liberalh****r wrote:
Yea......yea it is.
I suggest you check.
Gee the things I do to help out the lost orange mob.... This truly seems like a trivial goal, but over the decades, it will be big for both homeowners and the environment.. well worth the doing..
ttps://environmentamerica.org/texas/center/articles/inefficient-incandescent-bulbs-no-longer-available-for-sale-in-u-s/#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20US%20Department,because%20they%20produce%20more%20heat.
About 27,800,000 results (0.30 seconds)
According to the US Department of Energy (DOE), approximately 5% of greenhouse gas emissions worldwide are due to lighting. Incandescents and other energy-inefficient bulbs contribute more because they produce more heat.Aug 1, 2023
Inefficient incandescent bulbs no longer available for sale in the US... as of August 2023.....
https://www.popsci.com/environment/light-bulbs-sustainability-energy/Incandescent bulbs aren’t very energy-efficient
The biggest environmental issue with incandescent bulbs is low energy efficiency. Only two to three percent of the electricity powering the bulb actually is converted to visible light, says Matthew J. Eckelman, assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering at Northeastern University. For an incandescent bulb to work, the tungsten filament inside must be heated to the point that it glows. These kinds of bulbs aren’t efficient because the rest of the electrical power supplied to the bulb that isn’t converted to visible light is lost as heat.
“Incandescent bulbs use more energy and produce more heat due to their engineering designs,” says Paul Foote, energy efficiency and conservation specialist at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. It’s important to shift to more energy-efficient alternatives to reduce the environmental impacts of incandescent bulbs from the utilization of f****l f**ls for electricity, he added.
Other lighting technologies are a more efficient option. For instance, CFLs and LEDs use about 75 percent and 90 percent less energy than incandescent light bulbs respectively. Compared to incandescent bulbs, these higher-efficiency alternatives use more electricity for the production of light, not heat.
[Related: Energy costs hit low-income Americans the hardest.]
If every household in the country replaced one incandescent light bulb with a CFL bulb, it would save enough energy annually to prevent GHG emissions equivalent to what 800,000 cars would produce. Given that LEDs are more energy-efficient than CFLs, their use may reduce GHG emissions even further.
“This matters because 60 percent of the electricity in the US is still generated from f****l f**ls, with their attendant emissions of greenhouse gasses and harmful air pollutants, such as particulate matter,” says Eckelman. “Air pollution from the energy system causes one in five deaths worldwide, but reducing demand for electricity through energy efficiency helps to lessen this health burden.”
Once the new rules from the DOE are fully implemented next year, consumers are expected to save nearly $3 billion per year on their utility bills. Moreover, they don’t have to buy bulbs as frequently as they used to because energy-efficient bulbs last much longer than incandescent ones.
[Related: You might be buying the wrong lightbulbs.]
“Incandescent bulbs have shorter lifetimes compared to other lighting technologies like fluorescents or LEDs that can last 10 to 50 times longer,” says Eckelman. “This means that consumers won’t have to replace bulbs as often. Typical incandescent bulbs operate at about 15 lumens per watt, so the standard represents a tripling of energy efficiency at a minimum and electricity for lighting will decrease by at least two-thirds.”
About 222 million metric tons of carbon emissions are projected to be slashed over the next 30 years thanks to the new rule. Still, ensuring that everyone has access to affordable energy-efficient bulbs is a crucial step.