What's your opinion? What in your opinion would be a measured response from Israel toward Iran? 300 missiles for 300 missiles? Much less or none at all? I don't think Iran's failure to...

Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.

What in your opinion would be a measured response from Israel toward Iran? 300 missiles for 300 missiles? Much less or none at all? I don't think Iran's failure to hit a single target should enter into the equation.

Sonny Magoo Loc: Where pot pie is boiled in a kettle

Just one
One Trident D5 over Iran would end everything instantly.
See you later Bye bye.

XXX Loc: Somewhere north of the Mason-Dixon

Strycker wrote:

What in your opinion would be a measured response from Israel toward Iran? 300 missiles for 300 missiles? Much less or none at all? I don't think Iran's failure to hit a single target should enter into the equation.

Just blow up the whole Iran. Problem solved.

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

Strycker wrote:

What in your opinion would be a measured response from Israel toward Iran? 300 missiles for 300 missiles? Much less or none at all? I don't think Iran's failure to hit a single target should enter into the equation.

Si k their spy ship in the Red Sea. Completely demolish all petroleum platforms. Takeout every single abode of all the Iran leaders. If you remove the leaders, you will see a vast number of citizens celebrating.

We completely failed in not providing support when there were citizen protests several years ago.

LostAggie66 Loc: Corpus Christi, TX (Shire of Seawinds)

AuntiE wrote:

Si k their spy ship in the Red Sea. Completely demolish all petroleum platforms. Takeout every single abode of all the Iran leaders. If you remove the leaders, you will see a vast number of citizens celebrating.

We completely failed in not providing support when there were citizen protests several years ago.

That is the appropriate response. Maybe hit their reactors also.....This is my only post for this evening..Spring bowling league starts at 7p(CDT) have a Great night AuntiE

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

LostAggie66 wrote:

That is the appropriate response. Maybe hit their reactors also.....This is my only post for this evening..Spring bowling league starts at 7p(CDT) have a Great night AuntiE

There would need to be serious management and planning to do anything to their reactors. I do not disagree, just taking a cautious view.

billy a Loc: South Florida

Sonny Magoo wrote:

Just one
One Trident D5 over Iran would end everything instantly.
See you later Bye bye.

With the Trident quietly sitting nearby, you would think deterrence would be enough to make these people behave themselves.
But the biden bunch seem to enjoy watching the only Democracy in the region take pot-shots.
The subs can only watch and collect data.
Tehran could be erased in fifteen minutes, and they know it. Yet, they continue to antagonize the Free World. They KNOW the impotent old man in D.C. won't/can't respond to these attacks. What's the point of billions of American tax-dollars spent on this military might, just to sit and watch our Ally get taunted into war ?

Big dog

Strycker wrote:

What in your opinion would be a measured response from Israel toward Iran? 300 missiles for 300 missiles? Much less or none at all? I don't think Iran's failure to hit a single target should enter into the equation.

What’s the Bible say about this particular situation?

Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.

Big dog wrote:

What’s the Bible say about this particular situation?

Eye for an eye, or, turn the other cheek. Your choice.

Justice101

Strycker wrote:

What in your opinion would be a measured response from Israel toward Iran? 300 missiles for 300 missiles? Much less or none at all? I don't think Iran's failure to hit a single target should enter into the equation.

Destroy their drone making factories, their oil refining and distribution, their oil tankers and their bases housing pirate helicopters.

Radar OReilly

billy a wrote:

With the Trident quietly sitting nearby, you would... (show quote)

You actually mean we should nuke Tehran? I seriously hope you are not in favor of this insane idea.

Big dog

Radar OReilly wrote:

You actually mean we should nuke Tehran? I seriously hope you are not in favor of this insane idea.

It’s not up to the United States. And if the USA stops supplying Israel with the necessary resources to defend themselves, you can bet they will glass Iran if necessary.

Bassman65

Strycker wrote:

What in your opinion would be a measured response from Israel toward Iran? 300 missiles for 300 missiles? Much less or none at all? I don't think Iran's failure to hit a single target should enter into the equation.

With the intelligence capabilities Israel has hit their command and control facilities

pegw

I am hoping the Israelis aren't going to do something really stupid again, like they did to start this escalation when they attacked an Iranian embassy. However, since the Israelis are being run by a bunch of trigger happy hard liners, I don't see much hope for the Israelis to act in an intelligent manor.

Proud American Patriot

Strycker wrote:

What in your opinion would be a measured response from Israel toward Iran? 300 missiles for 300 missiles? Much less or none at all? I don't think Iran's failure to hit a single target should enter into the equation.

I would like to see Israel also take out their nuke capability. The Israelis, in my opininion should go after the Generals, mullahs and their lead human resources incl nuke scientists. Take out their military installations and infrastructures.