba’s 1 million-strong “neighborhood vigilance committees.”
Immediately after assuming power in 1959, Castro changed his position, following Mao’s rule that guns should not be in the hands of the people.
For three weeks after the Castro government was formed, Radio Havana warned, “All citizens must turn in their combat weapons.
Civilians must take arms to police stations, soldiers to military headquarters.”

Radio Havana’s explanation was somewhat contradictory: The guns were in bad shape anyway and the “struggle against our enemies requires a rigorous control of all combat weapons.”
There was an urgency about the new policy that suggested serious concern.
Failure to turn in military weapons by Sept. 1, 1959, warned Radio Havana, would be punished not by criminal courts but by the dreaded Revolutionary Tribunals—those kangaroo courts that sentenced thousands of Cubans to death after Castro took over.

Venezuela and Gun Control
Venezuela is now paying the price for allowing Chavez to implement the Mao rule when he came to power in 2012.
The shocking nature of an economic collapse that led Venezuela from being one of the richest countries in Latin America to one of the poorest has been well documented.
One aspect of the Venezuelan crisis that does not receive much coverage is the country’s gun control regime.
All guns were outlawed when Chavez came to power, and harsh penalties were imposed on violators.
The Venezuelan Armed Forces have exclusive power to control, register, and potentially confiscate firearms.
Many citizens now regret the repressive gun control legislation the Venezuelan government implemented in 2012. Naturally, this regret is warranted.
The Venezuelan government is among the most tyrannical in the world, with a proven track record of violating basic civil liberties such as free speech, debasing its national currency, confiscating private property, and creating economic controls that destroy the country’s productivity.

E******ns have proven to be useless, as they’ve been mired with corruption and charges of government tampering. For many, taking up arms is the only option left for the country to shake off its tyrannical government.
But the Venezuelan government has prevented such an uprising with its draconian gun control.
These life-and-death lessons of history are lost on too many Americans.
Our Founding Fathers didn’t give us the Second Amendment for duck hunting or simply for self-protection in a country that at the time had a vast and yet unknown frontier.
They bestowed it upon us so that we could protect our precious nation from devolving into tyranny as so many others have done.
Politicians who respect the American ideal don’t try to diminish the Second Amendment or blame it for other ills of society that they have failed to solve but rather embrace it as part of the legacy of rights that helps keep America free.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2022/06/16/after-the-guns-were-removed-the-k*****g-fields-began/

Rose42

And a good morning to you too!✝️

Smedley_buzkill

For someone who claims to be a product of Jesuit education, you have a pathetic knowledge of legalities. First off, Einstein, Lincoln's suspension of habeus corpus was deemed unconstitutional in Ex Parte Milligan 1866.
Matter of fact, Mr. Lincoln was UNANIMOUSLY shot down by the SCOTUS, which also laid out the limits of Martial Law. Your scenario is illegal and unconstitutional, which is what I have come to expect of your maunderings. You have already repeatedly proven the Peter Principle to be true. Now you're just rubbing it in.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/71/2/

Did I mention that your scheme also runs afoul of Article I sections 9 & 10 of the Constitution; or did you wish that re-written to suit your druthers?

TJKMO Loc: Bicycle Heaven

That is not what the evidence in this article has proven.
It is not what you say.

That is not what the evidence is leading us toward.
This case evidence is quite different.

TJKMO Loc: Bicycle Heaven

What qualifies Trump for your
WORSHIP?

keepuphope Loc: Idaho

Slander is a sin TJ. And I worship only God Almighty and my savior. I told you how I thought about Trump but you twist it around to slander me. Kinda like satan did Jesus about God's word or the Sanhedrin against Jesus. Your fruit reveals your standing with my savior. You shall know them by their fruit.

TJKMO Loc: Bicycle Heaven

You, like Pilate, betrayed the Trust of Jesus Christ.
That is a great pity.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

Your keyboard is full of cheap baloney. And so is any supposed evidence you claim supports what it is writing in these silly posts.
Just as the amount of gasoline your car uses is all IT"S choice. And your credit cards are responsible for all the money you do or do not spend, and any debt you might owe.
The only choice YOU have, according to your own theory of cause and effect, is which weird ass articles you choose to believe in order to support your own weird ass opinions.
All liberal gun articles ever do is point out that the more guns are available, then the more injuries and deaths related to gun violence occur. Which is obvious and true and irrelevant. If there were no powered vehicles there would be no vehicle caused deaths or injuries, as well. That does NOT mean they should be eliminated, or that they do not save more lives than their misuse causes. THAT is true and factual about BOTH powered vehicles AND firearms. You are setting much higher limits to the definitions of both ignorance and embarrassingly foolishness.
You should leave your keyboard and go into the kitchen and watch your stove and refrigerator fix you some dinner.
When you are done, you should ask your computer to look up the definition of TOOL for you. There is no such thing as an EVIL tool. Only tools that are misused.