One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Scheme to Eliminate the E*******l College
Page 1 of 2 next>
Apr 11, 2024 10:06:17   #
Darling Mary
 
Scheme to Eliminate E*******l College 76 Percent Complete
Last week, the state legislature of Maine became the 17th in the nation to pass a bill that will effectively eliminate the E*******l College.
Unbeknownst to most people, there is a serious effort in this country to make the p**********l e******n a simple popular v**e. And even though most people have never heard about this effort, it’s actually already 76 percent complete—meaning that the E*******l College is truly at risk of getting completely scrapped in the near future.
This effort is officially called the National Popular V**e Interstate Compact. And what it basically is, is an agreement between the states that join to give their e*******l v**es to whichever candidate wins the popular v**e at the national level. This movement will be blown out of the water by the SCOTUS. It takes an Amendment to the Constitution to accomplish such a scheme!!!

Reply
Apr 11, 2024 10:39:22   #
Kevyn
 
Darling Mary wrote:
Scheme to Eliminate E*******l College 76 Percent Complete
Last week, the state legislature of Maine became the 17th in the nation to pass a bill that will effectively eliminate the E*******l College.
Unbeknownst to most people, there is a serious effort in this country to make the p**********l e******n a simple popular v**e. And even though most people have never heard about this effort, it’s actually already 76 percent complete—meaning that the E*******l College is truly at risk of getting completely scrapped in the near future.
This effort is officially called the National Popular V**e Interstate Compact. And what it basically is, is an agreement between the states that join to give their e*******l v**es to whichever candidate wins the popular v**e at the national level. This movement will be blown out of the water by the SCOTUS. It takes an Amendment to the Constitution to accomplish such a scheme!!!
Scheme to Eliminate E*******l College 76 Percent C... (show quote)

Actually this is a clean workaround, the states run the e******ns and can already determine how e*******l v**es are allotted. An interstate agreement would be entirely within our constitution.

Reply
Apr 11, 2024 11:17:47   #
Liberty Tree
 
Kevyn wrote:
Actually this is a clean workaround, the states run the e******ns and can already determine how e*******l v**es are allotted. An interstate agreement would be entirely within our constitution.


You only care about the Constitution when you think it can be worked into something you support.

Reply
 
 
Apr 11, 2024 11:29:53   #
Gatsby
 
Kevyn wrote:
Actually this is a clean workaround, the states run the e******ns and can already determine how e*******l v**es are allotted. An interstate agreement would be entirely within our constitution.


Actually, the states v**e for e*****rs, not the candidates, and those e*****rs are bound, by law.

We all know how you feel about "alternate" slates of e*****rs.

I reckon that you have already screwed yourself on this plot.

Reply
Apr 11, 2024 11:52:37   #
LiberalGrammyD
 
Darling Mary wrote:
Scheme to Eliminate E*******l College 76 Percent Complete
Last week, the state legislature of Maine became the 17th in the nation to pass a bill that will effectively eliminate the E*******l College.
Unbeknownst to most people, there is a serious effort in this country to make the p**********l e******n a simple popular v**e. And even though most people have never heard about this effort, it’s actually already 76 percent complete—meaning that the E*******l College is truly at risk of getting completely scrapped in the near future.
This effort is officially called the National Popular V**e Interstate Compact. And what it basically is, is an agreement between the states that join to give their e*******l v**es to whichever candidate wins the popular v**e at the national level. This movement will be blown out of the water by the SCOTUS. It takes an Amendment to the Constitution to accomplish such a scheme!!!
Scheme to Eliminate E*******l College 76 Percent C... (show quote)


Yes it does require an amendment to change. Those take time...possibly years for approval by the required number of states.

Reply
Apr 11, 2024 11:54:05   #
guzzimaestro
 
Darling Mary wrote:
Scheme to Eliminate E*******l College 76 Percent Complete
Last week, the state legislature of Maine became the 17th in the nation to pass a bill that will effectively eliminate the E*******l College.
Unbeknownst to most people, there is a serious effort in this country to make the p**********l e******n a simple popular v**e. And even though most people have never heard about this effort, it’s actually already 76 percent complete—meaning that the E*******l College is truly at risk of getting completely scrapped in the near future.
This effort is officially called the National Popular V**e Interstate Compact. And what it basically is, is an agreement between the states that join to give their e*******l v**es to whichever candidate wins the popular v**e at the national level. This movement will be blown out of the water by the SCOTUS. It takes an Amendment to the Constitution to accomplish such a scheme!!!
Scheme to Eliminate E*******l College 76 Percent C... (show quote)



Reply
Apr 11, 2024 13:32:20   #
Calconserv
 
Kevyn wrote:
Actually this is a clean workaround, the states run the e******ns and can already determine how e*******l v**es are allotted. An interstate agreement would be entirely within our constitution.


Your so smart

Reply
 
 
Apr 11, 2024 14:20:24   #
WEBCO
 
Kevyn wrote:
Actually this is a clean workaround, the states run the e******ns and can already determine how e*******l v**es are allotted. An interstate agreement would be entirely within our constitution.


Holy s**t...you are finally correct.

Reply
Apr 11, 2024 17:42:15   #
tomhoff24
 
Gatsby wrote:
Actually, the states v**e for e*****rs, not the candidates, and those e*****rs are bound, by law.

We all know how you feel about "alternate" slates of e*****rs.

I reckon that you have already screwed yourself on this plot.
Actually, the states v**e for e*****rs, not the ca... (show quote)


Yes,”alternate” e*****rs. Funny!

Reply
Apr 11, 2024 17:51:29   #
Darling Mary
 
Kevyn wrote:
Actually this is a clean workaround, the states run the e******ns and can already determine how e*******l v**es are allotted. An interstate agreement would be entirely within our constitution.


Legal Scholars disagree with the concept!

Reply
Apr 11, 2024 19:30:33   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
You only care about the Constitution when you think it can be worked into something you support.


The cultural Marxist Democrats have been extremely successful in both showing and exploiting the weaknesses in our Constitution.

Reply
 
 
Apr 11, 2024 20:27:32   #
billlingle
 
Darling Mary wrote:
Scheme to Eliminate E*******l College 76 Percent Complete
Last week, the state legislature of Maine became the 17th in the nation to pass a bill that will effectively eliminate the E*******l College.
Unbeknownst to most people, there is a serious effort in this country to make the p**********l e******n a simple popular v**e. And even though most people have never heard about this effort, it’s actually already 76 percent complete—meaning that the E*******l College is truly at risk of getting completely scrapped in the near future.
This effort is officially called the National Popular V**e Interstate Compact. And what it basically is, is an agreement between the states that join to give their e*******l v**es to whichever candidate wins the popular v**e at the national level. This movement will be blown out of the water by the SCOTUS. It takes an Amendment to the Constitution to accomplish such a scheme!!!
Scheme to Eliminate E*******l College 76 Percent C... (show quote)


SCOTUS is not involved in amending the constitution. An amendment is really not needed. All the would be required would be an agreement to award the e*******l v**es to the winner of the popular v**e by the swing states. If SCOTUS didn't like it that would be a shame but it would be meaningless.
Right wingers may be delusional but they're not totally stupid. They know that with their main objectives being disapproved by 60, 70 and 80% of the country that they can't possibly win anything in an open e******n.
Two out of the last three republican presidents did not win the popular v**e but still took office and did near irreparable damage to everything. Thanks to Joe Biden and his knowledge of government and legislation not to mention negotiation, we have just about returned to normal after the debacle of the Fat incompetent Loser.

Reply
Apr 11, 2024 21:44:45   #
WEBCO
 
billlingle wrote:
SCOTUS is not involved in amending the constitution. An amendment is really not needed. All the would be required would be an agreement to award the e*******l v**es to the winner of the popular v**e by the swing states. If SCOTUS didn't like it that would be a shame but it would be meaningless.
Right wingers may be delusional but they're not totally stupid. They know that with their main objectives being disapproved by 60, 70 and 80% of the country that they can't possibly win anything in an open e******n.
Two out of the last three republican presidents did not win the popular v**e but still took office and did near irreparable damage to everything. Thanks to Joe Biden and his knowledge of government and legislation not to mention negotiation, we have just about returned to normal after the debacle of the Fat incompetent Loser.
SCOTUS is not involved in amending the constitutio... (show quote)


You were good for a minute, then went full on bat s**t crazy. Opposed by 60% of the country? That would be Biden on the economy, the border, and foreign affairs.

Reply
Apr 11, 2024 21:44:57   #
Darling Mary
 
billlingle wrote:
SCOTUS is not involved in amending the constitution. An amendment is really not needed. All the would be required would be an agreement to award the e*******l v**es to the winner of the popular v**e by the swing states. If SCOTUS didn't like it that would be a shame but it would be meaningless.
Right wingers may be delusional but they're not totally stupid. They know that with their main objectives being disapproved by 60, 70 and 80% of the country that they can't possibly win anything in an open e******n.
Two out of the last three republican presidents did not win the popular v**e but still took office and did near irreparable damage to everything. Thanks to Joe Biden and his knowledge of government and legislation not to mention negotiation, we have just about returned to normal after the debacle of the Fat incompetent Loser.
SCOTUS is not involved in amending the constitutio... (show quote)


You must be another one who got out of his mental cell!

Reply
Apr 12, 2024 08:35:25   #
LindaK
 
billlingle wrote:
SCOTUS is not involved in amending the constitution. An amendment is really not needed. All the would be required would be an agreement to award the e*******l v**es to the winner of the popular v**e by the swing states. If SCOTUS didn't like it that would be a shame but it would be meaningless.
Right wingers may be delusional but they're not totally stupid. They know that with their main objectives being disapproved by 60, 70 and 80% of the country that they can't possibly win anything in an open e******n.
Two out of the last three republican presidents did not win the popular v**e but still took office and did near irreparable damage to everything. Thanks to Joe Biden and his knowledge of government and legislation not to mention negotiation, we have just about returned to normal after the debacle of the Fat incompetent Loser.
SCOTUS is not involved in amending the constitutio... (show quote)


Biden has no ‘negotiation’ sk**ls, instead he works to appease our known enemies like Iran by making it possible for them to fund terrorism. Don’t tell me those funds belonged to them. Biden unfroze their frozen funds which gave their nations the ability to use those funds to support terrorism like the HAMAS terrorists and those who v**ed to put Hamas in power.

Also his and H****rs ‘friends’ in power in the Ukraine too. It’s cost taxpayers multi-millions of their hard earned money. Pelosi and Biden pledged the funds to the Ukrainian beggar for as long as their war with the Russia lasts. He protects their border but refuses to protect our own. The US has pretty much been funding the Ukrainian war with Russia and it’s not even our war.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.