One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Cat is Now out of the Bag on B******i
Page 1 of 11 next> last>>
Jan 25, 2015 12:17:18   #
ninetogo
 
Tom Fitton, President of Judicial Watch just posted on the Judicial Watch Blog the following:

January 23, 2015: Another B******i Cover-Up

Contrary to what the Obama administration had initially claimed in its public comments, top U.S. diplomatic officials knew the U.S. compound in B******i, Libya, was under terrorist attack on September 11, 2012. This is big. In testimony before the U.S. House Oversight Committee on October 10, 2012, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Charles Lamb let the cat out of the bag. Apparently, the agents within the Diplomatic Security Commander Center in Washington, D.C., knew that U.S. embassy personnel were under a terrorist attack from the moment it began.

Mr. Lamb told the congressional committee the Command Center knew in "real time" that a coordinated terrorist attack was underway against U.S. facilities in B******i. Moreover, it was clear to top officials within the Commander Center that the attack had no relationship to a controversial video. But this is not what U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice said during an appearance on NBC's Meet the Press program on September 16, 2011. The B******i attack was "almost a copycat" of spontaneous demonstrations that erupted against U.S. facilities in Cairo, Egypt, in response to the video," Rice said on the program. But her scenario is in conflict with Lamb's testimony.

"When the attack began," Lamb testified, "a diplomatic security agent working in the Tactical Operations Center immediately activated the Imminent Danger Notification System and made an emergency announcement over the PA. Based on our security protocols he also alerted the annex U.S. quick reaction security team stationed nearby, Libyan 17th February Brigade, Embassy Tripoli, and the Diplomatic Security Command Center in Washington. From that point on, I could follow what was happening in almost real-time."
There is good reason to have faith in Lamb's testimony. That's because there was an October 9, 2012, press conference call in which a senior State Department official told reporters "The ambassador walked guests out at 8:30 or so; there was nobody on the street. Then at 9:40 they saw on the security cameras that there were armed men invading the compound." What this means is that we have now entered the fourth year of a cover-up that demonstrates the Command Center knew a full-fledged terrorist attack was underway almost from the instant it began. Documents from the Command Center could help to further unravel information the administration has sought to conceal.
All this is why Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the U.S. State Department last October. Thanks to a court order in this lawsuit, the State Department finally started disgorging documents - the first batch of which arrived earlier this week (on January 20).
Despite knowing it was an attack, the State Department, including its Security Command Center, continued to falsely tie "demonstrations" to the B******i terrorist assault. The State Department's January 20 document production contains a press release issued by the Diplomatic Security Command Center, on September 12, 2012, that falsely states that "violent demonstrations took place at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, Egypt, and at the U.S. Special Mission Compound in B******i, Libya, resulting in damages in both locations and casualties in B******i."
By the way, I'm not aware of the State Department telling Congress or anyone else about another "security" cover-up we uncovered, which is that there was no licensed security force at the B******i special mission compound on the day of the attack. We found those documents in another FOIA lawsuit.
We have now filed 40 FOIA requests, a Mandatory Declassification Review and eight lawsuits against the Obama administration relating to the B******i terrorist attack. We are the only non-governmental organization currently litigating in federal court to uncover information withheld by the administration about the events that t***spired before, during and after the assault on our fellow citizens in B******i.
The House created a Select Committee on B******i as the direct result of Judicial Watch's uncovering emails showing White House orchestration of the knowingly false narrative that the B******i attack was due to an Internet video and spontaneous protests. The documents were obtained through a federal court order obtained by Judicial Watch in a separate FOIA lawsuit. Exclusive disclosures by Judicial Watch include photos of the B******i compound attack aftermath; various records about security contracts and gaps; documents related to administration's efforts to lie to Congress and the American people about the attack; and emails with specific reports the State Department was receiving as the attack was taking place (including a State Department email detailing intelligence that Ambassador Stevens may have been alive at a B******i hospital).
Judicial Watch also produced an exclusive investigative news story questioning the handling of the B******i investigation by outgoing House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rodgers (R-MI).

In the meantime, I understand that the Select Committee on B******i held its third hearing (after nine months of operation) on, among other things, why the State Department is ignoring its document requests. "Ugh," you might say. Just so you know, that hearing was secret. "Double ugh," you may also say. Don't worry; we will continue our lawsuits and investigations. Your Judicial Watch will continue to be the best available means to hold the Obama administration (and corrupt alumnae such as Hillary Clinton) accountable for the B******i outrage.

Until Next Week

Tom Fitton
President

Reply
Jan 25, 2015 12:28:28   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
And just think, the sheople will probably elect Billary POTUS in 2016.

Reply
Jan 25, 2015 12:28:52   #
dkree
 
Judicial Watch is an organization we can trust and deserves our readership support and for those that can afford it our financial support. I have to inflated ball in the game. It is just my opinion.

Reply
 
 
Jan 25, 2015 12:31:57   #
Weyner
 
ninetogo wrote:
Tom Fitton, President of Judicial Watch just posted on the Judicial Watch Blog the following:

January 23, 2015: Another B******i Cover-Up

Contrary to what the Obama administration had initially claimed in its public comments, top U.S. diplomatic officials knew the U.S. compound in B******i, Libya, was under terrorist attack on September 11, 2012. This is big. In testimony before the U.S. House Oversight Committee on October 10, 2012, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Charles Lamb let the cat out of the bag. Apparently, the agents within the Diplomatic Security Commander Center in Washington, D.C., knew that U.S. embassy personnel were under a terrorist attack from the moment it began.

Mr. Lamb told the congressional committee the Command Center knew in "real time" that a coordinated terrorist attack was underway against U.S. facilities in B******i. Moreover, it was clear to top officials within the Commander Center that the attack had no relationship to a controversial video. But this is not what U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice said during an appearance on NBC's Meet the Press program on September 16, 2011. The B******i attack was "almost a copycat" of spontaneous demonstrations that erupted against U.S. facilities in Cairo, Egypt, in response to the video," Rice said on the program. But her scenario is in conflict with Lamb's testimony.

"When the attack began," Lamb testified, "a diplomatic security agent working in the Tactical Operations Center immediately activated the Imminent Danger Notification System and made an emergency announcement over the PA. Based on our security protocols he also alerted the annex U.S. quick reaction security team stationed nearby, Libyan 17th February Brigade, Embassy Tripoli, and the Diplomatic Security Command Center in Washington. From that point on, I could follow what was happening in almost real-time."
There is good reason to have faith in Lamb's testimony. That's because there was an October 9, 2012, press conference call in which a senior State Department official told reporters "The ambassador walked guests out at 8:30 or so; there was nobody on the street. Then at 9:40 they saw on the security cameras that there were armed men invading the compound." What this means is that we have now entered the fourth year of a cover-up that demonstrates the Command Center knew a full-fledged terrorist attack was underway almost from the instant it began. Documents from the Command Center could help to further unravel information the administration has sought to conceal.
All this is why Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the U.S. State Department last October. Thanks to a court order in this lawsuit, the State Department finally started disgorging documents - the first batch of which arrived earlier this week (on January 20).
Despite knowing it was an attack, the State Department, including its Security Command Center, continued to falsely tie "demonstrations" to the B******i terrorist assault. The State Department's January 20 document production contains a press release issued by the Diplomatic Security Command Center, on September 12, 2012, that falsely states that "violent demonstrations took place at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, Egypt, and at the U.S. Special Mission Compound in B******i, Libya, resulting in damages in both locations and casualties in B******i."
By the way, I'm not aware of the State Department telling Congress or anyone else about another "security" cover-up we uncovered, which is that there was no licensed security force at the B******i special mission compound on the day of the attack. We found those documents in another FOIA lawsuit.
We have now filed 40 FOIA requests, a Mandatory Declassification Review and eight lawsuits against the Obama administration relating to the B******i terrorist attack. We are the only non-governmental organization currently litigating in federal court to uncover information withheld by the administration about the events that t***spired before, during and after the assault on our fellow citizens in B******i.
The House created a Select Committee on B******i as the direct result of Judicial Watch's uncovering emails showing White House orchestration of the knowingly false narrative that the B******i attack was due to an Internet video and spontaneous protests. The documents were obtained through a federal court order obtained by Judicial Watch in a separate FOIA lawsuit. Exclusive disclosures by Judicial Watch include photos of the B******i compound attack aftermath; various records about security contracts and gaps; documents related to administration's efforts to lie to Congress and the American people about the attack; and emails with specific reports the State Department was receiving as the attack was taking place (including a State Department email detailing intelligence that Ambassador Stevens may have been alive at a B******i hospital).
Judicial Watch also produced an exclusive investigative news story questioning the handling of the B******i investigation by outgoing House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rodgers (R-MI).

In the meantime, I understand that the Select Committee on B******i held its third hearing (after nine months of operation) on, among other things, why the State Department is ignoring its document requests. "Ugh," you might say. Just so you know, that hearing was secret. "Double ugh," you may also say. Don't worry; we will continue our lawsuits and investigations. Your Judicial Watch will continue to be the best available means to hold the Obama administration (and corrupt alumnae such as Hillary Clinton) accountable for the B******i outrage.

Until Next Week

Tom Fitton
President
Tom Fitton, President of Judicial Watch just poste... (show quote)

Obummer,Hillary and all the rest should be tried and Hung! they are nothing but Trash!

Reply
Jan 25, 2015 12:33:42   #
Ricko Loc: Florida
 
ninetogo wrote:
Tom Fitton, President of Judicial Watch just posted on the Judicial Watch Blog the following:

January 23, 2015: Another B******i Cover-Up

Contrary to what the Obama administration had initially claimed in its public comments, top U.S. diplomatic officials knew the U.S. compound in B******i, Libya, was under terrorist attack on September 11, 2012. This is big. In testimony before the U.S. House Oversight Committee on October 10, 2012, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Charles Lamb let the cat out of the bag. Apparently, the agents within the Diplomatic Security Commander Center in Washington, D.C., knew that U.S. embassy personnel were under a terrorist attack from the moment it began.

Mr. Lamb told the congressional committee the Command Center knew in "real time" that a coordinated terrorist attack was underway against U.S. facilities in B******i. Moreover, it was clear to top officials within the Commander Center that the attack had no relationship to a controversial video. But this is not what U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice said during an appearance on NBC's Meet the Press program on September 16, 2011. The B******i attack was "almost a copycat" of spontaneous demonstrations that erupted against U.S. facilities in Cairo, Egypt, in response to the video," Rice said on the program. But her scenario is in conflict with Lamb's testimony.

"When the attack began," Lamb testified, "a diplomatic security agent working in the Tactical Operations Center immediately activated the Imminent Danger Notification System and made an emergency announcement over the PA. Based on our security protocols he also alerted the annex U.S. quick reaction security team stationed nearby, Libyan 17th February Brigade, Embassy Tripoli, and the Diplomatic Security Command Center in Washington. From that point on, I could follow what was happening in almost real-time."
There is good reason to have faith in Lamb's testimony. That's because there was an October 9, 2012, press conference call in which a senior State Department official told reporters "The ambassador walked guests out at 8:30 or so; there was nobody on the street. Then at 9:40 they saw on the security cameras that there were armed men invading the compound." What this means is that we have now entered the fourth year of a cover-up that demonstrates the Command Center knew a full-fledged terrorist attack was underway almost from the instant it began. Documents from the Command Center could help to further unravel information the administration has sought to conceal.
All this is why Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the U.S. State Department last October. Thanks to a court order in this lawsuit, the State Department finally started disgorging documents - the first batch of which arrived earlier this week (on January 20).
Despite knowing it was an attack, the State Department, including its Security Command Center, continued to falsely tie "demonstrations" to the B******i terrorist assault. The State Department's January 20 document production contains a press release issued by the Diplomatic Security Command Center, on September 12, 2012, that falsely states that "violent demonstrations took place at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, Egypt, and at the U.S. Special Mission Compound in B******i, Libya, resulting in damages in both locations and casualties in B******i."
By the way, I'm not aware of the State Department telling Congress or anyone else about another "security" cover-up we uncovered, which is that there was no licensed security force at the B******i special mission compound on the day of the attack. We found those documents in another FOIA lawsuit.
We have now filed 40 FOIA requests, a Mandatory Declassification Review and eight lawsuits against the Obama administration relating to the B******i terrorist attack. We are the only non-governmental organization currently litigating in federal court to uncover information withheld by the administration about the events that t***spired before, during and after the assault on our fellow citizens in B******i.
The House created a Select Committee on B******i as the direct result of Judicial Watch's uncovering emails showing White House orchestration of the knowingly false narrative that the B******i attack was due to an Internet video and spontaneous protests. The documents were obtained through a federal court order obtained by Judicial Watch in a separate FOIA lawsuit. Exclusive disclosures by Judicial Watch include photos of the B******i compound attack aftermath; various records about security contracts and gaps; documents related to administration's efforts to lie to Congress and the American people about the attack; and emails with specific reports the State Department was receiving as the attack was taking place (including a State Department email detailing intelligence that Ambassador Stevens may have been alive at a B******i hospital).
Judicial Watch also produced an exclusive investigative news story questioning the handling of the B******i investigation by outgoing House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rodgers (R-MI).

In the meantime, I understand that the Select Committee on B******i held its third hearing (after nine months of operation) on, among other things, why the State Department is ignoring its document requests. "Ugh," you might say. Just so you know, that hearing was secret. "Double ugh," you may also say. Don't worry; we will continue our lawsuits and investigations. Your Judicial Watch will continue to be the best available means to hold the Obama administration (and corrupt alumnae such as Hillary Clinton) accountable for the B******i outrage.

Until Next Week

Tom Fitton
President
Tom Fitton, President of Judicial Watch just poste... (show quote)


ninetogo-if they were innocent they would not be withholding documents. Do not be fooled by the fact that they will use National Security as a reason not to release documents. The real reason is more than likely CYA. This administration has lied from day one and has been embroiled in one scandal or another since they took office. This is the Obama modus operandi. Good Luck America !!!

Reply
Jan 25, 2015 12:46:55   #
grumbledog
 
Ricko wrote:
ninetogo-if they were innocent they would not be withholding documents. Do not be fooled by the fact that they will use National Security as a reason not to release documents. The real reason is more than likely CYA. This administration has lied from day one and has been embroiled in one scandal or another since they took office. Thi is the Obama modus operandi. Good Luck America !!!


8 committee(all republican controlled)reports all with the same concluisons. No stand down order, no wrong doing. Now you got a select committee (that's been given their marching orders you have to find something we can use against Clinton) if you can't find anything just keep the hearing going until 2016 so we can make believe there is something there.

You think if the democrats had 9 committees look into the Iraq war we could have found all the lies that cost us 4000 lives.

You have no interest in finding the t***h just trying to find a way to steal an e******n.

Reply
Jan 25, 2015 13:02:43   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Just so you remember moron Hilary v**ed for the Iraq war.
grumbledog wrote:
8 committee(all republican controlled)reports all with the same concluisons. No stand down order, no wrong doing. Now you got a select committee (that's been given their marching orders you have to find something we can use against Clinton) if you can't find anything just keep the hearing going until 2016 so we can make believe there is something there.

You think if the democrats had 9 committees look into the Iraq war we could have found all the lies that cost us 4000 lives.

You have no interest in finding the t***h just trying to find a way to steal an e******n.
8 committee(all republican controlled)reports all ... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Jan 25, 2015 13:27:41   #
2bltap Loc: Move to the Mainland
 
grumbledog wrote:
8 committee(all republican controlled)reports all with the same concluisons. No stand down order, no wrong doing. Now you got a select committee (that's been given their marching orders you have to find something we can use against Clinton) if you can't find anything just keep the hearing going until 2016 so we can make believe there is something there.

You think if the democrats had 9 committees look into the Iraq war we could have found all the lies that cost us 4000 lives.

You have no interest in finding the t***h just trying to find a way to steal an e******n.
8 committee(all republican controlled)reports all ... (show quote)


You sir are really out there aren't you. I would hope that even the progressive left would want the the t***h. You are just a dyed in the wool l*****t low information analgesic Dufus.

Reply
Jan 25, 2015 13:36:46   #
greyfox Loc: western mass.
 
buffalo wrote:
And just think, the sheople will probably elect Billary POTUS in 2016.


Looks like Obama and Hillary will burn over this---too bad it has taken this long---should be no surprise with the Two biggest liars involved!!!!

Reply
Jan 25, 2015 13:56:11   #
alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
 
greyfox wrote:
Looks like Obama and Hillary will burn over this---too bad it has taken this long---should be no surprise with the Two biggest liars involved!!!!


most of this was known from the start but the administration had all hands shoveling bulls**t as fast as they could to cover it all up

Reply
Jan 25, 2015 14:23:10   #
greyfox Loc: western mass.
 
alex wrote:
most of this was known from the start but the administration had all hands shoveling bulls**t as fast as they could to cover it all up


Then all sure worked at that!!!!!

Reply
 
 
Jan 25, 2015 15:15:33   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Add this to the cat:
Admiral: U.S. could have ousted Gadhafi peacefully
Brokered deal but Obama chose to arm al-Qaida-linked 'rebels'
For full article: http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/admiral-u-s-could-have-ousted-gadhafi-peacefully/#uHr0jsO2Y1jPRV00.99

NEW YORK – As the allied bombing of Libya began in 2011, the Obama administration rejected an offer by Moammar Gadhafi to engage in negotiations to abdicate, according to a retired U.S. Navy officer who says he was prepared to broker the deal.



ninetogo wrote:
Tom Fitton, President of Judicial Watch just posted on the Judicial Watch Blog the following:

January 23, 2015: Another B******i Cover-Up

Contrary to what the Obama administration had initially claimed in its public comments, top U.S. diplomatic officials knew the U.S. compound in B******i, Libya, was under terrorist attack on September 11, 2012. This is big. In testimony before the U.S. House Oversight Committee on October 10, 2012, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Charles Lamb let the cat out of the bag. Apparently, the agents within the Diplomatic Security Commander Center in Washington, D.C., knew that U.S. embassy personnel were under a terrorist attack from the moment it began.

Mr. Lamb told the congressional committee the Command Center knew in "real time" that a coordinated terrorist attack was underway against U.S. facilities in B******i. Moreover, it was clear to top officials within the Commander Center that the attack had no relationship to a controversial video. But this is not what U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice said during an appearance on NBC's Meet the Press program on September 16, 2011. The B******i attack was "almost a copycat" of spontaneous demonstrations that erupted against U.S. facilities in Cairo, Egypt, in response to the video," Rice said on the program. But her scenario is in conflict with Lamb's testimony.

"When the attack began," Lamb testified, "a diplomatic security agent working in the Tactical Operations Center immediately activated the Imminent Danger Notification System and made an emergency announcement over the PA. Based on our security protocols he also alerted the annex U.S. quick reaction security team stationed nearby, Libyan 17th February Brigade, Embassy Tripoli, and the Diplomatic Security Command Center in Washington. From that point on, I could follow what was happening in almost real-time."
There is good reason to have faith in Lamb's testimony. That's because there was an October 9, 2012, press conference call in which a senior State Department official told reporters "The ambassador walked guests out at 8:30 or so; there was nobody on the street. Then at 9:40 they saw on the security cameras that there were armed men invading the compound." What this means is that we have now entered the fourth year of a cover-up that demonstrates the Command Center knew a full-fledged terrorist attack was underway almost from the instant it began. Documents from the Command Center could help to further unravel information the administration has sought to conceal.
All this is why Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the U.S. State Department last October. Thanks to a court order in this lawsuit, the State Department finally started disgorging documents - the first batch of which arrived earlier this week (on January 20).
Despite knowing it was an attack, the State Department, including its Security Command Center, continued to falsely tie "demonstrations" to the B******i terrorist assault. The State Department's January 20 document production contains a press release issued by the Diplomatic Security Command Center, on September 12, 2012, that falsely states that "violent demonstrations took place at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, Egypt, and at the U.S. Special Mission Compound in B******i, Libya, resulting in damages in both locations and casualties in B******i."
By the way, I'm not aware of the State Department telling Congress or anyone else about another "security" cover-up we uncovered, which is that there was no licensed security force at the B******i special mission compound on the day of the attack. We found those documents in another FOIA lawsuit.
We have now filed 40 FOIA requests, a Mandatory Declassification Review and eight lawsuits against the Obama administration relating to the B******i terrorist attack. We are the only non-governmental organization currently litigating in federal court to uncover information withheld by the administration about the events that t***spired before, during and after the assault on our fellow citizens in B******i.
The House created a Select Committee on B******i as the direct result of Judicial Watch's uncovering emails showing White House orchestration of the knowingly false narrative that the B******i attack was due to an Internet video and spontaneous protests. The documents were obtained through a federal court order obtained by Judicial Watch in a separate FOIA lawsuit. Exclusive disclosures by Judicial Watch include photos of the B******i compound attack aftermath; various records about security contracts and gaps; documents related to administration's efforts to lie to Congress and the American people about the attack; and emails with specific reports the State Department was receiving as the attack was taking place (including a State Department email detailing intelligence that Ambassador Stevens may have been alive at a B******i hospital).
Judicial Watch also produced an exclusive investigative news story questioning the handling of the B******i investigation by outgoing House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rodgers (R-MI).

In the meantime, I understand that the Select Committee on B******i held its third hearing (after nine months of operation) on, among other things, why the State Department is ignoring its document requests. "Ugh," you might say. Just so you know, that hearing was secret. "Double ugh," you may also say. Don't worry; we will continue our lawsuits and investigations. Your Judicial Watch will continue to be the best available means to hold the Obama administration (and corrupt alumnae such as Hillary Clinton) accountable for the B******i outrage.

Until Next Week

Tom Fitton
President
Tom Fitton, President of Judicial Watch just poste... (show quote)

Reply
Jan 25, 2015 15:44:21   #
dkree
 
Here is some food for thought.

THE UNANSWERED MYSTERY OF THE CENTURY



This came from a union guy in Chicago who didn't v**e for Obama.
Very, very interesting perspective that I never thought of in this light.
------------------------


It will be interesting to see what they put in his "P**********l Library" about his early years when he is out of office.


In a country where we take notice of many, many facets of our public figures' lives, doesn't seem odd that there's so little we know about our current president, Barack Obama.


For example, we know that Andrew Jackson 's wife smoked a corn cob pipe and was accused of adultery; Abe Lincoln never went to school; Jack Kennedy wore a back brace; Harry Truman played the piano.


As Americans, we enjoy knowing details about our newsmakers, but none of us know one single humanizing fact about the history of our own president.


We are all aware of the lack of uncontestable birth records for Obama; that document managing has been spectacularly successful.


There are however, several additional oddities in Obama's history that appear to be as well managed as the birthing issue.


One other interesting thing... There are no birth certificates of his daughters that can be found ?


It's interesting that no one who ever dated him has shown up. The charisma that caused women to be drawn to him so strongly during his campaign, certainly would in the normal course of events, lead some lady to come forward, if only to garner some attention for herself. We all know about JFK's magnetism, that McCain was no monk and quite a few details about Palin's courtship and even her athletic prowess Joe Biden's aneurisms are no secret; look at Cheney and Clinton, we all know about their heart problems. Certainly Wild Bill Clinton's exploits before and during his White House years, were well known. That's why it's so odd that not one lady has stepped up and said, "He was soooo shy..." or "What a great dancer..."

It's virtually impossible to know anything about this fellow.

Who was the best man at his wedding? Start there. Then check g***msmen.

Then get the footage of the graduation ceremony. Has anyone talked to the professors? It is odd that no one is bragging that they knew him or taught him or lived with him.

When did he meet Michele, and how? Are there photos there? Every president gives to the public all their photos, etc. for their library, etc. What has he released? And who in hell v**ed for him to be the most popular man in 2010? Doesn't this make you wonder?

Ever wonder why no one ever came forward from President Obama's past saying they knew him, attended school with him, was his friend, etc??
Not one person has ever come forward from his past.
It certainly is very, very strange...


This should be a cause for great concern. To those who v**ed for him, you may have elected an unqualified, inexperienced shadow man. Have you seen a movie named "The Manchurian Candidate"

As insignificant as each of us might be, someone with whom we went to school will remember our name or face; someone will remember we were the clown or the dork or the brain or the quiet one or the bully or something about us.

George Stephanopoulos of ABC News said the same thing during the 2008 campaign. He questions why no one has acknowledged the president was in their classroom or ate in the same cafeteria or made impromptu speeches on campus. Stephanopoulos also was a classmate of Obama at Columbia -- the class of 1984. He says he never had a single class with him.

He is such a great orator; why doesn't anyone in Obama's college class remember him? Why won't he allow Columbia to release his records?


Nobody remembers Obama at Columbia University ....


Looking for evidence of Obama's past, Fox News contacted 400 Columbia University students from the period when Obama claims to have been there... but none remembered him.


Wayne Allyn Root was, like Obama, a political science major at Columbia who also graduated in 1983. In 2008, Root says of Obama, "I don't know a single person at Columbia that knew him, and they all know me. I don't have a classmate who ever knew Barack Obama at Columbia, ever."

Nobody recalls him. Root adds that he was also, like Obama, Class of '83 Political Science, and says, "You don't get more exact or closer than that. Never met him in my life, don't know anyone who ever met him. At the class reunion, our 20th reunion five years ago, who was asked to be the speaker of the class? Me. No one ever heard of Barack! And five years ago, nobody even knew who he was. The guy who writes the class notes, who's kind of the, as we say in New York, 'the macha' who knows everybody, has yet to find a person, a human who ever met him."


Obama's photograph does not appear in the school's yearbook and Obama consistently declines requests to talk about his years at Columbia, provide school records, or provide the name of any former classmates or friends while at Columbia .


Some other interesting questions:


Why was Obama's law license inactivated in 2002?
it is said there is no record of him ever taking the Bar exam.


Why was Michelle's law license inactivated by court order?
We understand that was forced to avoid fraud charges.


It is circulating that according to the U.S. Census, there is only one Barack Obama but 27 Social Security numbers and over 80 alias connected to him.


The Social Security number he uses now originated in Connecticut where he is never reported to have lived. And was originally registered to another man (Thomas Louis Wood) from Connecticut, who died in Hawaii while on vacation there.
As we all know Social Security Numbers are only issued 'once, they are not reused'


No wonder all his records are sealed...


Please continue sending this out to everyone. Somewhere, someone had to know him in school...before he "reorganized" Chicago & burst upon the Scene at the 2004 Democratic Convention.

Reply
Jan 25, 2015 17:06:36   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Great post dkree - Many things to ponder here.
How about why there was so much money behind him, and why he had such a favorable press?

dkree wrote:
Here is some food for thought.

THE UNANSWERED MYSTERY OF THE CENTURY



This came from a union guy in Chicago who didn't v**e for Obama.
Very, very interesting perspective that I never thought of in this light.
------------------------


It will be interesting to see what they put in his "P**********l Library" about his early years when he is out of office.


In a country where we take notice of many, many facets of our public figures' lives, doesn't seem odd that there's so little we know about our current president, Barack Obama.


For example, we know that Andrew Jackson 's wife smoked a corn cob pipe and was accused of adultery; Abe Lincoln never went to school; Jack Kennedy wore a back brace; Harry Truman played the piano.


As Americans, we enjoy knowing details about our newsmakers, but none of us know one single humanizing fact about the history of our own president.


We are all aware of the lack of uncontestable birth records for Obama; that document managing has been spectacularly successful.


There are however, several additional oddities in Obama's history that appear to be as well managed as the birthing issue.


One other interesting thing... There are no birth certificates of his daughters that can be found ?


It's interesting that no one who ever dated him has shown up. The charisma that caused women to be drawn to him so strongly during his campaign, certainly would in the normal course of events, lead some lady to come forward, if only to garner some attention for herself. We all know about JFK's magnetism, that McCain was no monk and quite a few details about Palin's courtship and even her athletic prowess Joe Biden's aneurisms are no secret; look at Cheney and Clinton, we all know about their heart problems. Certainly Wild Bill Clinton's exploits before and during his White House years, were well known. That's why it's so odd that not one lady has stepped up and said, "He was soooo shy..." or "What a great dancer..."

It's virtually impossible to know anything about this fellow.

Who was the best man at his wedding? Start there. Then check g***msmen.

Then get the footage of the graduation ceremony. Has anyone talked to the professors? It is odd that no one is bragging that they knew him or taught him or lived with him.

When did he meet Michele, and how? Are there photos there? Every president gives to the public all their photos, etc. for their library, etc. What has he released? And who in hell v**ed for him to be the most popular man in 2010? Doesn't this make you wonder?

Ever wonder why no one ever came forward from President Obama's past saying they knew him, attended school with him, was his friend, etc??
Not one person has ever come forward from his past.
It certainly is very, very strange...


This should be a cause for great concern. To those who v**ed for him, you may have elected an unqualified, inexperienced shadow man. Have you seen a movie named "The Manchurian Candidate"

As insignificant as each of us might be, someone with whom we went to school will remember our name or face; someone will remember we were the clown or the dork or the brain or the quiet one or the bully or something about us.

George Stephanopoulos of ABC News said the same thing during the 2008 campaign. He questions why no one has acknowledged the president was in their classroom or ate in the same cafeteria or made impromptu speeches on campus. Stephanopoulos also was a classmate of Obama at Columbia -- the class of 1984. He says he never had a single class with him.

He is such a great orator; why doesn't anyone in Obama's college class remember him? Why won't he allow Columbia to release his records?


Nobody remembers Obama at Columbia University ....


Looking for evidence of Obama's past, Fox News contacted 400 Columbia University students from the period when Obama claims to have been there... but none remembered him.


Wayne Allyn Root was, like Obama, a political science major at Columbia who also graduated in 1983. In 2008, Root says of Obama, "I don't know a single person at Columbia that knew him, and they all know me. I don't have a classmate who ever knew Barack Obama at Columbia, ever."

Nobody recalls him. Root adds that he was also, like Obama, Class of '83 Political Science, and says, "You don't get more exact or closer than that. Never met him in my life, don't know anyone who ever met him. At the class reunion, our 20th reunion five years ago, who was asked to be the speaker of the class? Me. No one ever heard of Barack! And five years ago, nobody even knew who he was. The guy who writes the class notes, who's kind of the, as we say in New York, 'the macha' who knows everybody, has yet to find a person, a human who ever met him."


Obama's photograph does not appear in the school's yearbook and Obama consistently declines requests to talk about his years at Columbia, provide school records, or provide the name of any former classmates or friends while at Columbia .


Some other interesting questions:


Why was Obama's law license inactivated in 2002?
it is said there is no record of him ever taking the Bar exam.


Why was Michelle's law license inactivated by court order?
We understand that was forced to avoid fraud charges.


It is circulating that according to the U.S. Census, there is only one Barack Obama but 27 Social Security numbers and over 80 alias connected to him.


The Social Security number he uses now originated in Connecticut where he is never reported to have lived. And was originally registered to another man (Thomas Louis Wood) from Connecticut, who died in Hawaii while on vacation there.
As we all know Social Security Numbers are only issued 'once, they are not reused'


No wonder all his records are sealed...


Please continue sending this out to everyone. Somewhere, someone had to know him in school...before he "reorganized" Chicago & burst upon the Scene at the 2004 Democratic Convention.
Here is some food for thought. br br THE UNANSWER... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Jan 25, 2015 17:36:31   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
I believe he is a fraud. How does he get away with it? Everyone in power is afraid what would happen to the country if the first black president were removed. They went nuts in Ferguson over the death of a thug. Half the fools that v**ed for this fraud wouldn't believe he's a fraud if he admitted it, the other half wouldn't care.
eagleye13 wrote:
Great post dkree - Many things to ponder here.
How about why there was so much money behind him, and why he had such a favorable press?



:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Page 1 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.